MODERN METHODS OF QUARRYING.

Mr. Wm. L. Saunders, for many years the engineer of the Ingersoll Rock

Drill Co., and hence thoroughly familiar with modern quarrying

practice, read a paper before the last meeting of the American Society

of Civil Engineers on the above subject, containing many interesting

points, given in the _Engineering News_, from which we abstract as

follows.

As a preliminary to describing the new Knox system of quarrying, which

even yet is not universally known among quarrymen, Mr. Saunders gives

the following in regard to older methods:

The Knox system is a recent invention; no mention was made of

it in the tenth census, and no description has yet been given

of it in any publications on quarrying. The first work done by

this method was in 1885, and at the close of that year 2

quarries had adopted it. In 1886 it was used in 20 quarries;

in 1887 in 44, in 1888 in upward of 100, and at the present

time about 300 quarries have adopted it. Its purpose is to

release dimension stone from its place in the bed, by so

directing an explosive force that it is made to cleave the

rock in a prescribed line without injury. The system is also

used for breaking up detached blocks of stone into smaller

sizes.

Quarrymen have, ever since the introduction of blasting, tried to

direct the blast so as to save stock. Holes drilled by hand are seldom

round. The shape of the bit and their regular rotation while drilling

usually produce a hole of somewhat triangular section. It was

observed, many years ago, that when a blast was fired in a

hand-drilled hole the rock usually broke in three directions,

radiating from the points of the triangle in the hole. This led

quarrymen to look for a means by which the hole might be shaped in

accordance with a prescribed direction of cleavage.

The oldest sandstone quarries in America are those at Portland, Conn.

It was from these quarries that great quantities of brownstone were

shipped for buildings in New York. The typical "brownstone front" is

all built of Portland stone. As the Portland quarries were carried to

great depths the thickness of bed increased, as it usually does in

quarries. With beds from 10 to 20 ft. deep, all of solid and valuable

brownstone, it became a matter of importance that some device should

be applied which would shear the stone from its bed without loss of

stock and without the necessity of making artificial beds at short

distances. A system was adopted and used successfully for a number of

years which comprised the drilling of deep holes from 10 to 12 in. in

diameter, and charging them with explosives placed in a canister of

peculiar shape. The drilling of this hole is so interesting as to

warrant a passing notice. The system was similar to that followed with

the old fashioned drop drill. The weight of the bit was the force

which struck the blow, and this bit was simply raised or lowered by a

crank turned by two men at the wheel. The bit resembled a broad ax in

shape, in that it was extremely broad, tapering to a sharp point, and

convex along the edge.

[Illustration: Fig. 1]

Fig. 1 illustrates in section one of the Portland drills, and a drill

hole with the canister containing the explosive in place. The canister

was made of two curved pieces of sheet tin with soldered edges, cloth

or paper being used at the ends. It was surrounded with sand or earth,

so that the effect of the blast was practically the same as though the

hole were drilled in the shape of the canister. In other words, the

old Portland system was to drill a large, round hole, put in a

canister, and then fill up a good part of the hole. Were it possible

to drill the hole in the shape of the canister, it would obviously

save a good deal of work which had to be undone. The Portland system

was, therefore, an extravagant one, but the results accomplished were

such as to fully warrant its use. Straight and true breaks were made,

following the line of the longer axis of the canister section, as in

Fig. 2.

[Illustration: Fig. 2.]

It was found that with the old Portland canister two breaks might be

made at right angles by a single blast, when using a canister shaped

like a square prism. In some of the larger blasts, where blocks

weighing in the neighborhood of 2,000 tons were sheared on the bed,

two holes as deep as 20 ft. were drilled close together. The core

between the holes was then clipped out and large canisters measuring 2

ft. across from edge to edge were used.

In regard to another of the older systems of blasting, known as

Lewising, Mr. Saunders says:

A Lewis hole is made by drilling two or three holes close

together and parallel with each other, the partitions between

the holes being broken down by using what is known as a

broach. Thus a wide hole or groove is formed in which powder

is inserted, either by ramming it directly in the hole, or by

puling it in a canister, shaped somewhat like the Lewis hole

trench. A complex Lewis hole is the combination of 3 drill

holes, while a compound Lewis hole contains 4 holes. Lewising

is confined almost entirely to granite. In some cases a series

of Lewis holes is put in along the bench at distances of 10

and 25 ft. apart, or even greater, each Lewis hole being

situated equidistant from the face of the bench. The holes are

blasted simultaneously by the electric battery.

