CVIII. Such are the observations we would make in order to remove

despair and excite hope, by bidding farewell to the errors of past

ages, or by their correction. Let us examine whether there be other

grounds for hope. And, first, if many useful discoveries have occurred

to mankind by chance or opportunity, without investigation or attention

on their part, it must necessarily be acknowledged that much more may

be brought to light by investigation and attention, if it be regular

and orderly, not hasty and interrupted. For although it may now and

then happen that one falls by chance upon something that had before

escaped considerable efforts and laborious inquiries, yet undoubtedly

the reverse is generally the case. We may, therefore, hope for further,

better, and more frequent results from man’s reason, industry, method,

and application, than from chance and mere animal instinct, and the

like, which have hitherto been the sources of invention.

CIX. We may also derive some reason for hope from the circumstance

of several actual inventions being of such a nature, that scarcely

any one could have formed a conjecture about them previously to their

discovery, but would rather have ridiculed them as impossible. For

men are wont to guess about new subjects from those they are already

acquainted with, and the hasty and vitiated fancies they have thence

formed: than which there cannot be a more fallacious mode of reasoning,

because much of that which is derived from the sources of things does

not flow in their usual channel.

If, for instance, before the discovery of cannon, one had described

its effects in the following manner: There is a new invention by which

walls and the greatest bulwarks can be shaken and overthrown from a

considerable distance; men would have begun to contrive various means

of multiplying the force of projectiles and machines by means of

weights and wheels, and other modes of battering and projecting. But

it is improbable that any imagination or fancy would have hit upon a

fiery blast, expanding and developing itself so suddenly and violently,

because none would have seen an instance at all resembling it, except

perhaps in earthquakes or thunder, which they would have immediately

rejected as the great operations of nature, not to be imitated by man.

So, if before the discovery of silk thread, any one had observed, that

a species of thread had been discovered, fit for dresses and furniture,

far surpassing the thread of worsted or flax in fineness, and at the

same time in tenacity, beauty, and softness; men would have begun

to imagine something about Chinese plants, or the fine hair of some

animals, or the feathers or down of birds, but certainly would never

have had an idea of its being spun by a small worm, in so copious a

manner, and renewed annually. But if any one had ventured to suggest

the silkworm, he would have been laughed at as if dreaming of some new

manufacture from spiders.

So again, if before the discovery of the compass, any one had said,

that an instrument had been invented, by which the quarters and points

of the heavens could be exactly taken and distinguished, men would

have entered into disquisitions on the refinement of astronomical

instruments, and the like, from the excitement of their imaginations;

but the thought of anything being discovered, which, not being a

celestial body, but a mere mineral or metallic substance, should yet

in its motion agree with that of such bodies, would have appeared

absolutely incredible. Yet were these facts, and the like (unknown for

so many ages) not discovered at last either by philosophy or reasoning,

but by chance and opportunity; and (as we have observed), they are of a

nature most heterogeneous, and remote from what was hitherto known, so

that no previous knowledge could lead to them.

We may, therefore, well hope[62] that many excellent and useful matters

are yet treasured up in the bosom of nature, bearing no relation or

analogy to our actual discoveries, but out of the common track of

our imagination, and still undiscovered, and which will doubtless be

brought to light in the course and lapse of years, as the others have

been before them; but in the way we now point out, they may rapidly and

at once be both represented and anticipated.

CX. There are, moreover, some inventions which render it probable

that men may pass and hurry over the most noble discoveries which

lie immediately before them. For however the discovery of gunpowder,

silk, the compass, sugar, paper, or the like, may appear to depend on

peculiar properties of things and nature, printing at least involves

no contrivance which is not clear and almost obvious. But from want

of observing that although the arrangement of the types of letters

required more trouble than writing with the hand, yet these types once

arranged serve for innumerable impressions, while manuscript only

affords one copy; and again, from want of observing that ink might be

thickened so as to stain without running (which was necessary, seeing

the letters face upward, and the impression is made from above), this

most beautiful invention (which assists so materially the propagation

of learning) remained unknown for so many ages.

