When the Hurons in Upper Canada in 1647 began to sink under the

fearful blows dealt by the Five Nations, the Susquehannas sent an

embassy to offer them aid against the common enemy. (_Gendron,

Quelques Particularitez du Pays des Hurons_, p. 7). Nor was the offer

one of little value, for the Susquehannas could put in the field

1,300 warriors (_Relation de la Nouvelle France_, 1647–8, p. 58)

trained to the use of fire arms and European modes of war by three

Swedish soldiers whom they had obtained to instruct them. (_Proud’s

Pennsylvania_, I, p. 111; _Bozman’s Maryland_, II, p. 273.) Before

interposing in the war, they began by negotiation, and sent an embassy

to Onondaga to urge the cantons to peace. (_Relation_, 1648, p. 58).

The Iroquois refused, and the Hurons, sunk in apathy, took no active

steps to secure the aid of the friendly Susquehannas.

That tribe, however, maintained its friendly intercourse with its

European neighbors, and in 1652 Sawahegeh, Auroghteregh, Scarhuhadigh,

Rutchogah and Nathheldianeh, in presence of a Swedish deputy, ceded to

Maryland all the territory from the Patuxent river to Palmer’s island,

and from the Choptauk to the northeast branch north of Elk river.

(_Bozman’s Maryland_, II, p. 683).

Four years later the Iroquois, grown insolent by their success in

almost annihilating their kindred tribes north and south of Lake Erie,

the Wyandots, Dinondadies, Neuters and Eries, provoked a war with the

Susquehannas, plundering their hunters on Lake Ontario. (_Relation de

la Nouvelle France_, 1657, pp. 11, 18).

It was at this important period in their history that Alsop knew and

described them to us.

In 1661 the small-pox, that scourge of the native tribes, broke out

in their town, sweeping off many and enfeebling the nation terribly.

War had now begun in earnest with the Five Nations; and though the

Susquehannas had some of their people killed near their town (_Hazard’s

Annals_, 341–7), they in turn pressed the Cayugas so hard that some of

them retreated across Lake Ontario to Canada (_Relation de la Nouvelle

France_, 1661, p. 39, 1668, p. 20). They also kept the Senecas in such

alarm that they no longer ventured to carry their peltries to New York,

except in caravans escorted by six hundred men, who even took a most

circuitous route. (_Relation_, 1661, p. 40). A law of Maryland passed

May 1, 1661, authorized the governor to aid the Susquehannas.

Smarting under constant defeat, the Five Nations solicited French

aid (_Relation de la Nouvelle France_, 1662–3, p. 11, 1663–4, p. 33;

_Charlevoix_, II, p. 134), but in April, 1663, the Western cantons

raised an army of eight hundred men to invest and storm the fort of the

Susquehannas. They embarked on Lake Ontario, according to the French

account, and then went overland to the Susquehanna. On reaching the

fort, however, they found {120} it well defended on the river side,

and on the land side with two bastions in European style with cannon

mounted and connected by a double curtain of large trees. After some

trifling skirmishes the Iroquois had recourse to stratagem. They sent

in a party of twenty-five men to treat of peace and ask provisions to

enable them to return. The Susquehannas admitted them, but immediately

burned them all alive before the eyes of their countrymen. (_Relation

de la Nouvelle France_, 1663, p. 10). The Pennsylvania writers,

(_Hazard’s Annals of Pennsylvania_, p. 346) make the Iroquois force one

thousand six hundred, and that of the Susquehannas only one hundred.

They add that when the Iroquois retreated, the Susquehannas pursued

them, killing ten and taking as many.

After this the war was carried on in small parties, and Susquehanna

prisoners were from time to time burned at Oneida, Onondaga, Seneca and

Cayuga (_Relations de la Nouvelle France_, 1668 to 1673), and their

prisoners doubtless at Canoge on the Susquehanna. In the fall of 1669

the Susquehannas, after defeating the Cayugas, offered peace, but the

Cayugas put their ambassador and his nephew to death, after retaining

him five or six months; the Oneidas having taken nine Susquehannas

and sent some to Cayuga, with forty wampum belts to maintain the war.

(_Relation de la Nouvelle France_, 1670, p. 68.)

At this time the great war chief of the Susquehannas was one styled

Hochitagete or Barefoot (_Relation de la Nouvelle France_, 1670, p.

47); and raving women and crafty medicine men deluded the Iroquois

with promises of his capture and execution at the stake (_Relation_,

1670, p. 47), and a famous medicine man of Oneida appeared after death

to order his body to be taken up and interred on the trail leading to

the Susquehannas as the only means of saving that canton from ruin.

