CHAPTER IX.

YAKOOB BEG'S GOVERNMENT OF KASHGAR.

Yakoob Beg's chief claim to our consideration is that, for more than

twelve years, he gave a settled government to a large portion of Central

Asia, and that, however faulty his external policy may have been in

critical moments, his internal management was founded on a practical and

sufficiently just basis. As a warrior he had done much to justify

admiration, and had proved on many a well-fought field, and in many a

desperate encounter, his claims to be considered a fearless and resolute

soldier; but in this quality he was equalled, if not excelled, by his

own lieutenant, Abdulla Beg, the Murat of Kashgar, while some of the

deeds of his son, Beg Bacha, will rank in daring and surpass in ferocity

anything achieved by the Athalik Ghazi. But in capacity for

administration Yakoob Beg far surpassed his contemporaries, and the

merit of his success was enhanced, not so much by the originality of the

method adopted, as by the unique vigour and perseverance with which it

was put into force. The secret of his power can only be discovered by

constantly bearing in mind the fact that he had constituted himself the

champion of the Mahomedan religion in Central Asia. The Ameers of

Bokhara and Afghanistan might trifle with the seductive promises of the

Russians, and might consent to sacrifice the interests of their religion

for a transitory advancement of their worldly possessions; but to such

degradations the Athalik Ghazi--true "champion father" as he was--never

stooped. With whatever imaginary power the sympathy and good-will of

the Mahomedan peoples of Turkestan may have clothed this ruler, there is

no question that his attitude towards the Muscovite would have warranted

the assertion of greater power than was ever attributed to him; and the

secret of this delusion, an attitude of defiant strength without any

solid foundation for so bold a course, can only be unravelled by

remembering that the Athalik Ghazi strove to represent, not so much

Kashgaria, as the whole Mahomedan world of Central Asia. The necessities

of his own position, when, having conquered Kashgar, he found that he

had aroused the susceptibilities of the Russians, compelled him to seek

in every direction for aid, and to have recourse to every artifice for

increasing his strength, or its semblance, in order to avoid the

dissolution of his state and a subjection to the Czar. So well did he

succeed in his efforts, and so prompt were his movements and so fearless

his attitude, that the Russians were deluded into a belief--which was,

as we emphatically insist, unfounded--that Kashgar would prove a more

formidable antagonist than either Bokhara, or Khokand, or Khiva.

The interior management of a state, which, young in years, yet seemed to

tower among its fellows, might be supposed to be a very interesting

topic to dilate upon; but on this subject there is less direct evidence

than could be wished. Even Sir Douglas Forsyth, in his official report,

is not able to throw as much light as is desired on the inner working of

the administrative system of Yakoob Beg. Still, such as it is, with the

exception of the Russian writer, Gregorieff, he is the only authority on

the subject.

To commence with the court and the immediate surroundings of Yakoob Beg,

we are struck by two inconsistencies. In the first place, there were no

great nobles, or indeed adherents or his family; those chiefs who,

whether they were Khokandian nobles or Kirghiz or Afghan adventurers,

had proved their fidelity to his rule, and their capacity for service,

were actively employed as governors of districts, or as commandants of

fortresses in the wide-stretching dominions of their imperious master.

Periodically they came to pay their respects in the capital, and at

frequent intervals Yakoob Beg, in his journeys to the frontier, visited

them, and superintended their operations in person; but, in so active a

community where there was a dearth of mankind, the intellectually gifted

members of the society were too valuable to be permitted to devote their

energies and their attention to the object of becoming palace ornaments.

Yakoob Beg had forced himself on a people who regarded him with

indifference, and he had to maintain himself in his place by a never

relaxing vigour. To make this possible, he required a large staff of

efficient and trustworthy subordinates, who may be divided into three

classes of various capacities, viz., soldiers, administrators, and

tax-gatherers. Until the last few months of his reign there was no

symptom that his system was declining in vigour, or that his supply of

competent officials was limited and susceptible of being exhausted. Even

in his most prosperous years, however, there was always a difficulty in

obtaining a full supply; and in all inferior posts the disaffected

Khitay had to be employed. The Tungani of Kucha and Aksu were scarcely

more to be trusted in an emergency than their Buddhist kinsmen. Yet the

extensive civil service of the state, which undertook the education, the

religion, the civil order, the local administration of the people all

into its own hands, had to be kept in working order, whatever else might

happen. It can at once be perceived that, when a government which never

obtained any deep hold on the affections of the people had only a

limited population to draw upon, it was only a question of time to solve

the difficulty by an exhaustion of the supply of suitable brain

material, or by the uprising of an, at heart, dissatisfied people. No

one will ever understand the secret of Yakoob Beg's rule unless he

constantly bears in mind that his strict orthodoxy as a Mussulman, and

his still stricter enforcement of the laws of his religion within his

borders, were elements of strength only in his external relations; in

his internal affairs they placed him in the light of a tyrant, and

prevented his people ever experiencing any enthusiasm for his person and

rule. It is doubtful whether outside the priesthood and the more

fanatical Andijanis there was any great religious zeal at all, and it is

quite a delusion to speak of the Kashgari, as a whole, as being

fanatical Mahomedans, in the same degree that it is true to say so of

the Bokhariots or Afghans. In addition to there being no noble or

wealthy official class in the city of Kashgar, there was also the

strange inconsistency of an intensely strict etiquette being enforced

side by side with extreme plainness in costume and ceremonial. It is

rare indeed to hear any traveller to Kashgar speaking of the richness or

finery of court functionaries. Even Hadji Torah, or the Seyyid Yakoob

Khan, as he is now called, and Mahomed Yunus, the governor of Yarkand,

two of the most trusted and prominent followers of the Athalik Ghazi,

were not to be distinguished from a host of minor luminaries in the

court circle by any external insignia of their elevated position. Some

of the military, officers of the household troops, wore a device of a

dragon's head worked in silk over their plain uniform of leather; and

this seems to have been a custom surviving the disappearance of the

Chinese. Hadji Torah--who recently visited this country, and who had on

previous occasions travelled in Russia, Turkey, and India--however,

alone among Kashgarian notables, had introduced into his household some

of the comforts and luxuries of European life. His example was not

imitated by many others, and, after a brief period of fashion, the

improvements he had striven to make popular died out and were lost sight

of. The ordinary dress of a person above the rank of gentleman is a

large blanket-like cloak worn over a close-fitting tunic and breeches;

