Londoners may congratulate themselves that they are at last allowed to

cross the bridges which connect the opposite banks of the Thames at the

western end of this great city without paying toll. The Metropolitan

Board of Works have expended £538,847 19s. in freeing these five

bridges--viz.: Lambeth Bridge, £36,059; Vauxhall Bridge, £255,230 16s.

8d.; Albert and Battersea Bridges, (including Parliamentary costs),

£170,305; Albert Bridge Company (taxed costs of arbitration), £2,253

3s. 1d.; Chelsea Bridge, £75,000. On Saturday, the 24th of May, 1879,

Her Majesty Queen Victoria's birthday was appropriately chosen for

the occasion and great preparations had been made for giving _éclat_

to the ceremony. The route taken by the Royal Party (which included

the Prince and Princess of Wales--two of their children, Prince

Albert Victor and Prince George of Wales, attired in naval costume

as naval cadets; the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh, the Crown Prince

of Denmark) which was gay with Venetian masts, bannerets, streamers

and flags. The Circular Engine Shed in Victoria Bridge Road and that

portion of the railway bridge which spans the Thames belonging to

the London, Brighton and South-Coast Railway Company were lavishly

festooned and decorated with coloured flags most profusely. Shortly

after 3 p.m. came three open carriages each drawn by two horses and the

well-known scarlet livery of the Court Mews on the hammer-cloths. At

the south side of Lambeth Bridge the Prince was received by Sir James

M'Garel Hogg, M.P., Chairman of the Board of Works; the Archbishop of

Canterbury, Lord Middleton, Sir Henry Peek, Sir James Lawrence, M.P.,

Mr. Alderman McArthur, M.P., Mr. Selway, M.P., Mr. Coope, M.P., and

other notabilities. The keys having been surrendered with the customary

formalities, a Royal salute having been fired from the banks of the

river and the bands having played the National Anthem, Mr. J. M. Clabon

handed the Prince of Wales an address, folded and tied with green

tape, after a moment's parley His Royal Highness with a smile and an

approving nod of the head from the Princess, who was by express wish a

joint participator with the Heir Apparent in the ceremony of opening

the bridge, handed back the address asking that it might be read as

he wished to reply, then Sir James M'Garel Hogg untying the tape and

unfolding the address read as follows:--

"To their Royal Highnesses the Prince and Princess of Wales. May

it please your Royal Highness--It is with great gratification that

we, the Chairman and Members of the Metropolitan Board of Works,

receive your Royal Highnesses on the occasion of your opening free

to the public the five bridges over the Thames, from Lambeth Bridge

on the east to Battersea Bridge on the west, which serve to connect

important districts on the two sides of the river. London, which in

many respects stands at the head of the great cities of the world, has

too long, we fear, in the matter of free passage across the river,

been behind the capitals of other countries. Until to-day there has

been no free bridge in the metropolis westward of Westminster by which

the population north and south of the Thames could pass from one

side of the river to the other. We are glad that this reproach will

now be removed. The bridges which your Royal Highnesses are about to

declare free have been acquired by the board under the powers of an

Act of Parliament passed in the year 1877, which had for its object

the extinction of the tolls on all the bridges in London. Waterloo

Bridge and the Charing-cross Railway Footbridge have already been made

free. The tolls will this day be extinguished on five other bridges,

and before the end of the year it is hoped that there will be none

but free bridges over the Thames throughout the metropolitan area.

The metropolis and its inhabitants have received many proofs of the

interest which your Royal Highnesses feel in their welfare, and of

the encouragement which you are always ready to give to those who are

engaged in promoting that welfare. Your presence upon this occasion

is a further proof of the interest you feel, and we offer your Royal

Highnesses our sincere thanks for the honour you have done us.

Signed, on behalf of the Metropolitan Board of Works,

J. M. M'GAREL HOGG, Chairman of the Board,

May 24, 1879.

The Prince of Wales spoke in reply as follows:

Sir James Hogg and Gentlemen--I thank you in my own name and that

of the Princess of Wales for your address, and I can assure you

that it gives us both sincere pleasure to take a part in this day's

proceedings. The opening of the five bridges westward of Westminster

is an important event in the annals of the metropolis, and I rejoice

that you should have chosen the Queen's Birthday to declare them free.

