I was born to parents of the working class in Israel, in 1961. It was a

grim neighbourhood, in a polluted industrial area, a red bastion of the

"socialist" labour party. The latter would have easily qualified as

Bolshevik-communist anywhere else. It exerted the subtly pernicious

decadently corrupt kind of all-pervasive influence that is so typical

in one party states. Sure, there were a few token fringe opposition

parties but Labour's dominance went uninterrupted for more than 90

years. And corruption was both rife and rampant - nepotism, cronyism,

outright bribery. During the 70s, the recently appointed governor of

the central bank was imprisoned and a minister committed suicide. Many

more immolated themselves or ended serving long sentences in

over-crowded jails. Massive scandals erupted daily. Some of them cost

the country more than 10% of its GDP each (for example, the crisis of

the bank shares in 1983). In the 80s, privatisation turned into an orgy

of privateering, spawning a class of robber barons. Red tape is still a

major problem - and a major source of employment. And then there were

the wars and armed conflicts and vendettas and retributions and mines

and missiles and exploding buses and the gas masks. In its 52 years of

independence the country has gone through 6 major official wars and

more than 10 war-sized conflicts.

Yet, despite all the above, Israel emerged as by far the most

outstanding economic miracle. Its population was multiplied by 10 by

surges of immigrants. During the 50s, it tripled from 650,000 (1948 -

Jewish population figures only) to 2,000,000. The newcomers were all

destitute, the refugees of the geopolitics of hate from both the

Eastern block and from the Arab countries. The cultural, social and

religious profile of the latter stood in stark contrast to that of

their "hosts". Thus the seeds of long term inter-ethnic,

inter-cultural, social and religious conflicts were sown, soon to

blossom into full-fledged rifts. During the 90s - 800,000 Russian

immigrants flooded a Jewish population of 4,500,000 souls. But these

demographic upheavals did not disturb a pattern of unprecedented

economic growth, which led to a GDP per capita per annum of 17,000 USD.

Israel is a world leader in agriculture, armaments, information

technology, research and development in various scientific fields. Yet,

it is a desert country, smaller in area than Macedonia and with much

fewer and lesser natural endowments. It was subjected to an Arab

embargo for more than 40 consecutive years. On average it had c. 3

million inhabitants throughout its existence.

Israel's secret was the Jews in the Jewish Diaspora the world over.

From its very inception - as a budding concept in the febrile brain of

Herzl - the Jewish State was considered to be the home of all Jews,

wherever they are. A Law of Return granted them the right to

immediately become Israeli citizens upon stepping on the country's

soil. The Jewish State was considered to be an instrument of the Jewish

People, a shelter, an extension, a long arm, a collaborative and

symbiotic effort, an identity, an emotional apparatus, a buffer, an

insurance policy, a retirement home, a showcase, a convincing argument

against all anti-Semites past and present. There was no question

whatsoever regarding the implicit and explicit contractual obligations

between these two parties. The Jews in the Diaspora had to disregard

and ignore Israel's warts, misdeeds and disadvantages. They had to turn

a public blind eye to corruption, nepotism, cronyism, the inefficient

allocation of economic resources, blunders and failures. They had to

support Israel financially. In return, the Jewish State had to ensure

its own successful survival against all odds and to welcome all the

Jews to become its citizens whenever they chose to and no matter what

their previous record or history is. Hence the constant arguments about

WHO is a Jew and which institution should be allowed to monopolize the

endowment of this lucrative and, potentially, life saving status. Hence

the bitter resentment felt in many circles toward the 200,000 or so

non-Jewish immigrants, the relatives of the Jewish ones who flooded

Israel's shores in the last decade.

