CHAPTER LII

LONDONDERRY AND ENNISKILLEN, 1689

[Sidenote: The siege of Londonderry.]

[Sidenote: Difficulties of the besiegers.]

It was the remark of a brilliant writer that trying to describe the

siege of Londonderry after Macaulay was like trying to describe the

siege of Troy after Homer. No elaborate copy need be attempted here.

The heroism of the defenders it is scarcely possible to exaggerate, but

the weakness of the attack was largely responsible for their success.

Hamilton had never seen a siege, and Rosen, though an experienced

soldier, was wanting in initiative. There was the worst feeling

between French and Irish, the latter complaining that the foreigners

got all the good appointments, and the former that they were exposed

without support. At first Avaux thought the town could not hold out

long, but very soon he changed his opinion. On the same day that he

wrote to Louis of his hopes, he confided his fears to Louvois. A

week later he was in despair. Maumont and Pusignan were killed, with

several other French officers. Pointis, who commanded the artillery,

was badly wounded. The besieging army was then under 3000 men, and

not one musket in ten was serviceable, so that they had to entrench

themselves against the attacks of the garrison. Even at the end of May

most of the soldiers had no swords. Some carried iron-tipped sticks,

and others pike-staffs without heads. In the long June days, the

Enniskilleners extended their raids to within forty miles of Dublin,

and James sent Rosen to check them. At Trim, where he had been promised

four battalions of infantry, a regiment of dragoons, and nearly two

regiments of cavalry, he found two battalions, one very badly and the

other very indifferently armed. The dragoons did not appear at all,

and of cavalry there were but five ill-mounted troops, the men without

pistols or carbines, and most of the horses without saddles or bridles.

There were some guns, but the shot did not fit, so that only one in six

could be fired. Then it was reported that Kirke's fleet had been seen

in Lough Foyle, and Rosen was sent to Londonderry, where he found that

there were only thirty pickaxes, and no available cannon, and that the

unpaid soldiers were deserting in great numbers. The battering train

was throughout inadequate. By the middle of July only five out of

thirty-six French gunners were fit for service, and Massé, the chief

engineer, was killed while laying a gun, since no artillery officer

was to be had. Avaux says Lord Melfort was not sorry for the French

officer, who had complained that he was abandoned, and given none of

the promised requisites for a siege.[222]

[Sidenote: Character of the town.]

[Sidenote: Baker and Walker governors.]

The Londonderry of the siege, standing entirely on the left bank of

the Foyle, was nearly oblong in shape, extending about half a mile

from north to south, and something less from east to west. It was

surrounded by a strong wall without any ditch, having a small bastion

at each angle. There were four gates, and in front of the southern, or

Bishop's gate, a slight ravelin had been thrown up by Lundy as his sole

contribution to the defence. The besieged had twenty guns, none of them

as large as a twelve pounder, and many much smaller. The men bearing

arms at the beginning of the siege were over 7000, divided into eight

regiments, the total number of people within the walls being thirty

thousand. There were about 300 cavalry under Adam Murray's command.

Major Baker and George Walker were chosen joint-governors, both of

them being colonels of regiments. According to the accounts hostile to

Walker, he was only an assistant in charge of the stores, and no doubt

that was his most important duty, but he was commonly called Governor,

and always signed first, which can hardly have been without the

general consent of those chiefly concerned. Many, perhaps most, of the

defenders were Scots Presbyterians, or inclined that way, but sectarian

differences were got over while the siege lasted. The Episcopalians had

the cathedral in the morning, and the Presbyterians in the afternoon,

and sermons did much to keep up the spirit of the garrison. Walker was

afterwards accused of preaching in a discouraging tone, but his extant

sermons do not sustain this. By the wise connivance of both Baker

and Walker, Lundy was allowed to escape in disguise. On April 21 the

Jacobites opened fire with one light gun from the right bank of the

river, doing little damage, and on the same day the garrison made a

sally towards Pennyburn Mill lower down the water, on their own side.

The fighting was indecisive, but Maumont fell, perhaps by Murray's own

hand. Two days later Culmore surrendered, thus giving the besiegers

the means of preventing relief from the sea. On the 25th, there was

another sally in the same direction, and Pusignan received a wound

from which he died for want of a surgeon. On May 6 there was a sally

towards Windmill Hill, on the south side of the town, to prevent an

attack there, and the besiegers suffered severely, Brigadier-General

Ramsay, a distinguished Scotch officer, being among the slain. The guns

used by the Jacobite army were never of calibre sufficient to damage

the wall seriously, and nothing like a breach was made at any time.

Three mortars appear to have been used, which killed a few men and did

much damage to the houses, but none to the defences. Two hundred and

sixty-one shells were thrown in, each weighing 272 pounds, without the

charge, and 326 of 34 pounds.[223]

[Sidenote: Fight at the windmill.]

