Or this:—

“About what am I now employing my soul? On every occasion I must ask

myself this question, and inquire, What have I now in this part of me

which they call the ruling principle, and whose soul have I now?—that of

a child, or of a young man, or of a weak woman, or of a tyrant, or of

one of the lower animals in the service of man, or of a wild beast?”

The character he wished to attain he knew well, and beautifully he has

marked it, and marked, too his sense of shortcoming:—

“When thou hast assumed these names,—good, modest, true, rational,

equal-minded, magnanimous,—take care that thou dost not change these

names; and, if thou shouldst lose them, quickly return to them. If thou

maintainest thyself in possession of these names without desiring that

others should call thee by them, thou wilt be another being, and wilt

enter on another life. For to continue to be such as thou hast hitherto

been, and to be torn in pieces and defiled in such a life, is the

character of a very stupid man, and one overfond of his life, and like

those half-devoured fighters with wild beasts, who though covered with

wounds and gore still entreat to be kept to the following day, though

they will be exposed in the same state to the same claws and bites.

Therefore fix thyself in the possession of these few names: and if thou

art able to abide in them, abide as if thou wast removed to the Happy

Islands.”

For all his sweetness and serenity, however, man’s point of life

“between two infinities” (of that expression Marcus Aurelius is the real

owner) was to him anything but a Happy Island, and the performances on

it he saw through no veils of illusion. Nothing is in general more

gloomy and monotonous than declamations on the hollowness and

transitoriness of human life and grandeur: but here, too, the great

charm of Marcus Aurelius, his emotion, comes in to relieve the monotony

and to break through the gloom; and even on this eternally used topic he

is imaginative, fresh, and striking:—

“Consider, for example, the times of Vespasian. Thou wilt see all these

things, people marrying, bringing up children, sick, dying, warring,

feasting, trafficking, cultivating the ground, flattering, obstinately

arrogant, suspecting, plotting, wishing for somebody to die, grumbling

about the present, loving, heaping up treasure, desiring to be consuls

or kings. Well then that life of these people no longer exists at all.

Again, go to the times of Trajan. All is again the same. Their life too

is gone. But chiefly thou shouldst think of those whom thou hast thyself

known distracting themselves about idle things, neglecting to do what

was in accordance with their proper constitution, and to hold firmly to

this and to be content with it.”

Essays in criticism · 第 64 / 96 题