CHAPTER XVII.

I have thought that it might be more convenient to the reader to have

the letters contained in the foregoing chapter all together, and have

not interrupted them therefore to speak of any of the events which

were meantime happening in my own life.

But during the period which the letters cover the two greatest sorrows

of my life had fallen upon me--I had lost first my mother, then my

wife.

The bereavement, however, was very different in the two cases. If my

mother had died a dozen years earlier I should have felt the loss as

the end of all things to me--as leaving me desolate and causing a void

which nothing could ever fill. But when she died at eighty-three she

had lived her life, upon the whole a very happy one, to the happiness

of which I had (and have) the satisfaction of believing I largely

contributed.

It is very common for a mother and daughter to live during many years

of life together in as close companionship as I lived with my mother,

but it is not common for a son to do so. During many years, and many,

many journeyings, and more _tête-à-tête_ walks, and yet more of

_tête-à-tête_ home hours, we were inseparable companions and friends.

I can truly say that, from the time when we put our horses together on

my return from Birmingham to the time of my marriage, she was all in

all to me! During some four or five days in the early time of our

residence at Florence I thought I was going to lose her, and I can

never forget the blank wretchedness of the prospect that seemed to be

before me.

She had a very serious illness, and was, as I had subsequently

reason to believe, very mistakenly treated. She was attended by a

practitioner of the old school, who had at that time the leading

practice in Florence. He was a very good fellow, and an admirable

whist player; and I do not think the members of our little colony

drew a sufficiently sharp line of division between his social and his

professional qualifications. He was, as I have said, essentially a man

of the (even then) old school, and retained the old-fashioned general

practitioners phraseology. I remember his once mortally disgusting an

unhappy dyspeptic old lady by asking her, "Do we go to our dinner with

glee?" As if the poor soul had ever done anything with glee!

This gentleman had bled my mother, and had appointed another bleeding

for the evening. I believe she would assuredly have died if that had

been done, and I attribute to Lord Holland the saving of her. Her

doctor had very wrongly resisted the calling in of other English

advice, professional jealousy, and indeed enmity, running high just

then among us. Lord Holland came to the house just in the nick of

time; and over-ruling authoritatively all the difficulties raised by

the Esculapius in possession of the field, insisted on at once sending

his own medical attendant. The result was the immediate administration

of port wine instead of phlebotomy, and the patient's rapid recovery.

My mother was at the time far past taking any part in the discussion

of the medical measures to be adopted in her case. But I am not

without a suspicion that she too, if she could have been consulted,

would have sided with phlebotomy and whist, as against modern practice

unrelieved by any such alleviation. For the phlebotomist had been a

constant attendant at her Friday night whist-table; and as it was she

lost him, for he naturally was offended at her recovery under rival

hands.

What my mother _was_ I have already said enough to show, as far as

my imperfect words can show it, in divers passages of these

reminiscences. She was the happiest natured person I ever knew--happy

in the intense power of enjoyment, happier still in the conscious

exercise of the power of making others happy; and this continued to

be the case till nearly the end. During the last few years the bright

lamp began to grow dim and gradually sink into the socket. She

suffered but little physically, but she lost her memory, and then

gradually more and more the powers of her mind generally. I have often

thought that this perishing of the mind before the exceptionally

healthy and well-constituted physical frame, in which it was housed,

may have been due to the tremendous strain to which she was subjected

during those terrible months at Bruges, when she was watching the

dying bed of a much-loved son during the day, and, dieted on green tea

and laudanum, was writing fiction most part of the night. The cause,

if such were the case, would have preceded the effect by some forty

years; but whether it is on the cards to suppose that such an effect

may have been produced after such a length of time, I have not

physiological knowledge enough to tell.

She was, I think, to an exceptional degree surrounded by very many

friends, mostly women, but including many men, at every period of her

life. But the circumstances of it caused the world of her intimates

during her youth, her middle life, and her old age, to be to a great

degree peopled by different figures.

She was during all her life full of, and fond of, fun; had an

exquisite sense of humour; and at all times valued her friends and

acquaintances more exclusively, I think, than most people do, for

their intrinsic qualities, mainly those of heart, and, not so much

perhaps intellect, accurately speaking, as brightness. There is a

passage in my brother's _Autobiography_ which grates upon my mind,

and, I think, very signally fails to hit the mark.