and the dress of the peasant is similar, only his cloak is usually a

sheepskin. The Ameer himself set the example of exceeding plainness in

his costume, and his followers were far too skilled courtiers to vary

their practice from that of their ruler. But what his court lacked in

pomp it gained in impressiveness by the perfect system of etiquette

enforced, and by the external show of reverence to the ruler and to his

religion, manifested in every petty detail of the palace ceremonial. The

Ameer received publicly in his audience-chamber every day, when all

petitions and stringent punishments were submitted to him. His

_shaghawals_, or foreign secretaries, made their report to him on

whatever business might be most pressing, whether it was concerning his

relations with India or Russia, with Afghanistan or the Tungani; and the

local governors, who might happen to have arrived at the capital, were

received in audience, either to present their personal respects to the

ruler, or their reports of the government of their provinces. But with

the exception of a few of his kinsmen, and more intimate associates,

such as Abdulla, none were permitted to be seated in his presence. Even

these could not sit within a certain distance of their sovereign. All

subjects who were allowed to approach his person had to do so in the

humblest manner, and with the deepest expressions of humility and

subjection. His son, Kuli Beg, was still more particular in his

intercourse with his subjects. Even his cousin, Hadji Torah, a man whose

experience and lineage entitled him to exceptional consideration, never

placed himself on an equality with this youthful despot, and always

clothed his words and thoughts when in conversation with him in an

outward show of humble respect and deferential obsequiousness. It will

be at once surmised, and, so far as our information warrants an opinion,

with correctness, that all this terrorism alienated any good feeling

from the ruling family that its prowess in the field and the cabinet

might have secured for it. In Kashgar we have a forcible proof of the

truth of Tennyson's line, that "he who only rules by terror doeth

grievous wrong;" and yet, founded as it was on a military system, and on

the deepest distrust of the subject races, it could not well have been

otherwise.

The most unmistakable proof of how Yakoob Beg's rule was founded, and

how it was maintained, is to be seen in the fact that his _orda_, or

palace, was one large barrack, the interior compartments of which were

devoted to the accommodation of the royal household. His out-houses were

filled with cannon of every description, from antiquated Chinese irjirs

to modern Krupps and Armstrongs, and his select corps of artillerymen,

clothed in a scarlet uniform, seldom left the chief cities, except for

serious operations against foreign enemies. At the Yangy-Shahr of

Kashgar, too, he kept his military stores, and it was said that in his

workshops there he was able to construct cannon and muskets in

considerable numbers in imitation of the most perfect weapons of

European science. But it must be noted that we have no record of any of

his home-made weapons being used in actual hostilities, while the supply

of arms received from Russia, or this country, is known to have been

made the most of. Besides the natural aptitude of his subjects of

Chinese descent for imitation, he had in his service, particularly in

his artillery, many sepoys who had deserted our service either at the

time of the mutiny or since. These soldiers, valuable either as

non-commissioned officers or in higher ranks still, combined with a

large number of good troops from Khokand and the mountain tribes of the

neighbourhood, gave a cohesion and vigour to the whole army that was

simply inestimable. That army, it may be here convenient to say, was

divided into two classes widely differing from each other, and called

upon, except in an emergency, when all the resources of the state were

summoned to take part in its defence, to perform duties as opposite as

their own composition. The army of the Ameer, founded on that confused

assemblage with which he conquered Kashgar, was divided into two bodies,

the _jigit_ or _djinghite_, the horse soldier, and the _sarbaz_, or foot

soldier. The former of these was the more formidable warrior, being

selected for personal strength or skill. The _jigits_ were trained to

fight on foot as well as on horse, and were armed with a long

single-barrelled gun and a sabre. Their uniform was a serviceable coat

of leathern armour mostly buff in colour, and to all intents and

purposes they correspond with our dragoons, or, perhaps, still more

closely with the proposed corps of mounted riflemen. The _sarbaz_, among

whom are included the artillerymen, presented greater varieties of

efficiency than his mounted comrade; still he had gone through some

regular drill and training, and resided in barracks. He was a regular

soldier, and might be trusted in defence of his country up to a certain

point. In numbers it is impossible to state accurately how many _jigits_

and _sarbazes_ there were in the service of the state; some months ago

they would have been placed as high as 50,000 or 60,000 strong, possibly

at a higher number still; now we are wiser on the subject, and we have

gone to the other end of the scale. It is probable, however, that Yakoob

Beg never had 20,000 perfectly trustworthy soldiers in his army, and

that after the conclusion of the Tungan wars, half that number would

more accurately represent his force of _jigits_ and _sarbazes_. But in

addition to the more or less effective main body, there was a

nondescript following of Khitay, Tungani, half-savage Kirghiz, and rude

degraded savages like the Dolans, that in numbers would have presented a

very formidable appearance. The Khitay must at once be struck out of the

estimate, for they were never permitted to go beyond the immediate

vicinity of Yarkand and Kashgar, where they kept themselves apart, and

were employed as military servants, as sentries, and as workmen in the

military shops and factories. The Tungani, who enrolled themselves at

various epochs in the service of Kashgar, were more than dubious in

their fidelity to the state; besides they were of such questionable

courage, that they were no allies of any importance. Even as compared

with one another, these were of varying kinds of efficiency; the Tungani

who joined Yakoob Beg in the earlier portion of his career seeming to be

the best of them. Those who joined after the fall of Aksu and Kucha,

less efficient and more ambiguous in their fidelity; and those who dwelt

in the country from Korla to Turfan and Manas, were totally inefficient,

and not to be trusted to any degree whatever. The Kirghiz and Kipchak

nomads were rather a source of danger to their friends than of dread to

their foes. Yakoob Beg had, therefore, at his orders but a very limited

force to maintain his own dynasty against the machinations of Khoja and

Tungan, and to defend a long and vulnerable frontier against many

powerful and ambitious neighbours. It was absurd for him to think of

venturing single-handed across the path of Russia, and to do him justice

he never deluded himself into the idea that he could. All he seems to

have aspired to was to resist to the uttermost any invasion of his

territory by them, and to die sooner than surrender. Limited in numbers

as his regular forces were, they seem to have had every claim to be

placed high in the rank of Asiatic soldiers. They were certainly not as

formidable a body as the Sikhs or Ghoorkas, probably not as the Afghans;

still they were infinitely superior, except in numbers, to any forces

the Ameer of Bokhara or the Khan of Khokand could place in the line of

battle. To Yakoob Beg alone belongs the credit of their organization.

Yakoob Beg's system of administration was simple in the extreme. A

_Dadkwah_, or governor, was appointed for each district, and in his

hands was vested the supreme control in all the affairs of his province.

Yet he was no irresponsible minister who could tyrannize as he pleased.

Tyrannize in small ways, undoubtedly, many of them did, but, as the life

of the subject could only be taken away by order of the ruler himself,

the most powerful weapon in the hands of an unscrupulous viceroy was

removed.