The human mind is often so awkward and ill-regulated in the career of

invention that it is at first diffident, and then despises itself. For

it appears at first incredible that any such discovery should be made,

and when it has been made, it appears incredible that it should so long

have escaped men’s research. All which affords good reason for the

hope that a vast mass of inventions yet remains, which may be deduced

not only from the investigation of new modes of operation, but also

from transferring, comparing, and applying these already known, by the

method of what we have termed literate experience.

CXI. Nor should we omit another ground of hope. Let men only consider

(if they will) their infinite expenditure of talent, time, and

fortune, in matters and studies of far inferior importance and value;

a small portion of which applied to sound and solid learning would be

sufficient to overcome every difficulty. And we have thought right to

add this observation, because we candidly own that such a collection of

natural and experimental history as we have traced in our own mind, and

as is really necessary, is a great and as it were royal work, requiring

much labor and expense.

CXII. In the meantime let no one be alarmed at the multitude of

particulars, but rather inclined to hope on that very account. For the

particular phenomena of the arts and nature are in reality but as a

handful, when compared with the fictions of the imagination removed and

separated from the evidence of facts. The termination of our method

is clear, and I had almost said near at hand; the other admits of no

termination, but only of infinite confusion. For men have hitherto

dwelt but little, or rather only slightly touched upon experience,

while they have wasted much time on theories and the fictions of the

imagination. If we had but any one who could actually answer our

interrogations of nature, the invention of all causes and sciences

would be the labor of but a few years.

CXIII. We think some ground of hope is afforded by our own example,

which is not mentioned for the sake of boasting, but as a useful

remark. Let those who distrust their own powers observe myself, one who

have among my contemporaries been the most engaged in public business,

who am not very strong in health (which causes a great loss of time),

and am the first explorer of this course, following the guidance of

none, nor even communicating my thoughts to a single individual; yet

having once firmly entered in the right way, and submitting the powers

of my mind to things, I have somewhat advanced (as I make bold to

think) the matter I now treat of. Then let others consider what may

be hoped from men who enjoy abundant leisure, from united labors, and

the succession of ages, after these suggestions on our part, especially

in a course which is not confined, like theories, to individuals,

but admits of the best distribution and union of labor and effect,

particularly in collecting experiments. For men will then only begin to

know their own power, when each performs a separate part, instead of

undertaking in crowds the same work.

CXIV. Lastly, though a much more faint and uncertain breeze of hope

were to spring up from our new continent, yet we consider it necessary

to make the experiment, if we would not show a dastard spirit. For

the risk attending want of success is not to be compared with that

of neglecting the attempt; the former is attended with the loss of

a little human labor, the latter with that of an immense benefit.

For these and other reasons it appears to us that there is abundant

ground to hope, and to induce not only those who are sanguine to make

experiment, but even those who are cautious and sober to give their

assent.

CXV. Such are the grounds for banishing despair, hitherto one of the

most powerful causes of the delay and restraint to which the sciences

have been subjected; in treating of which we have at the same time

discussed the signs and causes of the errors, idleness, and ignorance

that have prevailed; seeing especially that the more refined causes,

which are not open to popular judgment and observation, may be referred

to our remarks on the idols of the human mind.

Here, too, we should close the demolishing branch of our Instauration,

which is comprised in three confutations: 1, the confutation of natural

human reason left to itself; 2, the confutation of demonstration; 3,

the confutation of theories, or received systems of philosophy and

doctrines. Our confutation has followed such a course as was open to

it, namely, the exposing of the signs of error, and the producing

evidence of the causes of it: for we could adopt no other, differing as

we do both in first principles and demonstrations from others.