The fiercest fight during the siege was on June 4. The garrison had

dug a ditch, and thrown up a bank across the Windmill Hill, which

protected St. Columb's Wells. These were very important, for the wells

inside the walls were made turbid by the constant firing. The windmill

itself, which still stands, had been strengthened by earthworks, and

two or three small guns were mounted on it. Hamilton ordered nearly

all his available infantry and some cavalry to advance against the

bank, which for the most part was about twelve feet high. No attempt

was made to loosen the newly made work, there were no ladders, and

the foot-soldiers were quite unable to surmount the obstacle. They

fell fast under the fire of the besieged, whose fowling pieces carried

farther than their muskets. Only one-third of the defenders fired

at a time, and thus a continuous hail of bullets was kept up. The

assailants' right wing of cavalry was commanded by Colonel Edmund

Butler, Lord Mountgarret's eldest son. He was exceptionally well

mounted, and galloped to the top of the bank, which at the waterside

did not exceed seven feet. On descending within the enclosure he was

at once made prisoner. About thirty men tried to follow, but only

two officers jumped successfully, one of whom was killed, the other

escaping after his horse had been shot under him. Of the Irish, at

least 200 were killed, besides many officers, the besieged only losing

one officer and six men.[224]

[Sidenote: An English squadron appears,]

[Sidenote: but is forced to retire.]

[Sidenote: Schomberg interferes.]

[Sidenote: Debate in the English Parliament.]

Three days after the fight at the windmill, the spirits of the garrison

were momentarily raised by the appearance of three English ships. Most

of the Irish guns had been moved to the riverside below the town, but

the mortar battery was placed in an orchard on the right bank. The

frigates exchanged shots with Culmore fort, but the _Greyhound_ took

ground, and lay exposed with a heavy list. Even with this advantage the

garrison of Culmore could not sink her, but some French gunners were

brought up, who made nine good shots out of fourteen. Nevertheless,

the vessel got off with the tide, having been hit seventeen times.

The experience gained was enough to show that it would not be easy

to relieve the town by water. A week later Kirke's fleet, twenty-six

transport and store ships under convoy of four men-of-war, was descried

in Lough Foyle, the fighting squadron under Rooke, with Leake among

the captains. But a council of war, comprising both naval and military

officers, was held on board the _Swallow_, where, after the manner of

such councils, it was unanimously decided that the thing could not be

done. There appeared to be a boom across the river, and it was wrongly

suspected that boatloads of stones had been sunk in the channel. As

soon as the result of the council of war reached the English Government

Schomberg gave the order which saved Londonderry. The sunken ships, he

said, were only guessed at, and the boom might not be formidable. Kirke

was told to get better information, 'and to consult for that purpose

the sea-officers whether it may not be possible to break the boom and

chain and to pass with the ships, and that you attempt the doing of

it for the relief of the town.' A considerable reinforcement of horse

and foot was at once despatched. In the meantime Kirke seems to have

thought that he could relieve Londonderry by land, and he established

a post on the Isle of Inch in Lough Swilly, scarcely five miles from

the walls, to which the Protestants of the country round flocked for

protection. After sending what help he could spare to Enniskillen,

Kirke obeyed Schomberg's orders, and sailed round again to Lough

Foyle. The long delay in rescuing the beleaguered city had caused much

indignation in England. 'When I speak for money,' said Birch, 'I would

lay the fault where it is. I will not talk of account of money now.

'Tis pity these brave fellows in Ireland should be deserted; we are

likely to lose those 10,000 brave men, to our shame all the world

over.' The dreaded boom, he added, could probably be cut, and if not,

there was nothing to prevent the landing of a relieving army.[225]

[Sidenote: Sufferings of the besieged.]

The garrison of Londonderry were never short of powder, in spite of the

constant firing. The stock of cannon balls failed before the end of

June, and the want was supplied by covering pieces of brick with lead

so that the size and weight were right, and good practice was made with

these rude projectiles. Food soon became scarce, dogs, cats, and rats

being readily eaten and sold at high prices. Rations of salted hides

were served out and tallow mixed with starch. The latter compound was

found to be a cure for dysentery. At the last distribution, before the

end of the siege, the allowance for a fighting man was half a pound of

meat and a pound and a half of horse flesh. There were no vegetables,

of course, and a handful of sea-wrack or chickweed fetched a penny or

twopence. Fuel was not much wanted in summer except for cooking, and

there was very little to cook, but fires could be made with the roofs

shattered by shell-fire. Only eighty soldiers were slain by the enemy,

but famine and sickness reduced their number from 7500 to about 4300,

of whom more than a fourth were unserviceable. Governor Baker died on

the last day of June, after naming Michelburn to succeed him. Murray

was shot through both thighs on July 17, and the starving troops had

not the advantage of his leadership during their last feeble sallies.

The very last was on July 25, when they issued from the Bishop's Gate

and the Butcher's Gate simultaneously in hopes of driving in some of

the enemy's cattle. They killed many of the besiegers, but caught no

cows, and returned as hungry as before, having lost a few men. Starch

was found in the pockets of the slain, and one dying soldier said he

had nothing else for five days.[226]

[Sidenote: Cruel action of Rosen.]

[Sidenote: Indignation of James.]

Conrad De Rosen was a Livonian, and King James had occasion to call

him a barbarous Muscovite, but he was a good officer, and was made

field-marshal-general. He wrote French well and knew how to behave

in good society, but was subject to fits of rage in which he was

little better than a madman. As Hamilton made no progress with the

siege, Rosen was sent to see what he could do, and he reached the

camp on June 20 with his badly armed reinforcements. His arrival gave

some encouragement to the besieging army, which was on the point of

dispersing spontaneously. He devoted himself to strengthening the force

for guarding the river, and at the same time tried to push approaches

up to Butcher's Gate with a view to blowing it in. His men got so

near that the garrison drove them off with stones. The weather was

very wet and the ditches filled with water which was kept back by the

high tide, so that it was found impossible to work in them. When he

heard Rosen's report, Avaux had little hope of the town being taken.