After noting another system used to a limited extent, and not to be

commended, viz., the use of inverted plugs and feathers (the plugs and

feathers being inserted as a sort of tamping which the blast drives

upward to split the rock), Mr. Saunders continues in substance as

follows:

It is thus seen that the "state of the art" has been

progressive, though it was imperfect. Mr. Sperr, in his

reference to this subject, made in the report of the tenth

census, says: "The influence of the shape of the drill hole

upon the effects of the blast does not seem to be generally

known, and a great waste of material necessarily follows."

This was written but a few years before the introduction of

the new system, and it is doubtless true that attention was

thus widely directed to the conspicuous waste, due to a lack

of knowledge of the influence of the shape of a drill hole on

the effect of a blast. The system developed by Mr. Knox

practically does all and more than was done by the old

Portland system, and it does it at far less expense. It can

best be described by illustrations.

[Illustrations: Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6]

Fig. 3 is a round hole drilled either by hand or otherwise, preferably

otherwise, because an important point is to get it round. Fig. 4 is

the improved form of hole, and this is made by inserting a reamer,

Figs. 5 and 6, into the hole in the line of the proposed fracture,

thus cutting two V-shaped grooves into the walls of the hole. The

blacksmith tools for dressing the reamers are shown in Fig. 7. The

usual method of charging and tamping a hole in using the new system is

shown in Fig. 8. The charge of powder is shown at C, the air space at

B and the tamping at A. Fig. 9 is a special hole for use in thin beds

of rock. The charge of powder is shown at C, the rod to sustain

tamping at D, air space at BB, and tamping at A.

[Illustration: Fig. 7]

Let us assume that we have a bluestone quarry, in which we may

illustrate the simplest application of the new system. The sheet of

stone which we wish to shear from place has a bed running horizontally

at a depth of say 10 ft. One face is in front and a natural seam

divides the bed at each end at the walls of the quarry. We now have a

block of stone, say 50 ft. long, with all its faces free except

one--that opposite and corresponding with the bench. One or more of

the specially formed holes are put in at such depth and distance from

each other and from the bench as may be regulated by the thickness,

strength and character of the rock. No man is so good a judge of this

as the quarry foreman who has used and studied the effect of this

system in his quarry. Great care should be taken to drill the holes

round and in a straight line. In sandstone of medium hardness these

holes may be situated 10, 12 or 15 ft. apart. If the bed is a tight

one the hole should be run entirely through the sheet and to the bed;

but with an open free bed holes of less depth will suffice.

[Illustration: Fig. 8, 9]

The reamer should now be used and driven by hand. Several devices have

been applied to rock drills for reaming the hole by machinery while

drilling; that is, efforts have been made to combine the drill and the

reamer. Such efforts have met with only partial success. The perfect

alignment of the reamer is so important that where power is used this

point is apt to be neglected. It is also a well known fact that the

process of reaming by hand is not a difficult or a slow one. The

drilling of the hole requires the greatest amount of work. After this

has been done it is a simple matter to cut the V-shaped grooves. The

reamer should be applied at the center, that is, the grooves should be

cut on the axis or full diameter of the hole. The gauge of the reamer

should be at least 1½ diameters. Great care should be taken that the

reamer does not twist, as the break may be thereby deflected; and the

reaming must be done also to the full depth of the hole.

The hole is now ready for charging. The powder should be a low

explosive, like black or Judson powder or other explosives which act

slowly. No definite rule can be laid down as to the amount of powder

to be used, but it should be as small as possible. Very little powder

is required in most rocks. Hard and fine grained stone requires less

powder than soft stone. Mr. Knox tells of a case which came under his

observation, where a block of granite "more than 400 tons weight,

split clear in two with 13 oz. of FF powder." He compares this with a

block of sandstone of less than 100 tons weight "barely started with

2½ lb. of the same grade of powder, and requiring a second shot to

remove it."

It is obvious that enough powder must be inserted in the hole to

produce a force sufficient to move the entire mass of rock on its bed.

In some kinds of stone, notably sandstone, the material is so soft

that it will break when acted upon by the force necessary to shear the

block. In cases of this kind a number of holes should be drilled and

fired simultaneously by the electric battery. In such work it is usual

to put in the holes only 4 or 5 ft. apart. The powder must, of course,

be provided with a fuse or preferably a fulminating cap. It is well to

insert the cap at or near the bottom of the cartridge, as shown in

Figs. 8 and 9.

