While the scriptural statements imply a belief in the existence of

spiritual beings intermediate between God and men, it is probable that

many of the details may be regarded merely as symbolic imagery. In

Scripture the function of the angel overshadows his personality; the

stress is on their ministry; they appear in order to perform specific

acts.

[Footnote 1: _E.g._ Gen. vi. 2; Job i. 6; Ps. viii. 5, xxix. I.]

[Footnote 2: Zech. xiv. 5.]

[Footnote 3: Dan. iv. 13.]

[Footnote 4: Deut. xvii. 3 (?).]

[Footnote 5: Josh. v. 14 (?).]

[Footnote 6: The identification of the "hosts" with the stars comes

to the same thing; the stars were thought of as closely connected with

angels. It is probable that the "hosts" were also identified with the

armies of Israel.]

[Footnote 7: Rev. i. 4.]

[Footnote 8: Gen. xxxii. 30; Judges xiii. 22.]

[Footnote 9: Exod. iii. 2, xiv.]

[Footnote 10: Zech. i. 11f.]

[Footnote 11: Cf. xviii. I with xviii. 2, and note change of number in

xix. 17.]

[Footnote 12: Gen. xxviii. 12, E.]

[Footnote 13: Gen. xxxii. I, E.]

[Footnote 14: Gen. xxxii. 24, 30, J.]

[Footnote 15: "An angel" of I Kings xiii. 18 might be the _Mal'akh

Yahweh_, as in xix. 5, cf. 7, or the passage, at any rate in its

present form, may be exilic or post-exilic.]

[Footnote 16: Deut. vi. 4. 5.]

[Footnote 17: Isaiah xliii. 10 &c.]

[Footnote 18: It is not however certain that these doctrines of

Zoroastrianism were developed at so early a date.]

[Footnote 19: Ezek. i.x.]

[Footnote 20: Ezek. ix.]

[Footnote 21: Zech. i. 11 f.]

[Footnote 22: Zech. iii. 1.]

[Footnote 23: Job i., ii. Cf. I Chron. xxi. 1.]

[Footnote 24: Pss. xci. 11, ciii. 20 &c.]

[Footnote 25: Tobit xii. 15; Rev. viii. 2.]

[Footnote 26: Dan. viii. 16, x. 13, 20, 21.]

[Footnote 27: Tob. xii. 15.]

[Footnote 28: Job iv. 18.]

[Footnote 29: Tobit iii. 8, 17, vi. 7.]

[Footnote 30: _E.g._ Matt. i. 20 (to Joseph), iv. 11. (to Jesus), Luke

i. 26 (to Mary), Acts xii. 7 (to Peter).]

[Footnote 31: _E.g._ Mark viii. 38, xiii. 27.]

[Footnote 32: Mark xii. 25.]

[Footnote 33: Luke i. 19.]

[Footnote 34: Rev. ix. 11.]

[Footnote 35: Mark iii. 22.]

[Footnote 36: Mark i. 13.]

[Footnote 37: Michael, Jude 9.]

[Footnote 38: Rom. viii. 38; Col, ii. 10.]

[Footnote 39: Col. i. 16.]

[Footnote 40: Rev. vii. 1.]

[Footnote 41: Gen. xviii. 8.]

[Footnote 42: Gen. xix. 16.]

[Footnote 43: Zech. iv. 1.]

[Footnote 44: Judges vi. 12, 21.]

[Footnote 45: Rev. vii. 1. viii.]

[Footnote 46: Rev. viii. 13, xiv. 6.]

[Footnote 47: Job xxxviii. 7; _Asc. of Isaiah_, iv. 18; Slav. _Enoch_,

iv. 1.]

[Footnote 48: Rev. xiv. 18, xvi. 5; possibly Gal. iv. 3; Col. ii. 8,

20.]

[Footnote 49: Ps. lxviii. 17; Dan. vii. 10.]

[Footnote 50: Matt, xviii. 10; Acts xii. 15.]

[Footnote 51: Gal. iii. 19; Heb. ii. 2; _LXX_. of Deut. xxxiii. 2.]

BIBLIOGRAPHY.--See the sections on "Angels" in the handbooks of O.T.

