Among the Indians this ruling principle of existence was the doctrine of

the transmigration of souls, which appears indeed to be the most

characteristic of all their opinions, and was by its influence on real

life, by far the most important. We must in the first place remember,

and keep well in our minds, that, among those nations of primitive

antiquity, the doctrine of the immortality of the soul was not a mere

probable hypothesis, which, as with many moderns, needs laborious

researches and diffuse argumentations in order to produce conviction on

the mind. Nay, we can hardly give the name of faith to this primitive

conception; for it was a lively certainty, like the feeling of one's own

being, and of what is actually present; and this firm belief in a future

existence exerted its influence on all sublunary affairs, and was often

the motive of mightier deeds and enterprises than any mere earthly

interest could inspire. I said above that the doctrine of the

transmigration of souls was not unconnected with the Indian system of

castes; for the most honourable appellation of a Brahmin is _Tvija_,

that is to say, a second time born, or regenerated. On one hand this

appellation refers to that spiritual renovation and second birth of a

life of purity consecrated to God, as in this consists the true calling

of a Brahmin, and the special purpose of his caste. On the other hand

this term refers to the belief that the soul, after many transmigrations

through various forms of animals, and various stages of natural

existence, is permitted in certain cases, as a peculiar recompense, when

it has gone through its prescribed cycle of migrations to return to the

world, and be born in the class of Brahmins. This doctrine of the

transmigration of souls through various bodies of animals or other forms

of existence, and even through more than one repetition of human life,

(whether such migrations were intended as the punishment of souls for

their viciousness and impiety, or as trials for their further

purification and amendment)--this doctrine which has always been, and is

still so prevalent in India, was held likewise by the ancient Egyptians.

This accordance in the faith of these two ancient nations, established

beyond all doubt by historical testimony, is indeed remarkable; and even

in the minutest particulars on the course of migration allotted to

souls, and on the stated periods and cycles of that migration, the

coincidence is often perfectly exact. How strangely now it this most

singular error mixed up, I do not say with truth, but with a feeling

that is certainly closely akin to primitive truth! When an individual of

our own age, out of disgust with modern and well-known systems, or with

the vulgar doctrines, and from a love of paradox, adopted this ancient

hypothesis of the transmigration of souls; he merely considered the bare

transmutation of earthly forms.[48] But among those ancient nations this

doctrine rested on a religious basis, and was connected with a sentiment

purely religious. In this doctrine there was a noble element of

truth--the feeling that man, since he has gone astray, and wandered so

far from his God, must needs exert many efforts, and undergo a long and

painful pilgrimage before he can rejoin the Source of all

perfection;--the firm conviction and positive certainty that nothing

defective, impure, or defiled with earthly stains can enter the pure

region of perfect spirits, or be eternally united to God; and that thus,

before it can attain to this blissful end, the immortal soul must pass

through long trials and many purifications. It may now well be

conceived, (and indeed the experience of this life would prove it,) that

suffering, which deeply pierces the soul, anguish that convulses all the

members of existence, may contribute, or may even be necessary, to the

deliverance of the soul from all alloy and pollution, as, to borrow a

comparison from natural objects, the generous metal is melted down in

fire and purged from its dross. It is certainly true that the greater

the degeneracy and the degradation of man, the nearer is his

approximation to the brute; and when the transmigration of the immortal

soul through the bodies of various animals is merely considered as the

punishment of its former transgressions, we can very well understand the

opinion which supposes that man who, by his crimes and the abuse of his

reason, had descended to the level of the brute, should at last be

transformed into the brute itself. But what could have given rise to the

opinion that the transmigration of souls through the bodies of beasts

was the road or channel of amendment, was destined to draw the soul

nearer to infinite perfection, and even to accomplish its total union

with the Supreme Being, from whom, in all appearance, it seemed

calculated to remove it further? And as regards a return to the present

state and existence of man, what thinking person would ever wish to

return to a life divided and fluctuating as it is, between desire and

disgust, wasted in internal and external strife, and which, though

brightened by a few scattered rays of truth, is still encompassed with

the dense clouds of error;--even though this return to earthly existence

should be accomplished in the Brahminical class so highly revered in

India, or in the princely and royal race so highly favoured by fortune?

There is in all this a strange mixture and confusion of the ideas of

this world with those of the next; and how the latter is separated from

the former by an impassable gulf, they seem not to have been

sufficiently aware. Both these ancient nations, the Egyptians as well as

the Indians, regarded with few exceptions, the Metempsychosis, not as an

object of joyful hope, but rather as a calamity impending over the soul;

and whether they considered it to be a punishment for earthly

transgressions, or a state of probation--a severe but preparatory trial

of purification; they still looked on it as a calamity; which to avert

or to mitigate, they deemed no attempt, no act, no exertion, no

sacrifice, ought to be spared.

