I imagine that Caesar’s army did not resemble those old Roman armies

that are depicted to us in such grave and temperate guise, always

trembling under the rod of the lictors, and submissive at all times to

an inflexible discipline. It was, doubtless, sternly controlled in time

of danger, and never complained of this. No other army has ever

undergone greater fatigues and executed greater deeds; but when the

danger was over discipline relaxed. Caesar allowed his soldiers rest,

and sometimes diversion. He let them decorate themselves with splendid

arms, and even adorn themselves with studied elegance. “What does it

matter if they use perfumes?” he said, “they will know very well how to

fight.”[267] And in fact these soldiers, whom the Pompeians called

effeminate, are the same who, though dying of hunger at Dyrrhachium,

declared that they would eat the bark of the trees rather than let

Pompey escape. They were recruited for the most part among those

Cisalpine Gauls from whom Roman civilization had not taken the good

qualities of their race, an amiable and brilliant people who loved war

and carried it on gaily. The chiefs very much resembled the common

soldiers; they were lively and ardent, full of resources in critical

moments, and trusted more to inspiration than to routine. It is to be

remarked that no one of them had gained his reputation in earlier wars.

Caesar seems to have wished that their military glory should come from

him only. A few, and among these Labienus, perhaps the greatest of them,

were his political friends, old conspirators like himself, who, after

his example, and without any more preparation, from popular agitators

had become excellent generals. Others, on the contrary, like Fabius

Maximus and Servius Galba, bore illustrious names; they were partisans

whom he secured in the aristocracy, or hostages that he took from it.

The greater number, Crassus, Plancus, Volcatius Tullus, Decimus Brutus,

and later Pollio, were young men whom he treated with marked preference,

and whom he readily trusted in perilous enterprises. He liked the young

by personal preference, and also by policy: as they did not yet belong

to any party, and had not had time to attach themselves to the republic

by serving it, he hoped they would have less difficulty in accustoming

themselves to the new _régime_ that he wished to establish.

These lieutenants, whose number varied, did not alone form the ordinary

retinue of a proconsul. We must remember to add that crowd of young

Romans, sons of illustrious houses, destined by their birth for public

office, who came to serve their apprenticeship in war under him. They

were called his tent-comrades, _contubernales_. Soldiers like the rest,

and exposing themselves on the day of battle, they became after the

fight the friends, the companions of the chief whom they followed in all

his expeditions, as the clients accompanied their patron in the city.

They were present at his receptions, took part in all his recreations

and diversions, sat at his table, surrounded him when he sat on the

judgment-seat; they formed, in sum, what was called the cohort, we

should almost say the court, of the praetor (_praetoria cohors_). Scipio

Africanus, it is said, invented this means of adding splendour to the

public display of the supreme power in the eyes of the conquered

nations, and after him governors had taken great care to preserve all

this pomp which added to their prestige. These were not all; by the side

of these military men there was room for men of very various abilities

and positions. Able financiers, intelligent secretaries, and even

learned lawyers might be necessary for the administration of those vast

countries that a proconsul governed. Thus Trebatius himself, the pacific

Trebatius, was not out of place in the train of an army, and he had

opportunities of exercising his profession even among the Nervii and the

Belgae. If we add to these men, to whom their high offices gave a

certain importance, a crowd of inferior officers or subaltern servants,

such as lictors, ushers, scribes, interpreters, apparitors, doctors,

men-servants, and even soothsayers, we shall have some idea of that

truly royal retinue which a proconsul always carried about with him.

Caesar’s train must have been even more magnificent than that of others.

The ten legions that he commanded, the extent of country that he had to

conquer and govern, explain the great number of officers and persons of

all sorts by whom he was surrounded. Moreover, he naturally loved

magnificence. He readily welcomed all who came to see him, and always

found some office to give them in order to retain them. Even in those

wild countries he took pleasure in astonishing them by his reception.

Suetonius relates that he took with him everywhere marquetry or mosaic

floors, and that he had always two tables laid at which rich Romans who

visited him and provincials of distinction took their places.[268] His

lieutenants imitated him, and Pinarius wrote to Cicero that he was

delighted with the dinners his brother gave him.[269] Caesar did not

care much for these sumptuous repasts, and these rich dwellings, on his

own account. We know that he was temperate, that in case of need he

could sleep well in the open air, and eat rancid oil without blinking;