Theology by Ewald, Schultz, Smend, Kayser-Marti, &c.; and of

N.T. Theology by Weiss, and in van Oosterzee's _Dogmatics_. Also

commentaries on special passages, especially Driver and Bevan on

_Daniel_, and G.A. Smith, _Minor Prophets_, ii. 310 ff.; and articles

_s.v._ "Angel" in Hastings' _Bible Dictionary_, and the _Encyclopaedia

Biblica_.

(W.H. BE.)

ANGEL, a gold coin, first used in France (_angelot, ange_) in 1340,

and introduced into England by Edward IV. in 1465 as a new issue of

the "noble," and so at first called the "angel-noble." It varied in

value between that period and the time of Charles I. (when it was

last coined) from 6s. 8d. to 10s. The name was derived from the

representation it bore of St. Michael and the dragon. The angel was the

coin given to those who came to be touched for the disease known

as king's evil; after it was no longer coined, medals, called

touch-pieces, with the same device, were given instead.

ANGELICA, a genus of plants of the natural order _Umbelliferae_,

represented in Britain by one species, _A. sylvestris_, a tall

perennial herb with large bipinnate leaves and large compound umbels

of white or purple flowers. The name Angelica is popularly given to

a plant of an allied genus, _Archangelica officinalis_, the tender

shoots of which are used in making certain kinds of aromatic

sweetmeats. _Angelica balsam_ is obtained by extracting the roots with

alcohol, evaporating and extracting the residue with ether. It is of

a dark brown colour and contains angelica oil, angelica wax and

angelicin, C_{18}_H_{30}_O. The essential oil of the roots of

_Angelica archangelica_ contains ß-terebangelene, C_{10}_H_{16}, and

other terpenes; the oil of the seeds also contains ß-terebangelene,

together with methylethylacetic acid and hydroxymyristic acid.

The angelica tree is a member of the order _Avaliaceae_, a species of

_Aralia (A. spinosa_), a native of North America; it grows 8 to 12 ft.

high, has a simple prickle-bearing stem forming an umbrella-like head,

and much divided leaves.

ANGELICO, FRA (1387-1455), Italian painter. Il Beato Fra Giovanni

Angelico da Fiesole is the name given to a far-famed painter-friar of

the Florentine state in the 15th century, the representative, beyond

all other men, of pietistic painting. He is often, but not accurately,

termed simply "Fiesole," which is merely the name of the town where he

first took the vows; more often Fra Angelico. If we turn his compound

designation into English, it runs thus--"the Beatified Friar John the

Angelic of Fiesole." In his lifetime he was known no doubt simply as

Fra Giovanni or Friar John; "The Angelic" is a laudatory term which

was assigned to him at an early date,--we find it in use within thirty

years after his death; and, at some period which is not defined in

our authorities, he was beatified by due ecclesiastical process. His

baptismal name was Guido, Giovanni being only his name in religion. He

was born at Vicchio, in the Tuscan province of Mugello, of unknown

but seemingly well-to-do parentage, in 1387 (not 1390 as sometimes

stated); in 1407 he became a novice in the convent of S. Domenico at

Fiesole, and in 1408 he took the vows and entered the Dominican order.

Whether he had previously been a painter by profession is not certain,

but may be pronounced probable. The painter named Lorenzo Monaco may

have contributed to his art-training, and the influence of the Sienese

school is discernible in his work.

[v.02 p.0007]

