Licentiate Manuel Simrez de Olivera

Before me:

Juan Soriano

In the city of Manila, on the said day, November twenty-one, one

thousand six hundred and thirty-five, the said auditor-general caused

Pedro Gutierrez, a soldier of the company of the master-of-camp, to

appear before him for the said proof. I, the present notary, received

from him the oath in due form of law, before God our Lord and with the

sign of the cross; and under that obligation he promised to tell the

truth. Being questioned, in accordance with the head of the process,

he declared that what he knows and what passes is as follows: On

this the said day, after nightfall, and while the witness was on

guard with the corporal, Alferez Don Francisco de Rivera, at the

gate of Santo Domingo of this said city; at that time there were two

Dominican religious outside the gate and two others on the inside--lay

brothers of the said order; and at the same time a small champan, with

three other religious of St. Francis, arrived. Having disembarked,

they asked for a jug of water; and answer was given them to enter the

city and drink. While they were entering the city by the said gate,

the said alferez and corporal thought that one of the said Franciscans

was walking somewhat as if he wished to be unknown. Recognizing him, he

began to call out to the guard and to lay hold of the Franciscan. The

witness, having hastened, saw many religious who were fighting the

said corporal and the other soldiers with their fists. They did that

with this witness, for they gave him many blows and tore his jerkin

and shirt from him, showering many insulting words upon this witness

and the others. At this juncture he heard the said corporal say that

Don Pedro de Monrroy was one of the said friars who was clad in the

habit of St. Francis. This witness knows that the order contained

in the said head of the process was given to him and the others at

the said gate, so that they might not allow the said Don Pedro de

Monrroy to enter thereby. This witness saw that two of the three

Franciscan religious who came in the said small champan, and entered

this city, tried to go out, and that one of them was left inside. All

the above is the truth, on the oath that he has taken. He affirmed

and ratified his deposition, and declared that he is forty years

of age and competent to be a witness. He signed the above, together

with the said auditor-general. Further this witness who has made his

deposition declares that he saw that a crowd of Dominican friars came

out, by a little bridge which extends to the guardhouse, and joined

the others whom he had mentioned; and these latter are the ones who

maltreated the said corporal and the other soldiers. He affirmed

that, etc. This witness believes that even if they had had many more

soldiers, they could not have resisted the said religious, because of

the great force with which they defended the said Don Pedro de Monrroy.

Licentiate Don Manuel Suarez Olivera

Pedro Gutierrez

Before me:

Juan Soriano, notary-public.

In the city of Manila, on the said day, November twenty-one, one

thousand six hundred and thirty-five, the said auditor of war caused

Manuel de Campos, a soldier of the company of the master-of-camp, to

appear before him for the said investigation. I, the present notary,

received from him the oath in due form of law, before God our Lord,

and with the sign of the cross; and under that obligation he promised

to tell the truth. Being questioned as to the tenor of the process,

this witness declared that what he knows and what occurred is

as follows: He knows that the order contained in the head of the

process was given at the gate of Santo Domingo. On the above date,

after nightfall, as he was at his post, and with orders from Alferez

Don Francisco de Rivera, the corporal at the said gate, there were

at that time, outside the said gate three Dominican religious and

one secular, and inside one Dominican lay brother. At that juncture

came a small champan with three religious of St. Francis aboard,

who joined those others who were outside; and all together began to

enter by the said gate--the two Franciscans, and one muffled in his

mantle. The said commandant came up and looked sharply at the one

who was muffled up in the said mantle, saying to him, "I pray you,

Father, to uncover." The latter answered, "He who meddles in this

is a base villain;" and, lowering his head, the said commandant

recognized the said Pedro de Monrroy. Seizing him, he called out,

"Ho, the guard!" This witness hastened to him, and laid hold of the

friar whom the said corporal had seized. At that same instant, the

father guardian of Dilao gave him a blow; while many other friars,

who were behind the gate which leads to the convent, charged down upon

the said corporal and this witness, and dealt them many blows--dragging

them even to the doors of the church, and saying many insulting words

to them, telling them that they were excommunicated rogues, who were

committing a very great outrage against the Church. Things were in

that condition when the said corporal ordered that witness to go to

report to the sargento-mayor; and he did so. The above is the truth,

on the oath that he has taken. He affirmed all the above, and declared

that he is thirty years old, and competent to be a witness. He signed

it, together with the said auditor-general:

Licentiate Manuel Suarez de Olivera, master-of-camp.