He writes (vol. i. p. 28):--"She loved society, affecting a somewhat

Liberal _rôle_, and professing an emotional dislike to tyrants, which

sprung from the wrongs of would-be regicides and the poverty of

patriot exiles. An Italian marquis who had escaped with only a second

shirt from the clutches of some archduke whom he had wished to

exterminate, or a French _prolétaire_ with distant ideas of

sacrificing himself to the cause of liberty, were always welcome to

the modest hospitality of her house. In after years, when marquises of

another caste had been gracious to her, she became a strong Tory, and

thought that archduchesses were sweet. But with her, politics were

always an affair of the heart, as indeed were all her convictions. Of

reasoning from causes I think that she knew nothing."

Now there is hardly a word of this in which Anthony is not more

or less mistaken; and that simply because he had not adequate

opportunities for close observation. The affection which subsisted

between my mother and my brother Anthony was from the beginning to the

end of their lives as tender and as warm as ever existed between a

mother and son. Indeed I remember that in the old days of our youth

we used to consider Anthony the Benjamin. But from the time that he

became a clerk in the Post Office to her death, he and my mother were

never together but as visitors during the limited period of a visit.

From the time that I resigned my position at Birmingham to the time

of her death, I was uninterruptedly an inmate of her house, or she of

mine. And I think that I knew her, as few sons know their mothers.

No regicide, would-be or other, ever darkened her doors. No French

_prolétaire_, or other French political refugee was ever among her

guests. She never was acquainted with any Italian marquis who had

escaped in any degree of distress from poverty. With General Pepe she

was intimate for years. But of him the world knows enough to perceive

that my brother cannot have alluded to him. And I recollect no other

marquis. It is very true that in the old Keppel Street and Harrow days

several Italian exiles, and I think some Spaniards, used to be her

occasional guests. This had come to pass by means of her intimacy with

Lady Dyer, the wife and subsequently widow of Sir Thomas Dyer, whose

years of foreign service had interested him and her in many such

persons. The friends of her friend were her friends. They were not

such by virtue of their political position and ideas. Though it is no

doubt true, that caring little about politics, and in a jesting way

(how jesting many a memorial of fun between her and Lady Dyer, and

Miss Gabell, the daughter of Dr. Gabell of Winchester, is still extant

in my hands to prove;) the general tone of the house was "Liberal."

But nothing can be farther from the truth than the idea that my mother

was led to become a Tory by the "graciousness" of any "marquises" or

great folks of any kind. I am inclined to think that there was _one_

great personage, whose (not graciousness, but) intellectual influence

_did_ impel her mind in a Conservative direction. And this was

Metternich. She had more talk with him than her book on Vienna would

lead a reader to suppose; and very far more of his mind and influence

reached her through the medium of the Princess.

To how great a degree this is likely to have been the case may be in

some measure perceived from a letter which the Princess addressed to

my mother shortly after she had left Vienna. She preserved it among a

few others, which she specially valued, and I transcribe it from the

original now before me.

* * * * *

"Vous ne pourriez croire, chère Madame Trollope, combien le portrait

que vous avez chargé le Baron Hügel de me remettre m'a fait de

plaisir!

"Il y a longtemps que je cachais au fonds de mon coeur le désir de

posséder votre portrait, qui, interressant pour le monde, est devenu

précieux pour moi, puisque j'ai le plaisir de vous connaître telle

que vous êtes, bonne, simple, bienveillante, et loin de tout ce qui

effroie et eloigne des reputations litéraires. Je remercie M. Hervieu

de Tavoir fait aussi ressemblant. Et je vous assure, chère Madame

Trollope, que rien ne pouvait me toucher aussi vivement et me faire

autant de plaisir que ce souvenir venant de vous, qui me rappelera

sans cesse les bons moments que j'ai eu la satisfaction de passer avec

vous et qui resteront à jamais chères à ma mémoire.

"MELANIE, PRINCESSE DE METTERNICH."

* * * * *

I think that the hours passed by the Princess and my mother

_tête-à-tête_, save for the presence of the artist occupied by his

work during the painting of the Princess Melanie's portrait for

my mother, were mainly the cause of the real intimacy of mind and

affection which grew up between them--though, of course, the painting

of the portrait shows that a considerable intimacy had previously

arisen. And it had been arranged that the portrait of my mother, which

was the occasion of the above letter, should be exchanged for that of

the Princess. But there had been no time amid the whirl of the Vienna

gaieties to get it executed. It was, therefore, sent from England by

Baron Hügel when he called on my mother, on visiting this country

shortly after her return from Austria.