It is a source of great gratification to us to hear your announcement

that the other bridges will, before long, be equally open to the

public. A free communication across the Thames is an incalculable boon

to all classes of the inhabitants on both sides of the river, and it

is our earnest hope that you will be enabled to carry your promised

work into effect within the specified time. Let me state in conclusion

that the Princess and myself are always ready to assist in advancing

any object which identifies us with the population of London, and

which tends to promote the interests of the public. The Prince then,

amidst loud cheers, exclaimed, 'I declare this bridge open and free

for ever.'"

Twenty carriages were devoted to the Members of Parliament, Members

of the Metropolitan Board and the Officials the twentieth containing

Sir James M'Garel Hogg and some ladies and following this came the

three Royal carriages. The route being kept clear of traffic and

the spectators massed in lines along side by the police--some 1600

were on duty--the arrangements south side of the bridges being in

charge of Captain Braynes, while on the north side Colonel Pearson

had the directions. His Royal Highness proceeded by way of the Albert

Embankment to Vauxhall Bridge, the approach to which was exceedingly

picturesque the banks of the Thames fluttering with flags, and the

river crowded with boats that followed the _cortège_. The procession

crossed and re-crossed Chelsea Suspension Bridge. In the London,

Brighton and South-Coast Railway West-end Goods Traffic Yard a Royal

salute was given on the arrival of the Prince by the crushing weight

of a locomotive named Rennes, No. 130, passing over twenty-one fog

signals, an arrangement previously made by Mr. J. Richardson, the

effect of which gave general satisfaction. The west side of the

Victoria Railway Bridge which spans the Thames was elegantly decorated

from one end to the other by the London, Brighton and South-Coast

Railway Company. Festoons and tri-coloured flags representing the

colours used for signals on railways were voluntarily displayed in such

profusion by Messrs. J. Richardson and Everest as to render the scene

quite imposing. In front of Chelsea Hospital were drawn up two hundred

warriors of olden times, pensioners in their beaver cocked hats who

knowing more about "Brown Bess than the Martini rifle managed to do a

salute with tolerable precision." The people assembled in Battersea

Park made a rush for Albert Bridge as the procession approached that

graceful structure. The Albert Bridge Company was represented by Mr.

Ewing Matheson, the Chairman; Mr. Youngman, Manager; Mr. A. C. Harper,

Secretary, and Mr. Frederick Stanley, Solicitor. (The Countess of

Cadogan presented the Princess of Wales and the Duchess of Edinburgh

with handsome bouquets on behalf of the ladies of Chelsea. Button holes

of a very choice nature were also presented to the Prince of Wales

and the Duke.) Mr. Kingsbury, Chairman of the Chelsea Vestry, had the

honour of presenting a silver medal commemorative of the occasion to

the Prince of Wales which was graciously accepted. At the north side

of the bridge were drawn up the boys of the Duke of York Asylum; at

the south side the children of the local schools, all singing with as

much gusto as their little lungs would allow "God bless the Prince of

Wales." The Pier Hotel and the houses facing the Albert Bridge were

gaily and handsomely decorated with flags of all nations, and the

balconies at the corner of Cheyne Walk being filled with ladies arrayed

in summer toilets, thus lending an additional charm to the _mise en

scène_. The military display consisted of guards of honour from the

1st Middlesex Engineer Volunteers and the 2nd (South) Middlesex Rifle

Volunteers. The keys of the Albert Bridge were handed over on behalf

of the Company by Messrs. Matheson and Stanley and a device swung

across the bridge denoting that the latter was "free for ever." On the

Chelsea side Mr. Stayton was the designer of the festivities. Passing

along the Surrey side of the river the Prince made for Old Battersea

Bridge the last of the five to be opened. Here the Surrey Volunteers

and the Surrey Artillery mustered in force, and a Salvo of Artillery

from the Citizen Steamboat Company announced that the bridge was free.

At the approach to the Bridge in Bridge Road stands of evergreens were

most tastefully arranged by the employés of Messrs. H. and G. Neal

the well-known Nurserymen of Wandsworth Common. At no point in the

line of route were greater demonstrations of joy expressed and loyalty

manifested than by the Battersea people.

The Royal party returned to Marlborough House---the other carriages

then went to Chelsea Vestry Hall where a banquet was served, and at

night there was a display of fireworks at Battersea Park supplied by

the Crystal Palace Pyrotechnists, T. Brock & Co., the expense being

borne by Earl Cadogan to wind up the eventful day's proceedings.