At stated periods, too, he had to proceed to Kashgar to give a report of

the chief occurrences in his province, and on such occasions petitions

containing charges against the Dadkwah were formally considered in his

presence. It may be said that this proceeding was a farce, and it is

probably true that a favoured viceroy could laugh at any ordinary

accusation against his character. But that would be an exceptional case.

Many Dadkwahs were reduced in official rank, for malpractices, and some,

such as Yakoob Beg's own half-brother, were removed for incompetence in

their charges. Side by side, too, with the Dadkwah, ruled the Kazi or

Judge, who, if of course not on a par in rank with the viceroy, was

still invested with complete authority in all legal decisions on crime.

This prominence given to the legal authorities had a good effect on the

public mind, for, although the Kazi, as a rule, might not dare to thwart

the wishes of the Dadkwah, the effect of the law being supreme was

scarcely detracted from. And what was that law? it may naturally be

asked. Precisely the same as the law of every other Mahomedan state,

with a few innovations traceable to the influence of the Chinese. The

Shariat, the holy code of the Prophet followed in all the Sunni states,

was enforced by Yakoob Beg, with particular severity; and in its working

no sense of mercy was permitted to temper the harshness of its

regulations. Crimes committed by women were punished with greater

inflictions than the same committed by men; and the ordinary

punishments, whipping, mutilation, and torture could be inflicted by

order of the Dadkwah. Only in capital cases had the decision to rest

with the sovereign. Thieves, beggars, and vagrants found wandering about

the streets at prohibited hours were immediately locked up, and brought

before the Kazi, who would either administer a caution, or a whipping,

if the accused had previously offended. Another check on the abuse of

power by the officials was to be found in the following regulation. A

charge to be visited with a severer punishment than twenty heavy strokes

from the _dira_--a leather strap, fixed in a wooden handle--had to be

investigated by a member of each official rank; so the Kazi passed a

culprit on, with his comments, to the Mufti, the Mufti to the Alim, and

the Alim to the Dadkwah. If any of these officials dissented from the

remarks of his subordinate, and the matter was found impossible to

arrange by mutual concessions, it was either referred to the sovereign

for solution, or was permitted to fall through. The Dadkwah had also to

be present at every punishment within his jurisdiction, and was directly

responsible to the Ameer for any miscarriage of justice. The Kazi Rais,

or head judge, had the right to decide all minor matters for

himself--for instance, in his patrols through the streets, if he met a

woman unveiled he could order her to be struck so many times with the

_dira_; or if he found a man selling adulterated food, or using light

weights, he could confiscate his goods, or in some other manner mulct

him in addition to administering a certain number of strokes. He and his

attendants were particularly energetic and zealous in compelling idlers

about the bazaars to repair to the mosques at prayer time, and in a very

paternal and authoritative manner did the Rais exercise his petty power

for the good of his people. Even on his despotism there was some check,

as he had no authority to inflict more than forty blows with the _dira_

for one offence. Intimately connected with the administration of justice

was the police system, which in its intricate ramifications permeated

all sections of society. Much as we may feel admiration for the judicial

code, which, up to a certain point admirably administered, ensured a

certain kind of rough justice throughout the Athalik Ghazi's dominions,

the police laws and discipline have greater claims to our favourable

opinion, as evidences of an astonishing capacity for government. In his

legal code, Yakoob Beg simply adopted the laws enforced on all true

believers by the Koran, and he had no claims to originality as a

lawgiver. But as a ruler adopting all those checks on sedition which lie

at the disposal of an unscrupulous sovereign, and which were brought to

such a pitch of perfection under Fouche and the Second Empire, Yakoob

Beg has reason to be placed in the very highest class of such

potentates. In this achievement, too, he was not a plagiarist, and, as

he must have been ignorant of similar regulations existing in Europe, he

must be allowed the credit of having originated a system of police in

which it is difficult to find a single flaw. In China, indeed, something

of the same kind has at all times existed, and at periods when the

Emperor grasped the sceptre firmly, and made his individuality felt in

the management of affairs, the police were one of the most active tools

of power. But even in that empire there is no record of their having

attained so complete a control over the actions and sentiments of the

people as in Kashgaria during the last decade. It appears, too, that in

superiority of system lay the sole pre-eminence of the latter; for the

Tungan, or policeman, of China was, individually man for man, a superior

class to the Kashgarian and other constables of Yakoob Beg. In short,

the whole credit of their existence belongs to that ruler.

Let us now give some account of this important body. It was divided into

two chief divisions quite distinct from and irrespective of each other,

secret and municipal. The _secret_ was not, like ours, a perceptible

class of detectives, acting in combination with the municipal, to which

was entrusted the discovery of crimes and conspiracies. It may loosely

be described as consisting of every member of the community, for all

desired to stand well with the powers that be, and the easiest way to

attain that object would be to place all confidential information at

their disposal. But it is evident that even in a state of irresponsible

power, like Kashgar, a clear encouragement, such as this, to invent

libels of one's neighbours, could only end in unprofitable litigation

and confusion. There was certainly a check on the too zealous

imaginations of the subjects, and, although there is not much evidence

on the subject, it appears to have been twofold. In the first place a

libeller incurred the risk of receiving very severe punishment,

particularly if the person libelled were of saintly lineage, or if he

filled any official post. This operated as a check on too hasty

accusations, especially when it became known that the reward for such

service was seldom speedily forthcoming, and scarcely ever answered the

expectations of the informer. But this check, which alone seems to have

been adopted in the earlier years of Yakoob Beg's authority, was found

to be insufficient as his power became consolidated. The secret police

then became organized to a certain degree; that is to say, they so far

formed a distinct corps that a member had to be approved of either by

the Dadkwah or the Rais. So well, however, was the secret of their

individuality maintained that few of them were generally known to the

people. Suspicion was wide-spread throughout all ranks of society, and

the governor in his _orda_, or the Rais in his hall of justice, or the

shopkeeper in his booth, or the artisan in his hut, never felt safe that

his neighbour, the man with whom he was holding the most friendly

converse, was not dissecting his expressions to discover whether they

contained anything treasonable. Members of this formidable body were

always attached to the suite of either foreign envoys or merchants; and

their presence in the rear of the _cortege_, always effectually closed

the mouths of the inhabitants, or only induced them to open them to give

false or contradictory replies.