It occurs to me here to mention a circumstance which was, I think,

the first thing to begin--not the acquaintance but--the intimacy in

question; and which may be related as possessing an interest not

confined to either of the ladies in question.

The Archduchess Sophie had graciously intimated her desire that my

mother should be presented to her, and an evening had been named

for the purpose. But a few days before--just three, if I remember

rightly--my mother caught a cold, which resulted in erysipelas,

causing her head to become swollen to nearly double its usual size!

Great was the dismay of the ladies who had arranged the meeting with

the Archduchess, chief among whom had been the Princess Melanie.

She came to my mother, and insisted upon sending to her an old

homoeopathic physician, who was her own medical attendant, and had

been Hahnemann's favourite pupil. He came, saw his patient, and

was told that what he had to do was to make her presentable by the

following Friday! He shook his head, said the time was too short--but

he would do his best. And the desired object was _fully_ attained.

I have no doubt that my mother returned from her Vienna visit a more

strongly convinced Conservative in politics than she had hitherto

been. And it does not seem to me that the modification of her

opinions in that direction, which was doubtless largely operated by

conversation with the great Conservative statesman and his _alter

ego_, the Princess, needs to be in any degree attributed to the

"graciousness" of people in high position either male or female. Is

it not very intelligible and very likely that such opinions, so set

forth, as she from day to day heard them, should have honestly and

legitimately influenced her own?

But I think that I should be speaking, if perhaps presumptuously, yet

truly, if I were to add that there was also one very far from great

personage, whose influence in the same direction was greater than even

that of Prince Metternich or of any other great folks whatever; and

that was the son in daily and almost hourly communion and conversation

with whom she lived. I also had begun life as a "Liberal," and was

such in the days when Mr. Gladstone was a high Tory. But my mind had

long been travelling in an inverse direction to his. And far too large

a number of my contemporaries distinguished and undistinguished have

been moving in the same direction for it to be at all necessary to

say that most assuredly my slowly maturing convictions were neither

generated nor fostered by any "graciousness" or other influence of

dukes or duchesses or great people of any sort.

That my mother's political ideas were in no degree "an affair of the

heart," I will not say, and by no means regret not being able to say.

But I cannot but assert that it is a great mistake to say that they

were uninfluenced by "reasoning from causes," or that the movement

of her mind in this respect was in any degree whatever due to the

caresses which my brother imagines to have caused it.

She was not a great or careful preserver of papers and letters, or

I might have been able to print here very many communications from

persons in whom the world feels an interest. Among her early and very

dear friends was Mary Mitford.

I have a very vivid remembrance of the appearance of Mary Russell

Mitford as I used to see her on the occasions of my visits to Reading,

where my grandfather's second wife and then widow was residing. She

was not corpulent, but her figure gave one the idea of almost cubical

solidity. She had a round and red full moon sort of face, from the

ample forehead above which the hair was all dragged back and stowed

away under a small and close-fitting cap, which surrounding her face

increased the effect of full-blown rotundity. But the grey eye and

even the little snub nose were full of drollery and humour, and the

lines about the generally somewhat closely shut mouth indicated

unmistakable intellectual power. There is a singular resemblance

between her handwriting and that of my mother. Very numerous letters

must have passed between them. But of all these I have been able to

find but four.

On the 3rd of April, 1832, she writes from the "Three Mile Cross," so

familiar to many readers, as follows:--

* * * * *

"My dear Mrs. Trollope,--I thank you most sincerely for your very

delightful book, as well as for its great kindness towards me; and I

wish you joy from the bottom of my heart of the splendid success which

has not merely attended but awaited its career--a happy and I trust

certain augury of your literary good fortune in every line which you

may pursue. I assure you that my political prejudices are by no

means shocked at your dislike of Republicanism. I was always a very

aristocratic Whig, and since these reforming days am well-nigh become

a staunch Tory, for pretty nearly the same reason that converted

you--a dislike to mobs in action.... Refinement follows wealth,

but not often closely, as witness the parvenu people even in dear

England.... I heard of your plunge into the Backwoods first from Mr.

