3. QUALITY OF FOOD.

Having ascertained the kind and quantity of food allowed to the

slaves, it is important to know something of its _quality_, that we

may judge of the amount of sustenance which it contains. For, if their

provisions are of an inferior quality, or in a damaged state, their

power to sustain labor must be greatly diminished.

Thomas Clay, Esq. of Georgia, from an address to the Georgia

Presbytery, 1834, speaking of the quality of the corn given to the

slaves, says,

"There is _often a defect here_."

Rev. Horace Moulton, a Methodist clergyman at Marlboro, Mass. and

five years a resident of Georgia.

"The food, or 'feed' of slaves is generally of the _poorest_ kind."

The "Western Medical Reformer," in an article on the diseases peculiar

to negroes, by a Kentucky physician, says of the diet of the slaves;

"They live on a coarse, _crude, unwholesome diet_."

Professor A.G. Smith, of the New York Medical College; formerly a

physician in Louisville, Kentucky.

I have myself known numerous instances of large families of _badly

fed_ negroes swept off by a prevailing epidemic; and it is well known

to many intelligent planters in the south, that the best method of

preventing that horrible malady, _Chachexia Africana_, is to feed the

negroes with _nutritious_ food.

The Anti-Slavery Examiner, Part 3 of 4 · 第 39 / 294 题