There can be no doubt that this secret organization, brought to a high

pitch of perfection during the later years of his reign, gave a

consistency and strength to Yakoob Beg's tenure of power that was

wanting to all his predecessors. In leaving this part of the system, it

is as well to point out in conclusion that this detective force was

only useful in discovering what was about to occur in the state among

Andijani or Tungani, and that it was powerless to attempt the repression

by force of any outbreak of popular feeling. Its members were simply

spies, and as a body its value vanished when its members became

generally known. Constant changing, and the introduction of fresh

members, were the sole effectual means of preserving the _incognito_ of

a large body of men, and women even, who preserved official

communication only with the local governor or judge.

The municipal police were subdivided into urban and suburban, and they

present a complete contrast to the vague body we have just attempted to

describe. Their functions were known and recognizable. They were the

functionaries who put into practice the behests of the Kazi, and they

maintained order in the streets and bazaars, much as our own do. The

_Corbashi_ is the head of this body, and his subordinates are styled

_tarzagchi_. They wore a distinct uniform, and had drilling grounds

attached to barracks, in which, however, they were not all compelled to

reside. They were essentially military in their rules, and presented a

powerful first front to all evil-doers and would-be rebels. It was they

who accompanied the Kazi Rais in his daily circuit of the streets and

market-place, and it was from their weapon, the _dira_, that the

ordinary punishment was received. Their principal avocation seems to

have been to maintain order in the towns during the night-time, for in

the day we only hear of a few of them being detailed for personal

attendance on the Dadkwah and Kazi. With sunset their true importance is

more visible, for not only were they stationed in all main

thoroughfares, squares, and other open places of the city; but until

sunrise patrols at frequent intervals throughout the night visited all

the chief quarters of the town. The power vested in their hands during

these hours was very great, and it was dangerous for any stranger to

venture out after prohibited hours. All persons found in the streets

after sunset were arrested and incarcerated until the morning, when, if

they could give a satisfactory account of themselves, they were

released, with a caution not to keep such unseemly hours for the future.

If, however, they were unable to explain their business, a further term

of imprisonment was imposed; and it was a matter of some difficulty for

a stranger to obtain his complete liberty for some time afterwards. The

suburban police fulfilled much the same duties, and on all the country

roads patrols passed up and down during the night, while pickets were

stationed at the cross-roads. In the same manner as in the towns all

travellers, except those armed with a passport, were interned for a

minute investigation into their affairs in the morning. And "thieves,

beggars, and wanderers" were chastised at the discretion of the local

magistrate. The vagrant laws were as much enforced, too, as they were in

this country in the days of Queen Elizabeth, and in a general mode of

interference with the thoughts and actions of its subjects, the

Kashgarian government had attained a height of excellence that would

entitle it to rank with the Inquisition. Still there was order. No riots

occurred to distract the harmony of the public weal, and to an external

observer, especially to one belonging to a country where order is

considered the greatest _desideratum_, the government of the Athalik

Ghazi seemed to be the perfection of an Asiatic state, and that order a

reason for attributing all other virtues to its originator.

Travellers, however, who were provided with a passport, were accorded

privileges of transit, and were permitted, if they felt so disposed, to

continue their journeys during hours interdicted to less privileged

mortals. In each chief town there were offices for the issue of these

permits to travel. Not many obstacles were thrown in the path of those,

who left permanent guarantees in the shape of property behind them for

their return, in accomplishing their desire for travel; but rarely was

permission granted to any one, not blessed with these worldly

advantages, to proceed farther than the neighbouring district. Indeed in

all cases leave to visit foreign states, other than Khokand or Bokhara,

was a matter of difficulty to be obtained, and only in the most

exceptional cases was it granted. But it appears that there were some

evasions of this regulation by a simulation of religious zeal, for the

Sheikh-ul-Islam had it in his power to grant permits to leave the

country on pilgrimages to Bokhara the "holy," or to Mecca. In themselves

the passports were simple in phraseology. They merely stated the name

and address of the traveller, the nature of his business, and his

destination. Having obtained the consent of the Dadkwah, and the

authority of the Kazi, no difficulty was experienced in procuring the

necessary slip of paper. Infractions of this permission, by too long an

absence, or by proceeding in some forbidden direction, were visited on a

first offence with a fine. On a repetition of it, however, the

punishment became more severe. It would be interesting to know how these

protectors of the public peace were paid, and by what means. But on this

point there is little trustworthy information. We, however, know of one

tax which was devoted to the support of the urban police, but of the

funds from which the suburban were remunerated, we have no authority for

any assertion. A weekly tax was levied from all the shop and booth

owners, to go towards the payment of their protectors; but it is not

supposed that this amounted to a sufficient sum to maintain the large

force in the more important cities. The difference was probably paid out

of the state coffers under the head of justice. Judging from this we

cannot be far wrong in assuming that a similar tax was levied on the

farmers and country residents for the support of the suburban police;

and as the secret police required less outlay in the country than in the

cities, it is possible that that tax more nearly defrayed the total

cost, than it did in Yarkand or Kashgar. The police supervision and the

military terrorism, freely resorted to on all occasions offering an

excuse for such an extreme measure, have not been without their effect

in leaving traces of their existence and influence in the daily life of

the Kashgari, and on the countenances and sentiments of the subject

peoples. Where formerly lived a light-hearted and happy race there now

seemed as if a never-to-be-removed gloom had settled down on the face of

the land, and neither the assurance of security nor the irregular

encouragement of the ruler to commerce could remove the blight that had

fallen upon the energies and happiness of the people. As one of them

expressed it, in pathetic language, "During the Chinese rule there was

everything; there is nothing now." The speaker of that sentence was no

merchant, who might have been expected to be depressed by the

falling-off in trade, but a warrior and a chieftain's son and heir. If

to him the military system of Yakoob Beg seemed unsatisfactory and

irksome, what must it have appeared to those more peaceful subjects to

whom merchandise and barter were as the breath of their nostrils? All

the advantages of a perfect police system, heavily weighted by the

incumbrance of a costly addition of spies and tale-bearers, would seem

as nothing compared with the loss incurred by the fetters placed on

individual motion and enterprise. Considered by itself, the police

organization of Kashgar was, perhaps, the most perfect design achieved

by Yakoob Beg, and his community of spies will rank with anything in

effectiveness that has ever been accomplished by any potentate. But as a

permanent addition to his strength it is permissible to doubt whether he

really secured his rule by employing the latter, or obtained much more

by the formation of the former than the services of a trained body of

trustworthy, courageous men. The restrictions imposed on trade by the

severance of all communications with the East by the Tungan wars and by

the limited amount of liberty granted the native Kashgari, proved most

deterrent to all mercantile adventure, and placed in the hands of

Khokandians or Russians on the north, and of Cashmerians and Punjabis on

the south, most of the trade still carried on with Eastern Turkestan.

