In the opening of the discourse, we alluded to the fact that when a man's

attention is directed to the subject of his soul's salvation, his first

spontaneous thought is, that he must of _himself_ render something to

God, as an offset for his sins; that he must perform his duty by _his

own_ power and effort, and thereby acquire a personal merit before his

Maker and Judge. The thought of appropriating another person's work, of

making use of what another being has done in his stead, does not occur to

him; or if it does, it is repulsive to him. His thought is, that it is

his own soul that is to be saved, and it is his own work that must save

it. Hence, he begins to perform religious duties in the ordinary use of

his own faculties, and in his own strength, for the purpose, and with the

expectation, of _settling the account_ which he knows is unsettled,

between himself and his Judge. As yet, there is no faith in another

Being. He is not trusting and resting in another person; but he is

trusting and resting in himself. He is not making use of the work or

services which another has wrought in his behalf, but he is employing

his own powers and faculties, in performing these his own works, which he

owes, and which, if paid in this style, he thinks will save his soul.

This is the spontaneous, and it is the correct, idea of a "work,"--of

what St. Paul so often calls a "work of the law." And it is the exact

contrary of faith.

For, faith never does anything in this independent and self-reliant

manner. It does not perform a service in its own strength, and then hold

it out to God as something for Him to receive, and for which He must pay

back wages in the form of remitting sin and bestowing happiness. Faith is

wholly occupied with _another's_ work, and _another's_ merit. The

believing soul deserts all its own doings, and betakes itself to what a

third person has wrought for it, and in its stead. When, for

illustration, a sinner discovers that he owes a satisfaction to Eternal

Justice for the sins that are past, if he adopts the method of works, he

will offer up his endeavors to obey the law, as an offset, and a reason

why he should be forgiven. He will say in his heart, if he does not in

his prayer: "I am striving to atone for the past, by doing my duty in the

future; my resolutions, my prayers and alms-giving, all this hard

struggle to be better and to do better, ought certainly to avail for my

pardon." Or, if he has been educated in a superstitious Church, he will

offer up his penances, and mortifications, and pilgrimages, as a

satisfaction to justice, and a reason why he should be forgiven and made

blessed forever in heaven. That is a very instructive anecdote which St.

Simon relates respecting the last hours of the profligate Louis XIV. "One

day,"--he says,--"the king recovering from loss of consciousness asked

his confessor, Pere Tellier, to give him absolution for all his sins.

Pere Tellier asked him if he suffered much. 'No,' replied the king,

'that's what troubles me. I should like to suffer more, for the expiation

of my sins.'" Here was a poor mortal who had spent his days in carnality

and transgression of the pure law of God. He is conscious of guilt, and

feels the need of its atonement. And now, upon the very edge of eternity

and brink of doom, he proposes to make his own atonement, to be his own

redeemer and save his own soul, by offering up to the eternal nemesis

that was racking his conscience a few hours of finite suffering, instead

of betaking himself to the infinite passion and agony of Calvary. This is

a work; and, alas, a "_dead_ work," as St. Paul so often denominates it.

This is the method of justification by works. But when a man adopts the

method of justification by faith, his course is exactly opposite to all

this. Upon discovering that he owes a satisfaction to Eternal Justice for

the sins that are past, instead of holding up his prayers, or

alms-giving, or penances, or moral efforts, or any work of his own, he

holds up the sacrificial work of Christ. In his prayer to God, he

interposes the agony and death of the Great Substitute between his guilty

soul, and the arrows of justice.[2] He knows that the very best of his

own works, that even the most perfect obedience that a creature could

render, would be pierced through and through by the glittering shafts of

violated law. And therefore he takes the "shield of faith." He places the

oblation of the God-man,--not his own work and not his own suffering, but

another's work and another's suffering,--between himself and the judicial

vengeance of the Most High. And in so doing, he works no work of his own,

and no dead work; but he works the "work of God;" he _believes_ on Him

whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation for his sins, and not for

his only but for the sins of the whole world.

This then is the great doctrine which our Lord taught the Jews, when they

asked Him what particular thing or things they must do in order to

eternal life. The apostle John, who recorded the answer of Christ in this

instance, repeats the doctrine again in his first Epistle: "Whatsoever we

ask, we receive of Him, because we keep His commandment, and do those

things that are pleasing in His sight. And _this is His commandment_,

that we should _believe_ on the name of His Son Jesus Christ" (1 John

iii, 22, 23). The whole duty of sinful man is here summed up, and

concentrated, in the duty to trust in another person than himself, and in

another work than his own. The apostle, like his Lord before him, employs

the singular number: "This is His commandment,"--as if there were no

other commandment upon record. And this corresponds with the answer which

Paul and Silas gave to the despairing jailor: "Believe on the Lord Jesus

Christ,"--do this one single thing,--"and thou shalt be saved." And all

of these teachings accord with that solemn declaration of our Lord: "He

that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life; and he that believeth

not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him." In

the matter of salvation, where there is faith in Christ, there is

everything; and where there is not faith in Christ, there is nothing.