But Kirke was daily expected to attempt something, and Hamilton made

an effort to do by treaty what he could not do by force. The town

was summoned to surrender on such terms as might be agreed on, with

a general promise that there should be no distinction made between

Catholic and Protestant. Protection was offered to all, and favour to

those who would serve King James. It was particularly insisted that

Rosen had no power to interfere concerning the siege, that he was

sent only to stop the English succours, and that 'all conditions and

parleys' depended on Hamilton, who had power to grant such articles

as he thought fit. In spite of all this, Rosen took everything into

his own hands three days later. He issued a declaration requiring the

garrison to accept Hamilton's terms within twenty-four hours, and to

send hostages. Failing this, all the men, women, and children of their

party (_cabale_), whether under protection or not, from Enniskillen to

Charlemont, and from Charlemont to the sea, should be driven under the

walls, without any provisions or shelter. The garrison might admit them

if they liked, otherwise they would have the pain of seeing the death

by starvation of their 'fathers, mothers, wives, children, brothers,

sisters, and, in short, all their relations, for not one single one

shall be left at home, and they shall have nothing to eat.' Those who

had taken refuge in towns were to be turned out and driven along with

the rest. Orders to this effect were at once sent to the commandants

at Coleraine, Antrim, Carrickfergus, Belfast, Dungannon, Charlemont,

Belturbet, and Sligo, and to the Duke of Berwick, who had a flying

column on the Enniskillen side. All mills and houses belonging to the

rebels and their adherents were to be burned, all horses and cattle

driven off or killed; so that if English troops were to land they would

find only a desert. On the same day Rosen wrote to inform King James

of what he had done and meant to do. James at once replied that he

should have been informed of the Marshal's plan beforehand, and that he

thoroughly disapproved of it, though he had no objection to ravaging

the country for military reasons. He positively ordered commanding

officers to disobey the Marshal except in that one particular, and to

send back to their homes all who had already suffered. He had promised

protection to all who lived peacefully, and they should have it. Rosen,

who cared nothing for His Majesty's favour, rejoined that he was much

too full of benevolence to rebels, who were thus encouraged in their

insolence. James was greatly annoyed at his word being broken and at

the General's presumption in acting without his orders. Avaux tried

to plead that the time had been too precious to stand upon ceremony,

and that neither he nor Rosen had official knowledge of the King's

promises, but he admits that his arguments had no effect. Melfort, who

could not lose such an opportunity of annoying the ambassador, said

that if the Marshal had been the King of England's subject he would

have been hanged. 'I found the expression very strong,' said Avaux,

'but made no answer, for the King was already very angry.'[227]

[Sidenote: Determination of the besieged.]

Rosen may have hoped to frighten the town into surrender without

carrying out all his threats. If so, he was completely mistaken. In

the evening of Monday, July 1, about 200 victims were gathered under

the walls and a thousand more appeared in the morning. Many of these

had been living peaceably under the King's protection. Throughout

that day and the next the number increased, being brought in from

the surrounding country. It does not appear that Rosen's orders were

fully carried out in more distant parts, probably because of James's

action. Even before the King's letter arrived the Marshal saw that

his bolt had missed, and had merely furnished the garrison with an

irrefutable argument. They erected a gallows on the south-western

bastion, and warned the prisoners, who had hitherto been very kindly

treated, to prepare for instant death. There were twenty of them,

and they appealed to Hamilton, who gave them no comfort but the

assurance that their deaths should be revenged on many thousands of

people, innocent or guilty, both within and without the city. As to

the proposals for capitulation, the governors said that they could

not trust the besiegers, Rosen's manifesto being inconsistent with

Hamilton's suggestions. Besides, the latter's commission was dated May

1, since which a Parliament had sat in which their lives and estates

were forfeited. Meanwhile neither the besieged nor the starving people

outside had any thoughts of surrender. On the fourth day Rosen allowed

the victims of his scheme to return to their devastated homes, and King

James renewed Hamilton's commission. A few of the strongest outside

slipped into the town, and many of the weakest within seized the chance

of escape. The governors thought their food would not last beyond July

26, and might have yielded if time had been given to that day, but it

was refused, and all negotiations came to naught. Help did not come

until after the last ration of famine-fare had been served out.[228]

[Sidenote: The town relieved by sea.]

From the time that Kirke appeared upon the coast until the end of

the siege there were many attempts to establish communications.

Daily signals were made from the cathedral and answered from the

ships, but were not well understood on either side, though it seems,

from the account of Captain James Roche, that there was so much of

a preconcerted code as enabled him to tell Kirke how many more days

the town could hold out. Roche was induced by the promise of 3000

guineas to carry a letter, and this he succeeded in doing, by swimming

under great difficulties; but even he could not get back, and had to

stay till the end. Another messenger was drowned, and a third taken

and hanged. A little boy afterwards succeeded in bringing a letter.