The trade carried on by the Athalik Ghazi's state, if we are to judge

solely by amount, with foreign countries, was greatest with Russia and

her dependencies; but if we investigate the matter more closely we find

that the result is a little more satisfactory to ourselves. The direct

trade that was carried on by way of Leh with Khoten and Sanju was

steadily increasing, while that of Russia by Khokand had for some time

remained stationary, if it had not even decreased. And then much of the

Russian trade has to be scored to this country, for in the marts of

Kashgar, underneath Russian exteriors, were very often to be found

English interiors, and the brand of well-known Manchester and Liverpool

makers was discovered beneath some gaudy and brilliant-looking cover

hailing from Moscow or Nishni Novgorod. Besides, recent investigations

have proved that some of the goods exported from Shikarpore, in Scinde,

through the Bholan Pass find their way through the mountainous districts

that intervene into the territory of his late Highness the Ameer of

Kashgar. Nor had Yakoob Beg totally neglected all means for inducing

merchants to enter his state; indeed, his chief objection seemed to have

been, not that they should have entered his state, but that they should

leave it. Serais were built in all the chief towns for the accommodation

of such merchants as might take up a temporary abode within his

territory, and the Andijani Serai, or hotel, specially constructed for

merchants from Khokand, was one of the largest and most striking

buildings in the city of Kashgar. Yakoob Beg had even detailed off to

take care of the serai and its occupants a large number of the old

Khitay, or Yangy Mussulmans, who were generally employed throughout the

city as domestic servants. When we come to the description of the

relations of Yakoob Beg with England and with Russia we will speak more

fully of the details of those treaties of commerce which were ratified

on several occasions, and whose ostensible object was the promotion of

trade and other friendly intercourse.

We have now considered the army, the police, the administration of

justice, and the court of Yakoob Beg, and the only chief subject that

remains to be discussed are the principles of finance adopted by the

Ameer. To keep any state, even an Asiatic state, in a fit condition for

preserving its independence, a settled revenue is requisite, and Yakoob

Beg, whose atmosphere was one of almost continual warfare, was on

several occasions pressed for money in a manner difficult to be

conceived by us. His military operations languished for the want of the

sinews of war, and we are told on credible authority that many of his

soldiers received only payment out of the spoil taken at the sack of

Turfan and other places. So long as his ordinary expenditure was

increased by the addition of an extraordinary war outlay, so long was he

unable to make his receipts and expenditure balance. On the cessation of

hostilities against the Tungani, and the partial revival of trade in

consequence, his fiscal affairs assumed a brighter aspect, and it is

possible that during the last few years of his reign his revenue showed

a surplus. But to obtain that success, a most joyful one to every

embarrassed potentate, Yakoob Beg had to resort to many strange

expedients, and to manifest much patience and long-suffering; and in

overcoming petty obstacles and minor details, he proved himself to be a

man of more than average ability, no less than he had previously by the

skilful manipulation of armies and intriguers. Here again he erected a

structure distinct and separate from that handed down to him by the

Chinese. Comparatively speaking, the Chinese had been wealthy to the

Athalik Ghazi, and they received in moderate imposts on merchandise

alone almost a sufficient sum to defray the total cost of their

administration. Yakoob Beg had no such certain source of revenue; he had

to raise from an impoverished and only half-conquered state a sum almost

as large as that required by the Chinese. That he did it remains the

chief proof of his skill as a finance minister, and is another reason

for our regarding this extraordinary ruler with admiration. We may feel

sure that if we could follow closely the history of his fiscal efforts,

and the numberless plans that proved abortive, we should have revealed

one of the most instructive and interesting narratives of modern Asia.

There are no materials out of Kashgar, if there are such there, for such

an investigation however, and we can only follow as best we may be able,

the thread of events by the light of such authorities as are at our

disposal. In court and personal expenditure he set an example that might

with advantage be followed by other rulers in Asia even at the present

day, and in a strict economy and supervision of the petty sums that in

the aggregate make all the difference in any state between a surplus and

a deficit, were to be found the two guiding principles of his conduct.

Kashgaria might be in a very backward state of cultivation, and years of

commotion and warfare had undoubtedly thrown it back in the ranks of

prosperity and civilization, but the Athalik Ghazi was persuaded of the

truth of the Latin philosopher's saying, that "Parsimonia magna

vectigalia est." It must be remembered that Yakoob Beg set himself a

different task to accomplish than had the Chinese. Their idea was not so

much to extend their empire, although there has always been a tendency

with the Chinese to be aggressive against small neighbours, as to

acquire a territory that could be made a paying thing: much as the

pioneers of Anglo-Saxon conquest have made their impression in every

quarter of the globe in search of wealth and adventure, did the Chinese

by a seemingly irresistible impulse spread over the continent of Asia.

In doing so they were actuated as much by calculation of possible profit

as by any desire for military renown. The Emperor Keen-Lung himself was

flattered by the triumphs achieved beyond Gobi; but his lieutenants and

viceroys aimed at more mercenary objects, and but for the golden promise

held forth by a permanent conquest of Turkestan would have induced their

master to direct his efforts to some more profitable undertaking. The

Chinese, having acquired Kashgar, were far too sagacious to use up its

resources by an organized system of pillage, and they accordingly, let

it be granted chiefly with a view to their own personal aggrandizement,

devoted their attention to the development of its natural wealth by

means already detailed in a previous chapter. For three generations the

officials grew rich on the prosperity of their dependency, and for the

same period the people themselves were scarcely less flourishing. The

Chinese had accepted no slight responsibility in undertaking the

government of Kashgar on principles identical with those by which they

held authority in Tibet; but, owing to wonderful perseverance and good

management, they triumphed over every difficulty. The revenue raised for

state and local purposes was very great, and it sufficed to preserve

good order for many years, and to add permanent improvement to the state

in every direction. The task voluntarily undertaken by the Chinese was

far more onerous than that Yakoob Beg found he had to execute; but they

came to it with many advantages that he wanted. They had a large and

faithful army; he had only an uncertain gathering, which might flee or

desert on the first symptom of disaster: they had the resources of a

great and powerful empire at their back; he had nothing but his own

energy and determination: and above all, they had a reputation that

added to their strength and facilitated their undertakings, while he was

regarded as a mere military adventurer, receiving the contempt of Tungan

and Khoja alike. The very nature of things made the Chinese turn most of

their attention to commerce, while for years Yakoob Beg's sole thought

was to consolidate his military strength and form a large standing army.