At the foot of Chelsea Suspension Bridge a board is erected on which

is written the following: _Notice, Metropolitan Board of Works. No

Traction Engine, Steam Roller, or any load exceeding_ 5 _tons on each

pair of wheels, must be taken over this bridge. By order of J. E.

Wakefield, Clerk to the Board, May,_ 1879.

Shortly after the freeing of the bridges the "bars" were removed, and

the old toll house at the foot of Battersea Bridge entirely demolished.

The stupendous Railway Bridge across the Thames at Battersea from

Battersea Park Railway Pier to Grosvenor Road Station is said to be

_the Widest Railway Bridge in the World_. It consists of four arches

each one hundred and seventy-five feet span in the clear, with a rise

of seventeen feet six inches. The immense ribs which support the

superstructure are formed throughout of wrought iron, and are firmly

attached to massive cast-iron standards which are placed over the

piers; the whole of the frame-work is thus made continuous throughout.

On each side of the river is a land arch of seventy feet span, making

the entire length of the bridge eight hundred and forty feet. The

abutments were put in by means of coffer-dams, and the foundations are

carried down thirty feet below Trinity high-water mark. The piers are

built upon the same principle as that which was first applied by the

late Charles Fox to the building of the Bridge at Rochester, Charing

Cross, and Cannon Street, Railway Bridges. The bridge was first erected

by Mr. J. Fowler. In 1865-6 it was enlarged by the late Sir Charles Fox.

Some antiquarians have stated that about fifty yards westward of

Chelsea Suspension Bridge, Cæsar and his legions crossed the river

Thames by a ford when in pursuit of the Britons who were retreating

from the Romans. The ford is described at low water as a shoal of

gravel not more than three feet deep, sufficient for ten men to walk

abreast, except on the Surrey side where it has been deepened by

raising ballast, and the causeway from the South bank may yet be traced

at low water. Others think that the place of crossing was higher up the

river, either at Chertsey or Kingston; the latter was anciently called

Moreford, or the Great Ford. However, landing at Deal, it is natural

the Romans would cross the river at some ford nearest that point.[1]

[Footnote 1: The distance of Chertsey (Surrey) from London is about

nineteen miles. Here, says Camden, Julius Cæsar crossed the Thames

when he first attempted the conquest of Britain; but Mr. Gough, in

his addition to the "Britannia," has advanced some arguments against

this opinion. The passage some believe to have been effected at Coway

Stakes, about a quarter of a mile below Chertsey Bridge, where Julius

Cæsar crossed the Thames when he led the Roman army into the kingdom

of Cassivellaunus, who had encamped his forces on the opposite shore.

The Britons did everything in their power to prevent the Romans from

crossing by driving stakes into the bed of the river and fencing the

banks with wooden palisades. Obstacles of this kind were lightly

estimated by the bold legionaries. The cavalry at once entered the

river; the infantry crossed with their heads only above water, and

panic-struck at the sight of Roman intrepidity, the barbarian warriors

fled from their post without an effort to maintain it. Bede, who lived

in the beginning of the eighth century, tells us, that some of the

stakes were then to be seen, and were as big as a man's thigh. Mr.

Milner says some of these stakes have been found at a recent period,

hard as ebony, each being the body of a young oak tree.]

We would suggest that the next Monolith brought to this country from

the land of the Ptolemys or Cæsars be erected on this spot, similar to

that of Cleopatra's Needle on the Victoria Embankment.

Watermen and others who navigate the river have observed how very

shallow the water is at this spot. Sir Richard Phillips says "the event

was pregnant with such consequences to the fortune of these Islands,

that the spot deserves the record of a monument; which ought to be

preserved from age to age, as long as the veneration due to antiquity

is cherished among us. Who could then have contemplated that the folly

of Roman ambition would be the means of introducing arts among the

semi-barbarous Britons, which in eighteen hundred and forty years or

after the lapse of nearly sixty generations, would qualify Britain

to become mistress of Imperial Rome; while one country would become

as exalted, and the other be so debased, that the event would excite

little attention, and be deemed but of secondary importance? Possibly

after another sixty generations, the posterity of the savage tribes

near Sierra-Leone, or New Holland may arbitrate the fate of London, or

of Britain, as an affair of equal indifference."[1]

[Footnote 1: "A Morning's Walk from London to Kew," by Sir Richard

Phillips, pp. 26-27, published 1817.]