1. And it is with this thought that we would close this discourse, and

enforce the doctrine of the text. Do whatever else you may in the matter

of religion, you have done nothing until you have believed on the Lord

Jesus Christ, whom God hath, sent into the world to be the propitiation

for sin. There are two reasons for this. In the first place, it is _the

appointment and declaration of God_, that man, if saved at all, must be

saved by faith in the Person and Work of the Mediator. "Neither is there

salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given

among men, whereby we must be saved" (Acts iv. 12). It of course rests

entirely with the Most High God, to determine the mode and manner in

which He will enter into negotiations with His creatures, and especially

with His rebellious creatures. He must make the terms, and the creature

must come to them. Even, therefore, if we could not see the

reasonableness and adaptation of the method, we should be obligated to

accept it. The creature, and particularly the guilty creature, cannot

dictate to his Sovereign and Judge respecting the terms and conditions by

which he is to be received into favor, and secure eternal life. Men

overlook this fact, when they presume as they do, to sit in judgment upon

the method of redemption by the blood of atonement and to quarrel with

it.

In the first Punic war, Hannibal laid siege to Saguntum, a rich and

strongly-fortified city on the eastern coast of Spain. It was defended

with a desperate obstinacy by its inhabitants. But the discipline, the

energy, and the persistence of the Carthaginian army, were too much for

them; and just as the city was about to fall, Alorcus, a Spanish

chieftain, and a mutual friend of both of the contending parties,

undertook to mediate between them. He proposed to the Saguntines that

they should surrender, allowing the Carthaginian general to make his own

terms. And the argument he used was this: "Your city is captured, in any

event. Further resistance will only bring down upon you the rage of an

incensed soldiery, and the horrors of a sack. Therefore, surrender

immediately, and take whatever Hannibal shall please to give. You cannot

lose anything by the procedure, and you may gain something, even though

it be little."[3] Now, although there is no resemblance between the

government of the good and merciful God and the cruel purposes and

conduct of a heathen warrior, and we shrink from bringing the two into

any kind of juxtaposition, still, the advice of the wise Alorcus to the

Saguntines is good advice for every sinful man, in reference to his

relations to Eternal Justice. We are all of us at the mercy of God.

Should He make no terms at all; had He never given His Son to die for our

sins, and never sent His Spirit to exert a subduing influence upon our

hard hearts, but had let guilt and justice take their inexorable course

with us; not a word could be uttered against the procedure by heaven,

earth, or hell. No creature, anywhere can complain of justice. That is an

attribute that cannot even be attacked. But the All-Holy is also the

All-Merciful. He has made certain terms, and has offered certain

conditions of pardon, without asking leave of His creatures and without

taking them into council, and were these terms as strict as Draco,

instead of being as tender and pitiful as the tears and blood of Jesus,

it would become us criminals to make no criticisms even in that extreme

case, but accept them precisely as they were offered by the Sovereign and

the Arbiter. We exhort you, therefore, to take these terms of salvation

simply as they are given, asking no questions, and being thankful that

there are any terms at all between the offended majesty of Heaven and the

guilty criminals of earth. Believe on Him whom God hath sent, because it

is the appointment and declaration of God, that if guilty man is to be

saved at all, he must be saved by faith in the Person and Work of the

Mediator. The very disposition to quarrel with this method implies

arrogance in dealing with the Most High. The least inclination to alter

the conditions shows that the creature is attempting to criticise the

Creator, and, what is yet more, that the criminal has no true perception

of his crime, no sense of his exposed and helpless situation, and

presumes to dictate the terms of his own pardon!

2. We might therefore leave the matter here, and there would be a

sufficient reason for exercising the act of faith in Christ. But there is

a second and additional reason which we will also briefly urge upon you.

Not only is it the Divine appointment, that man shall be saved, if saved

at all, by the substituted work of another; but there are _needs_, there

are crying _wants_, in the human conscience, that can be supplied by no

other method. There is a perfect _adaptation_ between the Redemption that

is in Christ Jesus, and the guilt of sinners. As we have seen, we could

reasonably urge you to Believe in Him whom God hath sent, simply because

God has sent Him, and because He has told you that He will save you

through no other name and in no other way, and will save you in this name

and in this way. But we now urge you to the act of faith in this

substituted work of Christ, because it has an _atoning_ virtue, and can

pacify a perturbed and angry conscience; can wash out the stains of guilt

that are grained into it; can extract the sting of sin which ulcerates

and burns there. It is the idea of _expiation_ and _satisfaction_ that we

now single out, and press upon your notice. Sin must be

expiated,--expiated either by the blood of the criminal, or by the blood

of his Substitute. You must either die for your own sin, or some one who

is able and willing must die for you. This is founded and fixed in the

nature of God, and the nature of man, and the nature of sin. There is an

eternal and necessary connection between crime and penalty. The wages of

sin is death. But, all this inexorable necessity has been completely

provided for, by the sacrificial work of the Son of God. In the gospel,

God satisfies His own justice for the sinner, and now offers you the full

benefit of the satisfaction, if you will humbly and penitently accept it.