For many years, then, Yakoob Beg only spent money on the drilling of

soldiers and the purchase of weapons. Now and then, when some danger

seemed to threaten him, either from Russia, Afghanistan, or the Tungani,

he would devote considerable sums to the construction of forts in the

line of the menaced position. But his chief expenditure was confined to

his army, and the maintenance of his dynasty by his police system. The

administration of justice required a certain sum of money, and the

Church for its support came in for a fair share of the good things that

were going. It is clear that his expenditure, if not very great in our

eyes, would severely tax a population of 1,000,000 people in no very

high state of prosperity. The chief source of wealth in the past had

always been the trade with China, and when that was broken off, the

slight increase in intercourse with Russia and India was not a

sufficient compensation. In fact, the country was very poor, without the

ingenuity and commercial instincts of the Khitay. During the days of the

war under Buzurg Khan, the only means of obtaining the necessary revenue

was by despoliation and enforced levies on the occupied portion of the

territory. When the western portion of Kashgaria was subdued, Yakoob Beg

found himself without any money in his exchequer, and no easy means of

filling it presented itself to him. In these straits he had recourse to

an expedient that, if not very novel, was at all events very effective.

He issued a proclamation to his faithful subjects to the effect that as

conqueror he was landowner of the whole state; but that he was

willing--eager would have been the more correct expression--to sell it

to them at a cheap rate. He, however, exempted from this the old

possessions of the Chinese Wangs and Ambans, and distributed their

extensive domains among the more prominent of his followers, who in

return acknowledged their liability to military service. The system was

an exact copy of the old feudal regime, and Yakoob Beg was vested with

all the rights and authority of the feudal lord of the Middle Ages. The

parallel is still further maintained by the large reward that the Church

received for its aid to the new ruler. The old revenues, devoted to the

support of the temples and religious seminaries in the past, and which

had miscarried during the troublous period of the war for the possession

of Turkestan, were restored, and fresh possessions were added thereto,

to demonstrate the generosity of the sovereign and his veneration for

the religion of Mahomed. His old friend the Sheikh-ul-Islam was still

more fortunate, and a large estate was set apart for his special

enjoyment. Nor does it appear that the Mussulman priests abused the

fresh power and advantages they thus secured; for among the toilers in

Kashgaria none were more energetic than they in educating the people,

and in extending their influence over their minds, both for the benefit

of their religion and for the security of the power of the Athalik

Ghazi. But in one respect, and it is impossible to exaggerate its

importance, Yakoob Beg's endeavours to found a strong military class,

bound to him by ties of past favours and others yet to come, were

abortive; for with rare exceptions his followers refused to fill their

new avocation of landed proprietors. Instead of devoting their attention

to the questions arising from agriculture and other rural pursuits, they

sub-let all their possessions to Andijani immigrants, and, residing in

their city _ordas_, gave themselves over either to lascivious pleasures

or to complete indolence. Even so distinguished a warrior as Abdulla

Beg, the slayer of more than 12,000 persons, as his panegyrists boasted,

suffered from the pervading effeminacy on the cessation of active

hostilities; and in the lower ranks of the service such deterioration in

energy was still more manifest. This change in the spirit of his earlier

supporters, among other things, obliged Yakoob Beg to depend the more on

the Andijani merchants and shopkeepers, and conduced to his adopting

more favourable views on foreign trade in the later years of his power.