Owen himself, with whom I foregathered three years ago in London,

and of whom you have given so very true and graphic a picture. What

extraordinary mildness and plausibility that man possesses! I

never before saw an instance of actual wildness--madness of theory

accompanied by such suavity and soberness of manner. Did you see my

friend, Miss Sedgwick? Her letters show a large and amiable mind, and

a little niece of nine years old, who generally writes in them, has

a style very unusual in so young a girl, and yet most youthful and

natural too.... Can you tell me if Mr. Flint be the author of _George

Mason, or the Young Backwoodsman_? I think that he is; and whether

the name of a young satirical writer be Sams or Sands? Your answering

these questions will stead me much, and I am sure that you will answer

them if you can.

"Now to your kind questions. I am getting ready a fifth and last

volume of _Our Village_ as fast as I can, though with pain and

difficulty, having hurt my left hand so much by a fall from an

open carriage that it affects the right, and makes writing very

uncomfortable to me. And I am in a most perplexed state about my

opera, not knowing whether it will be produced this season or not, in

consequence of Captain Polhill and his singers having parted. This

would not have happened had my coadjutor the composer kept to his

time. And I have still hopes that when the opera be [shall, omitted

probably] taken in (the music is even now not finished), a sense of

interest will bring the parties together again. I hope that it may,

for it will not only be a tremendous hit for all of us, but it will

take me to London and give me the pleasure of a peep at you, a

happiness to which I look forward very anxiously. I know Mr. Tom, and

like him of all things, as everybody who knows him must, and I hear

that his sisters are charming. God bless you, my dear friend. My

father joins me in every good wish, and

"I am ever most affectionately yours,

"M.R. MITFORD."

* * * * *

A few weeks later she writes a very long letter almost entirely filled

with a discussion of the desirability or non-desirability of writing

in this, that, and the other "annual" or magazine. Most of those she

alludes to are dead, and there is no interest in preserving her mainly

unfavourable remarks concerning them and their editors and publishers.

One sentence, however, is so singularly and amusingly suggestive

of change in men and women and things, that I must give it. After

reviewing a great number of the leading monthlies she says "as for

Fraser's and Blackwood's, they are hardly such as a lady likes to

write for"!

After advising my mother to stick to writing novels, she says, "I have

not a doubt that that is by far the most profitable branch of the

literary profession. If ever I be bold enough to try that arduous

path, I shall endeavour to come as near as I can to Miss Austen, my

idol. You are very good about my opera. I am sorry to tell you, and

you will be sorry to hear, that the composer has disappointed me,

that the music is not even yet ready, and that the piece is therefore

necessarily delayed till next season. I am very sorry for this on

account of the money, and because I have many friends in and near

town, yourself amongst the rest, whom I was desirous to see. But

I suppose it will be for the good of the opera to wait till the

beginning of a season. It is to be produced with extraordinary

splendour, and will, I think, be a tremendous hit. I hope also to have

a tragedy out at nearly the same time in the autumn, and _then_ I

trust we shall meet, and I shall see your dear girls.

"How glad I am to find that you partake of my great aversion to the

sort of puffery belonging to literature. I hate it! and always did,

and love you all the better for partaking of my feeling on the

subject. I believe that with me it is pride that revolts at the trash.

And then it is so false; the people are so clearly flattering to be

flattered. Oh, I hate it!!!

"Make my kindest regards [_sic_] and accept my father's.

"Ever most faithfully and affectionately yours,

"M.R. MITFORD.

"P.S.--I suppose my book will be out in about a month. I shall desire

Whittaker to send you a copy. It is the fifth and last volume."

* * * * *

The following interesting letter, franked by her friend Talfourd, and

shown only by the post-mark to have been posted on the 20th of June,

1836, is apparently only part of a letter, for it is written upon one

page, and the two "turnovers" only; and begins abruptly:--

* * * * *

"My being in London this year seems very uncertain, although if Mr.

Sergeant Talfourd's _Ion_ be played, as I believe it will, for Mr.

