CHAPTER II

EDUCATION AND CHILD-LIFE

As soon as the little American baby was born in New Netherland, he was

taken to the church by his Dutch papa, and with due array of sponsors

was christened by the domine from the _doop-becken_, or dipping-bowl,

in the Dutch Reformed Church. New Yorkers had a beautiful silver

_doop-becken_ in 1695, and the church on the corner of Thirty-Eighth

Street and Madison Avenue has it still. It was made in Amsterdam from

silver coin and ornaments brought by the good folk of the Garden

Street Church as offerings. For it Domine Henricus Selyns, “of nimble

faculty,” then minister of that church, and formerly of Breuckelen,

and the first poet of Brooklyn, wrote these pious and graceful verses,

which were inscribed on the bowl:

“Op’t blote water stelt geen hoot

’Twas beter noyt gebooren.

Maer, ziet iets meerder in de Dorp

Zo’ gaet nien noÿt verlooren.

Hoe Christús met sÿn dierbaer Bloedt

Mÿ reÿniglt van myn Zonden.

En door syn Geest mÿ leven doet

En wast mÿn Vuÿle Wonden.”

Which translated reads:--

“Do not put your hope in simple water alone, ’twere better never to

be born.

But behold something more in baptism, for that will prevent your

getting lost.

How Christ’s precious blood cleanses me of my sins,

And now I may live through His spirit and be cleansed of my vile

wounds.”

This christening was the sole social or marked event of the

_kindeken’s_ infancy, and little else do we know of his early life. He

ate and slept, as do all infants. In cradles slept these children of

the Dutch,--deep-hooded cradles to protect from the chill draughts of

the poorly heated houses. In cradles of birch bark the Albany babies

slept; and pretty it was to see the fat little Dutch-men sleeping in

those wildwood tributes of the Indian mothers’ skill to the children of

the men who had driven the children of the redmen from their homes.

Children were respectful, almost cowed, in their bearing to their

parents, and were enjoined by ministers and magistrates to filial

obedience. When the government left the Dutch control and became

English, the Calvinistic sternness of laws as to obedience to parents

in maturer years which was seen in New England was also found in New

York.

“If any Child or Children, above sixteen years of age, and of

Sufficient understanding, shall smite their Natural Father or Mother,

unless provoked and forct for their selfe preservation from Death

or Mayming, at the Complaint of the said Father or Mother, and not

otherwise, they being Sufficient witness thereof, that Child, or those

Children so offending shall be put to Death.”

A few prim little letters of English children have survived the wear

and tear of years, and still show us in their pretty wording the formal

and respectful language of the times. Martha Bockée Flint, in that

interesting and valuable book, “Early Long Island,” gives this letter

written to Major Ephenetus Platt “at Huntting-town” by a little girl

eleven years old:--

EVER HONORED GRANDFATHER;

SIR: My long absence from you and my dear Grandmother has been not a

little tedious to me. But what renders me a Vast Deal of pleasure

is Being intensely happy with a Dear and Tender Mother-in-Law and

frequent oppertunities of hearing of your Health and Welfair which I

pray God may long Continue. What I have more to add is to acquaint you

that I have already made a Considerable Progress in Learning. I have

already gone through some Rules of Arithmetic, and in a little Time

shall be able of giving you a Better acct of my Learning, and in mean

time I am Duty Bound to subscribe myself

Your most obedient and

Duty full Granddaughter

PEGGA TREADWELL.

In the Lloyd Collections is a charming little letter from another Long

Island miss, ten years of age. The penmanship is elegant and finished,

as was that of her elders at that date.