The investment was very close, but the besiegers gave up any hope of

succeeding except by starvation, and Kirke's chief advice by Roche

was to husband the provisions. On July 20 Hamilton held a council at

which six generals attended, all of whom agreed with him that the town

could only be taken by famine. Rosen was in bed, and disclaimed all

responsibility, saying that he was always against the siege, and that

his advice had been slighted. The guns, said the others, were quite

insufficient, and the besiegers had suffered so much that they were not

numerically superior to the besieged. On Saturday, July 27, the day of

Killiecrankie, Captain Ash wrote in his diary, 'Next Wednesday is our

last, if relief not does arrive before it.' About six in the evening of

the day following that on which these despairing words were written,

three ships were seen coming up the Foyle. They proved to be the

_Dartmouth_, of forty guns, commanded by John Leake, the _Mountjoy_,

under Micaiah Browning, a native of Londonderry, and the _Phoenix_ of

Coleraine, under Andrew Douglas. If we consider what Rooke and Leake

did together in after years, we may believe that they would have made

the attack much sooner, but they were under Kirke's orders, and he was

a landsman. The _Dartmouth_ anchored opposite Culmore and engaged the

fort, the man-of-war having probably better guns, and certainly better

gunners. Meanwhile the two merchant-ships, accompanied by boats from

the fleet, sailed or were towed up to the boom, at each end of which

a fort had been built. The boats' crews hacked at the obstacle, and

before it was quite cleared the _Mountjoy_ struck against its timbers,

and went ashore. A shout of triumph went up from the Irish army, and

the hearts of the men on the wall sank. But a gap had been made and

the _Phoenix_ passed up to the Quay. The larger vessel--her burden

was only 135 tons--used what guns she had, and the concussion, joined

to the rising tide, soon brought her off, but not before her brave

captain had been killed by a cannon-ball. He died, says Macaulay, 'by

the most enviable of all deaths, in the sight of the city which was

his birthplace, which was his home, and which had just been saved

by his courage and self-devotion from the most frightful form of

destruction.'[229]

[Sidenote: Cost of the siege.]

The _Phoenix_ carried three or four thousand bushels of Scotch meal,

the _Mountjoy_ was laden with biscuit, cheese, pork, and pease, and

as Hamilton's only hope was in famine, the siege was virtually over.

It lasted 105 days, and cost some 15,000 lives, more from fever and

starvation than from wounds. The mortality among the women and among

those who were too old or too young to fight was far greater than

among the soldiers. Michelburne lost his wife and all his children.

For two days the Irish continued to fire from their trenches, but

they were preparing to go. Everything within reach was destroyed, and

on the night of July 31 they set fire to their camp and marched off

to Strabane. Some of the late besieged, who had no horses, attempted

pursuit, but the Irish rearguard turned on them and killed seven men.

The battle of Newtown Butler was fought on the day that the siege was

raised, and when the news reached Strabane, Hamilton's army retired,

abandoning their guns, and burning everything until they got near

Charlemont. Avaux reported that they were completely ruined, and that

the double disaster had demoralised the Irish everywhere.[230]

[Sidenote: Defence of Enniskillen.]

[Sidenote: Repulse of Galmoy.]

While Londonderry was beset Enniskillen kept her assailants at arm's

length. The north-east side was protected by the garrisons left by Lord

Kingston in Donegal and Ballyshannon, but on the north-west Sarsfield

had a good force of Connaught men at Sligo and Manor Hamilton, and in

June he fixed a camp at Bundrowes, where the waters of Lough Melvin

reach the sea. To the south, Colonel Crichton maintained Crom Castle.

The Protestants living in the open country knew that they had nothing

to expect from Lundy, who had ordered the evacuation of Dungannon,

and done what he could to prevent Enniskillen from resisting. All the

help he gave the defenders was five barrels of powder and some old

gun-barrels, which they managed to fix with locks and stocks. They

had no other ammunition for months, except what they took from the

enemy. In March Lord Galmoy with a strong force approached Enniskillen

and on March 30 the defenders saw the Protestants of Cavan pouring

in. First came some horse and foot, then 'the whole inhabitants with

their women and children to their middle in clay and dirt, with

pitiful lamentations, and little or no provision to sustain them.'

They did their best to persuade the Enniskilleners to fly with them to

Londonderry. After two days' rest they were told that if the men went

the women and children should be turned out. Some remained with their

families, but the majority went on. Galmoy came as far as Belturbet,

whence he sent a party to besiege Crom. He had no battering guns,

but made a show with two pieces consisting of tinplates covered with

buckram, and bound round with whipcord. A wooden ball was fired from

one of these machines, which quickly burst, and did not frighten the

garrison, who were soon strengthened by a detachment from Enniskillen,

conveyed partly in boats. Galmoy advanced as far as Lisnaskea, but drew

back towards Crom on the approach of the whole Enniskillen force. The

men in the castle and those who came by road then attacked the Irish

simultaneously, and Galmoy retired with loss to Belturbet, leaving his

buckram batteries behind him.[231]

[Sidenote: Galmoy's cruelty.]

At Cavan, on his passage northwards, Galmoy captured Captain Dixie, son

of the Dean of Kilmore, whom he was anxious to exchange for an officer

named Maguire, a prisoner at Crom. This was agreed to, and Maguire was

given up accordingly, but Galmoy nevertheless tried Dixie and another

by court-martial and ordered them to be hanged. Their heads were then

cut off, and kicked about like footballs. This atrocious act satisfied

the Protestants that no faith would be kept with them, and added much

to the bitterness of the struggle. Maguire was so much disgusted at the

use to which he had been put that he resigned his commission.[232]

[Sidenote: Exploits of Colonel Lloyd.]