(_Relation_, 1672, p. 20.)

Towards the summer of 1672 a body of forty Cayugas descended the

Susquehanna in canoes, and twenty Senecas went by land to attack

the Susquehannas in their fields; but a band of sixty Andasté or

Susquehanna boys, the oldest not over sixteen, attacked the Senecas,

and routed them, killing one brave and taking another. Flushed with

victory they pushed on to attack the Cayugas, and defeated them also,

killing eight and wounding with arrow, knife and hatchet, fifteen or

sixteen more, losing, however, fifteen or sixteen of their gallant

band. (_Relation_, 1672, p. 24.)

At this time the Susquehannas or Andastés were so reduced by war and

pestilence that they could muster only three hundred warriors. In 1675,

however, the Susquehannas were completely overthrown (_Etat Present_,

1675, manuscript; _Relation_, 1676, p. 2; _Relations Inédites_, II, p.

44; _Colden’s Five Nations_, I, p. 126), but unfortunately we have no

details whatever as to the forces which effected it, or the time or

manner of their utter defeat.

A party of about one hundred retreated into Maryland, and occupied

some abandoned Indian forts. Accused of the murder of some settlers,

apparently slain by the Senecas, they sent five of their chiefs to

the Maryland and Virginia troops, under Washington and Brent, who

went out in {121} pursuit. Although coming as deputies, and showing

the Baltimore medal and certificate of friendship, these chiefs were

cruelly put to death. The enraged Susquehannas then began a terrible

border war, which was kept till their utter destruction (S. F.

Streeter’s Destruction of the Susquehannas, _Historical Magazine_,

I, p. 65). The rest of the tribe, after making overtures to Lord

Baltimore, submitted to the Five Nations, and were allowed to retain

their ancient grounds. When Pennsylvania was settled, they became known

as Conestogas, and were always friendly to the colonists of Penn, as

they had been to the Dutch and Swedes. In 1701 Canoodagtoh, their king,

made a treaty with Penn, and in the document they are styled Minquas,

Conestogos or Susquehannas. They appear as a tribe in a treaty in 1742,

but were dwindling away. In 1763 the feeble remnant of the tribe became

involved in the general suspicion entertained by the colonists against

the red men, arising out of massacres on the borders. To escape danger

the poor creatures took refuge in Lancaster jail, and here they were

all butchered by the Paxton boys, who burst into the place. Parkman in

his _Conspiracy of Pontiac_, p. 414, details the sad story.

The last interest of this unfortunate tribe centres in Logan, the

friend of the white man, whose speech is so familiar to all, that we

must regret that it has not sustained the historical scrutiny of Brantz

Mayer (_Tahgahjute; or, Logan and Capt. Michael Cresap_, Maryland Hist.

Soc., May, 1851; and 8vo, Albany, 1867). Logan was a Conestoga, in

other words a Susquehanna.

_Note_ 47, _page_ 71.

The language of the Susquehannas, as Smith remarks, differed from that

of the Virginian tribes generally. As already stated, it was one of the

dialects of the Huron-Iroquois, and its relation to other members of

the family may be seen by the following table of the numerals:

Susquehanna

or Minqua. Hochelaga. Huron. Mohawk. Onondaga.

1. Onskat, Segada, Eskate, Easka, Unskat.

2. Tiggene, Tigneny, Téni, Tekeni, Tegni.

3. Axe, Asche, Hachin, Aghsea, Achen.

4. Raiene, Honnacon, Dac, Kieri, Gayeri.

5. Wisck, Ouiscon, Ouyche, Wisk, Wisk.

6. Jaiack, Indahir, Houhahea, Yayak, Haiak.

7. Tzadack, Ayaga, Sotaret, Jatak, Tchiatak.

8. Tickerom, Addegue, Attaret, Satego, Tegeron.

9. Waderom, Madellon, Nechon, Tiyohto, Waderom.

10. Assan, Assem, Oyeri.

{122}

_Note_ 48, _page_ 73.

Smith thus describes them: “Sixty of those Sasquesahanocks came to vs

with skins, Bowes, Arrows, Targets, Beads, swords and Tobacco pipes for

presents. Such great and well proportioned men are seldome seene, for

they seemed like Giants to the English; yea and to the neighbours, yet

seemed of an honest and simple disposition, with much adoe restrained

from adoring vs as Gods. Those are the strangest people of all those

Countries, both in language and attire; for their language it may well

beseeme their proportions, sounding from them as a voyce in a vault.