We have, however, scant sources from which to learn of the life of

children in colonial New York. No diarist of Pepysian minuteness tells

of the children of New Netherland as does the faithful Samuel Sewall of

those of New England; no collections of letters such as the Winthrop

Papers and others recount the various items of domestic life. There

are none of the pious and garrulous writings of ministers such as

Cotton Mather, who in diary and various literary compositions give

another side of their life. We have no such messages from the colonial

Dutch. In whatever depended on the use of “a flourit pen,” posterity is

neither richer nor wiser for the Dutch settlers having lived. Nor were

their English successors much fonder of literary composition. Nothing

but formal records of churches, of courts, of business life, offer to

us any pages for study and drawing of inference. And from these records

the next hint of the life of these colonial children, sad to relate, is

to their discredit. The pragmatic magistrates kept up a steady prying

and bullying over them. In New Orange, in 1673, “if any children be

caught on the street playing, racing, and shouting previous to the

termination of the last preaching, the officers of justice may take

their hat or upper garment, which shall not be restored to the parents

until they have paid a fine of two guilders,” which, we may be sure,

would insure the miserable infants summary punishment on arriving home.

Matters were no better in New Amsterdam. One amusing complaint was

brought up against “y^e wretched boys” of that settlement, and by one

high in authority, Schout De Sille. One of his duties was to patrol

the town of New Amsterdam at night to see that all was peaceful as

befitted a town which was the daughter of the Dutch government. But the

poor _schout_ did not find his evening stroll altogether a happy one.

He complained that the dogs set upon him, and that tantalizing boys

shouted out “The Indians!” at him from behind trees and fences,--which

must have startled him sorely, and have been most unpleasantly

suggestive in those days of Indian horrors; and his chief complaint was

that there was “much cutting of hoekies” by the boys,--which means, I

fancy, playing of tricks, of jokes, of _hoaxes_, such as were played on

Hock-day in England, or perhaps “playing hookey,” as American boys of

to-day have been known to do.

As years passed on, I fear some of these young Dutch-Americans were sad

rogues. They sore roused the wrath of Albany legislators, as is hereby

proven:--

“Whereas y^e children of y^e s^d city do very unorderly to y^e shame

and scandall of their parents ryde down y^e hills in y^e streets of

the s^d city with small and great slees on the lord day and in the

week by which many accidents may come, now for pventing y^e same it

is hereby publishd and declard y^t it shall and may be lawful for any

Constable in this City or any other person or persons to take any slee

or slees from all and every such boys and girls rydeing or offering to

ryde down any hill within y^e s^d city and breake any slee or slees in

pieces. Given under our hands and seals in Albany y^e 22th of December

in 12th year of Her Maj’s reign Anno Domini 1713.”

In 1728 Albany boys and girls still were hectored, still were fined by

the bullying Albany constable for sliding down the alluringly steep

Albany streets on “sleds, small boards, or otherwise.”

Mrs. Grant, writing of about the year 1765, speaks of the custom of

coasting, but not of the legislation against it, and gives a really

delightful picture of coasting-joys, which apparently were then

partaken of only by boys. The _schepens_ and their successors the

constables, joy-destroying Sivas, had evidently succeeded in wresting

this pleasure from the girls.