[Sidenote: The Break of Belleek.]

A month after the attack on Crom the Enniskilleners, now reinforced

by many of Lord Kingston's men, set out, under Lloyd's command, to

prevent a Jacobite garrison from being established at Trillick.

Having succeeded in this, they made a like expedition to Augher, and

returned by Clones, which they found burned. A great many cattle were

driven off, and during the whole time that Londonderry was starving,

Enniskillen enjoyed plenty. So successful were the foragers that a

milch cow could sometimes be bought for eighteenpence, and a dry one

for sixpence. When horses were caught, they were used to bring in

foodstuffs and fodder. Two days after their return from the raid into

Tyrone, Lloyd's men were again engaged. A large body from Connaught

attacked Ballyshannon, and the relieving force met them at Belleek.

Lough Erne was on one hand and a great bog on the other. Lloyd provided

his troopers with faggots to make a causeway, but a guide suddenly

offered himself and showed them a sound passage. The Irish were routed,

and near 200 of their horse slain. Sixty men whom they left in the

fish-island at Ballyshannon were taken, but the rest of the foot made

their way through bogs back to Sligo. The Enniskilleners did not lose

a man. This affair is known in history as the 'Break of Belleek.'

Before the end of May, Lloyd, with something over 1500 men, attacked

and took Redhill and Ballinacargy in Cavan, and penetrated as far as

Kells in Meath, only thirty miles from Dublin, returning with 5000 head

of cattle and sheep, and 500 horses laden with provisions. The small

garrison of Trillick were equally successful in an attack on Omagh, and

the horses of three troops were surprised and led away.

[Sidenote: Attempt to relieve Londonderry.]

[Sidenote: Victory at Belturbet.]

So great was the reputation of the Enniskilleners that Dublin was

hardly considered safe, their numbers being, of course, enormously

over-estimated. The besiegers of Londonderry were throughout hampered

by their fear of them, and Berwick with a flying column was constantly

occupied in trying to keep them at a distance. Governor Hamilton

resolved to relieve the beleaguered city if possible, but the

expedition was mismanaged. It was food, and not men, that the defenders

wanted, whereas the relieving party did not take enough even for

themselves. They occupied Omagh, but Lord Clancarty was reported to be

on his way, and Sarsfield being at Manor Hamilton, it was feared that

the unfinished fort at Enniskillen might be attacked. The expedition

was accordingly given up, though some thought that it might have

succeeded if Lloyd had been in command. Immediately after his return,

Hamilton had news that Brigadier Sutherland was at Belturbet with a

daily increasing force, but the Jacobite general promptly retreated

even before Lloyd appeared with his dragoons. The garrison was easily

overcome, 300 becoming prisoners with their arms and 700 muskets which

had been stored for the use of a newly raised regiment. Two barrels of

much-needed powder were also taken, with fifty troop-horses, and enough

red coats to dress two companies. Two hundred able men were kept to

work at the unfinished citadel. Thirteen officers were detained, but

the rest of the prisoners with the women and children were allowed to

go free.[233]

[Sidenote: Kirke in Lough Swilly.]

[Sidenote: Defeat at Trillick.]

[Sidenote: Arrival of Wolseley.]

A fortnight after the affair at Belturbet, news was brought to

Enniskillen of Kirke's arrival in Lough Swilly. Communications were

opened with him at once, and he promised thirty barrels of powder

and the help of some officers. Before they came, Berwick crossed the

Barnesmore Gap and attacked Donegal, where Lord Kingston had left

a garrison. He burned the town, but could not take the castle, and

afterwards joined Sutherland at Trillick. He was attacked by Governor

Hamilton, Lloyd having gone to meet Kirke, and here the Enniskilleners

suffered their only serious check, losing fifty men killed, and as

many prisoners. On July 28, a fortnight afterwards, the officers sent

by Kirke reached Enniskillen by water, under the command of Lieut.-Col.

William Wolseley, whose Protestant zeal was well known. He brought

acting commissions for two regiments of cavalry and three of infantry,

a supply of powder, 1600 muskets and firelocks, and eight field-pieces.

On the very evening of his arrival, Wolseley learned that MacCarthy

had come before Crom, where there were no cannon, with a considerable

army and with eight guns, not made of buckram. Next day, being July

30, every available man was brought up from Ballyshannon, and Colonel

Berry, the second in command, was sent on as far as Lisnaskea,

MacCarthy raising the siege as he drew near.

[Sidenote: MacCarthy threatens Enniskillen.]

Early in the morning of July 31, Berry, after spending the night in

the open, moved forward as far as the little village of Donagh, where

his scouts brought word that MacCarthy was advancing. He drew back

accordingly through Lisnaskea, and took up a position among the marshes

near the Colebrooke River. Some of his troopers, who had behaved badly

in the fight near Trillick, now swore to support him, and they kept

their word. The enemy consisted of thirteen companies of dragoons

under Anthony Hamilton, who dismounted his men when they got into the

difficult ground. The Enniskilleners were skilfully posted, and much

the better shots, so that when the Jacobite dragoons were withdrawn,

their retreat rapidly changed into a headlong flight. Berry's horsemen

followed them through Lisnaskea and for a mile beyond, taking thirty

prisoners and killing two hundred men. Hamilton himself was badly

wounded. At the approach of MacCarthy's main army, the victors drew

back to Lisnaskea before nine o'clock, and waited for Wolseley, who was

coming to their rescue with all his available forces. Of the two roads

to Lisnaskea, Berry had taken that to the right, Wolseley that to the

left, and they met at the junction at about eleven o'clock.[234]

[Sidenote: Victory of Newtown Butler.]

