CHAPTER V.

PROGRESS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL MOVEMENT FROM THE ABOLITION OF

FEUDALISM TO THE PROCLAMATION OF OCTOBER 12, 1881.

The leaders of the Restoration were of an entirely different type from

the court nobles of former days. They were, with a few exceptions,

men of humble origin. They had raised themselves from obscurity to the

highest places of the state by sheer force of native ability. They had

studied much and travelled far. Their experiences were diverse; they

had seen almost every phase of society. If they were now drinking the

cup of glory, most of them had also tasted the bitterness of exile,

imprisonment, and fear of death. Patriotic, sagacious, and daring,

they combined the rare qualities of magnanimity and urbanity. If

they looked with indifference upon private morality, they were keenly

sensitive to the feeling of honor and to public morals. If they made

mistakes and did not escape the charge of inconsistency in their

policy, these venial faults were, for the most part, due to the

rapidly changing conditions of the country. No other set of statesmen

of Japan or of any other country, ancient or modern, have witnessed

within their lifetime so many social and political transformations.

They saw the days when feudalism flourished--the grandeur of its

rulers, its antique chivalry, its stately etiquette, its ceremonial

costumes, its codes of honor, its rigid social order, formal

politeness, and measured courtesies. They also saw the days when

all these were swept away and replaced by the simplicity and stir of

modern life. They accordingly "have had to cast away every tradition,

every habit, and every principle and mode of action with which even

the youngest of them had to begin official life."

The ranks of this noble body of statesmen and reformers are now

gradually diminishing. Saigo and Gesho are no more. Kido and Iwakura

have been borne to their graves. Okubo and Mori have fallen under the

sword of fanatics. But, thanks be to God, many of them yet remain and

bear the burdens of the day.

I have mentioned in Chapter III. the overthrow of feudalism and

its causes. Its immediate effect on the nation, in unifying their

thoughts, customs, and habits, was most remarkable. From this time

we see the marked growth of common sentiment, common manners, common

interest among the people, together with a love of peace and order.

While the government at home was thus tearing down the old framework

of state, the Iwakura Embassy in foreign lands was gathering materials

for the new. This was significant, inasmuch as five of the best

statesmen of the time, with their staff of forty-four able men, came

into association for over a year with western peoples, and beheld in

operation their social, political and religious institutions. These

men became fully convinced that "the wealth, the power, and the

happiness of a people," as President Grant told them, "are advanced

by the encouragement of trade and commercial intercourse with other

powers, by the elevation and dignity of labor, by the practical

adaptation of science to the manufactures and the arts, by increased

facilities of frequent and rapid communication between different parts

of the country, by the encouragement of immigration, which brings with

it the varied habits and diverse genius and industry of other lands,

by a free press, by freedom of thought and of conscience, and a

liberal toleration in matters of religion."[1]

The impressions and opinions of these men on the importance of a free

and liberal policy can be gleaned from the speeches they made during

the western tour, and some of their writings and utterances on other

occasions.

The chief ambassador, Iwakura, in reply to a toast made to him in

England, said: "Having now become more intimately acquainted with her

(England's) many institutions, we have discovered that their success

is due to the _liberal_ and energetic spirit by which they are

animated."[2]

Count Ito, the present President of the Privy Council, in his speech

at San Francisco, said: "While held in absolute obedience by despotic

sovereigns through many thousand years, our people knew no freedom

or liberty of thought. With our material improvement they learned to

understand their rightful privileges, which for ages have been denied

them."[3]

Count Inouye, the ex-Minister of State for Agriculture and Commerce,

in his memorial to the government in 1873, said: "The people of

European and American countries are for the most part rich in

intelligence and knowledge, and they preserve the spirit of

independence. And owing to the nature of their polity they share in

the counsels of their government. Government and people thus mutually

aid and support each other, as hand and foot protect the head and eye.