“In town all the boys were extravagantly fond of a diversion that

to us would appear a very odd and childish one. The great street of

the town sloped down from the hill on which the fort stood, towards

the river; between the buildings was an unpaved carriage-road, the

foot-path beside the houses being the only part of the street which

was paved. In winter the sloping descent, continued for more than a

quarter of a mile, acquired firmness from the frost, and became very

slippery. Then the amusement commenced. Every boy and youth in town,

from eight to eighteen, had a little low sledge, made with a rope like

a bridle to the front, by which it could be dragged after one by the

hand. On this one or two at most could sit, and this sloping descent

being made as smooth as a looking-glass, by sliders’ sledges, etc.,

perhaps a hundred at once set out from the top of this street, each

seated in his little sledge with the rope in his hand, which, drawn

to the right or left, served to guide him. He pushed it off with a

little stick, as one would launch a boat; and then, with the most

astonishing velocity, precipitated by the weight of the owner, the

little machine glided past, and was at the lower end of the street

in an instant. What could be so delightful in this rapid and smooth

descent I could never discover; though in a more retired place,

and on a smaller scale, I have tried the amusement; but to a young

Albanian, sleighing, as he called it, was one of the first joys of

life, though attended by the drawback of walking to the top of the

declivity, dragging his sledge every time he renewed his flight, for

such it might well be called. In the managing this little machine some

dexterity was necessary: an unskilful Phaeton was sure to fall. The

conveyance was so low that a fall was attended with little danger, yet

with much disgrace, for an universal laugh from all sides assailed the

fallen charioteer. This laugh was from a very full chorus, for the

constant and rapid succession of this procession, where every one had

a brother, lover, or kinsman, brought all the young people in town

to the porticos, where they used to sit wrapt in furs till ten or

eleven at night, engrossed by this delectable spectacle. I have known

an Albanian, after residing some years in Britain, and becoming a

polished fine gentleman, join the sport and slide down with the rest.”

Mrs. Grant tells of another interesting and unusual custom of the

children of Albany:

“The children of the town were divided into companies, as they called

them, from five to six years of age, until they became marriageable.

How those companies first originated, or what were their exact

regulations, I cannot say; though I, belonging to none, occasionally

mixed with several, yet always as a stranger, notwithstanding that

I spoke their current language fluently. Every company contained as

many boys as girls. But I do not know that there was any limited

number; only this I recollect, that a boy and girl of each company,

who were older, cleverer, or had some other pre-eminence among the

rest were called heads of the company, and as such were obeyed by the

others.... Children of different ages in the same family belonged to

different companies. Each company at a certain time of the year went

in a body to gather a particular kind of berries to the hill. It was

a sort of annual festival attended with religious punctuality. Every

company had a uniform for this purpose; that is to say, very pretty

light baskets made by the Indians, with lids and handles, which hung

over one arm, and were adorned with various colors. Every child was

permitted to entertain the whole company on its birthday, and once

besides, during winter and spring. The master and mistress of the

family always were bound to go from home on these occasions, while

some old domestic was left to attend and watch over them, with an

ample provision of tea, chocolate, preserved and dried fruits, nuts

and cakes of various kinds, to which was added cider or a syllabub;

for these young friends met at four and amused themselves with the

utmost gayety and freedom in any way their fancy dictated.”

From all the hints and facts which I have obtained, through letters,

diaries, church and court records, of child-life in any of the colonies

or provinces among English, German, Swedish, or Dutch settlers, I am

sure these Albany young folk were the most favored of their time. I

find no signs of such freedom in any other town.

It has been asserted that in every town in New York which was settled

under the Dutch, a school was established which was taught by a

competent teacher who received a small salary from the government,

in addition to his other emoluments; and that after the reign of the

English, begun in 1664, this public salary ceased, and many of the

towns were schoolless.

This statement is not confirmed by a letter of Domine Megapolensis

written from Albany in 1657. He says plainly that only Manhattan,

Beverwyck, and Fort Casimir had schoolmasters, and he predicts, as a

result, “ignorance, a ruined youth, and bewilderment of men’s minds.”

Other authorities, such as Mr. Teunis G. Bergen, state that this

liberality where it existed should be accredited to the Dutch church,

not the Dutch state, or Dutch West India Company. In truth, it was all

one matter. The church was an essential power in the government of New

Netherland, as it was in Holland; hence the West India Company and the

Classis of Amsterdam conjoined in sending domines with the supply of

burgomasters, and likewise furnished school-teachers.

When Wouter van Twiller arrived in 1633 with the first military

garrison for New Amsterdam, he brought also envoys of religion and

learning,--Domine Everardus Bogardus and the first pedagogue, Adam

Roelandsen. Master Roelandsen had a schoolroom assigned to him, and he

taught the youthful New Amsterdamites for six years, when he resigned

his position, and was banished from the town and went up the river to

Renssellaerwyck. I fear he was not a very reputable fellow, “people

did not speak well of him;” and he in turn was sued for slander; and

some really sad scandals were told about him, both in and out of court.