Macready's benefit, I shall hardly be able to resist the temptation of

going up for a very few days to be present upon that occasion. But

I scarcely ever stir. I am not strong, and am subject to a painful

complaint, which renders the service of a maid indispensable not only

to my comfort but to my health; and that, besides the expense, has an

appearance of fuss and finery, to which I have a great objection, and

to which indeed I have from station no claim. My father, too, hates to

be left even for a day. And splendid old man as he is in his healthful

and vigorous age, I cannot but recollect that he is seventy-five, and

that he is my only tie upon earth--the only relation (except, indeed,

a few very distant cousins, Russells, Greys, Ogles, and Deans, whom I

am too proud and too poor to hook on upon), my only relation in the

wide world. This is a desolate view of things; but it explains a

degree of clinging to that one most precious parent which people can

hardly comprehend. You can scarcely imagine how fine an old man he is;

how clear of head and warm of heart. He almost wept over your letter

to-day, and reads your book with singular delight and satisfaction,

in spite of the difference in politics. He feels strongly, and so, I

assure you, do I, your kind mention of me and my poor writings--a sort

of testimony always gratifying, but doubly so when the distinguished

writer is a dear friend. Even in this desolation, your success--that

of your last work [_Paris and the Parisians_] especially must be

satisfactory to you. I have no doubt that two volumes on Italy will

prove equally delightful to your readers, whilst the journey will be

the best possible remedy for all that you have suffered in spirits and

health.

"I am attempting a novel, for which Messieurs Saunders and Ottley have

agreed to give 700_l_. It is to be ready some time in September--I

mean the MS.--and I am most anxious upon every account to make it as

good as possible, one very great reason being the fair, candid, and

liberal conduct of the intended publishers. I shall do my very best.

Shall I, do you think, succeed? I take for granted that our loss is

your gain, and that you see Mr. Milman and his charming wife, who

will, I am sure, sympathise most sincerely in your present[1]

affliction.

[Footnote 1: Mr. Milman had resigned recently the incumbency of a

parish in Reading. My mother's affliction alluded to was the death of

her youngest daughter, Emily.]

"Adieu, my dear friend. I am tying myself up from letter-writing until

I have finished my novel. While I cannot but hope for one line from

you to say that you are recovering. Letters to me may always be

inclosed to Mr. Sergeant Talfourd, M.P., 2, Elm Court, Temple. Even if

he be on circuit, they will reach me after a short delay. God bless

you all. My father joins heartily in this prayer, with

"Your faithful and affectionate,

"M.R. MITFORD."

* * * * *

The next, and last which I have found, is entirely undated, but

post-marked 20th April, 1837.

* * * * *

"MY DEAR FRIEND,--I don't know when a trifle has pleased me so much as

the coincidence which set us a-writing to each other just at the same

time. I have all the north-country superstition flowing through my

veins, and do really believe in the exploded doctrine of sympathies.

That is to say, I believe in all _genial_ superstitions, and don't

like this steam-packet railway world of ours, which puts aside with so

much scorn that which for certain Shakespeare and Ben Jonson held for

true. I am charmed at your own account of yourself and your doings.

Mr. Edward Kenyon--(whose brother, John Kenyon, of Harley Place, the

most delightful man in London--of course you know him--is my especial

friend)--Mr. Edward Kenyon, who lives chiefly at Vienna, although,

I believe, in great retirement, spending 200_l_. upon himself, and

giving away 2,000_l_.--Mr. Edward Kenyon spoke of you to me as having

such opportunities of knowing both the city and the country as rarely

befell even a resident, and what you say of the peasantry gives me a

strong desire to see your book.

"A happy subject is in my mind, a great thing, especially for you

whose descriptions are so graphic. The thing that would interest me

in Austria, and for the maintenance of which one almost pardons (not

quite) their retaining that other old-fashioned thing, the State

prisons, is their having kept up in their splendour those grand old

monasteries, which are swept away now in Spain and Portugal. I have

a passion for Gothic architecture, and a leaning towards the

magnificence of the old religion, the foster-mother of all that is

finest and highest in art, and if I have such a thing as a literary

project, it is to write a romance, of which Reading Abbey in its

primal magnificence should form a part, not the least about forms

of faith, understand, but as an element of the picturesque, and as

embodying a very grand and influential part of bygone days. At present

I have just finished (since writing _Country Stories_, which people

seem so good as to like) writing all the prose (except one story about

the fashionable subject of Egyptian magicians, furnished to me by your

admirer, Henry Chorley; I wish you had seen him taking off his hat to

the walls as I showed him your father's old residence at Heckfield),

all the prose of the most splendid of the annuals, Finden's

_Tableaux_, of which my longest and best story--a Young Pretender

story--I have been obliged to omit in consequence of not calculating

on the length of my poetical contributors. But my poetry, especially

that by that wonderful young creature Miss Barrett, Mr. Kenyon, and

Mr. Procter, is certainly such as has seldom before been seen in an

annual, and joined with Finden's magnificent engravings ought to make

an attractive work.