It is time for us therefore to come to the art itself, and the rule for

the interpretation of nature: there is, however, still something which

must not be passed over. For the intent of this first book of aphorisms

being to prepare the mind for understanding, as well as admitting, what

follows, we must now, after having cleansed, polished, and levelled

its surface, place it in a good position, and as it were a benevolent

aspect toward our propositions; seeing that prejudice in new matters

may be produced not only by the strength of preconceived notions, but

also by a false anticipation or expectation of the matter proposed. We

shall therefore endeavor to induce good and correct opinions of what we

offer, although this be only necessary for the moment, and as it were

laid out at interest, until the matter itself be well understood.

CXVI. First, then, we must desire men not to suppose that we are

ambitious of founding any philosophical sect, like the ancient Greeks,

or some moderns, as Telesius, Patricius, and Severinus.[63] For neither

is this our intention, nor do we think that peculiar abstract opinions

on nature and the principles of things are of much importance to men’s

fortunes, since it were easy to revive many ancient theories, and

to introduce many new ones; as, for instance, many hypotheses with

regard to the heavens can be formed, differing in themselves, and yet

sufficiently according with the phenomena.

We bestow not our labor on such theoretical and, at the same time,

useless topics. On the contrary, our determination is that of trying,

whether we can lay a firmer foundation, and extend to a greater

distance the boundaries of human power and dignity. And although here

and there, upon some particular points, we hold (in our own opinion)

more true and certain, and I might even say, more advantageous tenets

than those in general repute (which we have collected in the fifth part

of our Instauration), yet we offer no universal or complete theory.

The time does not yet appear to us to be arrived, and we entertain no

hope of our life being prolonged to the completion of the sixth part of

the Instauration (which is destined for philosophy discovered by the

interpretation of nature), but are content if we proceed quietly and

usefully in our intermediate pursuit, scattering, in the meantime, the

seeds of less adulterated truth for posterity, and, at least, commence

the great work.

CXVII. And, as we pretend not to found a sect, so do we neither offer

nor promise particular effects; which may occasion some to object to

us, that since we so often speak of effects, and consider everything

in its relation to that end, we ought also to give some earnest of

producing them. Our course and method, however (as we have often said,

and again repeat), is such as not to deduce effects from effects, nor

experiments from experiments (as the empirics do), but in our capacity

of legitimate interpreters of nature, to deduce causes and axioms from

effects and experiments; and new effects and experiments from those

causes and axioms.

And although any one of moderate intelligence and ability will observe

the indications and sketches of many noble effects in our tables of

inventions (which form the fourth part of the Instauration), and also

in the examples of particular instances cited in the second part, as

well as in our observations on history (which is the subject of the

third part); yet we candidly confess that our present natural history,

whether compiled from books or our own inquiries, is not sufficiently

copious and well ascertained to satisfy, or even assist, a proper

interpretation.

If, therefore, there be any one who is more disposed and prepared for

mechanical art, and ingenious in discovering effects, than in the mere

management of experiment, we allow him to employ his industry in

gathering many of the fruits of our history and tables in this way,

and applying them to effects, receiving them as interest till he can

obtain the principal. For our own part, having a greater object in

view, we condemn all hasty and premature rest in such pursuits as we

would Atalanta’s apple (to use a common allusion of ours); for we are

not childishly ambitious of golden fruit, but use all our efforts to

make the course of art outstrip nature, and we hasten not to reap moss

or the green blade, but wait for a ripe harvest.