And some folk have also made very merry over the fact that he took in

washing, which was really one of the best things we know about him, for

it was not at all a disreputable nor unmanly calling in those times.

It doubtless proved a very satisfactory source of augmentation of the

wavering school-salary, in those days of vast quarterly or semi-annual

washings and great _bleeckeryen_, or laundries,--which his probably

was, since his bills were paid by the year.

A carpenter, Jan Cornelissen, tired of his tools and trade, left

Renssellaerwyck upon hearing of the vacant teacher’s chair in New

Amsterdam, went down the river to Manhattan, and in turn taught the

school for ten years. Jan was scarcely more reputable than Adam. He lay

drunk for a month at a time, and was incorrigibly lazy,--so aggravated

Albanians wrote of him. But any one was good enough to teach school.

Neither Jan nor Adam was, however, a convicted and banished felon, as

were many Virginian schoolmasters.

This drunken schoolmaster was only the first of many. Until this

century, the bane of pedagogy in New York was rum. A chorus of colonial

schoolmasters could sing, in the words of Goldsmith,--

“Let schoolmasters puzzle their brains

With grammar and nonsense and learning;

Good liquor I stoutly maintain

Gives genius a better discerning.”

Occasionally a certain schoolmaster would be specified in a

school-circular as a sober man; proving by the mentioning the

infrequency of the qualification.

As the colony grew, other teachers were needed. Governor Stuyvesant

sent to the Classis of Amsterdam for “a pious, well-qualified, and

diligent schoolmaster.” William Vestens crossed the ocean in answer to

this appeal, and taught for five years in one room in New York; while

Jan de la Montagne, with an annual salary of two hundred florins,

taught at the Harberg--later the Stadt-Huys--and occupied the position

of the first public-school teacher.

For years a project of building a schoolhouse was afloat. A spot had

been fixed upon, and some money subscribed. In 1649 the Commonalty

represented to the West India Company that “the plate was a long time

passed around for a common school which has been built with words,

for as yet the first stone is not laid.” In response to this appeal,

a schoolhouse was at last erected. Still another school was opened

by Master Hoboocken, who taught in the Governors’ bowery, where

Dutch-American children were already beginning to throng the green

lanes and by-ways. He was succeeded by Evert Pietersen, who was engaged

as “Consoler of the Sick, Chorister and Schoolmaster;” and all persons

without distinction were ordered not to molest, disturb, or ridicule

him in either of these offices, but to “deliver him from every painful

sensation.” Many of the other schoolmasters had filled similar offices

in the church and community.

This public school, maintained with such difficulty and so many rebuffs

through these early days, was successfully continued by the Collegiate

Dutch Church after the English possession of New York; and it still

exists and flourishes, as does the church. This should be a matter of

civic pride to every New Yorker. The history of that school has been

carefully written, and is most interesting to read.

Many other teachers were licensed to give private lessons, but these

public and private schools did not satisfy ambitious New Yorkers.

A strong longing was felt in New Amsterdam for a Latin School. A

characteristic petition was sent by the burgomasters and _schepens_ to

the West India Company:

“It is represented that the youth of this place and the neighborhood

are increasing in number gradually, and that most of them can read

and write, but that some of the citizens and inhabitants would like

to send their children to a school the principal of which understands

Latin, but are not able to do so without sending them to New England;

furthermore, they have not the means to hire a Latin schoolmaster

expressly for themselves from New England, and therefore they ask

that the West India Company will send out a fit person as Latin

schoolmaster, not doubting that the number of persons who will send

their children to such a teacher will from year to year increase until

an academy shall be formed whereby this place to great splendour

will have attained, for which, next to God, the Honorable Company

which shall have sent such teacher here shall have laud and praises.

For our own part we shall endeavor to find a fit place in which the

schoolmaster shall hold his school.”