But the consensus was and is unharmed, appearances notwithstanding. And

the Jews supported Israel in numerous straightforward and inventive

ways. They volunteered to fight for it. They spied for it. They donated

money and built hospitals, schools, libraries, universities and

municipal offices. They supported students through scholarships and

young leaders through exchange programs. They managed and financed a

gigantic network of educational facilities from youth summer camps to

cultural exchanges. They bought the risky long-term bonds of the

nascent state, which was constantly fighting for its life (and they did

an excellent business in hindsight). Some of them invested money in

centrally planned, periphery bound, lost economic causes - ghost

factories that produced shoddy and undemanded goods. Year in and year

out they poured an average of half a billion US dollars a year annually

(about 200 million US dollars a year in net funds). Most of the money

did not come from the stereotypical Jewish billionaires. Most of it

came through a concerted effort of voluntary (though surely peer

pressured) money raising among hundreds of thousands of poor Jews the

world over. The Jewish people set up a horde of organizations whose aim

was collection of funds and their application to the advancement of

Zionist and Jewish causes. Every Jew deposited a few weekly cents into

the "Blue Box" - "for the cause": to redeem land, to establish

settlements, to open educational institutions, to publish a Jewish

newspaper, to act against anti-Semitism, to rebrand Judaism and fight

nefarious stereotypes. It was a grassroots movement directed only by

the dual slogans of "No Other Choice" and "The Whole World is Against

Us". Emanating from posttraumatic and paranoiac roots - it later became

a groundswell of goodwill, enthusiastic co-operation and pride.

And all this time, the Jews knew. Not only the sophisticated, worldly

Jewish moneymen. Not only the cosmopolitan, erudite Jewish

intellectuals. But also the more typical small time tailors and

shoemakers and restaurateurs and cab drivers and plumbers and sweatshop

textile workers. They all knew - and it did not sway them one bit. It

did not drive them away. They did not gripe and complain or abstain.

They kept coming. They kept pouring money into this seemingly

insatiable black hole. They kept believing. They kept waiting and they

kept active. And all these long decades - they knew.

They knew that Israel was ruled by a caste of utterly corrupt

politicians whose avarice equalled only their incompetence. They knew

that central planning was going nowhere fast. They knew that elections

were rigged, that red tape was strangling entrepreneurship and

initiative, that inter ethnic tension was explosive. They knew that

Israel lost its not to a demographically exploding Arab population

coupled with endless acts of terrorism. They knew that Israel's conduct

was not fair, not always democratic, and often unnecessarily

aggressive. They knew that tenders were won by bribes, that

transparency was a mockery, that the courts were negligent and

inefficient. They knew that property rights were not protected and that

people were pusillanimous and greedy and petty and self-occupied (not

to say narcissistic). They witnessed the waste of scarce resources, the

indefinitely protracted processes, the bureaucratic delays, the free

use of public funds for private ends. They watched as ministers and

members of the Knesset and top law enforcement agent conspired to

engage in crime and then colluded in covering it up. And they felt

betrayed and agonized over all this.

Yet, they NEVER - NEVER - not even for a second, considered giving up.

They NEVER - NEVER - stopped the money coming. They did not discontinue

the dialogue intended to make things better, over there, the land of

their so distant fathers. They always donated and invested and financed

and visited and cajoled and argued and opined and hoped and dreamed.

Because this was THEIR country, as well. Because it was a partnership

and the inexperienced, stray partner was given the benefit of

indefinite doubt. Because they saw the opportunity - the economic

opportunity, for sure - but, above all, the historical opportunity.

When Israel did mature, when it became a law state, orderly,

transparent, efficient, forward looking, the high tech Israel we all

know - it repaid them over and over again. They all made money on their

decades of patience and endurance. The rich made big money. The small

guys made less. But there is no Jew today who can say that he lost

money in Israel because he became financially or economically active

there in the long run.

They stuck to Israel primarily because they were Jews (and, by easy

extension, Israelis). And this is what being a Jew meant. And they were

richly rewarded by the Justice Minister of history. Perhaps there is a

lesson to be learnt here by Macedonians in the Diaspora. I, for one, am

sure there is.

Thank you.

Return

The Magla Vocables

The Macedonians have a word for it - "Magla", fog. It signifies the

twin arts of duplicity and ambiguity. In the mental asylum that the

swathe of socialist countries was, even language was pathologised. It

mutated into a weapon of self-defence, a verbal fortification, a medium

without a message, replacing words with vocables. Easterners (in this

text, the unfortunate residents of the Kafkaesque landscape which

stretches between Russia and Albania) don't talk or communicate. They

fend off. They hide and evade and avoid and disguise. In the planet of

capricious and arbitrary unpredictability, of shifting semiotic and

semantic dunes that they inhabited for so many decades (or centuries) -

they perfected the ability to say nothing in lengthy, Castro-like

speeches. The ensuing convoluted sentences are Arabesques of

meaninglessness, acrobatics of evasion, lack of commitment elevated to

an ideology. The Easterner prefers to wait and see and see what waiting

brings. It is the postponement of the inevitable that leads to the

inevitability of postponement as a strategy of survival.