CXVIII. There will be some, without doubt, who, on a perusal of our

history and tables of invention, will meet with some uncertainty,

or perhaps fallacy, in the experiments themselves, and will thence

perhaps imagine that our discoveries are built on false foundations and

principles. There is, however, really nothing in this, since it must

needs happen in beginnings.[64] For it is the same as if in writing

or printing one or two letters were wrongly turned or misplaced,

which is no great inconvenience to the reader, who can easily by his

own eye correct the error; let men in the same way conclude, that

many experiments in natural history may be erroneously believed and

admitted, which are easily expunged and rejected afterward, by the

discovery of causes and axioms. It is, however, true, that if these

errors in natural history and experiments become great, frequent, and

continued, they cannot be corrected and amended by any dexterity of

wit or art. If then, even in our natural history, well examined and

compiled with such diligence, strictness, and (I might say) reverential

scruples, there be now and then something false and erroneous in

the details, what must we say of the common natural history, which

is so negligent and careless when compared with ours? or of systems

of philosophy and the sciences, based on such loose soil (or rather

quicksand)? Let none then be alarmed by such observations.

CXIX. Again, our history and experiments will contain much that

is light and common, mean and illiberal, too refined and merely

speculative, and, as it were, of no use, and this perhaps may divert

and alienate the attention of mankind.

With regard to what is common; let men reflect, that they have hitherto

been used to do nothing but refer and adapt the causes of things of

rare occurrence to those of things which more frequently happen,

without any investigation of the causes of the latter, taking them for

granted and admitted.

Hence, they do not inquire into the causes of gravity, the rotation of

the heavenly bodies, heat, cold, light, hardness, softness, rarity,

density, liquidity, solidity, animation, inanimation, similitude,

difference, organic formation, but taking them to be self-evident,

manifest, and admitted, they dispute and decide upon other matters of

less frequent and familiar occurrence.

But we (who know that no judgment can be formed of that which is rare

or remarkable, and much less anything new brought to light, without

a previous regular examination and discovery of the causes of that

which is common, and the causes again of those causes) are necessarily

compelled to admit the most common objects into our history. Besides,

we have observed that nothing has been so injurious to philosophy as

this circumstance, namely, that familiar and frequent objects do not

arrest and detain men’s contemplation, but are carelessly admitted,

and their causes never inquired after; so that information on unknown

subjects is not more often wanted than attention to those which are

known.

CXX. With regard to the meanness, or even the filthiness of

particulars, for which (as Pliny observes), an apology is requisite,

such subjects are no less worthy of admission into natural history

than the most magnificent and costly; nor do they at all pollute

natural history, for the sun enters alike the palace and the privy,

and is not thereby polluted. We neither dedicate nor raise a capitol

or pyramid to the pride of man, but rear a holy temple in his mind,

on the model of the universe, which model therefore we imitate. For

that which is deserving of existence is deserving of knowledge, the

image of existence. Now the mean and splendid alike exist. Nay, as

the finest odors are sometimes produced from putrid matter (such as

musk and civet), so does valuable light and information emanate from

mean and sordid instances. But we have already said too much, for such

fastidious feelings are childish and effeminate.

CXXI. The next point requires a more accurate consideration, namely,

that many parts of our history will appear to the vulgar, or even any

mind accustomed to the present state of things, fantastically and

uselessly refined. Hence, we have in regard to this matter said from

the first, and must again repeat, that we look for experiments that

shall afford light rather than profit, imitating the divine creation,

which, as we have often observed, only produced light on the first

day, and assigned that whole day to its creation, without adding any

material work.

If any one, then, imagine such matters to be of no use, he might

equally suppose light to be of no use, because it is neither solid

nor material. For, in fact, the knowledge of simple natures, when

sufficiently investigated and defined, resembles light, which, though

of no great use in itself, affords access to the general mysteries

of effects, and with a peculiar power comprehends and draws with

it whole bands and troops of effects, and the sources of the most

valuable axioms. So also the elements of letters have of themselves

separately no meaning, and are of no use, yet are they, as it were,

the original matter in the composition and preparation of speech. The

seeds of substances, whose effect is powerful, are of no use except in

their growth, and the scattered rays of light itself avail not unless

collected.