After the charge the usual thing to do is to insert tamping. In the

improved form of hole the tamping should not he put directly upon the

powder, but an air space should be left, as shown at B, Fig. 8. The

best way to tamp, leaving an air space, is first to insert a wad,

which may be of oakum, hay, grass, paper or other similar material.

The tamping should be placed from 6 to 12 in. below the mouth of the

hole. In some kinds of stone a less distance will suffice, and as much

air space as practicable should intervene between the explosive and

the tamping. If several holes are used on a line they should be

connected in series and blasted by electricity. The effect of the

blast is to make a vertical seam connecting the holes, and the entire

mass of rock is sheared several inches or more.

The philosophy of this new method of blasting is simple, though a

matter of some dispute. The following explanation has been given. See

Fig. 10.

[Illustration: Fig. 10]

"The two surfaces, _a_ and _b_, being of equal area, must receive an

equal amount of the force generated by the conversion of the explosive

into gas. These surfaces being smooth and presenting no angle between

the points, A and B, they furnish no starting point for a fracture,

but at these points the lines meet at a sharp angle including between

them a wedge-shaped space. The gas acting equally in all directions

from the center is forced into the two opposite wedge-shaped spaces,

and the impact being instantaneous the effect is precisely similar to

that of two solid wedges driven from the center by a force equally

prompt and energetic. All rocks possess the property of elasticity in

a greater or less degree, and this principle being excited to the

point of rupture at the points, A and B, the gas enters the crack and

the rock is split in a straight line simply because under the

circumstances it cannot split in any other way."

Another theory which is much the same in substance is then given, and

after some general discussion of the theory of the action of the

forces under the several systems, the paper continues:

The new form of hole is, therefore, almost identical in principle with

the old Portland canister, except that it has the greater advantage of

the V-shaped groove in the rock, which serves as a starting point for

the break. It is also more economical than the Portland canister, in

that it requires less drilling and the waste of stone is less. It is,

therefore, not only more economical than any other system of blasting,

but it is more certain, and in this respect it is vastly superior to

any other blasting system, because stone is valuable, and anything

which adds to the certainty of the break also adds to the profit of

the quarryman.

It is doubtless true that, notwithstanding the greater area of

pressure in the new form of hole, the break would not invariably

follow the prescribed line but for the V-shaped groove which virtually

starts it. A bolt, when strained, will break in the thread whether

this be the smallest section or not, because the thread is the

starting point for the break. A rod of glass is broken with a slight

jar provided a groove has been filed in its surface. Numerous other

instances might be cited to prove the value of the groove. Elasticity

in rock is a pronounced feature, which varies to a greater or less

extent; but it is always more or less present. A sandstone has

recently been found which possesses the property of elasticity to such

an extent that it may be bent like a thin piece of steel. When a blast

is made in the new form of hole the stone is under high tension, and

being elastic it will naturally pull apart on such lines of weakness

as grooves, especially when they are made, as is usually the case in

this system, in a direction at right angles with the lines of least

resistance.

Horizontal holes are frequently put in and artificial beds made by

"lofting." In such cases where the rock has a "rift" parallel with the

bed, one hole about half way through is sufficient for a block about

15 ft. square, but in "liver" rock the holes must be drilled nearly

through the block and the size of the block first reduced.

A more difficult application of the system, and one requiring greater

care in its successful use, is where the block of stone is so situated

that both ends are not free, one of them being solidly fixed in the

quarry wall. A simple illustration of a case of this kind is a stone

step on a stairway which leads up and along a wall, Fig. 11. Each step

has one end fixed to the wall and the other free. Each step is also

free on top, on the bottom and on the face, but fixed at the back. We

now put one of the new form of holes in the corner at the junction of

the step and the wall. The shape of the hole is as shown in Fig. 12.

[Illustration: FIG. 11.]

It is here seen that the grooves are at right angles with each other,

and the block of stone is sheared by a break made opposite and

parallel with the bench, as in the previous case, and an additional

break made at right angles with the bench and at the fixed end of the

block. Sometimes a corner break is made by putting in two of the

regular V-shaped holes in the lines of the proposed break and without

the use of the corner hole. A useful application of this system is in

splitting up large masses of loose stone. For this purpose the

V-shaped grooves are sometimes cut in four positions and breaks are

made in four directions radiating from the center of the hole as shown

in Fig. 12. In this way a block is divided into four rectangular

pieces.

[Illustration: FIG. 12.]

Though the new system is especially adapted to the removal of heavy

masses of rock, yet it has been applied with success in cases where

several light beds overlie each other. In one such instance 10 sheets,

measuring in all only 6 ft., were broken by a blast, but in cases of

this kind the plug and feather process applies very well, and the new

system, when used, must be in the hands of an expert, or the loss will

be serious.