The sum of money which he immediately received by the sale of lands

placed him in a condition to undertake those wars against the Tungani,

which added so much to the extent of his territory and to the

responsibilities of his position. Indeed, for several years after its

first enforcement it continued to bring in a certain amount to the

coffers of the State. But even this resource was transitory, and the sum

of money received by this means and in the shape of spoil, from Yarkand,

Kashgar, Khoten, and other places, was not sufficient to meet the

expenditure caused by the formation of a large army. Neither of these

practices could be regarded as a permanent means of obtaining a revenue,

for the former would scarcely admit of a repetition, and the latter soon

exhausted itself. So when his rule had become a little settled, and

these modes of raising money, in addition to the still more

reprehensible practice of robbing foreign merchants, had become out of

date to a certain degree, the Athalik Ghazi had to place his fiscal

arrangements on a more practical and honourable basis. While he laboured

under some disadvantages, already enumerated, as compared with the

Chinese, he had the great advantage over them that he strove for an

object more easily accomplished than the restoration of Kashgar to its

pristine welfare; and in his budget he had only steadily to keep in view

how much he required to maintain so many _jigits_, and so many police in

his pay, and to keep in his exchequer a small surplus for any untoward

emergency. He left the roads to take care of themselves; the irrigation

works, sadly wanted in various parts of the state, must be reserved for

his successors; and all proposals for the amelioration of the people

were shelved for a more opportune occasion. But so many thousand

_jigits_ must be in the ranks; so many fresh guns and cartridges must be

placed in the arsenals; and so many adventurers must be induced by good

pay to take service in the army as non-commissioned officers, in order

that the rank and file should be well drilled. The very necessities of

his position compelled Yakoob Beg to make all these military

preparations; but the cost was great, and the sacrifices thus imposed on

ruler and on people were a terrible strain. Recent events make us

inclined to believe that a less active military and foreign policy, and

a more peaceable and domestic one, would have tended to have added more

strength to the Athalik Ghazi's rule than the somewhat ostentatious

military parade to which he had recourse. Be that as it may, Yakoob Beg

instituted in 1867 two taxes, which may be supposed to represent the two

chief classes of receipts during his tenure of authority. The first of

these was a tithe on all the cereal produce of the country; this tax was

called the _Ushr_. The second, called the _Zakat_, was a customs due

levied on all merchandise entering Kashgar. The _Ushr_ was payable on

all land except that occupied by the Church, or by those who owed

military service to the crown instead of other payment; and even those

who rented land from the noble classes were obliged to surrender a tithe

to the ruler. It would appear, therefore, from this that it was not so

much the land as its legal possessor who was exempt from liability to

the usual obligations of citizenship. The danger contained in the

acquisition of all the crown lands by Andijani merchants, and the

gradual displacement of his more immediate followers through the energy

of these people, was not imperceptible to Yakoob Beg, and he accordingly

adopted measures for preventing his nobles selling their land without

his sanction. The receipts from this _Ushr_ were very considerable, and

it was the main source of his revenue for years. We have some idea of

the approximate value of land in Kashgar. The method of measuring land

for sale, and consequently also for taxation, is peculiar. It is not by

any given size that it is computed, or, indeed, strictly speaking by the

amount of crop it produces; but at a rate in accordance with the amount

of wheat with which it had been planted. The average rate was about a

pound for as much land as was sown with 20 lb. of wheat. The tenant, as

has been said, paid the government dues and handed over three-fourths of

the net produce to the landlord as rent, receiving for his portion only

the one-fourth remaining. Under this system it was only in very

prosperous years that any but very large tenants made sufficient to earn

a competent livelihood. In bad years it is possible that the landlord

had to satisfy himself with a smaller share, if he was not induced to

surrender his claim altogether for the disastrous period. But the

tax-farmers, entrusted with the collection of this rate, were eager to

become rich, no less than to earn a good name with the authorities for

bringing in a list with no defaulters. The unfortunate people were

completely at their mercy, and without any means of ascertaining the

accuracy of the claim, or of opposing extortionate demands on the part

of the tax-collectors. They paid without a murmur, perhaps without a

suspicion of the imposition that was being practised upon them, the sum

demanded of them, if they were able; and as their dues were payable

without delay and on demand before anything else was taken out of the

total sum of the produce, the Athalik Ghazi received his share with

regularity, and his tax-collector pocketed the excess sum for his own

satisfaction. In many cases it is known that the amount claimed by the

official exceeded by threefold the legal demand. Such a system was no

less hurtful to the ruler than it was ruinous to the people. That in one

tax alone a larger sum should be extracted from the people for the

benefit of the officials than was contributed for the necessities of the

state, exhibited a very loose system of supervision on the part of the

sovereign, and is a strong piece of evidence that in many ways Yakoob

Beg was a mixture of contradictions. We can scarcely persuade ourselves

that he was aware of these occurrences, and yet how could he be ignorant

of them?

In addition to the _Ushr_ there was another tax on home produce, viz.,

the _Tanabi_, or tax on land devoted to the production of vegetables or

fruit. The Tanab is, by the way, a lineal measure of forty-seven yards,

and a Tanabi is a piece of land forty-seven yards square. On this extent

of land cultivated for vegetables, or fruit, a small tax was raised.

More than any other tax did this vary according to the character of the

district, and to the quality of the year's crop. It was seldom less than

a shilling a Tanabi, even in the least renowned district, whereas in

some parts, in good years, it was five shillings, or even more. Here

again, however, the middleman interfered, and exacted as much as he saw

there was any possibility of his obtaining. This tax undoubtedly ought

to have produced a large sum, as a larger portion of the soil is laid

out as fruit and vegetable gardens than for crops; but whether it was

more difficult to raise, or there was more peculation _in transitu_ from

the tax-payer to the imperial exchequer, it is certain that we hear much

less of this tax than we should be disposed to imagine. The two great

taxes on home productions were therefore a corn due and a fruit due. The

rate was not in itself excessive, and could be paid by any community

without embarrassment. It is uncertain to what extent the avarice of the

officials had made the conditions of these two taxes more onerous,

although, on the most favourable supposition, the citizen was mulcted in

no inconsiderable sum. A more serious question for the ruler was, how

did it affect his own position with regard to his subjects? Did Yakoob

Beg appear in the eyes of the Kashgari as an exacting and oppressive

tyrant on account of these heavy impositions?

It is impossible to speak on this point with any degree of certainty,

but it is only natural to expect that such was the case. No tiller of

the ground can feel grateful to a sovereign who required him to hand

over almost one-third of his receipts before he made use of one penny of

them, even for the payment of his rent. It is scarcely probable that

Yakoob Beg approved of such enormous profits going to his officials;

but, that having tolerated petty exactions in his earlier days, he found

himself unable to attempt the task of coping with the evil when it had

assumed such alarming proportions. It is impossible to believe that he

remained in ignorance of what was occurring under his very eyes, and

there is some evident foundation for the accusation that he participated

in the division of the profits of his tax-gatherers. We should be loth

to admit the accuracy of such a charge, and yet the arguments in its

favour are too plausible to admit of a very confident contradiction. It

would not speak well for the efficiency of his secret police if he had

remained in ignorance of a fact which was losing him the sympathy of his

subjects.

The gold mines at Khoten were worked after the fall of that city in

1868, and continued productive down to the present time. There is no

information on the quantities of the precious metal that are there

turned out in the year, but it is probable that they are not very great.

The coal mines near Aksu and Kucha are no longer made use of, except by

a few individuals, and the copper mines in that district have, since the

departure of the Chinese, only been very partially explored. The jade

that used to come in great quantities from Aksu and Khoten, is still to

be found throughout Kashgar; but although it is probable that it still

nearly all comes from those cities, the Kashgari themselves tell a

hesitating tale as to its place of production. A visitor to Kashgar, on

going the round of the bazaars, soon found that the people's tongues

were tied by the presence, in his train, of a number of the secret

police, who had been specially told off to prevent the Feringhee

obtaining any troublesome information on the state of the people, or the

resources of the state. A striking instance was given him of the close

attention paid by these guardians of order to the veriest trifles. The

traveller inquired in one stall where the jade, which was the chief

commodity of the merchant in question, came from, and received the

reply, Aksu. Proceeding to another shop in the street, he repeated the

question, when he was informed that it was imported from Khokand. But

the traveller said, your neighbour told me it came from Aksu. The

shopkeeper, taken aback by this abrupt remark, became confused, and

admitted that it came from Aksu. Warned by a look from the official, he

then repeated his original assertion that it came from Khokand. The use

of all this absurd shuffling, and attempt to throw dust in strangers'

eyes, is impossible to discover; for it was a matter of little moment

whether jade came from Aksu, or Khokand, so long as we knew that it

formed an important commodity, both in the rough and in the chiselled

state, in the cities of Kashgaria.

The customs tax, or _Zakat_, is sanctioned by the Shariat, and was

levied at all the border posts on the various roads leading into the

state. Up to the ratification of the treaties with Great Britain and

Russia, its regulations were vague and elastic in the extreme. In fact,

any merchant who might have been so foolhardy as to venture into Kashgar

would have had reason, before these events, to think himself fortunate

if he escaped the penalty of his rashness; for assuredly his luggage

would not, but would have been confiscated for the special benefit of

his Highness the Ameer. So late as 1869, Russian merchants were robbed

of their baggage, and personally ill-treated, and only after long years

of negotiation did the Russian Government obtain any satisfaction for

the injuries and loss inflicted on one of their subjects. And then how

did the Athalik Ghazi send the sum of money he agreed to pay for the

loss the merchant had incurred?--why in a depreciated Chinese currency,

part of a large number of coins that he had found in a disused temple in

Kashgar! Before this, all the external trade had been carried on with

Khokand and Bokhara, Afghanistan and Badakshan, and the receipts from

_Zakat_ were quite insignificant, barring such treasure trove as the

spoliation of a merchant from Tashkent, or from Leh. But with the

persistent efforts on the part of the Russians on the north, and of the

English native merchants on the south, to pierce the gloom hiding the

country of Eastern Turkestan, it became impossible for Yakoob Beg to

maintain much longer the incognito he was so jealous in maintaining.

