And again:—

“We ought to check in the series of our thoughts everything that is

without a purpose and useless, but most of all the over curious feeling

and the malignant; and a man should use himself to think of those things

only about which if one should suddenly ask, ‘What hast thou now in thy

thoughts?’ with perfect openness thou mightest immediately answer, ‘This

or That;’ so that from thy words it should be plain that everything in

thee is simple and benevolent, and such as befits a social animal, and

one that cares not for thoughts about sensual enjoyments, or any rivalry

or envy and suspicion, or anything else for which thou wouldst blush if

thou shouldst say thou hadst it in thy mind.”

So, with a stringent practicalness worthy of Franklin, he discourses on

his favorite text, _Let nothing be done without a purpose_. But it is

when he enters the region where Franklin cannot follow him, when he

utters his thoughts on the ground-motives of human action, that he is

most interesting; that he becomes the unique, the incomparable Marcus

Aurelius. Christianity uses language very liable to be misunderstood

when it seems to tell men to do good, not, certainly, from the vulgar

motives of worldly interest, or vanity, or love of human praise, but

“that their Father which seeth in secret may reward them openly.” The

motives of reward and punishment have come, from the misconception of

language of this kind, to to be strangely overpressed by many Christian

moralists, to the deterioration and disfigurement of Christianity.

Marcus Aurelius says, truly and nobly:—

“One man, when he has done a service to another, is ready to set it down

to his account as a favor conferred. Another is not ready to do this,

but still in his own mind he thinks of the man as his debtor, and he

knows what he has done. A third in a manner does not even know what he

has done, _but he is like a vine which has produced grapes, and seeks

for nothing more after it has once produced its proper fruit_. As a

horse when he has run, a dog when he has caught the game, a bee when it

has made its honey, so a man when he has done a good act, does not call

out for others to come and see, but he goes on to another act, as a vine

goes on to produce again the grapes in season. Must a man, then, be one

of these, who in a manner acts thus without observing it? Yes.”

Essays in criticism · 第 62 / 96 题