The desired “gerund-grinder”--to use Tristram Shandy’s word--was soon

despatched. The fit place was found,--a good house with a garden. He

was promised an annual salary of five hundred guilders. Each scholar

also was to pay six guilders per quarter. But Dr. Curtius’s lines fell

in difficult places; he could keep no order among his Latin-school

pupils, those bad young New Amsterdamites, who “beat each other and

tore the clothes from each other’s backs,” and he complained he was

restrained by the orders of parents from properly punishing them. (I

may say here that I have not found that New York schoolmasters were

ever as cruel as were those of New England.) A graver matter to honest

colonists was his charging a whole beaver-skin too much per quarter to

some scholars, and soon he was packed back to Holland. His successor, a

young man of twenty-two, who had been tutor to Stuyvesant’s sons, had

better luck, better control, and a better academy; and New Amsterdam

to “great splendour was attained,” having pupils from other towns and

colonies, even from so far away as Virginia.

The relations between church, school, and state were equally close

throughout all New Netherland. Thus, in 1661, Governor Stuyvesant

recommended Charles De Bevoise as schoolmaster for Brooklyn; and

when Domine Henricus Selyns left the Brooklyn church, Schoolmaster

De Bevoise was ordered to read prayers and sermons, “to read a

postille” every Sabbath until another minister was obtained. He was

also a _krankebesoecker_, or comforter of the sick. Even after the

establishment of English rule in the colony, the connection of Dutch

church and school was equally close. When Johannis Van Eckellen was

engaged by the Consistory of the Dutch church in Flatbush in October,

1682, as a schoolmaster for the town, it was under this extremely

interesting and minute contract, which, translated, reads thus:--

ARTICLES OF AGREEMENT made with Johannis Van Eckellen, schoolmaster

and clerk of the church at Flatbush.

1st. The school shall begin at eight o’clock in the morning, and go

out at eleven o’clock. It shall begin again at one o’clock and end at

four o’clock. The bell shall be rung before the school begins.

2nd. When the school opens, one of the children shall read the morning

prayer, as it stands in the catechism, and close with the prayer

before dinner. In the afternoon it shall begin with the prayer after

dinner, and close with the evening prayer. The evening school shall

begin with the Lord’s Prayer, and close by singing a Psalm.

3rd. He shall instruct the children in the common prayers and the

questions and answers of the catechism, on Wednesdays and Saturdays,

to enable them to say their catechism on Sunday afternoons in

the church before the afternoon service, otherwise on the Monday

following, at which the schoolmaster shall be present. He shall

demean himself patient and friendly towards the children in their

instruction, and be active and attentive to their improvement. 4th.

He shall be bound to keep his school nine months in succession, from

September to June, one year with another, or the like period of time

for a year, according to the agreement with his predecessor, he shall,

however, keep the school nine months, and always be present himself.

CHURCH SERVICE.

ART. 1st. He shall be chorister of the church, ring the bell three

times before service, and read a chapter of the Bible in the church,

between the second and third ringing of the bell; after the third

ringing he shall read the ten commandments and the twelve articles

of Faith, and then set the Psalm. In the afternoon, after the third

ringing of the bell, he shall read a short chapter, or one of the

Psalms of David, as the congregation are assembling. Afterwards he

shall again set the Psalm.

ART. 2nd. When the minister shall preach at Brooklyn or New Utrecht,

he shall be bound to read twice before the congregation a sermon from

the book used for the purpose. The afternoon sermon will be on the

catechism of Dr. Vander Hagen, and thus he shall follow the turns of

the minister. He shall hear the children recite the questions and

answers of the catechism, on that Sunday, and he shall instruct them.

When the minister preaches at Flatlands, he shall perform the like

service.

ART. 3rd. He shall provide a basin of water for the baptisms, for

which he shall receive twelve stuyvers, in wampum, for every baptism,

from the parents or sponsors. He shall furnish bread and wine for the

communion, at the charge of the church. He shall furnish the minister,

in writing, the names and ages of the children to be baptized,

together with the names of the parents and sponsors; he shall also

serve as a messenger for the consistories.

