DEAR MR. EDITOR,

What on earth, or rather what in the starry Heavens' name is the meaning of

this heading to a paragraph in the _Times_ of Tuesday, Nov. 3:--

"APPARENT DUPLICITY OF JUPITER'S SATELLITE No. 1."

Except that the stars are given to wink, I have never before heard of the

Heavenly Bodies being accused, of immorality. It is true that the duplicity

is said to be only "apparent" or alleged, but this is doubtless due to the

precaution of the scientist to escape an action for libel. Flatterers have

often been accused of this vice, and Satellites are not much better. A

"Star" on the stage might perhaps thus acknowledge the presence of a friend

and admirer in the Stalls or in the charmed Circle. But for a Heavenly Body

to be guilty of duplicity, and above all for a "Number One" Heavenly Body,

is too much. No more will the simple lines

"Twinkle, twinkle, little Star!"

be true. No; if "Jupiter's Satellite No. 1" takes to such light conduct,

then shall we, have to read

"Wink, O wink, you little Star!"

Henceforth let astronomers be very careful what observations they make. To

what a state of things are we coming, when at night all the sublunary world

is nodding, and the Stars above are winking. If there's duplicity in a

Satellite of Jupiter, how about Jupiter itself? Can we henceforth put any

trust in the Planets? Are they in league with deceitful soothsayers,

astrologers, and fortune-tellers? I cannot further pursue the painful

subject. We owe a debt of gratitude to the _Times_ for exposing duplicity

in the highest places. Imagine treachery in Aurora Borealis! What an awful

flirt she would be!! How she'd "wink the other eye!"

Yours,

AN ASTRONOMER LOYAL.

* * * * *

FROM MASHONALAND.--Inspired by the success of ARTHUR B., of DE GORSTIBUS

NON DISPUTANDUM, and of Sir KETTLE-DRUMMOND WOLFF, our GRANDOLPH meditates

a surprise return to his own native land and to Parliamentary life. He

announces his intention of changing his name, and will call himself "Lord

NIL DESPERANDUM CHURCHILL." Hail to the modern Coeur-de-Lion!"

* * * * *

FINAL.--The _Daily Chronicle_ says it does not regard Mr. GOSCHEN as one of

the Puritans of finance. Well, no, perhaps, GEORGE JOACHIM'S finance--like

his manner--is rather _Cavalier_!

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 101, November 14, 1891 · 第 17 / 19 题