"I am now going to my novel, if it please God to grant me health. For

the last two months I have only once crossed the outer threshold, and,

indeed, I have never been a day well since the united effects of the

tragedy and the influenza ... [word destroyed by the seal]. What will

become of that poor play is in the womb of time. But its being by

universal admission a far more striking drama than _Rienzi_, and by

very far the best thing I ever wrote, it follows almost of course,

that it will share the fate of its predecessor, and be tossed about

the theatres for three or four years to come. Of course I should be

only too happy that it should be brought out at Covent Garden under

the united auspices of Mr. Macready and Mr. Bartley.[1] But I am in

constitution and in feeling a much older person than you, my dear

friend, as well as in look, however the acknowledgment of age (I

am 48) may stand between us; and belonging to a most sanguine and

confiding person, I am of course as prone to anticipate all probable

evil as he is to forestall impossible good. He, my dear father, is,

I thank Heaven, splendidly well. He speaks of you always with much

delight, is charmed with your writings, and I do hope that you will

come to Reading and give him as well as me the great pleasure of

seeing you at our poor cottage by the roadside. You would like my

flower-garden. It is really a flower-garden becoming a duchess. People

are so good in ministering to this, my only amusement. And the effect

is heightened by passing through a labourer's cottage to get at it,

for such our poor hut literally is.

[Footnote 1: This gentleman was an old and highly valued friend of my

mother.]

"You have heard, I suppose, that Mr. Wordsworth's eldest son, who

married a daughter of Mr. Curwen, has lost nearly, if not quite, all

of his wife's portion by the sea flowing in upon the mine, and has now

nothing left but a living of 200_l._ given him by his father-in-law.

So are we all touched in turn.

"I have written to the Sedgwicks for the scarlet lilies mentioned by

Miss Martineau in her American book. Did you happen to see them in

their glory? of course they would flourish here; and having sent them

primroses, cowslips, ivy, and many other English wild flowers, which

took Theodore Sedgwick's fancy, I have a right to the return. How glad

I am to hear the good you tell me of my friend Tom. His fortune seems

now assured. My father's kindest regards.

"Ever my dear friend,

"Very faithfully yours,

"M.R. MITFORD.

"P.S.--Mr. Carey, the translator of Dante, has just been here. He

says that he visited Cowper's residence at Olney lately, and that his

garden room, which suggested mine, is incredibly small, and not

near so pretty. Come and see. You know, of course, that the 'Modern

Antiques' in _Our Village_ were Theodosia and Frances Hill, sisters of

Joseph Hill, cousins and friends of poor Cowper."

* * * * *

What the "good" was by which my "fortune was assured" I am unable

to guess. But I am sure of the sincerity of the writer's rejoicing

thereat.

Mary Mitford was a genuinely warm-hearted woman, and much of her talk

would probably be stigmatised by the young gentlemen of the present

generation, who consider the moral temperature of a fish to be "good

form," as "gush." How old Landor, who "gushed" from cradle to grave,

would have massacred and rended in his wrath such talkers! Mary

Mitford's "gush" was sincere at all events. But there is a

"hall-mark," for those who can decipher it, "without which none is

genuine."

A considerable intimacy grew up between my mother and the author of

_Highways and Byeways_ during the latter part of his residence in

England, and subsequently, when returning from Boston on leave, he

visited Florence and Rome. Many letters passed between them after

his establishment as British Consul at Boston, some characteristic

selections from which will, I doubt not, be acceptable to many

readers.

The following was written on the envelope enclosing a very long letter

from Mrs. Grattan, and was written, I think, in 1840:--

* * * * *

"I cannot avoid squeezing in a few words more just as the ship is on

the point of sailing or steaming away for England ... 'The President'

has been a fatal title this spring. Poor Harrison, a good and honest

man, died in a month after he was elected, and this fine ship, about

which we have been at this side of the Atlantic so painfully excited

ever since March, is, I fear, gone down with its gallant captain

(Roberts, with whom we crossed the Atlantic in the _British Queen_)

and poor Power, whom the public cannot afford to lose.

"Since I wrote my letter three days ago--pardon the boldly original

topic--the weather has mended considerably. Tell Tom that every tree

is also striving to turn over a new leaf, and it is well for you that

I have not another to turn too. God bless you.