According to Vasari, the first paintings of this artist were in the

Certosa of Florence; none such exist there now. His earliest extant

performances, in considerable number, are at Cortona, whither he

was sent during his novitiate, and here apparently he spent all the

opening years of his monastic life. His first works executed in fresco

were probably those, now destroyed, which he painted in the convent

of S. Domenico in this city; as a fresco-painter, he may have worked

under, or as a follower of, Gherardo Starnina. From 1418 to 1436

he was back at Fiesole; in 1436 he was transferred to the Dominican

convent of S. Marco in Florence, and in 1438 undertook to paint the

altarpiece for the choir, followed by many other works; he may have

studied about this time the renowned frescoes in the Brancacci chapel

in the Florentine church of the Carmine and also the paintings of

Orcagna. In or about 1445 he was invited by the pope to Rome. The pope

who reigned from 1431 to 1447 was Eugenius IV., and he it was who in

1445 appointed another Dominican friar, a colleague of Angelico, to

be archbishop of Florence. If the story (first told by Vasari) is

true--that this appointment was made at the suggestion of Angelico

only after the archbishopric had been offered to himself, and by

him declined on the ground of his inaptitude for so elevated and

responsible a station--Eugenius, and not (as stated by Vasari) his

successor Nicholas V., must have been the pope who sent the invitation

and made the offer to Fra Giovanni, for Nicholas only succeeded in

1447. The whole statement lacks authentication, though in itself

credible enough. Certain it is that Angelico was staying in Rome in

the first half of 1447; and he painted in the Vatican the Cappella del

Sacramento, which was afterwards demolished by Paul III. In June

1447 he proceeded to Orvieto, to paint in the Cappella Nuova of the

cathedral, with the co-operation of his pupil Benozzo Gozzoli. He

afterwards returned to Rome to paint the chapel of Nicholas V. In

this capital he died in 1455, and he lies buried in the church of the

Minerva.

According to all the accounts which have reached us, few men on

whom the distinction of beatification has been conferred could

have deserved it more nobly than Fra Giovanni. He led a holy and

self-denying life, shunning all advancement, and was a brother to

the poor; no man ever saw him angered. He painted with unceasing

diligence, treating none but sacred subjects; he never retouched

or altered his work, probably with a religious feeling that such as

divine providence allowed the thing to come, such it should remain. He

was wont to say that he who illustrates the acts of Christ should

be with Christ. It is averred that he never handled a brush without

fervent prayer and he wept when he painted a Crucifixion. The Last

Judgment and the Annunciation were two of the subjects he most

frequently treated.

Bearing in mind the details already given as to the dates of Fra

Giovanni's sojournings in various localities, the reader will be able

to trace approximately the sequence of the works which we now proceed

to name as among his most important productions. In Florence, in the

convent of S. Marco (now converted into a national museum), a series

of frescoes, beginning towards 1443; in the first cloister is the

Crucifixion with St. Dominic kneeling; and the same treatment recurs on

a wall near the dormitory; in the chapterhouse is a third Crucifixion,

with the Virgin swooning, a composition of twenty life-sized

figures--the red background, which has a strange and harsh effect, is

the misdoing of some restorer; an "Annunciation," the figures of about

three-fourths of life-size, in a dormitory; in the adjoining passage,

the "Virgin enthroned," with four saints; on the wall of a cell,

the "Coronation of the Virgin," with Saints Paul, Thomas Aquinas,

Benedict, Dominic, Francis and Peter Martyr; two Dominicans welcoming

Jesus, habited as a pilgrim; an "Adoration of the Magi"; the "Marys

at the Sepulchre." All these works are later than the altarpiece which

Angelico painted (as before mentioned) for the choir connected

with this convent, and which is now in the academy of Florence; it

represents the Virgin with Saints Cosmas and Damian (the patrons of

the Medici family), Dominic, Peter, Francis, Mark, John Evangelist and

Stephen; the pediment illustrated the lives of Cosmas and Damian, but

it has long been severed from the main subject. In the Uffizi gallery,

an altarpiece, the Virgin (life-sized) enthroned, with the Infant and

twelve angels. In S. Domenico, Fiesole, a few frescoes, less fine than

those in S. Marco; also an altarpiece in tempera of the Virgin and

Child between Saints Peter, Thomas Aquinas, Dominic and Peter Martyr,

now much destroyed. The subject which originally formed the predella

of this picture has, since 1860, been in the National Gallery, London,

and worthily represents there the hand of the saintly painter. The

subject is a Glory, Christ with the banner of the Resurrection, and

a multitude of saints, including, at the extremities, the saints or

beati of the Dominican order; here are no fewer than 266 figures

or portions of figures, many of them having names inscribed. This

predella was highly lauded by Vasari; still more highly another

picture which used to form an altarpiece in Fiesole, and which now

obtains world-wide celebrity in the Louvre--the "Coronation of the

Virgin," with eight predella subjects of the miracles of St. Dominic.