Juan Soriano, notary-public.

In the said city of Manila, November twenty-one, one thousand six

hundred and thirty-five, the said auditor-general caused a [certain]

man arrested for this complaint to appear before him, in order that

he might take his deposition. I, the present notary, received the

oath from him in due form of law, before God our Lord and with the

sign of the cross and under that obligation he promised to tell the

truth. Being questioned, he stated and declared the following. Being

asked his name, his age, and his calling and why he is arrested,

he stated and declared that his name is Don Francisco de Rivera y

Oseguera; that he is a soldier of the company of Don Lorenzo de Olaso;

that he is twenty-nine years old; and that the reason for his arrest

was that, having entered this day to guard the Parian, this deponent

went as corporal to guard the gate of Santo Domingo, with orders not

to allow Don Pedro de Monrroy to enter by the said gate. While he was

at the said gate, and three Dominican religious were outside of it,

and inside it one, at that juncture arrived a small champan, with

three religious of St. Francis. They and the others started to enter

the said gate, all with their faces covered. In the midst of them

was a Franciscan friar muffled in his mantle. On that account this

deponent was mistrustful, and going to him said: "I pray you, Father,

to uncover." Thereupon the father shrank further within his mantle,

but the deponent, going nearer, recognized that it was Don Pedro de

Monrroy, who was disguised as a Franciscan friar; and this deponent,

grappling with him, called out for the guard. Thereupon, one of the

said religious attacked the said Don Francisco, and shoved him about,

and struck him. And after the said [Franciscans] came many other

Dominican religious, who came out of their convent (which is near

the guardhouse); and they began to drag this deponent and the other

soldiers to the door of the church. That made the soldiers let go

of the said Don Pedro de Monroy; for, even had there been many more

soldiers, the religious would have taken him away, as there were many

of them, and they came headlong to the encounter. He had a report of

all the above made to the sargento-mayor. This, and naught else, is the

cause of his arrest; and this is his answer. This deponent being asked

whether he saw the disembarkation of the said Don Pedro de Monrroy

from the champan, and whether he knew that he was coming disguised as

a Franciscan friar before he entered the gate, he declared that he did

not know it, as night had already fallen; for if he had known it before

his arrival at the said gate, he would have prevented his entrance

or have shut the gate, and have tried with all his might to obey the

order given him. And he would have done that, had not the said friars

hastened to him. He stated that he recognized the said Don Pedro de

Monrroy only as he was about to enter the said gate in the guardhouse,

after which succeeded the aforesaid incidents. This is his response.

Being asked whether he knows the gravity of the offense which he

commits who breaks any military order, this deponent declared that

he knew it; but that he kept the said order to the utmost, and no

more, because the emergency that he has related occurred. This is

his response.

Being asked whether he knows and recognizes that the said religious

were aided by any secular persons in getting the said Don Pedro de

Monroy inside the gate, he declared that he had not seen or recognized

any secular persons except the said soldiers, his companions, who

aided him, and the said religious. This is his response.

Other questions were asked and brought forward touching the matter;

but to all he answered that which he has declared as above, under

obligation of the oath that he has sworn. He affixed his signature,

together with the auditor-general.

Licentiate Manuel Suarez de Olivera

Don Francisco de Rivera y Oseguera

Before me:

Juan Soriano, notary-public.

[The following is contained in the documents enclosed, in another

letter of like date with the above letter (also by Corcuera to the

king, and which will be given, _post_), and gives details omitted by

the present document.]

_Act._ In the city of Manila, November twenty-two, one thousand

six hundred and thirty-five, Licentiate Manuel Suarez de Olivera,

auditor-general of the war department of this royal camp, declared that

it is advisable, for the greater justification of this complaint, to

make investigation among the persons who were about the guardhouse at

the gate of Santo Domingo of this city, in order to ascertain and find

out more fully what happened last night at the said gate, by examining

more of the witnesses who were present or who knew something of the

aforesaid; and that the present notary should record the results

as a testimony in this cause, so that it might be apparent for all

time. Thus did he enact and order, and he signed the same.

The Philippine Islands, 1493-1898, Volume 26 of 55, 1636 Explorations by early navigators, descriptions of the islands and their peoples, their history and records of the Catholic missions, as related in contemporaneous books and manuscripts, showing the political, economic, commercial and religious conditions of those islands from their earliest relations with European nations to the close of the nineteenth century · 第 16 / 101 题