Referring again to our stone step, let us imagine a case where this

stairway runs between two walls. We have here each step fixed at each

end and free only on the top, the bottom, and one face. Let us assume

that there is a back seam, that is, that the step is not fixed at the

back. In a quarry, this seam, unless a natural one, should be made by

a channeling machine. In order to throw this step put of place it must

be cut off at both ends, and for this purpose the V-shaped holes are

put in at right angles to the face. It is well, however, to put the

first two holes next the back seam in a position where the grooves

will converge at the back so as to form a sort of key, which serves a

useful purpose in removing the block after the blast. In quarries

where there are no horizontal beds a channeling machine should be used

to free the block on all sides and to a suitable depth, and then the

ledge may be "lofted" by holes placed horizontally.

Where "pressure" exists in quarries, the new system has certain

limitations. After determining the line of "pressure" it is only

practicable to use the system directly on the line of thrust, or at

right angles to it. It is much better, however, to release the

"pressure" from the ledge by channeling, after which a single end may

be detached by a Knox blast. It is well to bear in mind that the holes

should invariably be of small diameter. In no case should the diameter

of a hole be over 1½ in. in any kind of rock. This being the case, the

blocks of stone are delivered to the market with but little loss in

measurement. It is a noticeable fact that stone quarried by the new

system shows very little evidence of drill marks, for the faces are

frequently as true as though cut with a machine.

A further gain is the safety of the system. The blasting is light and

is confined entirely within the holes. No spalls or fragments are

thrown from the bast.

The popular idea that the system is antagonistic to the channeling

process is a mistaken one. There are, of course, some quarries which

formerly used channeling machines without this system, but which now

do a large part of the work by blasting. Instances, however, are rare

where the system has replaced the channeler. The two go side by side,

and an intelligent use of the new system in most quarries requires a

channeling machine. There are those who may tell of stone that has

been destroyed by a blast on the new system, but investigation usually

shows that either the work was done by an inexperienced operator, or

an effort was made to do too much.

A most interesting illustration of the value of this system, side by

side with the channeler, is shown in the northern Ohio sandstone

quarries. A great many channeling machines are in use there, working

around the new form of holes, and when used together in an intelligent

and careful manner, the stone is quarried more cheaply than by any

other process that has yet been devised.

To a limited extent the system has been used in slate. The difficulty

is that most of the slate quarries are in solid ledges, where no free

faces or beds exist; but it has been used with success in a slate

quarry at Cherryville, Pa., since 1888. Among notable blasts made by

this system are the following: At the mica schist quarries, at

Conshohocken, Pa., a hole 1½ in. in diameter was drilled in a block

which was 27 ft. long, 15 ft. wide and 6 ft. thick. The blast broke

the stone across the "rift," only 8 oz. of black powder being used. At

the Portland, Conn., quarries a single blast was fired by electricity,

15 holes being drilled with 2 lb. of coarse No. C powder in each hole,

and a rock was removed 110 ft. long, 20 ft. wide and 11 ft. thick,

containing 24,200 cu. ft., or about 2,400 tons, the fracture being

perfectly straight. This large mass of stone was moved out about 2 in.

without injury to itself or the adjoining rock.

Another blast at Portland removed 3,300 tons a distance of 4 in.

Seventeen holes were drilled, using 2 lb. of powder in each hole, the

size of the block being 150 × 20 × 11 ft. In a Lisbon, O., quarry a

block of sandstone 200 ft. long, 28 ft. wide and 15 ft. thick was

moved about ½ in. by a blast. This block was also afterward cut up by

this system in blocks 6 ft. square. A sandstone bowlder 70 ft. long,

average width 50 ft., average thickness 13 ft., was embedded in the

ground to a depth of about 7 ft. A single hole 8 ft. deep was charged

with 20 oz. of powder and the rock was split in a straight line from

end to end and entirely to the bottom. A ledge of sandstone open on

its face and two ends, 110 × 13 × 8 ft., was moved by a blast about 3

in. without wasting a particle of rock, 8 holes being used, drilled by

three men in just one day, and 15 oz. of powder being used in each

hole. A sandstone ledge, open on the face and end only, 200 × 28 × 15

ft., containing 84,000 cu. ft. stone, was moved ½ in. by 25 holes,

each containing 1 lb. of powder.

* * * * *

Scientific American Supplement, No. 832, December 12, 1891 · 第 13 / 75 题