Their attire is the skinnes of Beares, and Woolues, some have Cassacks

made of Beares heads and skinnes, that a mans head goes through the

skinnes neck, and the eares of the Beare fastened to his shoulders,

the nose and teeth hanging downe his breast, another Beares face split

behind him, and at the end of the Nose hung a Pawe, the halfe sleeues

comming to the elbowes were the neckes of Beares and the armes through

the mouth with the pawes hanging at their noses. One had the head of a

Wolfe hanging in a chaine for a Iewell, his tobacco pipe three-quarters

of a yard long, prettily carued with a Bird, a Deere or some such

devise at the great end, sufficient to beat out ones braines; with

Bowes, Arrowes and Clubs, suitable to their greatnesse. They are scarce

known to Powhatan. They can make near 600 able men, and are palisadoed

in their Townes to defend them from the Massawomekes, their mortal

enemies. Five of their chief Werowances came aboord vs and crossed the

Bay in their Barge. The picture of the greatest of them is signified in

the Mappe. The calfe of whose leg was three-quarters of a yard about,

and all the rest of his limbes so answerable to that proportion, that

he seemed the goodliest man we ever beheld. His hayre, the one side

was long, the other shore close with a ridge over his crowue like a

cocks combe. His arrowes were five-quarters long, headed with the

splinters of a White christall-like stone, in form of a heart, an inch

broad, and an inch and a halfe or more long. These he wore in a Woolues

skinne at his backe for his quiver, his bow in one hand and his club in

the other, as described.”—_Smith’s Voyages_ (Am. ed.), I, p. 119–20.

Tattooing referred to by our author, was an ancient Egyptian custom,

and is still retained by the women. See _Lane’s Modern Egyptians_, etc.

It was forbidden to the Jews in _Leviticus_, 19: 28.

_Note_ 49, _page_ 74.

“_Purchas, his Pilgrimage_, or Relations of the World, and the

Religions observed in all Ages and Places discovered, from the Creation

unto this present,” 1 vol., folio, 1613. In spite of Alsop, Purchas is

still highly esteemed. {123}

_Note_ 50, _page_ 75.

As to their treatment of prisoners, see _Lafitau, Moeurs des Sauvages_,

II, p. 260.

_Note_ 51, _page_ 75.

Smith thus locates their town: “The Sasquesahannocks inhabit vpon the

cheefe spring of these foure branches of the Bayes head, one day’s

journey higher than our barge could passe for rocks,” vol. I, p. 182.

Campanius thus describes their town, which he represents as twelve

miles from New Sweden: “They live on a high mountain, very steep

and difficult to climb; there they have a fort or square building,

surrounded with palisades. There they have guns and small iron cannon,

with which they shoot and defend themselves, and take with them when

they go to war.”—_Campanius’s Nye Sverige_, p. 181; Du Ponceau’s

translation, p. 158. A view of a Sasquesahannock town is given in

_Montanus, De Nieuwe en Onbekende Weereld_ (1671), p. 136, based

evidently on Smith. De Lisle’s Map, dated June, 1718, lays down Canoge,

Fort des Indiens Andastés ou Susquehanocs at about 40° N.; but I find

the name nowhere else.

_Note_ 52, _page_ 77.

Scalping was practiced by the Scythians. (_Herodotus_, book IV, and in

the second book of _Macchabees_, VII, 4, 7). Antiochus is said to have

caused two of the seven Macchabee brothers to be scalped. “The skin

of the head with the hairs being drawn off.” The torture of prisoners

as here described originated with the Iroquois, and spread to nearly

all the North American tribes. It was this that led the Algonquins to

give the Iroquois tribes the names Magoué, Nadoué or Nottaway, which

signified cruel. _Lafitau, Moeurs des Sauvages_, II, p. 287.

_Note_ 53, _page_ 78.

The remarks here as to religion are vague. The Iroquois and Hurons

recognized Aireskoi or Agreskoe, as the great deity, styling him also

Teharonhiawagon. As to the Hurons, see _Sagard, Histoire du Canada_, p.

485. The sacrifice of a child, as noted by Alsop, was unknown in the

other tribes of this race, and is not mentioned by Campanius in regard

to this one. {124}

_Note_ 54, _page_ 78.

The priests were the medicine men in all probability; no author

mentioning any class that can be regarded properly as priests.

_Note_ 55, _page_ 78.

The burial rites here described resemble those of the Iroquois

(_Lafitau, Moeurs des Sauvages_, II, pp. 389, 407) and of the Hurons,

as described by Sagard (_Histoire du Canada_, p. 702) in the manner of

placing the dead body in a sitting posture; but there it was wrapped

in furs, encased in bark and set upon a scaffold till the feast of the

dead.