It is impossible to really understand an Easterner. The syntax fast

deteriorates into ever more labyrinthine structures. The grammar

tortured to produce the verbal Doppler shifts essential to disguise the

source of the information, its distance from reality, the speed of its

degeneration into rigid official versions. Buried under the lush flora

and fauna of idioms without an end, the language erupts, like some

exotic rash, an autoimmune reaction to its infection and contamination.

And this newspeak, this malignant form of political correctness is not

the exclusive domain of politicians or "intellectuals". Like vile weeds

it spread throughout, strangling with absent minded persistence the

ability to understand, to agree, to disagree and to debate, to present

arguments, to compare notes, to learn and to teach. Easterners,

therefore, never talk to each other - rather, they talk at each other.

They exchange subtexts, camouflage-wrapped by elaborate, florid, texts.

They read between the lines, spawning a multitude of private languages,

prejudices, superstitions, conspiracy theories, rumours, phobias and

mass hysterias. Theirs is a solipsistic world - where communication is

permitted only with oneself and the aim of language is to throw others

off the scent.

This has profound implications. Communication through unequivocal,

unambiguous, information-rich symbol systems is such an integral and

crucial part of our world - that its absence is not postulated even in

the remotest galaxies, which grace the skies of science fiction. In

this sense, Easterners are nothing short of aliens. It is not that they

employ a different language, a code to be deciphered by a new

Champollion. The Cyrillic alphabet is not the obstacle. It is also not

the outcome of cultural differences. It is the fact that language is

put by Easterners to a different use - not to communicate but to

obscure, not to share but to abstain, not to learn but to defend and

resist, not to teach but to preserve ever less tenable monopolies, to

disagree without incurring wrath, to criticize without commitment, to

agree without appearing to do so. Thus, Eastern contracts are vague

expressions of intentions at a given moment - rather than the clear

listing of long term, iron-cast and mutual commitments. Eastern laws

are loopholed incomprehensibles, open to an exegesis so wide and so

self-contradictory that it renders them meaningless. Eastern

politicians and Eastern intellectuals often hang themselves by their

own verbose Gordic knots, having stumbled through a minefield of

logical fallacies and endured self inflicted inconsistencies.

Unfinished sentences hover in the air, like vapour above a semantic

swamp.

In some countries (the poorer ones, which were suppressed for centuries

by foreign occupiers), there is the strong urge not to offend. Still at

the tribal-village stage of social development, intimacy and

inter-dependence are great. Peer pressure is irresistible and it

results in conformity and mental homogeneity. Aggressive tendencies,

strongly repressed in this social pressure cooker, are close under the

veneer of forced civility and violent politeness. Constructive

ambiguity, a non-committal "everyone is good and right", an atavistic

variant of moral relativism and tolerance bred of fear and of contempt

- are all at the service of this eternal vigilance against aggressive

drives, at the disposal of a never ending peacekeeping mission.

In other countries, language is used cruelly and ruthlessly to ensnare

one's enemies, to saw confusion and panic, to move the masses, to leave

the listeners in doubt, in hesitation, in paralysis, to gain control,

or to punish. There, symbols are death sentences in both the literal

and the figurative senses. Poets, authors and journalists still vanish

regularly and newspapers and books are compiled into black lists with

dreadful consequences. In these countries, language is enslaved and

forced to lie. There is no news - only views, no interest - only

interests, no facts - only propaganda, no communication - only

ex-communication. The language is appropriated and expropriated. It is

considered to be a weapon, an asset, a piece of lethal property, a

traitorous mistress to be gang raped into submission.