"T.C.G."

* * * * *

I beg to observe that the exhortation addressed to me had no moral

significance, but was the writer's characteristic mode of exciting me

to new scribblements.

The following, also written on the envelope enclosing a letter from

Mrs. Grattan, is dated the 30th of July, 1840:--

* * * * *

"I cannot let the envelope go quite a blank, though I cannot quite

make it a prize ... In literature I have done nothing but write a

preface and notes for two new editions of the old _Highways and

Byeways_, and a short sketchy article in this month's number of the

_North American Review_ on the present state of Ireland. I am going to

follow it up in the next number in reference to the state of the Irish

in America, and I hope I shall thus do some good to a subject I have

much at heart. I have had various applications to deliver lectures at

Lyceums, &c, and to preside at public meetings for various objects.

All this I have declined. I have been very much before the public at

dinners for various purposes, and have refused many invitations to

several neighbouring cities. I must now draw back a little. I think I

have hitherto done good to the cause of peace and friendship between

the countries. But I know these continued public appearances will

expose me to envy, hatred, and malice. I hope to do something

historical by and by, and perhaps an occasional article in the _North

American Review_. But anything like light writing I never can again

turn to."

* * * * *

From a very long letter written on the 13th of May, 1841, I will give

a, few extracts:--

* * * * *

"MY DEAR AND VALUED FRIEND,--Your letter from Penryth [_sic_] without

date, but bearing the ominous post-mark, 'April 1st,' has completely

made a fool of me, in that sense which implies that nothing else can

excuse a grey head and a seared heart for thinking and feeling that

there are such things in the world as affection and sincerity. Being

fond of flying in the face of reason, and despising experience,

whenever they lay down general rules, I am resolved to believe in

exceptions, to delight in instances, and to be quite satisfied that I

have 'troops of friends'--you being one of the troopers--no matter how

few others there may be, or where they are to be found.

"You really must imagine how glad we were to see your handwriting

again, and I may say also, how surprised; for it passeth our

understanding to discover how you _make_ time for any correspondence

at all. We have followed all your literary doings step by step since

we left Europe, and we never cease wondering at your fertility and

rejoicing at your success. But I am grieved to think that all this is

at the cost of your comfort. Or is it that you wrote in a querulous

mood, when you said those sharp things about your grey goose quill.

Surely composition must be pleasant to you. No one who writes so fast

and so well can find it actually irksome. I am aware that people

sometimes think they find it so. But we may deceive ourselves on the

dark as well as on the bright side of our road, and more easily,

because it _is_ the dark. That is to say, we may not only cheat

ourselves with false hopes of good, but with false notions of

evil, which proves, if it proves anything just now, that you are

considerably mistaken when you fancy writing to be a bore, and that I

know infinitely better than you do what you like or dislike."

It is rather singular to find a literary _workman_ talking in this

style. Grattan was not a fertile writer, and, I must suppose, was

never a very industrious one. But he surely must have known that talk

about the pleasures of "composition" was wholly beside the mark.

_That_ may be, often is, pleasant enough, and if the thoughts could

be telephoned from the brain to the types it would all be mighty

agreeable; and the world would be very considerably more overwhelmed

with authorship than it is. It is the "grey goose quill" work, the

necessity for incarnating the creatures of the brain in black and

white, that is the world's protection from this avalanche. And I for

one do not understand how anybody who, eschewing the sunshine and

the fields and the song of birds, or the enjoyment of other people's

brain-work, has glued himself to his desk for long hours, can say

or imagine that his task is, or has been, aught else than hard and

distasteful work, demanding unrelaxing self-denial and industry. And

however fine the frenzy in which the poet's eye may roll while he

builds the lofty line, the work of putting some thousands of them on

the paper when built must be as irksome to him as the penny-a-liner's

task is to _him_--more so, in that the mind of the latter does not

need to be forcibly and painfully restrained from rushing on to the

new pastures which invite it, and curbed to the pack-horse pace of the

quill-driving process.

"You must not," he continues, "allow yourself to be, or even to fancy

that you are tired or tormented, or worn out. Work the mine to the

last. Pump up every drop out of the well. Put money i' thy purse; and

add story after story to that structure of fame, which will enable you

to do as much to that house by the lake side, where I _will_ hope to

see you yet."