but he had a taste for display and luxury. Although the republic still

existed, he was almost a king; even in his camps in Britain and Germany

he had assiduous followers and courtiers. He could only be approached

with difficulty; Trebatius made the attempt, and we know that it was a

long time before he could reach him. No doubt Caesar did not receive men

with that stiff and solemn majesty that repelled them in Pompey; but,

however gracious he might wish to be, there was always something in him

that inspired respect, and it was felt that that ease of manner that he

affected with everybody proceeded from a superiority which was sure of

itself. This defender of the democracy was none the less an aristocrat

who never forgot his birth, and willingly spoke of his ancestors. Had

they not heard him, at the commencement of his political life, at the

very time when he attacked with most vivacity the institutions of Sulla,

and tried to get back their ancient powers for the tribunes, had they

not heard him pronounce over his aunt a funeral oration full of

genealogical fictions, in which he complacently related that his family

was descended at once from the kings and the gods? But in this he only

followed the traditions of the Gracchi, his illustrious predecessors.

They also defended public interests with ardour, but they called to mind

the aristocracy from which they had sprung by the haughty elegance of

their manners. We know that they had a court of clients at their rising,

and that they were the first who thought of making distinctions between

them which resembled the public and private admissions to the court of

Louis XIV.

The most remarkable thing in those around Caesar was their love of

letters. Assuredly they belonged no longer to the times when Roman

generals burnt masterpieces of art, or took a pride in being ignorant.

Since Mummius and Marius, letters had succeeded in penetrating even the

camps, which, as we know, are not their usual abode. Nevertheless, I do

not think that so many enlightened men of letters, so many men of

culture and men of fashion have ever been seen united in any other army.

Almost all Caesar’s lieutenants were private friends of Cicero, and they

took pleasure in maintaining a constant intercourse with him who was

regarded as the official patron of literature at Rome. Crassus and

Plancus had learnt eloquence in pleading at his side, and in what

remains to us of the letters of Plancus, we recognize, by a certain

oratorical exuberance, that he had profited by his lessons. Trebonius,

the conqueror of Marseilles, professed to relish his witticisms very

much, and even published a collection of them. Cicero, however, to whom

this admiration was not displeasing, thought that his editor had put too

much of himself into the introduction under pretence of preparing the

effect of the jokes and making them easier to understand. “They have

exhausted their laughter,” he said, “when they get to me.” Hirtius was a

distinguished historian, who undertook later to finish the

_Commentaries_ of his chief. Matius, a devoted friend of Caesar, who

showed himself worthy of this friendship by remaining faithful to him,

translated the _Iliad_ into Latin verse. Quintus was a poet also, but a

tragic poet. During the winter that he had to fight the Nervii, he was

seized with such an ardour for poetry, that he composed four pieces in

sixteen days: but this was to treat tragedy in a somewhat military

fashion. He sent the one he thought the best, the _Erigone_, to his

brother; but it was lost on the road. “Since Caesar has commanded in

Gaul,” said Cicero, “the _Erigone_ alone has not been able to travel in

safety.”[270] It is surprising no doubt to meet all at one time with so

many generals who are also men of letters; but what is still more

astonishing is that all those Roman knights who followed the army, and

whom Caesar made his commissaries and purveyors, collectors of stores,

and farmers of the taxes, seem to have loved literature more than their

habits and occupations usually admit. We find one of those he employed

in offices of this kind, Lepta, thanking Cicero for sending him a

treatise on rhetoric as though he were a man capable of appreciating the

present. The Spaniard Balbus, that intelligent banker, that skilful

administrator, who was able to put the finances of Rome into such good

order, and what was still more difficult, those of Caesar, loved

philosophy with more enthusiasm than one would expect in a banker. He

hastened to have Cicero’s works copied before they were known to the

public, and although he was by character the most discreet of men, he

went so far as even to commit indiscretions in order to be the first to

read them.

