OUR BOOKING-OFFICE.

(_By Mr. Punch's Staff of Learned Clerks_.)

I should like to commend with extraordinarily little reserve Mr.

FIELDING-HALL'S _The Way of Peace_ (HURST AND BLACKETT) to the kind of

reader that is drawing plans in his head for a New England. No wonder

that in these great days the impatient idealist rushes forth with his

bag of dreams. The author of _The Soul of a People_ is extreme but

sane--an extremist in common sense, say. He stakes on the fact of human

solidarity as the cure for the bitternesses and crookednesses of

politics; declares life and men to be good, not evil (how right he is!);

wants an England rescued from the Puritans on the one hand and the mere

musical comedians on the other; an England chaste because freer, less

ignorant; good beer in easeful inns; the village or township as the unit

of government and of fellowship; a return to music and the dance, not as

a plasmon-fed high-brow proposition but as the natural expression of a

joy of life returned; a clear fount of honour; a representative House of

Commons; justice, respect, common sense and responsibility instead of

charity; some place other than the streets for our young men and maidens

to make love in; a recognition of crime as mainly a social, not an

individual, disease; a law simplified and scales of justice not weighted

against the poor; and a host of other good and wise and nearly possible

things. Here is not the barren politics of manipulation but an ideal of

living citizenship. I commend it to all believers in new days and all

honourable disgruntlers; not perhaps as a programme but as a tonic.

* * * * *

Do not, please, run away with the idea that _The Nursery_ (HEINEMANN)

presents us with Mr. EDEN PHILLPOTTS' views on baby culture. The

background of his story, the scenes of which are laid in and around

Colchester a year or so ago, is composed of gardens and oyster-beds. On

these he gives a lot of information, and, as he could not be pedantic

even if he tried to be, I browsed pleasantly upon the store of knowledge

set before me. Also I liked the restraint he shows in dealing with the

War, and commend his exemplary method to some of our more blatant

novelists. When, however, I came to the inhabitants of _The Nursery_ I

failed to find in them that rare and delightful quality with which Mr.

PHILLPOTTS usually succeeds in endowing his characters. Readers of his

novels must know by this time that he is not exactly in love with _Mrs.

Grundy_, but here he seems to be insurgent against something, and for

the life of me I don't know quite what it is. Perhaps it is insincerity,

which is a very good thing to be in rebellion against. There is one very

amusing and delightful character, a bibulous old sinner who defied law

and order and almost at the last gasp ladled out what he considered

justice in a most dramatic manner. His name is _William Ambrose_, and it

is worth your while to make his disreputable acqaintance.

* * * * *

One fact at once awakened in me a fellow-feeling for Mr. BERTRAM

SMITH--the discovery of his appreciation (shared by myself, the elder

STEVENSON, and other persons of discernment) for the romantic

possibilities of the map. There is an excellent map in the beginning of

Days of Discovery (CONSTABLE), showing the peculiar domain of

childhood, the garden, in terms that will hardly fail to win your

sympathy. But not in this alone does Mr. SMITH show that he has the

heart of the matter in him; every page of these reminiscences of

nursery life proclaims a genuine memory, not a make-believe childhood

faked up for literary ends. Who that has once been young can read

unstirred by envy the chapter on "Devices and Contrivances," with its

entrancing triumph of the chain of mirrors arranged (during the

providential absence of those in authority) from the night nursery,

down two flights of stairs, to the store-room in the basement? I know a

reviewer whom nothing, but moral cowardice restrained from testing the

possibility of this delightful plan by personal experiment. Fireworks

too--Mr. SMITH has remembered them with a proper regard that is, of

course, wholly different from that of those who understand them only in

their pyrotechnic aspect, not as objects loved for themselves alone,

for their shape and feel, and the glamour of weeks of hoarding and

barter. In short, a real nursery book for the study; not one perhaps

that actual children would care for (quite possibly they might resent

it as betrayal), but one that for the less fortunate will reopen a door

of which too many of us have long lost the key.

* * * * *

What I found strangest in the _Transactions of Lord Louis Lewis_

(MURRAY) is that it is a story, or rather series of stories, about

rogues, in which trickery is invariably vanquished--a refreshing

contrast to the methods of most of our romanticists, who are given to a

certain courtier-like attitude towards the lawbreaker. Certainly that

various artist, Mr. ROLAND PERTWEE, has contrived to put together a

highly entertaining collection of diamond-cut-diamond yarns, adventure

tales that have the great advantage (for these days) of being concerned,

not with bloodshed and mysterious murders, but with the wiles of dealers

in the spurious antique and the exploits of _Lord Louis_ in defeating

them. This _Lord Louis_ is indeed a very pleasant as well as a very

ingenious gentleman. From the rotundity of his conversational periods

and a certain general suavity of demeanour I suspect him of having made

a careful study of the methods of his distinguished predecessor in

rogue-reducing, _Prince Florizel of Bohemia._ But he is, of course, none

the worse company for that. Once, however, he shocked me badly, when, in

perusing an eighteenth-century MS., he--I can hardly bring myself to

quote the passage!--he "moistened his fingers and turned over three

pages." And this of a nobleman and a connoisseur! Oh, Mr. PERTWEE!