And yet in other places in the East, the language is a lover. The

infatuation with its very sound leads to a pyrotechnic type of speech

which sacrifices its meaning to its music. Its speakers pay more

attention to the composition than to the content. They are swept by it,

intoxicated by its perfection, inebriated by the spiralling complexity

of its forms. Here, language is an inflammatory process. It attacks the

social tissues with artistic fierceness. It invades the healthy cells

of reason and logic, of cool-headed argumentation and level headed

debate. It raises the temperature of the body politic. It often kills.

It moves masses. Submerged in and lured by the notes issued forth by

the pied piper of the moment - nations go to war, or to civil war,

resonating with the echoes of their language.

Language is a leading indicator of the psychological and institutional

health of social units. Social capital can often be measured in

cognitive (hence, verbal-lingual) terms. To monitor the level of

comprehensibility and lucidity of texts is to study the degree of

sanity of nations (think about the rambling "Mein Kampf"). There can

exist no hale society without unambiguous speech, without clear

communications, without the traffic of idioms and content that is an

inseparable part of every social contract. Our language determines how

we perceive our world. It IS our mind and our consciousness. The

much-touted transition starts in the mind and consciousness determines

reality. Marx would have approved.

(Article written on December 8, 1999 and published December 13, 1999

in "Central Europe Review" volume 1, issue 25)

Return

The Elders of Zion

I was shown the same book in Yugoslavia, in Macedonia and in Bulgaria -

"The World Conspiracy" - a shabby tome written by an ageing "scholar".

The main, unabashedly anti-Semitic, hypothesis (presented as undisputed

fact) is that the Jews rule the world supreme - always have, probably

always will. Lists of prominent Jews in the world of international

finance reprinted with lists of influential Jews in the Soviet

communist regime. And it all amounts to a well-organized secretive

machinery of illicit power, claims the author with all the persuasion

of a paranoid. In here, trash magazines dwell endlessly on these and

similar themes.

Yet, anti-Semitism is only one species in a zoo of rumours, conspiracy

theories, Meta histories and metaphysics. Superstitions, prejudices and

calumny thrive in the putrid soil of disinformation, mis-information

and lack of information. In the void created by unreliable, politicised

and corrupt media - rumour mills spring eternal. It is a malignant

growth, the outcome of a breakdown of trust so compleat - that

communication is rendered impossible. This is the main characteristic

of the East (from Russia to Albania): distrust. Citizens and

politicians, businessmen and government, the media and its consumers,

manufacturers and service providers, the sick and their doctors - all

suspect each other of ulterior motives and foul play. All are more

often than not quite right to do so.

It is a Kafkaesque, sealed universe in which nothing is, as it appears

to be. This acrimonious divorce between appearances and essence, facade

and truth, the Potemkin and the real - is a facet of daily life, of the

most mundane exchanges, of the most trivial pursuits. Motives are

sought with increasing urgency - why did he do it, what did he try to

achieve, why had he not chosen a different path, why here, why with us,

why now, what can it teach us. Information is pursued frantically,

appearances discarded, data juggled, heated debates ensue, versions

erupt, only to subside and be replaced by others. It is a feverish

ritual, the sound of clashing exegeses, of theories constructed and

demolished in vacuo.

At the heart of it all, is the unbearable uncertainty of being.

Political uncertainty under communism was replaced by economic

uncertainty under the insidious and venal form of capitalism that

replaced it. Tucked in identical cubicles, the citizens of planet

communism were at least assured of a make belief job in a sprawling

bureaucracy or in a decrepit factory, manufacturing redundant documents

or shoddy goods. Subsistence was implicitly guaranteed by the

kleptocracy that ruled them and, in principle, it was always possible

to ignore the moral stench and join the nomenklatura, thereby

developing instant upward mobility. Corruption, theft and graft were

tolerated by the state as means of complementing income. Life was drab

but safe as long as one abstained from politics and subserviently

consumed the bitter medicines of acquiescence and collaboration. The

vast majority (with the exception of the USSR under Stalin) were not

affected by the arbitrary capriciousness of history. They decayed

slowly in their housing estates, morally degenerate, possession-less

but certain of a future that is the spitting image of their past.