For the church of Santa Trinita, Florence, Angelico executed a

"Deposition from the Cross," and for the church of the Angeli, a "Last

Judgment," both now in the Florentine academy; for S. Maria Novella, a

"Coronation of the Virgin," with a predella in three sections, now

in the Uffizi,--this again is one of his masterpieces. In Orvieto

cathedral he painted three triangular divisions of the ceiling,

portraying respectively Christ in a glory of angels, sixteen saints

and prophets, and the virgin and apostles: all these are now much

repainted and damaged. In Rome, in the Chapel of Nicholas V., the acts

of Saints Stephen and Lawrence; also various figures of saints, and

on the ceiling the four evangelists. These works of the painter's

advanced age, which have suffered somewhat from restorations, show

vigour superior to that of his youth, along with a more adequate

treatment of the architectural perspectives. Naturally, there are a

number of works currently attributed to Angelico, but not really his;

for instance, a "St Thomas with the Madonna's girdle," in the Lateran

museum, and a "Virgin enthroned," in the church of S. Girolamo,

Fiesole. It has often been said that he commenced and frequently

practised as an illuminator; this is dubious and a presumption arises

that illuminations executed by Giovanni's brother, Benedetto, also

a Dominican, who died in 1448, have been ascribed to the more famous

artist. Benedetto may perhaps have assisted Giovanni in the frescoes

at S. Marco, but nothing of the kind is distinctly traceable. A folio

series of engravings from these paintings was published in Florence,

in 1852. Along with Gozzoli already mentioned, Zanobi Strozzi and

Gentile da Fabriano are named as pupils of the Beato.

We have spoken of Angelico's art as "pietistic"; this is in fact

its predominant character. His visages have an air of rapt suavity,

devotional fervency and beaming esoteric consciousness, which is

intensely attractive to some minds and realizes beyond rivalry a

particular ideal--that of ecclesiastical saintliness and detachment

from secular fret and turmoil. It should not be denied that he did not

always escape the pitfalls of such a method of treatment, the faces

becoming sleek and prim, with a smirk of sexless religiosity which

hardly eludes the artificial or even the hypocritical; on other minds,

therefore, and these some of the most masculine and resolute, he

produces little genuine impression. After allowing for this, Angelico

should nevertheless be accepted beyond cavil as an exalted typical

painter according to his own range of conceptions, consonant with his

monastic calling, unsullied purity of life and exceeding devoutness.

Exquisite as he is in his special mode of execution, he undoubtedly

falls far short, not only of his great naturalist contemporaries such

as Masaccio and Lippo Lippi, but even of so distant a precursor as

Giotto, in all that pertains to bold or life-like invention of a

subject or the realization of ordinary appearances, expressions and

actions--the facts of nature, as distinguished from the aspirations or

contemplations of the spirit. Technically speaking, he had much finish

and harmony of composition and colour, without corresponding

mastery of light and shade, and his knowledge of the human frame

was restricted. The brilliancy and fair light scale of his tints

is constantly remarkable, combined with a free use of gilding; this

conduces materially to that celestial character which so pre-eminently

distinguishes his pictured visions of the divine persons, the

hierarchy of heaven and the glory of the redeemed.

[v.02 p.0008]

Books regarding Fra Angelico are numerous. We may mention those by S.

Beissel, 1895; V.M. Crawford, 1900; R.L. Douglas, 1900; I.B. Supino,

1901; D. Tumiati, 1897; G. Williamson, 1901.

(W.M.R.)

ANGELL, GEORGE THORNDIKE (1823-1909), American philanthropist, was

born at Southbridge, Massachusetts, on the 5th of June 1823. He

graduated at Dartmouth in 1846, studied law at the Harvard Law School,

and in 1851 was admitted to the bar in Boston, where he practised

for many years. In 1868 he founded and became president of the

Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, in the

same year establishing and becoming editor of _Our Dumb Animals_, a

journal for the promotion of organized effort in securing the humane

treatment of animals. For many years he was active in the organization

of humane societies in England and America. In 1882 he initiated the

movement for the establishment of Bands of Mercy (for the promotion

of humane treatment of animals), of which in 1908 there were more than

72,000 in active existence. In 1889 he founded and became president

of the American Humane Education Society. He became well known as a

criminologist and also as an advocate of laws for the safeguarding of

the public health and against adulteration of food. He died at Boston

on the 16th of March 1909.

ANGEL-LIGHTS, in architecture, the outer upper lights in a

perpendicular window, next to the springing; probably a corruption of

the word angle-lights, as they are nearly triangular.

ANGELUS, a Roman Catholic devotion in memory of the Annunciation.

It has its name from the opening words, _Angelus Domini nuntiavit

Mariae_. It consists of three texts describing the mystery, recited

as versicle and response alternately with the salutation "Hail, Mary!"