Wolseley had left Enniskillen in a great hurry and without provisions.

He had, therefore, no choice but to fight or to fall back, for

Sarsfield was at Bundrowes, and might attack Enniskillen in his

absence. The men were consulted, and all decided to advance. Beyond

Donagh the two armies came in sight of one another. The first encounter

was in crossing a bog with a paved causeway through the middle.

Apparently MacCarthy intended only a reconnaissance at this point,

for he retired after some skirmishing without bringing his guns into

action. The Jacobites kept their ranks through Newtown Butler, and set

fire to the town as they left it. About a mile beyond there was another

causeway through a bog. The position was strongly held by infantry,

who nearly all fought under cover, but failed to stem the advance of

Wolseley's foot. The causeway was swept by cannon, which at first

prevented his cavalry from moving, though the practice was so bad that

no one was hurt. At last the wings under Lloyd and Tiffen got up to

the guns and killed the gunners, who resisted bravely. The causeway

was then cleared, and the Enniskillen horse advanced very quickly

without much attempt at order. The Jacobite cavalry, posted on rising

ground, made no attempt to charge, but galloped away towards Cavan.

When they had ridden their horses to death, they threw away their arms

and clothes so as to run faster. The infantry scattered among the bogs

in the direction of Wattle Bridge, where great numbers were killed.

Of 500 who took to the water all but one man were drowned. When King

James heard the news he nearly took the advice of Melfort, who wished

him to retire to Rathfarnham, where he would be safe from the Dublin

Protestants, but Tyrconnel, Nugent, and Rice persuaded him that he was

in no danger, and that to leave the capital without a garrison might

cause an insurrection, in which many good Catholics would perish.[235]

[Sidenote: MacCarthy a prisoner.]

[Sidenote: Retreat of Sarsfield.]

Deserted by all but his own troop, MacCarthy made a desperate attack on

the infantry who guarded the captured guns, but he soon fell covered

with wounds. He was taken to Enniskillen, where he was very well

treated, as Avaux testifies, and King James sent a doctor and a surgeon

with wine and other luxuries. There were over 300 prisoners, most of

whom were afterwards employed by Kirke to clean and repair the rescued

but almost ruined city of Londonderry. The unfortunate runaways were

mercilessly killed among the reeds and bushes. The pursuit lasted all

night, and no quarter was given until the morning. The victors excused

this bloody work as a natural revenge for Lord Galmoy's perfidy. Avaux

reported that a regiment of dragoons and three battalions of infantry

had almost entirely disappeared. When MacCarthy was taken, a letter

from Sarsfield was found in his pocket saying that he was encamped at

Bundrowes and ready to attack Enniskillen on the west if MacCarthy and

Berwick would attack it on the east. The French ambassador thought it

much more likely that the garrison would crush the three armies in

succession; and, in fact, Wolseley lost no time in marching towards

Bundrowes, but Sarsfield, as soon as he heard of the rout at Newtown

Butler, broke up his camp and retreated to Sligo. Berwick, who was

threatening Donegal, also retired at the news, and effected an exchange

of prisoners. Those who returned to Enniskillen had seen Hamilton's

ruined army march away from Londonderry. They had no wish to meet

another victorious garrison, and Wolseley's scouts saw their rearguard

pass through Castle Caulfield, so that pursuit was impossible. One

regiment of cavalry, two of dragoons, and three of infantry were formed

from the defenders of Enniskillen. Of these Cunningham's became the

Inniskilling Dragoons, famous at Waterloo and on many other fields, and

Tiffen's grew into the Inniskilling Fusiliers. The fame of these troops

was great in their own day, and when a London regiment made a loyal

address to Queen Mary shortly before the Boyne, Tories and Jacobites

called them Inniskillings in derision, while good Whigs hoped that they

would be found such.[236]

[Sidenote: Kirke at Londonderry.]

[Sidenote: Walker in England.]

Tangier was a bad school, and Kirke showed during the Monmouth

insurrection that he had learned its lessons only too well. Very little

credit was due to him personally, but he treated Londonderry like a

conquered city. The late garrison was made into regiments, and the

claims of some who had done much were ignored. But Michelburn, who had

served under him in Africa, was continued as Governor, and Walker, who

hastened to get rid of his military character, was sent to London with

the news and an address from the defenders to King William. While he

was on his way, William's letter of thanks and congratulation arrived

addressed to the Governors, for only the bare facts of the relief had

then reached London. Kirke filled up the blanks with the names of

'George Walker and John Michelburn, Esquires.' Walker travelled by

way of Scotland, receiving the freedom of Glasgow and Edinburgh. Sir

Robert Cotton, the great antiquary's son, drove out as far as Barnet

to meet him, and crowds followed him in the streets. He was presented

to the King, who gave him 5000_l._, which was paid next day, adding

that that was only a small part of what he owed him. On receiving the

thanks of the House of Commons he made little of his own services. At

William's request Cambridge agreed to make him a Doctor of Divinity,

but he did not go there to receive the degree. At Oxford, which he

visited on his return journey in company with Archbishop Vesey, the

same distinction was conferred on him in convocation as the defender of

Londonderry, 'and by that fact, as we hope, the preserver and avenger

of all Ireland.' In London, says Luttrell, he was caressed by all sorts

of people, and entertained at dinner, and has the character of a very

modest person.' Tillotson said his modesty was equal to his merit, and

that everyone was pleased at hearing that he was to be made a bishop.