ART. 4th. He shall give the funeral invitations, and toll the bells,

for which service he shall receive, for persons of fifteen years of

age and upwards, twelve guilders; and for persons under fifteen, eight

guilders. If he shall invite out of the town, he shall receive three

additional guilders for every town; and if he shall cross the river to

New York, he shall have four guilders more.

SCHOOL MONEY.

He shall receive for a speller or reader in the day school three

guilders for a quarter, and for a writer four guilders.

In the evening school, he shall receive for a speller or reader four

guilders for a quarter, and for a writer five guilders.

SALARY.

The remainder of his salary shall be four hundred guilders in wheat,

of wampum value, deliverable at Brooklyn Ferry; and for his service

from October to May, two hundred and thirty-four guilders in wheat, at

the same place, with the dwelling, pasturage, and meadow appertaining

to the school to begin the first day of October.

I agree to the above articles, and promise to observe the same to the

best of my ability.

JOHANNIS VAN ECKELLEN.

Truly we have through this contract--to any one with any powers

of historic imagination--a complete picture of the duties of the

schoolmaster of that day.

When the English came in power in 1664, some changes were made in

matters of education in New York, but few changes in any of the

conditions in Albany. Governor Nicholls, on his first visit up

the river, made one significant appointment,--that of an English

schoolmaster. This was the Englishman’s license to teach:--

“Whereas the teaching of the English Tongue is necessary in this

Government; I have, therefore, thought fitt to give License to John

Shutte to bee the English Schoolmaster at Albany: and upon condition

that the said John Shutte shall not demand any more wages from each

Scholar than is given by the Dutch to their Dutch Schoolmasters. I

have further granted to the said John Shutte that hee shall bee the

only English Schoolmaster at Albany.”

The last clause of this license seems superfluous; for it is very

doubtful whether there was for many years any other English teacher

who eagerly sought what was so far from being either an onerous or

lucrative position. Many generations of Albany children grew to manhood

ere the Dutch schoolmasters found their positions supererogatory.

Women-teachers and girl-scholars were of small account in New York in

early days. Girls did, however, attend the public schools. We find

Matthew Hillyer, in 1676, setting forth in New York that he “hath kept

school for children of both sexes for two years past to satisfaction.”

Dame-schools existed, especially on Long Island, where English

influences and Connecticut emigration obtained. In Flushing Elizabeth

Cowperthwait was reckoned with in 1681 for “schooling and diet for

children;” and in 1683 she received for thirty weeks’ schooling, of

“Martha Johanna,” a scarlet petticoat,--truly a typical Dutch payment.

A school bill settled by John Bowne in Flushing in 1695 shows that

sixpence a week was paid to the teacher for each scholar who learned

reading, while writing and ciphering cost one shilling twopence a week.

This, considering the usual wages and prices of the times, was fair pay

enough.

We have access to a detailed school bill of the Lloyd boys in 1693,

but they were sent away from their Long Island home at Lloyd’s Neck to

New England; so the information is of no value as a record of a New

York school; but one or two of these items are curious enough to be

recounted:--

£ _s._ _d._

1 Quarter’s board for boys 9 7 6

Pd knitting stockings for Joseph 1 4

Pd knitting 1 stocking for Henry 6

Joseph’s Schooling, 7 mos. 7

A bottle of wine for His Mistris 10

To shoo nails & cutting their har 7

Stockins & mittins 3 9

Pd a woman tailor mending their cloaths 3 3

Wormwood & rubab for them 6

To Joseph’s Mistris for yearly feast and wine 1 8

Pair gloves for boys 2 6

Drest deerskin for the boys’ breeches 1 6

Wormwood and rhubarb for the boys and a feast and wine for the

schoolmistress, albeit the wine was but tenpence a bottle, seems

somewhat unfair discrimination.