This devotion is recited in the Catholic Church three times daily,

about 6 A.M., noon and 6 P.M. At these hours a bell known as the

Angelus bell is rung. This is still rung in some English country

churches, and has often been mistaken for and alleged to be a survival

of the curfew bell. The institution of the Angelus is by some ascribed

to Pope Urban II., by some to John XXII. The triple recitation is

ascribed to Louis XI. of France, who in 1472 ordered it to be thrice

said daily.

ANGELUS SILESIUS (1624-1677), German religious poet, was born in 1624

at Breslau. His family name was Johann Scheffler, but he is generally

known by the pseudonym Angelus Silesius, under which he published his

poems and which marks the country of his birth. Brought up a Lutheran,

and at first physician to the duke of Württemberg-Oels, he joined in

1652 the Roman Catholic Church, in 1661 took orders as a priest, and

became coadjutor to the prince bishop of Breslau. He died at Breslau

on the 9th of July 1677. In 1657 Silesius published under the title

_Heilige Seelenlust, oder geistliche Hirtenlieder der in ihren

Jesum verliebten Psyche_ (1657), a collection of 205 hymns, the most

beautiful of which, such as, _Liebe, die du mich zum Bilde deiner

Gottheit hast gemacht_ and _Mir nach, spricht Christus, unser Held_,

have been adopted in the German Protestant hymnal. More remarkable,

however, is his _Geistreiche Sinn-und Schluss-reime_ (1657),

afterwards called _Cherubinischer Wandersmann_ (1674). This is a

collection of "Reimsprüche" or rhymed distichs embodying a strange

mystical pantheism drawn mainly from the writings of Jakob Böhme and

his followers. Silesius delighted specially in the subtle paradoxes of

mysticism. The essence of God, for instance, he held to be love; God,

he said, can love nothing inferior to himself; but he cannot be an

object of love to himself without going out, so to speak, of himself,

without manifesting his infinity in a finite form; in other words, by

becoming man. God and man are therefore essentially one.

A complete edition of Scheffler's works (_Sämtliche poetische Werke_)

was published by D.A. Rosenthal, 2 vols. (Regensburg, 1862). Both

the _Cherubinischer Wandersmann_ and _Heilige Seelenlust_ have been

republished by G. Ellinger (1895 and 1901); a selection from the

former work by O.E. Hartleben (1896). For further notices of Silesius'

life and work, see Hoffmann von Fallersleben in _Weimarisches Jahrbuch

I_. (Hanover, 1854); A. Kahlert, _Angelus Silesius_ (1853); C.

Seltmann, _Angelus Silesius und seine Mystik_ (1896), and a biog. by

H. Mahn (Dresden, 1896).

ANGERMÜNDE, a town of Germany, in the Prussian province of

Brandenburg, on Lake Münde, 43 m. from Berlin by the Berlin-Stettin

railway, and at the junction of lines to Prenzlau, Freien-walde and

Schwedt. Pop. (1900) 7465. It has three Protestant churches, a grammar

school and court of law. Its industries embrace iron founding and

enamel working. In 1420 the elector Frederick I. of Brandenburg gained

here a signal victory over the Pomeranians.

ANGERONA, or ANGERONIA, an old Roman goddess, whose name and functions

are variously explained. According to ancient authorities, she was a

goddess who relieved men from pain and sorrow, or delivered the Romans

and their flocks from _angina_ (quinsy); or she was the protecting

goddess of Rome and the keeper of the sacred name of the city, which

might not be pronounced lest it should be revealed to her enemies; it

was even thought that Angerona itself was this name. Modern scholars

regard her as a goddess akin to Ops, Acca Larentia and Dea Dia; or

as the goddess of the new year and the returning sun (according to

Mommsen, _ab angerendo_= [Greek: apo tou anapheresthai. ton haelion).]

Her festival, called Divalia or Angeronalia, was celebrated on the

21st of December. The priests offered sacrifice in the temple of

Volupia, the goddess of pleasure, in which stood a statue of Angerona,

with a finger on her mouth, which was bound and closed (Macrobius

i. 10; Pliny, _Nat. Hist._ iii. 9; Varro, _L. L._ vi. 23). She was

worshipped as Ancharia at Faesulae, where an altar belonging to her

has been recently discovered. (See FAESULAE.)

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Andros, Sir Edmund" to "Anise" Volume 2, Part 1, Slice 1 · 第 2 / 20 段