"What compassion can equal the words of God the Father addressed to the

sinner condemned to eternal punishment, and having no means of redeeming

himself: 'Take my Only-Begotten Son, and make Him an offering for

thyself;' or the words of the Son: 'Take Me, and ransom thy soul?' For

this is what _both_ say, when they invite and draw man to faith in the

gospel."[4] In urging you, therefore, to trust in Christ's vicarious

sufferings for sin, instead of going down to hell and suffering for sin

in your own person; in entreating you to escape the stroke of justice

upon yourself, by believing in Him who was smitten in your stead, who

"was wounded for your transgressions and bruised for your iniquities;" in

beseeching you to let the Eternal Son of God be your Substitute in this

awful judicial transaction; we are summoning you to no arbitrary and

irrational act. The peace of God which it will introduce into your

conscience, and the love of God which it will shed abroad through your

soul, will be the most convincing of all proofs that the act of faith in

the great Atonement does no violence to the ideas and principles of the

human constitution. No act that contravenes those intuitions and

convictions which are part and particle of man's moral nature could

possibly produce peace and joy. It would be revolutionary and anarchical.

The soul could not rest an instant. And yet it is the uniform testimony

of all believers in the Lord Jesus Christ, that the act of simple

confiding faith in His blood and righteousness is the most peaceful, the

most joyful act they ever performed,--nay, that it was the first

_blessed_ experience they ever felt in this world of sin, this world of

remorse, this world of fears and forebodings concerning judgment and

doom.

Is the question, then, of the Jews, pressing upon your mind? Do you ask,

What one particular single thing shall I do, that I may be safe for time

and eternity? Hear the answer of the Son of God Himself: "This is the

work of God, that ye believe on Him whom He hath sent."

[Footnote 1: Romans iii. 27, 28; Galatians ii. 16, iii. 2.]

[Footnote 2: The religious teacher is often asked to define the act of

faith, and explain the way and manner in which the soul is to exercise

it. "_How_ shall I believe?" is the question with which the anxious mind

often replies to the gospel injunction to believe. Without pretending

that it is a complete answer, or claiming that it is possible, in the

strict meaning of the word, to explain so simple and so profound an act

as faith, we think, nevertheless, that it assists the inquiring mind to

say, that whoever _asks in prayer_ for any one of the benefits of

Christ's redemption, in so far exercises faith in this redemption.

Whoever, for example, lifts up the supplication, "O Lamb of God

who takest away the sins of the world, grant me thy peace," in this

prayer puts faith in the atonement, He trusts in the atonement, by

_pleading_ the atonement,--by mentioning it, in his supplication,

as the reason why he may be forgiven. In like manner, he who asks for the

renewing and sanctifying influences of the Holy Ghost exercises faith, in

these influences. This is the mode in which he expresses his _confidence_

in the power of God to accomplish a work in his heart that is beyond his

own power. Whatever, therefore, be the particular benefit in Christ's

redemption that one would trust in, and thereby make personally his own,

that he may live by it and be blest by it,--be it the atoning blood, or

be it the indwelling Spirit,--let him _ask_ for that benefit. If he would

trust _in_ the thing, let him ask _for_ the thing.

Since writing the above, we have met with a corroboration of this view,

by a writer of the highest authority upon such points. "Faith is that

inward sense and act, of which prayer is the _expression_; as is evident,

because in the same manner as the freedom of grace, according to the

gospel covenant, is often set forth by this, that he that _believes_,

receives; so it also oftentimes is by this, that he that _asks_, or

_prays_, or _calls upon_ God, receives. 'Ask and it shall be given you;

seek and ye shall find; knock and it shall be opened unto you. For

every one that asketh, receiveth; and he that seeketh, findeth; and to

him that knocketh, it shall be opened. And all things whatsoever ye shall

_ask in prayer, believing_, ye shall receive (Matt. vii. 7, 8; Mark xi.

24). If ye _abide_ in me and my words abide in you, ye shall _ask_ what

ye will, and it shall be done unto you' (John xv. 7). Prayer is often

plainly spoken of as the expression of faith. As it very certainly is in

Romans x. 11-14: 'For the Scripture saith, Whosoever _believeth_ on him

shall not be ashamed. For there is no difference between the Jew and

the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that _call_ upon

him; for whosoever shall _call_ upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

'How then shall they _call_ on him in whom they have not _believed_.'

Christian prayer is called the prayer of _faith_ (James v. 15). 'I will

that men everywhere lift up holy hands, without wrath and _doubting_ (1

Tim. ii. 8). Draw near in full assurance of _faith_' (Heb. x. 22). The

same expressions that are used, in Scripture, for faith, may well be used

for prayer also; such as _coming_ to God or Christ, and _looking_ to Him.

'In whom we have boldness and _access_ with confidence, by the _faith_ of

him' (Eph. iii. 12)." EDWARDS: Observations concerning Faith.]

[Footnote 3: Livius: Historia, Lib. xxi. 12.]

[Footnote 4: ANSELM: Cur Deus Homo? II. 20.]

End of Project Gutenberg's Sermons to the Natural Man, by William G.T. Shedd

Sermons to the Natural Man · 第 25 / 25 段