He spent about six months in England, exerting himself to obtain

rewards and recognition for those who had suffered by the siege, not

forgetting the services of the seven dissenting ministers.[237]

[Sidenote: Burnet on the siege.]

[Sidenote: Walker's True Account.]

[Sidenote: Mackenzie's _Narrative_.]

After giving a slight sketch of the events at Londonderry, Burnet

originally wrote that 'there was a minister in the place, Dr. Walker,

who acted a very noble part in the government and defence of the town;

he was but a man of ordinary parts, but they were suited to this work,

for he did wonders in this siege.' In the published history this was

left out, and Macaulay was at a loss to explain the omission. Swift and

Routh both blame the Bishop for not mentioning Walker. The explanation

is not, however, far to seek. Burnet, writing in the summer of 1691,

agreed with his friend Tillotson, and with society generally, in giving

a lion's share of credit to Walker, but he pretended to no exact

knowledge of Irish affairs, and when the time came to publish his work

he remembered that the late governor had detractors who were chiefly

Scotch Presbyterians, remaining dissenters in Ulster, but established

in the Bishop's own country. He therefore prudently decided not to

mention any individual hero, but to praise the resolution of the

defenders generally. In other respects the revised narrative gained

in accuracy what it lost in picturesqueness. Walker wrote an account

of the siege, and published it by request soon after his arrival in

London. It was done in a hurry, and to meet a pressing want--that

the demand was great is shown by the three extant editions bearing

date 1689, and by the translations into Dutch and German. Walker was

soon attacked for claiming too great a share in the siege, for giving

less praise than was due to Murray and others, and, above all, for

not naming the seven dissenting ministers whose good service he had

acknowledged. He then published a Vindication, saying that he did not

know the names which he was accused of suppressing, and supplying the

omission after inquiry. Some months later, when Walker had returned

to Ireland, the Rev. John Mackenzie, who had been through the siege,

published a more detailed pamphlet, declaring, among other things,

that Walker was never governor, and giving nearly all the glory to

the Presbyterians. Candid readers will not agree, but Mackenzie added

largely to the facts recorded and is historically very valuable. His

narrative is, however, dull reading compared to Walker's account and

the public had had enough of the subject. There were several minor

publications connected with this quarrel. We can only regret with

the very prosaic poet who wrote the Londeriad that the union between

Protestants which danger produced should have passed away with it.[238]

FOOTNOTES:

[222] Avaux's despatches, April 26/May 6 to July 30/August 9, 1689.

Rosen wrote to James on July 5 that the troops lately sent him had to

take such arms as were given them, 'mostly damaged and broken, and

accordingly useless, as you have not in all your army a single gunsmith

to mend them.' Hamilton's soldiers were still worse off, no battalion

stronger than 200 men; and more than two-thirds without swords. No

troop of cavalry had more than fourteen serviceable men.--Macpherson's

_Original Papers_, i. 205. The account of the siege in Witherow's

_Derry and Enniskillen_, 3rd edition, 1885, would leave little to be

desired but for the writer's violent antipathy to Walker.

[223] Walker and Mackenzie. Sermons and speeches by Walker are

reprinted in Dwyer's edition of the _True Account_. Sir Charles

Lyttleton, writing to Lord Hatton on August 8, 1689, says he had talked

the day before to a gentleman who was storekeeper in Ireland, who

confirmed all he had heard about the Irish want of guns. There were

only a few heavy ones in the country, and the ground about Londonderry

was so 'rotten' that they could not be drawn thither.--_Hatton

Correspondence._ Walker and Mackenzie both call the work at Bishop's

Gate a ravelin, but as there was no ditch it should probably be called

a demi-lune.

[224] Walker and Mackenzie. _Light to the Blind_, p. 77.

[225] Walker and Mackenzie. Pointis to Louis XIV. or Seignelay, June

13, 17, and 22, State Papers, _Domestic_. Colonel Birch's speech, June

19, in Grey's _Debates_, ix. 351. Schomberg's order to Kirke is printed

from the copy among the Nairne MSS. in Dwyer's edition of Walker: it

was apparently written on June 29 and despatched with a postscript on

July 3. Avaux to Louvois, June 16/26. The author of the _Light to the

Blind_ says a sunken gabbard or two would have destroyed the channel,

but that James had forbidden this for fear of lessening his customs

revenue.

[226] 'I myself,' says John Hunter, a private soldier, 'would have

eaten the poorest cat or dog I ever saw with my eyes. Many a man,

woman, and child died from want of food. I myself was so weak from

hunger that I fell under my musket one morning as I was going to the

walls, yet God gave me strength to continue all night at my post there,

and enabled me to act the part of a soldier as if I had been as strong

as ever I was; yet my face was blackened with hunger.'--Journal in

Graham's _Ireland Preserved_, p. 335.

[227] Hamilton's proposals, June 27, are in Walker's appendix and

elsewhere. Rosen's declaration, June 30, is enclosed in Avaux's letter

to Louvois, an English version being printed by Walker and elsewhere.