In the manner, however, in which these two nations conceived this

doctrine, there was a striking and fundamental difference; and if the

leading tenet was the same among both, the views which each connected

with it were very dissimilar. Deprived, as we are, of the old books and

original writings of the Egyptians, we are unable perfectly to

comprehend and seize their peculiar ideas on this subject, and state

them with the same assurance as we can those of the Indians, whose

ancient writings we now possess in such abundance, and which in all main

points perfectly agree with the accounts of the ancient classics. But we

are left to infer the ideas of the Egyptians on the Metempsychosis only

from their singular treatment of the dead, and the bodies of the

deceased; from that sepulchral art (if I may use the expression) which

with them acquired a dignity and importance, and was carried to a pitch

of refinement, such as we find among no other people; from that careful

and costly consecration of the corpse, which we still regard with wonder

and astonishment in their mummies and other monuments. That all these

solemn preparations, and the religious rites which accompanied them,

that the inscriptions on the tombs and mummies had all a religious

meaning and object, and were intimately connected with the doctrine of

the transmigration of souls, can admit of no doubt; though it is a

matter of greater difficulty to ascertain with precision the peculiar

ideas they were meant to express. Did the Egyptians believe that the

soul did not separate immediately from the body which it had ceased to

animate, but only on the entire decay and putrefaction of the corpse? Or

did they wish by their art of embalmment to preserve the body from

decay, in order to deliver the soul from the dreaded transmigration? The

Egyptian treatment of the dead would certainly seem to imply a belief

that, for some time at least after death, there existed a certain

connection between the soul and body. Yet we cannot adopt this

supposition to an unqualified extent, as it would be in contradiction

with those symbolical representations that so frequently occur in

Egyptian art, and in which the soul immediately after death is

represented as summoned before the judgment-seat of God, severely

accused by the hostile demon, but defended by the friendly and guardian

spirit, who employs every resource to procure the deliverance and

acquittal of the soul. Or did the Egyptians think that by all these

rites, as by so many magical expedients, they would keep off the

malevolent fiend from the soul, and obtain for it the succour of good

and friendly divinities? Now that the gates of hieroglyphic science have

been at last opened, we may trust that a further progress in the science

will disclose to us more satisfactory information on all these topics.

The Indians, however, who ever remained total strangers to the mode of

burial and treatment of the dead practised in Egypt, adopted a very

different course to procure the deliverance of the human soul from

transmigration:--they had recourse to philosophy--to the highest

aspirings of thought towards God--to a total and lasting immersion of

feeling in the unfathomable abyss of the divine essence. They have never

doubted that by this means a perfect union with the Deity might be

obtained even in this life, and that thus the soul, freed and

emancipated from all mutation and migration through the various forms of

animated nature in this world of illusion, might remain for ever united

with its God. Such is the object to which all the different systems of

Indian philosophy tend--such is the term of all their enquiries. This

philosophy contains a multitude of the sublimest reflections on the

separation from all earthly things, and on the union with the God-head;

and there is no high conception in this department of metaphysics,

unknown to the Hindoos. But this absorption of all thought and all

consciousness in God--this solitary enduring feeling of internal and

eternal union with the Deity, they have carried to a pitch and extreme

that may almost be called a moral and intellectual self-annihilation.

This is the same philosophy, though in a different form, which in the

history of European intellect and science, has received the denomination

of _mysticism_. The possible excesses--the perilous abyss in this

philosophy, have been in general acknowledged, and even pointed out in

particular cases, where egotism or pride has been detected under a

secret disguise, or where this total abstraction of thought and feeling

has spurned all limit, measure, and law. In general however, the

European mind, by its more temperate and harmonious constitution, by the

greater variety of its attainments, and above all, by the purer and

fuller light of revealed truth, has been preserved from those

aberrations of mysticism which in India have been carried to such a

fearful extent, not only in speculation, but in real life and practice;

and which, transcending as they do all the limits of human nature, far

exceed the bounds of possibility, or what men have in general considered

as such. And the apparently incredible things which the Greeks related

more than two thousand years ago, respecting the recluses of India, or

_Gymnosophists_, as they called those Yogis, are found to exist even at

the present day; and ocular experience has fully corroborated the truth

of their narratives.

END OF LECTURE IV.

LECTURE V.

A comparative view of the intellectual character of the four

principal nations in the primitive world--the Indians, the Chinese,

the Egyptians, and the Hebrews; next of the peculiar spirit and

political relations of the ancient Persians.