The merits of each question that arises are distinctly comprehended

by the nation at home, and the government is merely its outward

representative. But our people are different. Accustomed for ages to

despotic rule, they have remained content with their prejudices and

ignorance. Their knowledge and intelligence are undeveloped and their

spirit is feeble. In every movement of their being they submit to the

will of the government, and have not the shadow of an idea of what 'a

right' is. If the government makes an order, the whole country obeys

it as one man. If the government takes a certain view, the whole

nation adopts it unanimously.... The people must be recalled to life,

and the Empire be made to comprehend with clearness that the objects

which the government has in view are widely different from those of

former times."[4]

If the passages quoted illustrate statesmen's zeal to introduce

western civilization, and to educate the people gradually to political

freedom and privileges, their actions speak more eloquently than their

words. In order to crush that social evil, the class system, which

for ages had been a curse, the government declared all classes of men

equal before the law, delivered the _eta_--the class of outcasts--from

its position of contempt, abolished the marriage limitations existing

between different classes of society, prohibited the wearing of

swords, which was the peculiar privilege of the nobles and the

Samurai; while to facilitate means of communication and to open the

eyes of the people to the wonders of mechanical art, they incessantly

applied themselves to the construction of railroads, docks,

lighthouses, mining, iron, and copper factories, and to the

establishment of telegraphic and postal systems. They also codified

the laws, abolished the use of torture in obtaining testimony,

revoked the edict against Christianity, sanctioned the publication of

newspapers, established by the decree of 1875 the "Genro-in (a kind

of Senate) to enact laws for the Empire, and the Daishin-in to

consolidate the judicial authority of the courts,"[5] and called an

assembly of the prefects, which, however, held but one session in

Tokio.

While the current of thought among the official circles was thus

flowing, there was also a stream, in the lower region of the social

life, soon to swell into a mighty river. Social inequality, that

barrier which prevents the flow of popular feeling, being already

levelled, merchants, agriculturists, tradesmen, artisans and laborers

were now set at liberty to assert their rights and to use their

talents. They were no longer debarred from places of high honor.

The great colleges and schools, both public and private, which were

hitherto established and carried on exclusively for the benefit of the

nobles and the Samurai, were now open to all. And in this democracy

of letters, where there is no rank or honor but that of talent and

industry, a sentiment was fast growing that the son of a Daimio is not

necessarily wiser than the son of a peasant.

Teachers of these institutions were not slow to infuse the spirit of

independence and liberty into their pupils and to instruct the people

in their natural and political rights. Mr. Fukuzawa, a schoolmaster,

an author, and a lecturer, the man who exercised an immense influence

in shaping the mind of young Japan, gave a deathblow to the old ideas

of despotic government, and of the blind obedience of the people, when

he declared that _government exists for the people and not the people

for the government_, that the government officials are the servants of

the people, and the people their employer. He also struck a heavy blow

at the arrogance and extreme love of military glory of the Samurai

class, with whom to die for the cause of his sovereign, whatever that

cause might be, was the highest act of patriotism, by advocating that

"Death is a democrat, and that the Samurai who died fighting for his

country, and the servant who was slain while caught stealing from his

master, were alike dead and useless."

In a letter to one of his disciples, Mr. Fukuzawa said: "The liberty

of which I have spoken is of such great importance that everything

should be done to secure its blessings in the family and in the

nation, without any respect to persons. When every individual, every

family and every province shall obtain this liberty, then, and not

till then, can we expect to witness the true independence of the

nation; then the military, the farming, the mechanical, and mercantile

classes will not live in hostility to each other; then peace will

reign throughout the land, and all men will be respected according to

their conduct and real character."[6]

The extent of the influence exercised with pen and tongue by these

teachers upon the nation showed that the reign of sword and brutal

force was over and the day of peace and reason had dawned. The

press has at last become a power. The increase during that period of

publications, both original and translations, and of newspapers,

both in their number and circulation, is marvellous. To give an

illustration, the number of newspapers transmitted in the mails

increased from 514,610 in the year 1873 to 2,629,648 in the year

1874--an increase of 411 per cent in one year--"a fact which speaks

volumes for the progress of civilization."[7]

These newspapers were soon to become the organs of political parties

which were in the process of formation. The most prominent among these

political societies was the _Ri-shi-sha_, which finally developed

into the present Liberal party. At the head of this party was Count

Itagaki, a man of noble character and of marked ability, who had

rendered many useful services to the country in the time of the

Restoration and had for some years been a member of the cabinet, but

who in 1875 resigned his office and became "the man of the people." He

and his party contributed greatly to the development of constitutional

ideas. Whatever may be said as to the extreme radicalism and childish

freaks of the rude elements of this party, the presence of its sober

members, who sincerely longed to see the adoption of a constitutional

form of government and used only proper and peaceful means for the

furtherance of their aim, and boldly and frankly told what they deemed

the defects of the government; the presence of such a party in the

country, whose masses knew nothing but slavish obedience to every

act of the government, was certainly a source of great benefit to the

nation at large.