But among all these lettered men, it was Caesar who had the most decided

taste for letters: they suited his cultivated nature; they seemed to

him, no doubt, the most agreeable exercise and relaxation of an

accomplished mind. I should not, however, venture to say that his love

for them was wholly disinterested, when I see that this taste assisted

his policy so wonderfully. He was compelled to gain public favour by

every means; now, nothing attracts the general judgment more than the

superiority of intelligence united with that of force. His principal

works were composed with this intention, and we might say, from this

point of view, that his writings were part of his actions. It was not

only to please a few idle men of letters that, during the latter part of

his stay in Gaul, he wrote his _Commentaries_ with such a rapidity as to

astonish his friends. He wished to prevent the Romans forgetting his

victories; he wished, by his admirable manner of narrating them, to

renew, and if possible, to increase, the effect they had produced. When

he composed his two books _De Analogia_, he calculated that people would

be struck by seeing the general of an army, who, according to the

expression of Fronto, “busied himself with the formation of words while

arrows were cleaving the air, and sought the laws of language amid the

din of clarions and trumpets.” He knew very well the advantage that his

reputation would draw from these very diverse performances, and how

great would be the surprise and admiration at Rome when they received at

the same moment a treatise on grammar, and the news of a new victory,

from such a distance. The same thought also made him eager for Cicero’s

friendship. If his refined and distinguished nature found a great

pleasure in keeping up some intercourse with a man of so much

cultivation, he was not ignorant of the power this man exercised over

public opinion, and how far his praises would resound when they came

from this eloquent mouth. We have lost the letters that he wrote to

Cicero; but as Cicero was delighted with them, and it was not very easy

to please him, we must believe that they were filled with flatteries and

caresses. Cicero’s answers were also full of the most lively

protestations of friendship. He declared at that time that Caesar came

in his affections immediately after his children, and indeed almost in

the same rank; he bitterly deplored all the prejudices that had up till

then kept him apart from him, and he resolved to make him forget that he

was one of the last who had entered into his friendship. “I shall

imitate,” said he, “the travellers who have risen later than they wished

to do; they double their speed, and make such good haste that they

arrive at their destination before those who have travelled part of the

night.”[271] They vied with each other, as it were, in compliments; they

overwhelmed one another with flatteries, and emulated each other in

works in verse and prose. On reading the first accounts of the

expedition to Britain, Cicero exclaimed in a transport of enthusiasm:

“What prodigious events! what a country! what people! what battles, and

above all, what a general!” He wrote off immediately to his brother:

“Give me Britain to paint; furnish me with the colours, I will use the

brush.”[272] And he had seriously taken in hand an epic poem on this

conquest, which his occupations prevented him completing as quickly as

he wished. Caesar, on his part, dedicated his treatise _De Analogia_ to

Cicero, and on this occasion said to him in splendid phrases: “You have

discovered all the resources of eloquence, and are the first to use

them. In virtue of this you have deserved well of the Roman name, and

you do honour to our country. You have obtained the most illustrious of

all honours, and a triumph preferable to those of the greatest generals,

for it is better to extend the boundaries of the mind than to enlarge

the limits of the empire!”[273] This, coming from a victorious general

like Caesar, was the most delicate flattery for a man of letters.

Such were the relations that Cicero kept up with Caesar and his officers

during the Gallic war. His correspondence, which preserves the memory of

them, makes us better acquainted with the tastes and preferences of all

these men of cultivation, and shows them to us in a very living fashion

and draws us closer to them. This is, assuredly, one of the greatest

services it could render to us. We seem, when we have read it, to be

able to understand of what kind the meetings of these men must have

been, and can imagine ourselves present at their conversations. We are

entitled to suppose that Rome took up very much of their thoughts. From

the depths of Gaul, they had their eyes upon it, and it was to make a

little stir there that they took so much trouble. While marching over so

many unknown countries from the Rhine to the Ocean, all these young men

hoped that they would be talked about at those feasts and assemblies

where men of the world discussed public affairs. Caesar himself, when he

crossed the Rhine on his wooden bridge, reckoned upon striking the

imaginations of all those idlers who met together in the Forum, at the

rostrum, to learn the news. After the landing of his troops in Britain,

we see him hastening to write to his friends, and especially to

Cicero;[274] not that he had much leisure at that moment, but he looked

upon it no doubt as an honour to date his letter from a country where no

Roman had yet set foot. If he was anxious to send glorious news to Rome,

they were also very glad to receive it from Rome. All the letters that

arrived were read with eagerness; they seemed as it were to carry even

to Germany and Britain a whiff of that fashionable life, which those who

have enjoyed can never forget or cease to regret. It was not enough for

Caesar to read the _journals of the Roman people_, which contained a dry

summary of the principal political events, and a concise report of the

proceedings of the assemblies of the people. His messengers constantly

traversed Gaul, bringing him letters accurate and full of the most

minute details. “He is told everything,” said Cicero, “small as well as

great.”[275] This news, impatiently waited for, and commented on with

pleasure, must have been the usual subject of his conversations with his

friends. I suppose that, at that sumptuous table of which I have spoken,

after literature and grammar had been discussed, and they had listened

to the verses of Matius or Quintus, the conversation turned especially

upon Rome, of which these elegant young men, who regretted its

pleasures, were never tired of talking. Certainly, if we could have

heard them chatting about the last news, the political disorders, or,

what interested them more, the private scandals of the city, telling the

last rumours afloat, and quoting the most recent jokes, we should have

found it difficult to believe that we were in the heart of the country

of the Belgae, or near to the Rhine or the Ocean, or on the eve of a

battle. I imagine that we should have rather fancied we were present at

a party of clever men in some aristocratic house on the Palatine or in

the rich quarter of Carinae.