There is an excellent list of the clothing of a New York schoolboy of

eleven years given in a letter written by Fitz-John Winthrop to Robert

Livingstone in 1690. This young lad, John Livingstone, had also been in

school in New England. The “account of linen & clothes” shows him to

have been very well dressed. It reads thus:--

Eleven new shirts

4 p^r laced sleves

8 plane cravets

4 cravets with lace

4 stripte wastecoats with black buttons

1 flowered wastecoat

4 new osinbrig britches

1 gray hat with a black ribbon

1 gray hat with a blew ribbon

1 dousin black buttons

1 dousin coloured buttons

3 pr gold buttons

3 pr silver buttons

2 p^r fine blew stockings

1 pr fine red stockins

4 white handkerchiefs

2 speckled handkerchiefs

3 pair gloves

1 stuff coat with black buttons

1 cloth coat

1 pr blew plush britches

1 pr serge britches

2 combs

1 pr new shoees

Silk & thred to mend his clothes.

In 1685 Goody Davis taught a dame-school at Jamaica; and in 1687 Rachel

Spencer died in Hempstead, and her name was recorded as that of a

schoolmistress. In 1716, at the Court of Sessions in Westchester, one

of the farm-wives, Dame Shaw, complained that “a travelling woman

who came out of y^e Jerseys who kept school at several places in Rye

parish, hath left with her a child eleven months old, for which she

desires relief from the parish.”

It is easy to fancy a vague romance through this short record of the

life of this nameless “travelling woman” who, babe in arms, earned a

scanty living by teaching, and who at last abandoned the school and the

child whose birth may, perhaps, have sent her a nameless wanderer in a

strange country,--for “the Jerseys” were far away from Rye parish in

those days.

There was a schoolmistress in Hempstead at a later date. She was old

in 1774. I don’t know her name, but I know of the end of her days. The

vestry allowed her forty shillings, “to be dealt out to her a little

at a time, _so as to last her all winter_.” She lived through that

luxurious winter, and died in 1775. Her coffin cost twelve shillings,

and Widow Thurston was paid six shillings for digging the grave for

her old crony and gossip. Schoolmistresses were not many on Long

Island,--can we wonder at it? Had this dame been one of the penniless

church-poor in a Dutch community (which Hempstead was not), she would

probably have had forty shillings a month instead of a winter, and a

funeral that would have been not only decent in all the necessities

of a funeral, but a triumph of prodigality in all the comforts and

pleasures of the mortuary accompaniments of the day, such as wine, rum,

beer, cakes, tobacco, and pipes.

The “book-learning” afforded to colonial girls in New York was

certainly very meagre. Mrs. Anne Grant wrote of the first quarter of

the eighteenth century:--

“It was at that time very difficult to procure the means of

instruction in those island districts; female education was, of

consequence, conducted on a very limited scale; girls learned

needlework (in which they were indeed both skilful and ingenious)

from their mothers and aunts; they were taught, too, at that period

to read, in Dutch, the Bible, and a few Calvinistic tracts of the

devotional kind. But in the infancy of the settlement few girls read

English; when they did, they were thought accomplished; they generally

spoke it, however imperfectly, and few were taught writing.”

William Smith, the historian of New York, writing during the year 1756

of his fellow townswomen, and of education in general in New York,

gives what was doubtless a true picture of the inelegance of education

in New York:--

“There is nothing they [New York women] so generally neglect as

Reading, and indeed all the Arts for the improvement of the Mind, in

which I confess we have set them the Example. Our Schools are in the

Lowest Order, the Instructors want Instruction, and through a long,

shameful neglect of the Arts and Sciences our Common Speech is very

corrupt, and the Evidences of a Bad Taste both as to thought and

Language are visible in all our Proceedings publick and private.”

One obstacle to the establishment and success of schools and education

was the hybridization of language. New Yorkers spoke neither perfect

Dutch nor good English. It was difficult in some townships to gather an

English-speaking jury; hence, naturally, neither tongue could be taught

save in the early and simpler stages of education. It was difficult

for those little Dutch-men who heard Holland-Dutch spoken constantly

at home to abandon it entirely and speak English in the schools. The

Flatbush master (himself a Dutchman, but bound to teach English)

invented an ingenious plan to crowd out the use of Dutch in school.