As, after discord had broken out among mankind, humanity became split

and divided into a multitude of nations, races, and languages, into

hostile and conflicting tribes, castes rigidly separated, and classes

variously divided; as indeed, when once we suppose this original

division and primitive opposition in the human race, it could not be

otherwise from the very nature and even destiny of man; so in a

psychological point of view, the moral unity of the individual man was

broken, and his faculties of will and understanding became mutually

opposed, or followed contrary courses. The whole internal structure of

human consciousness was deranged, and in the present divided state of

the human faculties, there is no longer the full play of the harmonious

soul--of the once unbroken spirit--but its every faculty hath now but a

limited, or, to speak more properly, one half of its proper power.

The restoration of the full life and entire operation of the divided

faculties of the human soul must be considered now only as a splendid

exception--the high gift of creative genius, and of a more than ordinary

strength of character; and such a re-union of faculties must be looked

upon as the high problem which constitutes the ultimate object and ideal

term of all the intellectual and moral exertions of man. When in an

individual a clear, comprehensive, penetrative understanding, that has

mastered all sound science, is combined with a will not only firm, but

pure and upright, such an individual has attained the great object of

his existence; and when a whole generation, or mankind in general,

present this harmonious concord between science on the one hand, and

moral conduct and external life, or to characterize them by one word,

the general will, on the other, which is often in utter hostility with

science--we may then truly say that humanity has attained its destiny.

The great error of ordinary philosophy, and the principal reason that

has prevented it from accomplishing its ends, is the supposition it so

hastily admits that the consciousness of man now entirely changed,

broken and mutilated, is the same as it was originally, and as it was

created and fashioned by its Maker; without observing that, since the

great primeval Revolution, man has not only been outwardly or

historically disunited, but even internally and psychologically

deranged. The moral being of man, a prey to internal discord, may be

said to be quartered, because the four primary faculties of the soul and

mind of man--Understanding and Will, Reason and Imagination, stand in a

two-fold opposition one to the other, and are, if we may so speak,

dispersed into the four regions of existence. Reason in man is the

regulating faculty of thought; and so far it occupies the first place in

life and the whole system and arrangement of life; but it is

unproductive in itself, and even in science it can pretend to no real

fertility or immediate intuition. Imagination on the other hand is

fertile and inventive indeed, but left to itself and without guidance,

it is blind, and consequently subject to illusion. The best will, devoid

of discernment and understanding, can accomplish little good. Still less

capable of good is a strong, and even the strongest understanding, when

coupled with a wicked and corrupt character; or should such an

understanding be associated with an unsteady and changeable will, the

individual destitute of character, is entirely without influence.

To prove moreover how all the other faculties of the soul, or the mind,

elsewhere enumerated are but the connecting links--the subordinate

branches[49] of those four primary faculties; how the general

dismemberment of the human consciousness reaches even to them; how they

diverge from one another, and appear still more split and narrowed; to

prove this would lead me too far, and is the less necessary, as, in the

peculiar character of particular ages or nations, the historical

enquirer can observe but those four primary faculties mentioned above,

as the intellectual elements prevalent in each. As in the intellectual

character of particular men, or in any given system of human thought,

fiction, or science (and these can be better described and more closely

analyzed than the fleeting and transient phenomena of real life and the

social relations); as in every such individual production, I say, of

human thought and human action, either Reason will preponderate as a

systematic methodizer and a moral regulator, or a fertile, inventive

Imagination will be displayed, or a clear, penetrative understanding, or

again a peculiar energy of will and strength of character will be

observed; so the same holds good in the great whole of universal

history--in the moral and intellectual existence--the character, or the

mind of particular ages or nations in the ancient world.