Rosen's correspondence with James, June 30 to July 5, is in Macpherson,

i. 204-210. See Berwick's account of Rosen, and Avaux to Louvois, July

5/15.

[228] 'One pound of oatmeal and 1 lb. of tallow served a man a week,

sometimes salt hides. It was as bad as Samaria, only we had no pidgens'

Dunge. I saw two shillings a quarter given for a little dog, horse

blood at 4_d._ per pint, all the starch was eaten, the graves of

tallow, horse flesh was a rarity, and still we resolved to hold out ...

I believe there died 15,000 men, women, and children, many of whom died

for want. A great fever--all the children died, almost whole families,

nor one left alive.' Narrative of George Holmes in _Le Fleming Papers_,

p. 265. Macpherson i. 312.

[229] Walker and Mackenzie. _Light to the Blind._ The written opinions

of Hamilton and his council of war are in Macpherson, i. 217. James's

letter of July 22 ordering the siege to be turned into a blockade,

_ib._ p. 218. Roche's story is in Harris's _Life of William III._,

appx. xxix., and see Cal. of Treasury Papers, February 14, 1693-4.

Writing to Louis XIV., August 4/14, Avaux says: 'L'estacade était si

mal faite qu'elle n'a pas resisté aux chaloupes qui remorquaient les

deux petits bastiments qui portaient des vivres, et nous avons déjà

sceu plus d'une fois que cette estacade se rompait souvent par le

vent; et par la seule force de la marée.' Though the Rev. James Gordon

can scarcely be credited with the relief of Londonderry, his local

knowledge may have been useful to Kirke, or rather to Rooke and Leake:

Reid's _Presbyterian Hist._, ed. Killen, ii. 387 and notes. Pointis,

who was destined to meet Leake again in later years, gave a description

of the boom (to Seignelay, probably), which he thought he had made

very strong, State Papers, _Domestic_, June 13, 1689. It was partly

attached to a great stone, which may still be seen, though moved from

its original place, in the grounds of Boom Hall, and partly to a great

tree, of which the stump remains.

[230] Walker and Mackenzie. Avaux to Louis XIV., August 4/14.

McCarmick. There is an independent account by George Holmes, who was

all through the siege and was made a major by Kirke; it is dated from

Strabane, November 16, _Le Fleming Papers_, p. 264.

[231] Hamilton and McCarmick.

[232] Hamilton and McCarmick.

[233] McCarmick.

[234] The roads through the boggy flats of upper Lough Erne were paved.

Mr. Thomas Plunkett, of Enniskillen, who knows more than anyone of the

subject, has found some bits of these causeways, but the exact line

taken by Wolseley and Berry cannot now be traced. The drainage works at

Belleek have done much to dry the country.

[235] Hamilton and McCarmick. Wolseley's own account to Kirke is dated

August 2 in _London Gazette_, 2481. Kirke's letters of August 5, _ib._

Avaux writes to Louis XIV., August 4/14: 'Ceux d'Enniskillen estant

venus à la debandade mais fort hardiment attaquer My lord Moncassel, la

cavalerie et les dragons ont lâché pied sans tirer un coup depistolet,'

and on the same day to Louvois: 'Ces mesmes dragons qui avaient fuy le

matin lâcherent le pied, &c.' MacCarthy's force was much the larger of

the two, but it is impossible to give exact numbers. For the reception

of the news by James, see Avaux to Louis XIV., November 14/24. Harris's

account is taken from Hamilton. A _Light to the Blind_ minimises the

defeat, but Kirke says it was the greatest blow to the Irish since

Scariffhollis. _Macariæ Excidium_, chap. xxxvi. Under August 16,

Luttrell's _Diary_ says Wolseley had 2000 men and MacCarthy 7000, which

is doubtless much exaggerated. MacCarmick says the Irish were estimated

at 6000, and that only some 2000 escaped.

[236] MacCarmick. Letter to Abigail Harley, May 9, 1690, _Portland

Papers_, iii. 448. Colonel Filgate has traced the history of many Irish

regiments.

[237] Walker's _True Account_ and papers printed with it and the

_Vindication_. Note 113 to Dwyer's edition of the same. Luttrell's

_Diary_, August and September 1689. Wood's _Fasti Oxonienses_, p.

234, February 26, 1689-90, and his _Life and Times_, ed. Clark, ii.

326. Tillotson to Lady Russell, September 19, 1689, in her _Letters_.

Dawson's memoir of Walker in _Ulster Journal of Archæology_, ii. 129.

[238] Naming Walker, Mackenzie, and other preachers, the author of the

_Londeriad_ says:--

From sun rising to sun setting they taught,

While we against the en'my bravely fought.

Thus Heaven assists those actions which proceed

From Unity in greatest time of need.

In my copy of Mackenzie's _Narrative of the Siege_ (March 31, 1690)

is written in a contemporary hand: 'A partial account against Kirk,

Walker, &c., on behalf of the fanatick party.' The controversy is

handled by Macaulay, chap. xv., with the titles of the pamphlets in

a note. It is fully but not impartially treated in chap. viii. of

Witherow's _Derry and Enniskillen_, 3rd edition, Belfast, 1885. Burnet,

ii. 19, and the _Supplement_, ed. Foxcroft, 321.

Ireland under the Stuarts and During the Interregnum, Vol. 3 (of 3), 1660-1690 · 第 13 / 17 章