We shall not attempt to speculate as to what is within the range of

human possibilities knowing as all history teaches us how transient is

the glory of sublunary things. We believe that while England is true

to herself and true to God such a state of things concerning Britain

as that depicted by Sir Richard will never be realised. The overthrow

of dynasties, of nations and of empires is the result of moral

degeneracy--the effect of national and individual sins. "Righteousness

exalteth a nation but sin is a reproach to any people. By the Almighty

who doeth according to His will in the armies of heaven and among the

inhabitants of the earth, kings reign and princes decree justice, He

putteth down one and setteth up another." However, while reading the

fore-mentioned quotation we were forcibly reminded of Macaulay's New

Zealander sitting upon a broken arch of London Bridge contemplating

o'er the desolation of England's chief city, or some other traveller

from the Antipodes who shall stand on the broken arches of Westminster

Bridge, and gazing on a horizon of ruin, cry "Here stood the Metropolis

of a Mighty Empire!"

Many years ago a person wrote a note to the Rev. John Brand, Secretary

to the Antiquarian Society, to say that as he was passing through

Battersea Fields he saw some labourers dig up a leaden coffin, in which

was a skeleton and near it there were three more human skeletons. There

is no date but it is addressed to Mr. Brand, at Northumberland House,

which he left about 1795.

About sixty-five years ago there was a house situated in the middle

of Battersea Fields which remained for a long time uninhabited on

account of the strange and weird stories related and circulated about

it. Ignorant and uneducated people said it was "haunted." Nobody would

live in it. At midnight "lights" it was said were to be seen "flitting

about the rooms," and "dismal groans of one in extremes, at the point

to die" were to be heard, and so many believed in "old bogies" and

tales of "hobgoblins" so their minds pictured the most frightful

and hideous spectres imaginable. At length the house like other old

buildings in the neighbourhood was demolished. The Rev. John Kirk, who

wrote a Biography of the Mother of the Wesleys, says: "The legendary

literature of the world teems with wonderful stories of haunted houses

where invisible spirits were believed to utter mysterious sounds, to

perform extraordinary pranks, and sometimes communicate revelations

of the future, or disclose the dread secrets of the hidden world.

These beliefs though strongest and most prevalent where the Gospel

is unknown or least influential, are not peculiar to generations 'of

old time' or to any particular nation under heaven." Certainly the

present generation do not appear to have improved much more than

their forefathers in this respect when there is so much nonsensical

talk about communicating with the invisible world by means of "spirit

rappings," "table turnings," etc. Surely the age when men shall give

heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of demons has come!

Battersea Fields, within the Manor along the Thames, were long notable

as a marshy tract producing a great variety of indigenous plants; and

were the scene on March 21st, 1829, of the duel between the Duke of

Wellington and Lord Winchelsea.[1] Battersea Fields were reputed as

a place for duelling and prize-fights but are now partly disposed in

a fine Public Park, and partly covered with streets and buildings. A

lane from Nine Elms past Tuggy's Mill and Rock's Tea Gardens, by the

poplar trees led to the Red House which faced the river near the foot

of the South side of Chelsea Suspension Bridge since erected. Here in

front was a tall flag-staff with flag waving in the breeze on which

were letters denoting the sign of the house. Seats and ale-benches,

embowered with clusters of elm trees with wide-spreading branches

overhead, were placed for the accommodation of persons who resorted

thither for refreshment. The space here embanked and enclosed with

an iron palisade formed a kind of jetty, divided in the centre by a

flight of steps from the river as well as having a flight of steps

at both ends where watermen landed their passengers or took up their

fares. There was a ferry here to the "White House" on the opposite

side of the Thames. The "Red House" was built of red bricks with white

pointings, wide but not high in elevation. It had one story above the

basement with slanted slated roof, and contained in all fourteen rooms.

Each of the windows on the ground-floor had wooden shutters hung on

hinges painted green, which, when closed or folded, fastened inside

with bolts. The windows did not project from the general face of the

building except the refreshment bar and the upstairs dining room.

This apartment and the long room adjoining commanded an extensive and

pleasant prospect of the river. A large lamp, supported by means of

an iron branch fastened to the wall, projected over the middle door.