In 1873, Count Itagaki with his friends had sent in a memorial to the

government praying for the establishment of a representative assembly,

but they had not been heeded by the government. In July, 1877, Count

Itagaki with his Ri-shi-sha again addressed a memorial to the Emperor,

"praying for a change in the form of government, and setting forth the

reasons which, in the opinion of the members of the society, rendered

such a change necessary."

These reasons were nine in number and were developed at great length.

Eight of them formed a direct impeachment of the present government,

and the ninth was a reminder that the solemn promise of 1868 had never

been fulfilled. "Nothing," they conclude, "could more tend to the

well-being of the country than for your Majesty to put an end to all

despotic and oppressive measures, and to consult public opinion in

the conduct of the government. To this end a representative

assembly should be established, so that the government may become

constitutional in form. The people would then become more interested

and zealous in looking after the affairs of the country; public

opinion would find expression, and despotism and confusion cease. The

nation would advance in civilization; wealth would accumulate in the

country; troubles from within and contempt from without would cease,

and the happiness of your Imperial Majesty and of your Majesty's

subjects would be secured."

But again the government heeded not, its attention at the time being

fully occupied with the suppression of the Satsuma Rebellion. The

civil war being ended, in 1878, the year which marked a decade from

the establishment of the new regime, the government, persuaded that

the time for popular institutions was fast approaching, not alone

through representations of the Tosa memorialists, but through many

other signs of the times, decided to take a step in the direction of

establishing a national assembly. But the government acted cautiously.

Thinking that to bring together hundreds of members unaccustomed to

parliamentary debate and its excitement, and to allow them a hand in

the administration of affairs of the state, might be attended with

serious dangers, as a preparation for the national assembly the

government established first local assemblies. Certainly this was a

wise course.

These local assemblies have not only been good training schools for

popular government, but also proved reasonably successful. They hold

their sessions every year, in the month of March, in their respective

electoral districts, and there discuss all questions of local

taxation. They may also petition the central government on other

matters of local interest. The members must be males of the full age

of twenty-five years, who have been resident for three years in the

district and pay the sum of $10 as a land tax within their district.

The qualifications for electors (males only) are: an age of twenty

years, registration, and payment of a land tax of $5. Voting is by

ballot, but the names of the voters are to be written by themselves on

the voting papers. There are now 2172 members who sit in these local

assemblies, and it was from the more experienced members of

these assemblies that the majority of the members of the House of

Representatives of the Imperial Diet, convened for the first time last

year, were chosen.

The gulf between absolute government and popular government was thus

widened more and more by the institution of local government. The

popular tide raised by these local assemblies was swelling in volume

year by year. New waves were set in motion by the younger generation

of thinkers. Toward the close of the year 1881 the flood rose so high

that the government thought it wise not to resist longer. His Imperial

Majesty hearing the petitions of the people, graciously confirmed and

expanded his promise of 1868 by the famous proclamation of October 12,

1881:

"We have long had it in view to gradually establish a constitutional

form of government.... It was with this object in view that in the

eighth year of Meiji (1875) we established the Senate, and in the

eleventh year of Meiji (1878) authorized the formation of local

assemblies.... We therefore hereby declare that we shall, in the

twenty-third year of Meiji (1890) establish a parliament, in order

to carry into full effect the determination we have announced; and we

charge our faithful subjects bearing our commissions to make, in the

meantime, all necessary preparations to that end."

[Footnote 1: C. Lanman, The Japanese in America, p. 38.]

[Footnote 2: Mossman's New Japan, p. 442.]

[Footnote 3: C. Lanman, The Japanese in America, p. 14.]

[Footnote 4: The translation of the whole memorial is given in C.

Lanman's Leading Men of Japan, p. 87.]

[Footnote 5: The Imperial decree of 1875.]

[Footnote 6: The translation given in C. Lanman, Leading Men of Japan.

p. 47.]

[Footnote 7: See the Appendix of Griffis' The Mikado's Empire.]

The Constitutional Development of Japan 1853-1881 Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Science, Ninth Series · 第 4 / 4 章