_Note_ 56, _page_ 79.

Sagard, in his _Huron Dictionary_, gives village, _andata_; he is in

the fort or village, _andatagon_; which is equivalent to _Connadago_,

_nd_ and _nn_ being frequently used for each other.

_Note_ 57, _page_ 80.

For the condition of the women in a kindred tribe, compare _Sagard,

Histoire du Canada_, p. 272; _Grand Voyage_, p. 130; _Perrot, Moeurs et

Coustumes des Sauvages_, p. 30.

_Note_ 58, _page_ 80.

Among the Iroquois the husband elect went to the wife’s cabin and sat

down on the mat opposite the fire. If she accepted him she presented

him a bowl of hominy and sat down beside him, turning modestly away. He

then ate some and soon after retired.—_Lafitau, Moeurs des Sauvages_,

I, p. 566.

_Note_ 59, _page_ 81.

Sagard, in his _Histoire du Canada_, p. 185, makes a similar remark as

to the Hurons, a kindred tribe, men and women acting as here stated,

and he says that in this they resembled the ancient Egyptians. Compare

_Hennepin, Moeurs des Sauvages_, p. 54; _Description d’un Pays plus

grand que l’Europe, Voyages au Nord_, V, p. 341. {125}

_Note_ 60, _page_ 96.

This characteristic of the active trading propensities of the early

settlers will apply to the present race of Americans in a fourfold

degree.

_Note_ 61, _page_ 96.

One who brought goods to Maryland without following such advice as

Alsop gives, describes in Hudibrastic verse his doleful story in the

_Sot Weed Factor_, recently reprinted.

_Note_ 62, _page_ 96.

For an account of this gentleman, see ante, p. 13.

_Note_ 63, _page_ 97.

The rebellion in Maryland, twice alluded to by our author in his

letters, was a very trifling matter. On the restoration of Charles II,

Lord Baltimore sent over his brother Philip Calvert as governor, with

authority to proceed against Governor Fendall, who, false alike to all

parties, was now scheming to overthrow the proprietary government. The

new governor was instructed on no account to permit Fendall to escape

with his life; but Philip Calvert was more clement than Lord Baltimore,

and though Fendall made a fruitless effort to excite the people to

opposition, he was, on his voluntary submission, punished by a merely

short imprisonment. This clemency he repaid by a subsequent attempt to

excite a rebellion.—_McMahon’s History of Maryland_, pp. 213–14, citing

Council Proceedings from 1656 to 1668, liber H. H., 74 to 82.

THE END.

TRANSCRIBER’S NOTE

Original spelling and grammar have been generally retained, with

some exceptions noted below. Original small caps (and also one

phrase in bold type) are now uppercase. Italics look _like this_.

Enlarged curly brackets, used to combine information from two or

more lines of text have been discarded. The transcriber produced

the cover image and hereby assigns it to the public domain.

The primary source of page images was archive.org—search for

“characterofprovi00alsorich”. Secondary sources, also at archive.org,

were “characterofprovince00also” and “gowansbibliothec00gowaiala”

There were two series of page numbers printed on each page of the

main text. One series, printed with gaps from 10 to 125, was printed

at the top of each page in an ornamented header. This series has been

retained, and is shown in curly brackets like this: {52}. Page one of

this series, inferred by counting back from ten, is the title page of

_Gowans’ Bibliotheca Americana 5_, New York, William Gowans, 1869. The

other series, printed with gaps from 417 to 533, in smaller type at the

bottom of each page, has been discarded. The book actually transcribed

herein was a reissue of _Gowans’ Bibliotheca Americana 5_, titled

_Fund-Publication, No. 15. A Character of the Province of Maryland_,

The Maryland Historical Society, Baltimore, 1880.

Page 106. Changed “capaple” to “capable”.

Page 117. Changed “p. II, 397” to “II, p. 397”.

Page 119. Changed “p. 7),” to “p. 7).”. Changed “1647–8. p. 58)” to

“1647–8, p. 58)”. Also “p. 273. Before” to “p. 273.) Before”.

Page 121. “Waderom,” to “Waderom.”, in the last column of the table.

Page 122. Added left double quotation mark to ‘_Purchas, his

Pilgrimage_, or Relations’, to match the one after ‘this present,’.

Page 124. Changed “p, 566” to “p. 566”.

A Character of the Province of Maryland Described in four distinct parts; also a small Treatise on the Wild and Naked Indians (or Susquehanokes) of Maryland, their customs, manners, absurdities, and religion; together with a collection of historical letters. · 第 6 / 6 段