The Royal Humane Society's drags were always kept here in readiness in

case of emergency, and notice was written on a board suspended outside

the west end of the house to that effect. The gardens were laid out in

small arbours decorated with Flemish and other paintings and fancifully

formed flower-beds. In the centre of the garden was a fish-pond; the

walks were prettily disposed; at the end of the principal one was a

painting, the perspective rendered the walk in appearance much longer

than it really was. The shooting ground was about 120 yards square,

and inclosed by palings. Beyond the east end of the house was situated

a range of "boxes" or alcoves--seven in number--which at night were

illuminated with oil-lamps. Each "box" had a table in the centre

with seats all round so that twelve persons could sit inside very

comfortably. Of a morning several of the Guards were in the habit of

arriving here by water from Whitehall stairs to enjoy their "Flounder

breakfast" at ten o'clock. And certain noblemen dignified with their

presence and patronage the annual "Sucking Pig Dinner," which generally

took place in the month of August.

[Footnote 1: The Roman Catholic Emancipation Bill passed the Commons

by a majority of 320 to 142, March 30, and was carried on the third

reading in the Lords by 313 to 104, April 10. The Bill met with

determined opposition from the Marquis of Winchelsea who said some

things which the Duke regarded as a personal insult. This led to the

hostile meeting at Battersea Fields. It was fashionable in those days

for gentlemen to settle their friendly differences with a yard of cold

steel or a bullet from the muzzle of a pistol--happily as the result

of this duel no blood was shed--the Duke with a directed aim sent a

bullet through the hat of Winchelsea, whereupon the Marquis fired his

pistol in the air, advanced towards the Duke and made an apology, the

Duke of Wellington politely bowed to his political antagonist and then

separated. Wellington Road, near Battersea Bridge, marks the locality

and derives its name from this circumstance.]

Mr. Wright, who at one time was proprietor of the "Red House," had a

Raven that he called "Gyp" that used to talk. Sometimes as if hailing

a waterman from the river the bird would cry out "boat ahoy!" "What's

o'clock? what's o'clock?" it would hurriedly repeat as if anxious to

know the hour. At another time "Gyp" would call "Rock! over!" "Over!"

as if to intimate that somebody requested to be ferried over to the

other side. Many a scull has been deceived by the mimic cries of this

black-feathered rascal. One day Rock the ferryman was so irritated,

having been twice deceived that day by the call of "Gyp," that he

took up a quart pewter pot and threw it at his head. "Gyp" narrowly

escaped uninjured. Mr. Wright remonstrated and said he would not have

the bird hurt at any price. The raven was deliciously fond of picking

bones. On one occasion a gentleman accidentally dropped his spectacles;

presently, on looking up, he discovered his lost property in the beak

of the raven perched on a bough with all the gravity of a sexton. "Gyp"

had an incurable antipathy to dogs. If perchance a dog passed by, in an

instant he would pounce upon its back, hold on by his claws and peck

at it most unmercifully, while the dog thus attacked ran away yelping

and howling. When dislodged, "Gyp's" pinions bore him swiftly away from

the reach of the teeth of his canine adversary. "Gyp" was of a jealous

disposition and did not like to see other birds petted. He has been

known to kill a magpie and a raven. It was dangerous to put money down

in the presence of "Gyp" for "Gyp" had the propensity of picking it

up and of flying away with it. On one occasion he seized a sovereign

which a customer put down. As "Gyp" had several hiding places where he

deposited "stolen articles," as spoons, knives, forks, etc., diligent

search was made but the valuable coin was never discovered. The last

account we heard of "Gyp" was that he was taken down to Shropshire and

that the poor bird died. Mr. W. Puttick, to whom we are indebted for

some curious pieces of information, says, "One of the notabilities at

the Red House beside the Raven whose bites I have often experienced was

a half-witted man who went by the name of 'Billy' the nutman. He used

to carry a bag of nuts and a dial, people paid a penny and turned a

hand and had nuts for their money. I have often seen this man stand in

the water and let the pigeon shooters shoot at him for a few pence, his

gesticulations and grotesque movements at the same time exciting from

the spectators shouts and roars of laughter."

Mr. Wright took the house of Mr. Swaine, but after Mr. Wright left, the

house was taken by a man of the name of Ireland.

James Rock, a respectable ferryman and lighterman, whose house was hard

by, was accidentally drowned in the river Thames, August, 1874. His

son, George Rock, is now Pier-master at Battersea Park Railway Pier.

All about Battersea · 第 10 / 23 段