Cicero’s letters render us yet another service. They show us the

prodigious effect that Caesar’s victories produced at Rome. They excited

as much surprise as admiration, for they were discoveries as well as

conquests. What was known before him of those distant countries? A few

ridiculous fables that traders related on their return, to give

themselves importance. It was through Caesar that they were first really

known. He first dared to attack, and he vanquished those Germans who

have been depicted as giants, whose very looks caused terror; he first

adventured as far as Britain, where it was said the night lasted three

entire months, and all the wonders that had been related gave as it were

a tinge of the marvellous to his victories. Nevertheless, not everybody

willingly gave way to this fascination. The most clear-sighted of the

aristocratic party, who felt, though indistinctly, that it was the fate

of the republic that was being decided on the banks of the Rhine, wished

to recall Caesar, and to appoint in his place another general, who might

not perhaps complete the conquest of Gaul, but who would not be tempted

to carry out that of his own country. Cato, who pushed everything to

extremes, when the senate was asked to vote a thanksgiving to the gods

for the defeat of Ariovistus, dared to propose, on the contrary, that

they should deliver up the conqueror to the Germans. But these

objections did not change public opinion, which declared itself in

favour of him who had just conquered with such rapidity so many unknown

countries. The knights, who had become the financiers and merchants of

Rome, congratulated themselves on seeing immense countries opened up to

their operations. Caesar, who wished to attach them to him, invited them

to follow him, and his first care had been to open them a road across

the Alps. The common people, who love military glory and who freely give

way to enthusiasm, were never tired of admiring him who extended the

limits of the Roman world. On the news of each victory, Rome had public

rejoicings, and offered thanksgivings to the gods. After the defeat of

the Belgae, the senate, under pressure of public opinion, was compelled

to vote fifteen days of solemn thanksgiving, which had never been done

for anybody. Twenty days was decreed, when the success of the expedition

against Germany was reported, and twenty more after the taking of

Alesia. Cicero usually demanded these honours for Caesar, and he became

the mouthpiece of the public admiration when he said in his noble

language: “This is the first time we have dared to attack the Gauls,

hitherto we have been content to repulse them. The other generals of the

Roman people regarded it as sufficient for their glory to prevent them

invading us; Caesar has gone to seek them out in their own homes. Our

general, our legions, our arms have overrun those countries of which no

history has ever spoken, of whose name the world was ignorant. We had

only a footpath in Gaul; now the boundaries of these nations have become

the frontiers of our own empire. It is not without the signal favour of

Providence that nature gave the Alps for a rampart to Italy. If the

entrance had been free to this multitude of barbarians, Rome never would

have been the centre and the seat of the empire of the world. Now let

insurmountable mountains sink. From the Alps to the Ocean Italy has

nothing now to fear.”[276]

These magnificent eulogies, for which Cicero has been so much blamed,

are easily understood however, and, whatever politicians may say, it is

easy to explain the enthusiasm that so many honest and sensible people

then felt for Caesar. That which justified the unreserved admiration

that his conquests caused, was less their grandeur than their necessity.

They might threaten the future, at that moment they were indispensable.

They later endangered the liberty of Rome, but they assured her

existence then.[277] The patriotic instinct of the people let them

divine what prejudice and fear, although quite legitimate, hid from the

aristocracy. They understood in a confused way all the dangers that

might soon come from Gaul, if they did not hasten to subdue it. It was

not, in truth, the Gauls who were to be feared—their decadence had

already commenced, and they no longer thought of making conquests—it was

the Germans. Dio is quite wrong in asserting that Caesar wantonly

stirred up wars for the sake of his glory. Whatever advantage he drew

from them, we may certainly say that he rather submitted to them than

provoked them. It was not Rome that went to seek the Germans at that

time, but rather the Germans who came boldly towards her. When Caesar

was appointed proconsul, Ariovistus occupied part of the country of the

Sequani and wished to seize the rest. His compatriots, attracted by the

fertility of this fine country, were crossing the Rhine every day to

join him, and twenty-five thousand had come at one time. What would have

happened to Italy if, while Rome was losing her strength in intestine

struggles, the Suevi and the Sicambri had established themselves on the

Rhone and the Alps? The invasion averted by Marius a century before was

recommencing; it might have caused the downfall of Rome then as it did

four centuries later, if Caesar had not arrested it. His glory is to

have thrown back the Germans beyond the Rhine, as it was to the honour

of the empire to have kept them there for more than three hundred years.

Cicero and his friends · 第 18 / 30 段