But if speculative subtilties give offence, what must we say of the

scholastic philosophers who indulged in them to such excess? And those

subtilties were wasted on words, or, at least, common notions (which

is the same thing), not on things or nature, and alike unproductive of

benefit in their origin and their consequences: in no way resembling

ours, which are at present useless, but in their consequences of

infinite benefit. Let men be assured that all subtile disputes and

discursive efforts of the mind are late and preposterous, when they

are introduced subsequently to the discovery of axioms, and that their

true, or, at any rate, chief opportunity is, when experiment is to be

weighed and axioms to be derived from it. They otherwise catch and

grasp at nature, but never seize or detain her: and we may well apply

to nature that which has been said of opportunity or fortune, that she

wears a lock in front, but is bald behind.

In short, we may reply decisively to those who despise any part of

natural history as being vulgar, mean, or subtile, and useless in its

origin, in the words of a poor woman to a haughty prince,[65] who had

rejected her petition as unworthy, and beneath the dignity of his

majesty: “Then cease to reign”; for it is quite certain that the empire

of nature can neither be obtained nor administered by one who refuses

to pay attention to such matters as being poor and too minute.

CXXII. Again, it may be objected to us as being singular and harsh,

that we should with one stroke and assault, as it were, banish all

authorities and sciences, and that too by our own efforts, without

requiring the assistance and support of any of the ancients.

Now we are aware, that had we been ready to act otherwise than

sincerely, it was not difficult to refer our present method to

remote ages, prior to those of the Greeks (since the sciences in all

probability flourished more in their natural state, though silently,

than when they were paraded with the fifes and trumpets of the Greeks);

or even (in parts, at least) to some of the Greeks themselves, and to

derive authority and honor from thence; as men of no family labor to

raise and form nobility for themselves in some ancient line, by the

help of genealogies. Trusting, however, to the evidence of facts, we

reject every kind of fiction and imposture; and think it of no more

consequence to our subject, whether future discoveries were known to

the ancients, and set or rose according to the vicissitudes of events

and lapse of ages, than it would be of importance to mankind to know

whether the new world be the island of Atlantis,[66] and known to the

ancients, or be now discovered for the first time.

With regard to the universal censure we have bestowed, it is quite

clear, to any one who properly considers the matter, that it is both

more probable and more modest than any partial one could have been. For

if the errors had not been rooted in the primary notions, some well

conducted discoveries must have corrected others that were deficient.

But since the errors were fundamental, and of such a nature, that

men may be said rather to have neglected or passed over things, than

to have formed a wrong or false judgment of them, it is little to be

wondered at, that they did not obtain what they never aimed at, nor

arrive at a goal which they had not determined, nor perform a course

which they had neither entered upon nor adhered to.

With regard to our presumption, we allow that if we were to assume a

power of drawing a more perfect straight line or circle than any one

else, by superior steadiness of hand or acuteness of eye, it would lead

to a comparison of talent; but if one merely assert that he can draw

a more perfect line or circle with a ruler or compasses, than another

can by his unassisted hand or eye, he surely cannot be said to boast

of much. Now this applies not only to our first original attempt, but

also to those who shall hereafter apply themselves to the pursuit. For

our method of discovering the sciences merely levels men’s wits, and

leaves but little to their superiority, since it achieves everything by

the most certain rules and demonstrations. Whence (as we have often

observed), our attempt is to be attributed to fortune rather than

talent, and is the offspring of time rather than of wit. For a certain

sort of chance has no less effect upon our thoughts than on our acts

and deeds.

CXXIII. We may, therefore, apply to ourselves the joke of him who said,

that water and wine drinkers could not think alike,[67] especially as

it hits the matter so well. For others, both ancients and moderns,

have in the sciences drank a crude liquor like water, either flowing

of itself from the understanding, or drawn up by logic as the wheel

draws up the bucket. But we drink and pledge others with a liquor made

of many well-ripened grapes, collected and plucked from particular

branches, squeezed in the press, and at last clarified and fermented in

a vessel. It is not, therefore, wonderful that we should not agree with

others.

Novum organum · 第 5 / 22 段