Under the spastic orgy of legalized robbery of state assets that passed

for privatisation, millions were made redundant while thousands

enriched themselves by choreographed looting. The results were

instability, unpredictability, uncertainty and fear. In a world thus

unhinged, the masses groped for reason, for a scheme, for a method in

the madness, for an explanation, however sinister and ominous. Anything

was preferable to the seemingly random natural forces unleashed upon

them with such apparent vengeance. Even a "World Government" (a

favourite), the Illuminati (a Freemasonry-like movement but much more

odious), the Jews, the USA, aliens. The greatest conspiracy theory of

them all - the Phoenix of religion - sprang back to life from the ashes

it was reduced to by communism. A host of mystical beliefs and sects

and cults mushroomed noxiously in the humid shadows of irrationality.

Thus, every event, no matter how insignificant, any occurrence, no

matter how inconsequential and any coincidence, no matter how

coincidental - assume heraldic meaning. People in these domains carry

their complex jigsaw puzzles with them. They welcome each new piece

with the zeal of the converted. They bellow triumphantly with every

"proof" of their pet theory, with every datum, with each rumour. Things

don't just happen - they whisper, conspiratorially - things are

directed from above, ordained, regulated, prevented, or encouraged by

"them". A group of 400 rule the world. They are Jews, they are the Serb

mafia, or the Bulgarian. Or the Americans who plan to dominate (which

obviously puts Kosovo in context). They are the rich and powerful, the

objects of envy and frightened admiration, of virulent hate and rage.

They are responsible. We pay the price - we, the small and powerless

and poor. And it is hopeless, it has been like that forever. The

disparity between them and us is too great. Resistance is futile.

Why was this president elected? Surely, the West demanded it. Or

political parties conspired to rig the vote. Or rich businessmen

supported him. What is the real aim of foreign investors in coming to

these godforsaken places, if not to infiltrate and penetrate and

establish their long-term dominion? And wouldn't it be safe to assume

that al the foreigners are spies, that all the Jews collaborate, that

the neighbours would have liked to conquer and to subjugate us, that

the world is a colossal puppet show? In other words, is it not true

that we are puppets - victims - in a theatre not of our making? They

filter out that which does not conform to their persuasion, does not

accord with their suspicions, and does not fit within their schemes.

This deferral of responsibility brings relief from shame and blame.

Guilt is allayed by symbolically and ritually passing it onto another.

Fear is quelled by the introduction of schemata. These are potent

psychological incentives. They provide structure to the amorphous,

bring order to the chaos that is the brave, new world of the economies

in transition. Flux is replaced by immutable "truths", possibilities by

certainties, threats by "knowledge". It is a re-construction and

reconquest of a paradise lost by giving up the fruit of the tree of

knowledge.

It is this hyper-vigilance, this elevated suspicion, these instant

certainties fabricated from frail pseudo-theories and conspiracies -

that make the Man of the East so easy to manipulate, so vulnerable, so

amenable to collude in his own downfall. Bewitched by his self-spun

myths, captivated by his own paranoia, under the spell of his magical,

immature, thinking - non critical, non analytical, non discriminating -

he is exquisitely susceptible to crooks and charlatans, to manipulators

and demagogues, to the realization of the very threats he tried to fend

off in the first place.

Here is what the DSM ("Diagnostics and Statistics Manual") IV (1994)

published by the APA (American Psychiatric Association) has to say

about paranoids and schizotypals:

The Paranoid Personality Disorder

A pervasive distrust and suspiciousness of others such that their

motives are interpreted as malevolent, beginning by early adulthood and

present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by four (or more) of the

following:

1. Suspects without sufficient basis, that others are exploiting,

harming, or deceiving him or her;

2. Is preoccupied with unjustified doubts about the loyalty or

trustworthiness of friends or associates;

3. Is reluctant to confide in others because of unwarranted fear

that the information will be used maliciously against him or her;

4. Reads hidden demeaning or threatening meanings into benign

remarks or events;

5. Persistently bears grudges, i.e., is unforgiving of insults,

injuries, or slights;

6. Perceives attacks on his or her character or reputation that

are not apparent to others and is quick to react angrily or to

counterattack;

After the Rain : how the West lost the East · 第 2 / 22 段