* * * * *

He then goes on to speak at considerable length of the society of

Boston, praising it much, yet saying that it is made more charming to

a visitor than to a permanent resident. "In this it differs," he says,

"from almost all the countries I have lived in in Europe, except

Holland."

Speaking of a visit to Washington during the inauguration of General

Harrison, which seems to have delighted him much, he says he travelled

back with a family, "at least with the master and mistress of it,

of whom I must tell you something. Mr. Paige is a merchant, and

brother-in-law of Mr. Webster; Mrs. Paige a niece of Judge Story. From

this double connection with two of the first men in the country their

family associations are particularly agreeable. Mrs. Paige is one of

three sisters, all very handsome, spirited, and full of talent. One is

married to Mr. Webster's eldest son. Another, Mrs. Joy, has for her

husband an idle gentleman, a rare thing in this place. Mrs. Paige was

in Europe two years ago with Mr. and Mrs. Webster senior (the latter

by the bye is a _most_ charming person) and had the advantage of

seeing society in England and France in its best aspect, and is one

who can compare as well as see ... Among the men [of the Boston

society] are Dr. Chinning, a prophet in our country, a pamphleteer

in his own; Bancroft, _the_ historian of America, a man of superior

talents and great agreeability, but a black sheep in society, on

account of his Van Buren politics, against whom the white sheep of the

Whig party will not rub themselves; Prescott, the author of _Ferdinand

and Isabella_, a handsome, half blind shunner of the vanities of the

world, with some others, who read and write a good deal, and no one

the wiser for it. Edward Everett is in Italy, where you will surely

meet him [we saw a good deal of him]. He is rather formal than

cold, if all I hear whispered of him be true; of elegant taste in

literature, though not of easy manners, and altogether an admirable

specimen of an American orator and scholar. At Cambridge, three miles

off, we have Judge Story, of the Supreme Court, eloquent, deeply

learned, garrulous, lively, amiable, excellent in all and every way

that a mortal can be. He is decidedly the gem of this western world.

Mr. Webster is now settled at Washington, though here at this moment

on a visit to Mrs. Paige. Among our neighbouring notabilities is John

Quincy Adams, an ex-President of the United States, ex-Minister at

half the courts in Europe, and now at seventy-five, a simple Member of

Congress, hard as a piece of granite, and cold as a lump of ice."

Speaking of his having very frequently appeared at public meetings

during the first year of his Consulship, and of his having since that

refrained from such appearances, he continues: "I was doubtful as to

the way my being so much _en evidence_ might be relished _at home_. Of

late public matters have been on so ticklish a footing, that all the

less a British functionary was seen the better.

"In literature I have done nothing barring a couple of articles on

Ireland and the Irish in America, a subject I have much at heart.

But much as I feel for them and with them, I refused dining with my

countrymen on St. Patrick's Day because they had the _gaucherie_ (of

which I had previous notice), to turn the festive meeting into a

political one, by giving 'O'Connell and success to repeal' as one of

their 'regular' toasts, and by leaving out the Queen's health, which

they gave when I dined with them last year."

Then after detailed notices of the movements of his sons, he goes on:

"We have many plans in perspective, Niagara, Canada, Halifax, the

mountains, the springs, the sea; the result of which you shall know as

soon as we receive a true and faithful account of your adventures in

just as many pages as you can afford; but Tom must in the meantime

send me a long letter ... Tell Tom I have half resolved to give up

punning and take to repartee. A young fellow said to me the other day,

'Ah! Mr. Consul (as I am always called), I wish I could discover a

new pleasure.' 'Try virtue!' was my reply. A pompous ex-Governor said

swaggeringly to me at the last dinner party at which I assisted,

'Well, Mr. Consul, I suppose you Europeans think us semi-civilised

here in America?' 'Almost!' said I. Now ask Tom if that was not pretty

considerable smart. But assure him at the same time, it is nothing at

all to what I _could_ do in the way of impertinence! Need I say how

truly and affectionately we all love you?

"T.C. GRATTAN."

* * * * *

I wrote back that I would enter the lists with him in the matter of

impertinence; and as a sample told him that I thought he had better

return to the punning.

I could, I doubt not, find among my mother's papers some further

letters that might be worth printing or quoting. But my waning space

warns me that I must not indulge myself with doing so.

What I Remember, Volume 2 · 第 17 / 20 章