I. What Barnabas saw.

The grace of God here has very probably the specific meaning of the

miracle-working gift of the Holy Spirit. That is rendered probable by

the analogy of other instances recorded in the Acts of the Apostles,

such as Peter's experience at Caesarea, where all his hesitations and

reluctance were swept away when 'the Holy Ghost fell on them as on us

at the beginning, and they spake with tongues.' If so, what convinced

Barnabas that these uncircumcised Gentiles were Christians like

himself, may have been their similar possession of the visible and

audible effects of that gift of God. But the language does not compel

this interpretation; and the absence of all distinct reference to these

extraordinary powers as existing there, among the new converts at

Antioch, may be intended to mark a difference in the nature of the

evidence. At any rate, the possibly intentional generality of the

expression is significant and fairly points to an extension of the

spiritual gifts much beyond the limits of miraculous powers. There are

other ways by which the grace of God may be seen and heard, thank God!

than by speaking with tongues and working miracles; and the first

lesson of our text is that wherever that grace is made visible by its

appropriate manifestations, there we are to recognise a brother.

Augustine said, 'Where Christ is there is the Church,' and that is

true, but vague; for the question still remains, 'And where _is_

Christ?' The only satisfying answer is, Christ is wherever Christlike

men manifest a life drawn from, and kindred with, His life. And so the

true form of the dictum for practical purposes comes to be: 'Where the

grace of Christ is visible, there is the Church.'

That great truth is sinned against and denied in many ways. Most

chiefly, perhaps, by the successors in modern garb of the more Jewish

portion of that Church at Jerusalem who sent Barnabas to Antioch. They

had no objection to Gentiles entering the Church, but they must come in

by the way of circumcision; they quite believed that it was Christ who

saved, and His grace which sanctified, but they thought that His grace

would only flow in a given channel; and so do their modern

representatives, who exalt sacraments, and consequently priests, to the

same place as the Judaizers in the early Church did the rite of the old

Covenant. Such teachers have much to say about the notes of the Church,

and have elaborated a complicated system of identification by which you

may know the genuine article, and unmask impostors. The attempt is

about as wise as to try to weave a network fine enough to keep back a

stream. The water will flow through the closest meshes, and when Christ

pours out the Spirit, He is apt to do it in utter disregard of notes of

the Church, and of channels of sacramental grace.

We Congregationalists, who have no orders, no sacraments, no Apostolic

succession; who in order not to break loose from Christ and conscience

have had to break loose from 'Catholic tradition,' and have been driven

to separation by the true schismatics, who have insisted on another

bond of Church unity than union to Christ, are denied nowadays a place

in His Church.

The true answer to all that arrogant assumption and narrow pedantry

which confine the free flow of the water of life to the conduits of

sacraments and orders, and will only allow the wind that bloweth where

it listeth to make music in the pipes of their organs, is simply the

homely one which shivered a corresponding theory to atoms in the fair

open mind of Barnabas.

The Spirit of Christ at work in men's hearts, making them pure and

gentle, simple and unworldly, refining their characters, elevating

their aims, toning their whole being into accord with the music of His

life, is the true proof that men are Christians, and that communities

of such men are Churches of His. Mysterious efficacy is claimed for

Christian ordinances. Well, the question is a fair one: Is the type of

Christian character produced within these sacred limits, which we are

hopelessly outside, conspicuously higher and more manifestly Christlike

than that nourished by no sacraments, and grown not under glass, but in

the unsheltered open? Has not God set His seal on these communities to

which we belong? With many faults for which we have to be, and are,

humble before Him, we can point to the lineaments of the family

likeness, and say, 'Are they Hebrews? so are we. Are they Israelites?

so are we. Are they the seed of Abraham? so are we.'

Once get that truth wrought into men's minds, that the true test of

Christianity is the visible presence of a grace in character which is

evidently God's, and whole mountains of prejudice and error melt away.

We are just as much in danger of narrowing the Church in accordance

with our narrowness as any 'sacramentarian' of them all. We are tempted

to think that no good thing can grow up under the baleful shadow of

that tree, a sacerdotal Christianity. We are tempted to think that all

the good people are Dissenters, just as Churchmen are to think that

nobody can be a Christian who prays without a prayer-book. Our own type

of denominational character--and there is such a thing--comes to be

accepted by us as the all but exclusive ideal of a devout man; and we

have not imagination enough to conceive, nor charity enough to believe

in, the goodness which does not speak our dialect, nor see with our

eyes. Dogmatical narrowness has built as high walls as ceremonial

Christianity has reared round the fold of Christ, And the one

deliverance for us all from the transformed selfishness, which has so

much to do with shaping all these wretched narrow theories of the

Church, is to do as this man did--open our eyes with sympathetic

eagerness to see God's grace in many an unexpected place, and square

our theories with His dealings.

It used to be an axiom that there was no life in the sea beyond a

certain limit of a few hundred feet. It was learnedly and conclusively

demonstrated that pressure and absence of light, and I know not what

beside, made life at greater depths impossible. It was proved that in

such conditions creatures could not live. And then, when that was

settled, the _Challenger_ put down her dredge five miles, and brought

up healthy and good-sized living things, with eyes in their heads, from

that enormous depth. So, then, the savant had to ask, _How_ can there

be life? instead of asserting that there cannot be; and, no doubt, the

answer will be forth coming some day.

We have all been too much accustomed to set arbitrary limits to the

diffusion of the life of Christ among men. Let us rather rejoice when

we see forms of beauty, which bear the mark of His hand, drawn from

depths that we deemed waste, and thankfully confess that the bounds of

our expectation, and the framework of our institutions, do not confine

the breadth of His working, nor the sweep of His grace.

Expositions of Holy Scripture: the Acts · 第 141 / 317 题