CHAPTER XXII.

It is the commandment of the Moral Philosophers that, of the good

gifts whereof they have spoken, Man ought to put his thought and his

anxious care into the effort to make them as useful as possible to the

receiver. Wherefore I, wishing to be obedient to such a mandate,

intend to render this my BANQUET [Convito] as useful as possible in

each one of its parts. And because in this part it occurs to me to be

able to reason somewhat concerning the sweetness of Human Happiness, I

consider that there could not be a more useful discourse, especially

to those who know it not; for as the Philosopher says in the first

book of Ethics, and Tullius in that book Of the Ends of Good and Evil,

he shoots badly at the mark who sees it not. Even thus a man can but

ill advance towards this sweet joy who does not begin with a

perception of it. Wherefore, since it is our final rest for which we

live and labour as we can, most useful and most necessary it is to see

this mark in order to aim at it the bow of this our work. And it is

most essential to make it inviting to those who do not see the mark

when simply pointed out. Leaving alone, then, the opinion which

Epicurus the philosopher had concerning it, and that which Zeno

likewise had, I intend to come summarily to the true opinion of

Aristotle and of the other Peripatetics. As it is said above, of the

Divine Goodness sown and infused in us, from the original cause of our

production, there springs up a shoot, which the Greeks term "hormen,"

that is to say, the natural appetite of the soul.

And as it is with the blades of corn which, when they first shoot

forth, have in the beginning one similar appearance, being in the

grass-like stage, and then, by process of time, they become unlike, so

this Natural appetite, which springs from the Divine Grace, in the

beginning appears as it were not unlike that which comes nakedly from

Nature; but with it, even as the herbage born of various grains of

corn, it has the same appearance, as it were: and not only in the

blades of corn, but in men and in beasts there is the same similitude.

And it appears that every animal, as soon as it is born, both rational

and brute beast, loves itself, and fears and flies from those things

which are adverse to it, and hates them, then proceeding as has been

said. And there begins a difference between them in the progress of

this Natural appetite, for the one keeps to one road, and the other to

another; even as the Apostle says: "Many run to the goal, but there is

but one who reaches it." Even thus these Human appetites from the

beginning run through different paths, and there is one path alone

which leads us to our peace; and therefore, leaving all the others

alone, it is for the treatise to follow the course of that one who

begins well.

I say, then, that from the beginning a man loves himself, although

indistinctly; then comes the distinguishing of those things which to

him are more or less; to be more or less loved or hated; and he

follows after and flies from either more or less according as the

right habit distinguishes, not only in the other things which he loves

in a secondary manner, for he even distinguishes in himself which

thing he loves principally; and perceiving in himself divers parts,

those which are the noblest in him he loves most. But, since the

noblest part of man is the Mind, he loves that more than the Body; and

thus, loving himself principally, and through himself other things,

and of himself loving the better part most, it is evident that he

loves the Mind more than the Body or any other thing; and the Mind it

is that, naturally, more than any other thing he ought to love.

Then, if the Mind always delights in the use of the beloved thing,

which is the fruit of love, the use of that thing which is especially

beloved is especially delightful: the use of our Mind is especially

delightful to us, and that which is especially delightful to us

becomes our Happiness and our Beatitude, beyond which there is no

greater delight or pleasure, nor any equal to it, as may be seen by

him who looks well at the preceding argument.

And no one ought to say that every appetite is Mind; for here one

understands Mind solely as that which belongs to the Rational part,

that is, the Will and the Intellect; so that if any one should wish to

call Mind the appetite of the Senses, here it has no place, nor can it

have any abiding; for no one doubts that the Rational appetite is more

noble than the Sensual, and therefore more to be loved; and so is this

of which we are now speaking.

The use of our Mind is double, that is to say, Practical and

Speculative (it is Practical insomuch as it has the power of acting);

both the one and the other are delightful in their use, but that of

Contemplation is the most pleasing, as has been said above. The use of

the Practical is to act in or through us virtuously, that is to say,

honestly or uprightly, with Prudence, with Temperance, with Courage,

and with Justice. The use of the Speculative is not to work or act

through us, but to consider the works of God and of Nature. This and

the other form our Beatitude and Supreme Happiness, which is the

sweetness of the before-mentioned seed, as now clearly appears. To

this often such seed does not attain, through being ill cultivated, or

through its tender growing shoots being perverted. In like manner it

is quite possible, by much correction and cultivation of him into whom

this seed does not fall primarily, to induce it by the process of

steady endeavour after goodness, so that it may attain to the power of

bearing this fruit. And it is, as it were, a method of grafting the

nature of another upon a different stock.

No man, therefore, can hold himself excused; for if from his natural

root the man does not produce sweet fruit, it is possible for him to

have it by the process of grafting; and in fact there would be as many

who should be grafted as those are who, sprung from a good root, allow

themselves to grow degenerate.

Of the two ways of goodness, one is more full of bliss than the other,

as is the Speculative, which is the use of our noblest part without

any alloy, and which, for the root, Love, as has been said, is

especially to be loved as the intellect. And in this life it is not

possible to have the use of this part perfectly, which is to see God,

who is the Supreme Being to be comprehended by the Mind, except

inasmuch as the intellect considers Him and beholds Him through His

effects, His Works. And that we may seek this Beatitude as the

supreme, and not the other, that is, that of the Active Life, the

Gospel of St. Mark teaches us, if we will look at it well.

Mark says that Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Mary

Salome went to find the Saviour in the Tomb, and they found Him not,

but they found a youth clothed in white, who said to them: "You seek

the Saviour, and I tell you that He is not here; and therefore be not

affrighted, but go and tell His disciples and Peter that He goeth

before you into Galilee; and there ye shall see Him, as He said unto

you." By these three women may be understood the three sects of the

Active Life, that is to say, the Epicureans, the Stoics, and the

Peripatetics, who go to the Tomb, that is to say, to the present

World, which is the receptacle of corruptible things, and seek for the

Saviour, that is, Beatitude, and they find it not; but they find a

youth in white garments, who, according to the testimony of Matthew,

and also of the other Evangelists, was an Angel of God. And therefore

Matthew said: "The Angel of the Lord descended from Heaven, and came

and rolled back the stone from the door, and sat upon it. His

countenance was like lightning, and his raiment white as snow." The

Angel is this Nobility of ours which comes from God, as it has been

said, of which our argument speaks, and says to each one of these

sects, that is, to whoever seeks perfect Happiness in the Active Life,

that it is not here; but go and tell the disciples and Peter, that is,

tell those who seek for it and those who are gone astray like Peter,

who had denied Him, that He will go before them into Galilee; meaning

that the Beatitude or Happiness will go before us into Galilee, that

is, into Contemplation; Galilee is as much as to say, Whiteness.

Whiteness is a colour full of material light, more so than any other;

and thus, Contemplation is more full of Spiritual light than any other

thing which is below.

And it says, "He will go before you," but it does not say, "He will be

with you," to make us understand that in our contemplation God always

goes before. Nor is it ever possible to us to attain to Him here, to

Him, our Supreme Bliss. And it says, "There shall ye see Him, as He

said unto you;" that is to say, there you will receive of His

Sweetness, that is, of the Happiness as it is promised to you here, as

it is established that you may receive it.

And thus it appears that our Beatitude, this Happiness of which we

speak, first we are able to find imperfect in the Active Life, that

is, in the operations of the Moral Virtues, and then almost perfect in

the operations of the Intellectual Virtues; which two operations are

speedy and most direct ways to lead to the Supreme Bliss, which it is

not possible to have here below, even as appears by that which has

been said.

The Banquet (Il Convito) · 第 22 / 30 章