He carried a little metal token which he gave each day to the first

scholar whom he heard use a Dutch word. That scholar could promptly

turn the token over to any other scholar whom he likewise detected in

using Dutch, and he in turn could do the same. Thus the token passed

from hand to hand through the day; but the unlucky wight who chanced to

have possession of it when the school day was over was soundly whipped.

In default of “spilling,” as one master wrote in his receipts, and in

which he was somewhat shaky himself, he and all other colonial teachers

took a firm stand on “cyphering.” “The Bible and figgers is all I

want my boys to know,” said one old farmer. When the school session

opened and closed, as we have seen in Flatbush, with prayer and praise,

with catechism every day, and special catechising twice a week, even

“figgers” did not have much of a chance. All the old Dutch primers that

I have seen, the _Groot A B C boeks zeer bekwaam voor de yongekinderen

te leeren_, contain nothing (besides the alphabet) but religious

sentences, prayers, verses of the Bible, pious rhymes, etc.; and dingy

little books they are, not even up to the standard of our well-known

New England Primer.

Though the Dutch were great printers of horn-books, I do not find that

they were universal users of those quaint little “engines of learning.”

If used in Dutch-American schools, none now survive the lapse of two

centuries; and indeed only one can be found in a Holland museum. Mr.

Tuer, the historian of the horn-book, states that there is one in the

museum at Antwerp, printed by H. Walpot, of Dordrecht, Netherlands, in

1640; and a beautiful silver-backed Dutch horn-book in the collection

of an English clergyman at Coombe Place, England; and a few others in

public libraries that are probably Dutch. Dutch artists show, by their

frequent representations of horn-books in paintings of children, that

the little _a-b-boordje_ was well known. In the “Christ blessing Little

Children,” by Rembrandt, the presentment of a child has a horn-book

hanging at his side. In several pictures by Jan Steen, 1626-79,

horn-books may be noted; in one a child has hung his horn-book on a

parrot’s perch while he plays. In 1753 English children used horn-books

in New York as in the other provinces, for they were advertised with

Bibles and primers in the New York newspapers at that time.

Printed arithmetics were rarely used or seen. Schoolmasters carried

with them carefully executed “sum-books” in manuscript, from which

scholars copied the sums and rules into small blank-books of their own.

One, of a Gravesend scholar in 1754, has evidently served to prove the

pupil’s skill both in arithmetic and penmanship. The book is prefaced

by instructive aphorisms, such as “Carefully mind to mend in every

line;” “Game not in school when you should write.” The wording of the

rules is somewhat curious. One reads:--

“Rule of Bartar, which is for exchanging of ware, One Commodity for

another. This Rule shows the Merchants how they may Proportion their

Goods so that neither of them may sustain loss. Sum. Two Merchants

A. and B. bartar. A. hath 320 Dozen of Candles @ ⁴⁄₆ per Dozen; for

which B. giveth him £30 in Cash and y^e Rest in Cotton @ 8d per lb. I

demand: how much Cotton B. must give A. more than the £30 in Cash.”

As commerce increased and many young men sought a seafaring life,

navigation was taught, and advanced mathematics. In 1749 the notice

of a Brooklyn “Philomath” on Nassau Island shows that he could teach

“Arithmetick vulgar and decimal; Geometry plain and Spherical;

Surveying, Navigation in 3 kinds, viz: Plain Mercator and Great

Circle Sailing, Astronomy, and Dialling.” Thus did this Philomath

meet the demand of the day. In 1773 the Flatbush Grammar School was

taught by John Copp, who also took scholar-boarders, who “have the

advantage of being taught geography in the winter evenings, with many

other useful particulars that frequently occur to the teacher,” which

seems to present a rather melancholy picture when we reflect on the

other particulars of good coasting and skating that then were around

Flatbush, on the _Steenbakkery_ for instance, which, doubtless, would

frequently occur on winter evenings to the scholar-boarder.

Colonial days in old New York · 第 2 / 14 章