This is apparent not only in the very various manner, in which sacred

Tradition--the external word to man revealed--was conceived, developed

and disfigured among each of those nations; but in the peculiar form and

direction which the internal word in man--that is to say his higher

consciousness and intellectual life assumed among each. Such an

intellectual opposition evidently exists between those two great

primitive nations already characterized, that inhabit the extreme East

and South of Asia--an opposition between reason and imagination. In

regard to the intellectual and moral character of nations as well as of

individuals, Reason is that human faculty which is conversant with

grammatical construction, logical inferences, dialectic contests,

systematic arrangement; and in practical life it serves as the divine

regulator, in so far as it adheres to the higher order of God. But when

it refuses to do this, and wishes to deduce all from itself and its own

individuality, then it becomes an egotistical, over-refining, selfish,

calculating, degenerate Reason, the inventress of all the arbitrary

systems of science and morals, dividing and splitting every thing into

sects and parties. Imagination must not be considered as a mere faculty

for fiction, nor confined to the circle of art and poetry--it includes a

faculty for scientific discoveries, nor did a mind destitute of all

imagination ever make a great scientific discovery. There is even a

higher, purely speculative fancy which finds its proper sphere in a

mysticism, like the Indian, that has already been described. Even if a

mysticism, like that which constitutes the basis of the Indian

philosophy, were entirely free from all admixture of sensual feelings,

and were entirely destitute of images, we should certainly not be right

in refusing on that account to imagination its share in this peculiar

intellectual phenomenon. That in the intellectual character of the

Chinese, reason, and not imagination, was the predominant element, it

would, after the sketch we have before given of that people, and which

was drawn from the best and most recent sources and authorities, be

scarcely necessary to prove at any length--so clearly is that fact

established. Originally when the old system of Chinese manners was

regulated by the pure worship of God, not disfigured as among other

nations by manifold fictions, but breathing the better spirit of

Confucius, it was undoubtedly in a sound, upright Reason, conformable to

God, that the Chinese placed the foundation of their moral and political

existence; since they designated the Supreme Being by the name of Divine

Reason. Although some modern writers in our time have, like the Chinese,

applied the term _divine reason_ to Almighty God; yet I cannot adopt

this Chinese mode of speech, since, though according to the doctrine

from which I start, and the truth of which has been all along

pre-supposed, the living God is a spirit; yet it by no means follows

thence that God is Reason or Reason God. If we examine the expression

closely and in its scientific rigour, we can with as little propriety

attribute to God the faculty of reason, as the faculty of imagination.

The latter prevails in the poetical mythology of ancient Paganism; the

former, when the expression is really correct, designates rationalism or

the modern idolatry of Reason; and to this indeed we may discern a

certain tendency even in very early times, and particularly among the

Chinese. Among the latter people at a tolerably early period, a sound,

just Reason conformable and docile to divine revelation was superseded

by an egotistical, subtle, over-refining Reason, which split into

hostile sects, and at last subverted the old edifice of sacred

Tradition, to re-construct it on a new revolutionary plan.

Equally, and even still more strongly, apparent is the predominance of

the imaginative faculty among the Indians, as is seen even in their

science and in that peculiar tendency to mysticism which this faculty

has imparted to the whole Indian philosophy. The creative fulness of a

bold poetical imagination is evinced by those gigantic works of

architecture which may well sustain a comparison with the monuments of

Egypt; by a poetry, which in the manifold richness of invention is not

inferior to that of the Greeks, while it often approximates to the

beauty of its forms; and, above all, by a mythology which in its leading

features, its profound import, and its general connexion resembles the

Egyptian, while in its rich clothing of poetry, in its attractive and

bewitching representations, it bears a strong similarity to that of the

Greeks. This decided and peculiar character of the whole intellectual

culture of the Indians, will not permit us to doubt which of the various

faculties of the soul is there the ruling and preponderant element.

A similar, and equally decided opposition in the intellectual character

and predominant element of human consciousness is observed between the

Hebrews and Egyptians; though this was an opposition of a different

kind, and of a deeper import. To show this more clearly, I will take the

liberty of interrupting for a moment the order I have hitherto followed,

of characterizing each nation in regular succession, and with as much

accuracy and fullness as possible; in order by a comparative view of the

four principal nations of remote antiquity, to draw such a general

sketch of the first period of universal history as may serve at once for

a central point in our enquiries, and for the ground-work of subsequent

remarks. Such a comparison will tend to facilitate our survey of the

primitive ages of the world: and in this general combination of the

whole, each part will appear in a clearer light.

If I wished to characterize in one word the peculiar bearing and ruling

element of the Egyptian mind; however unsatisfactory in other respects

such general designations may be--I should say that the intellectual

eminence of that people was in its scientific profundity--in an

understanding that penetrated or sought to penetrate by magic into all

the depths and mysteries of nature, even into their most hidden abyss.

So thoroughly scientific was the whole leaning and character of the

Egyptian mind, that even the architecture of this people had an

astronomical import, even far more than that of the other nations of

early antiquity. I have already had occasion to speak of the deep and

mysterious signification of their treatment of the dead. In all the

natural sciences, in mathematics, astronomy, and even in medicine, they

were the masters of the Greeks; and even the profoundest thinkers among

the latter, the Pythagoreans, and afterwards the great Plato himself,

derived from them the first elements of their doctrines, or caught at

least the first outline of their mighty speculations. Here too, in the

birth-place of hieroglyphics, was the chief seat of the Mysteries; and

Egypt has at all times been the native country of many true, as well as

of many false, secrets. These few remarks may here serve to characterize

this people; we shall later have occasion to add many minuter traits to

complete this brief sketch of the Egyptian intellect.

The Philosophy of History, Vol. 1 of 2 · 第 15 / 27 段