Having said so much, it is only fair that I should call your special

attention to one of the stories, "The House in Bath," an exquisite

little gem of considerably higher art than is usually associated with

such "Exploits of the Event."

* * * * *

You might perhaps allow yourself to be put off by such a title as _Home

Truths about the War_ (ALLEN), because it, or something like it, has so

often been used as the preliminary to alarming or disagreeable

statements that we have grown excusably suspicious. But to avoid on this

account the letters that the Rev. HUGH CHAPMAN has here brought together

would be to miss a very original and inspiring little book. Let me say

once that Mr. CHAPMAN (whom you may know is energetic and popular

chaplain of the Savoy; also as already, under a pseudonym, an author)

has deliberately essayed the impossible. Self-revelation, especially in

letters, can hardly ever be made convincing. But putting this on one

side, and accepting these, not as the letters that would be written from

one man to another, but rather (to speak without irreverence) such as

the human heart might address to its Creator, you will find them full of

interest and encouragement. All sorts and conditions of men and women

are here shown, in their varied reaction to the great acid that for

these three years past has been biting into the life of the world. The

priest, the actor, the profiteer, the society-woman, even the

conscientious objector, are all touched lightly, tactfully, and with a

kindly humour that saves the book from its very obvious danger of

becoming pedantic. In his brief preface Mr. CHAPMAN has crystallised

very happily into a couple of words his ideal for the British attitude

towards the War--buoyant sternness. It is the reflection of that quality

in its pages that gives this little book its tonic value.

* * * * *

Mr. ARNOLD WRIGHT'S main work in _Early English Adventurers in the East_

(MELROSE) has been that of making good. Most of us know something, at

any rate, of the men who brought our Eastern Empire into actual

existence, but I tell myself hopefully that my ignorance of those daring

pioneers, whom Mr. WRIGHT describes as humble adventurers of the

seventeenth century, is not exceptional. It has now been satisfactorily

removed, and, after reading this excellently written history of stirring

deeds, I must believe that even men of learning will thank him for

rescuing many good names from the oblivion which threatened them. And

Mr. WRIGHT is not only to be congratulated on this act of salvage, but

also on the admirable way in which he has performed it. A restrained

style and a temperate judgment are equally at his command. I cannot

better commend his book to Imperialists than by saying that all Little

Englanders will detest it.

* * * * *

On internal evidence I had set down _Root and Branch_ (ALLEN AND UNWIN),

by R. ALLATINI, as the very clever first book of a very clever and

observant writer of the (alleged) weaker sex. But I find the title-page

gives two previous novels to her pen--I still guess a woman's hand. And

I by no means withdraw the "clever." The characterisation of the various

members of the _Arenski_ family--the branches are better done than the

root, old _Paul Arenski, K.C._, idealist and orator--is uncannily good.

There's wit and humour and diversity of gifts. What suggested the "first

book" idea was an uncertainty of method, a hesitation between the new

realism and the older romanticism. In both moods the author is

successful, but the joints show something clumsily. This, however, is

technical merely. I commend the book to all who are interested,

approvingly or critically, in the Jew. A dramatic theme runs through the

book, the ethical question as to whether a man may be justified in

killing, at her passionate request, a woman dearly loved who is slowly

dying of a terrible disease.

* * * * *

[Illustration]

_Angry Customer (who has been induced by an advertisement to purchase a

portrait enlargement)._ "YOUR ADVERTISEMENT SAYS, 'MONEY RETURNED IF NOT

SATISFIED.' I'M _NOT_ SATISFIED, AND I WANT MY MONEY BACK."

_The Eureka Portrait Company (placidly)_ "I'M SORRY YOU DON'T LIKE

IT, MADAM; BUT IF YOU WILL READ THE ADVERTISEMENT CAREFULLY YOU WILL

NOTE THAT IT DOES NOT SPECIFY _WHO_ IS TO BE SATISFIED--AND I ASSURE

YOU I _AM_."

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 153, July 4, 1917 · 第 32 / 32 题