Perhaps also the prospect of deriving an income from _Zakat_, that

should smooth down many of his difficulties, was not without some

influence on his mind when he came into direct contact with civilized

empires. His expectations were far too sanguine, and he seems to have

once more, during the last twelve months of his life, become indifferent

to the advantages or disadvantages of trade with his neighbours. In

fact, when he placed his customs on a fair footing, he found that it

would require many years to recoup him for the excessive exactions he

surrendered. The merchants who first attempted to commence intercourse

with Kashgar became speedily discouraged by the dangers of the route,

and the small opening for a large remunerative trade in a country whose

wealth and population had been magnified tenfold. In a country where the

richest merchant in the chief town possessed only a capital of L8,000,

not much could be expected in the way of fortune; and although the legal

dues on all merchandise were fixed at an _ad valorem_ rate of 2-1/2 per

cent., it was soon discovered that if the ruler happened to be in want

of cash he would not scruple to take what he could from the stranger.

Both to the ruler, and to the foreign merchant, the new arrangement

contained distasteful matter. The former perceived that he had

surrendered some of his imperial rights, and that he was not to be

recompensed by his receiving more money, and the latter knew that the

treaty stipulation would not save him from having to pay excess fees.

The _Zakat_, far from showing the expected disposition to increase,

seemed rather inclined to remain stationary, if not to decrease; and

the foreign merchant had obtained some promise on the part of the ruler

of personal protection, and of assistance in the disposal of his wares.

His discontent at the stagnation in the customs soon showed itself by

his exacting excess dues, sometimes on British, sometimes on Russian,

but more often on Khokandian and Afghan merchants. Instead of increasing

his receipts, these strong measures only threw them back, and left him

in a worse plight than he was in before. He had not the patience

necessary to enable him to wait with confidence the fuller development

of trade, nor had he the perseverance or tact to place fresh inducements

in the path of merchants to renew their intercourse with him and his

state. Many visited Kashgar with merchandise a first time; but few,

indeed, repeated the visit. The ruler was off-handed in his reception of

them. They were scarcely accorded any liberty in their movements, and

the profit of their journey was greatly reduced by the payment of a due

of 5 per cent. instead of the stipulated condition of 2-1/2 per cent. It

is a pure fiction, therefore, to say that trade with Kashgar had

increased during the rule of the Athalik Ghazi through his friendly

inclination. If the amount of merchandise imported into his state had

increased, it was owing only to the necessities of its inhabitants, and

was a fact that must have taken place either by intercourse direct, or

through native states, with the two great providers of Central Asia. The

exaggerated enthusiasm that it was endeavoured to raise up in this

country about this same mythical ruler of Yarkand never spread far, and

there was always some scepticism, if there could be no disproof, of the

reports of the formidableness of this new kingdom. Looking calmly at the

real state of Yakoob Beg's position, even at the height of his power, we

find him to have always been a pecuniarily embarrassed ruler, glad of

the smallest windfall in the shape of the spoil of a single merchant.

The _Zakat_, his advisers pointed out to him, might be made a most

productive source of revenue, if foreign merchants could be induced to

bring their wares into the country. The loss the people had felt in the

departure of the Chinese might be amply repaired by the appearance of

Russian and English merchants to supply the same place that they filled.

If his aspirations were disappointed, and the _Zakat_ did not show any

signs of possessing that elasticity which had been predicted, it is

probable that in his impatience, heightened by the perception that

foreign trade might lead to foreign complications, he did not give the

scheme a sufficient time for a fair trial. His other sources of revenue,

_Ushr_ and _Tanabi_, and the gold mines of Khoten, brought in a sum

enough to meet the current expenses of the government and to maintain in

his service as many soldiers as his recruiting officers were able to

secure. But there was little if any surplus; and local improvements, and

all outlay that might have been reproductive and for the benefit of the

people, were strictly forbidden. The only works we can find constructed

by him, with a view to the advancement of the interests of his subjects,

were the merchants' _serais_, built in each city, and these were

self-supporting. Yakoob Beg has no claim to being considered as a

beneficent ruler. He was a military dictator, who had shown a rare power

for inaugurating a rough system of government, and whose campaigns had

always been singularly successful. As a ruler, showing a full

appreciation of the wants of his people, and adopting the best possible

measures to obtain them, he had no claims to consideration. Indeed, he

could not be compared with the Chinese, who, however personal may have

been their motives, certainly raised the state to a high pitch of

material prosperity, and left many enduring marks of their past

occupation. These two dominations, foisted on the Kashgari by the strong

arm, while each immeasurably superior to the Khoja claimants,

represented two distinct modes of governing a subject race. The Chinese

endeavoured to conciliate, and to make the necessity for their presence

felt by the people; the Athalik Ghazi was supremely indifferent to the

prosperity of his subjects, so long as they were willing to pay him the

tribute money, and to serve in his army. An exactly opposite result

might have been expected, for there was far more kinship between the

Khokandian adventurer and the Kashgari, than there was between the

Khitay and the Andijani. Admirers of Yakoob Beg may, of course, plead

that his rule had not acquired sufficient consistency to justify him in

tasking his strength by great undertakings, such as the construction of

roads and canals. In one respect he had not the labour at his disposal,

and he was, consequently, hampered by a difficulty that the Chinese were

free from. Still when we remember that all these works ought to have

been remunerative, and to have strengthened Yakoob Beg's individual

power, instead of taxing his resources, the excuse cannot be admitted as

entitled to our consideration. Yakoob Beg has claims only to be admired

for having given us something better than a repetition of the depravity

of the Khoja rulers, and of course among his coevals he is entitled to

far the highest place. If it is only asked for him that he should be

placed above them, no one can raise the slightest objection to it; for

beyond the shadow of a doubt, he was the most energetic and talented

ruler that had appeared among the Khanates for several centuries. But it

would be affectation to deny that a higher place than this has been

claimed for him; and before according his right to occupy it, the

evidence on which his claim rests must be sifted with the greatest care.

Even now I do not say that his claims are unproven; but that it is open

to doubt whether his work has not been exaggerated, I think must be

admitted by every one who has studied the course of his life in Kashgar.

It is absurd to talk of Yakoob Beg having been an equal of Genghis Khan

or of Timour, in any other way than that of showing that his personal

abilities were of a transcendent order. As a legislator and public

benefactor, it is fair to compare him with the Chinese, who possessed

some advantages over him, but who laboured under some disadvantages in

religion, and other conditions, as compared with him. And when we do

this, after impartial consideration we find that the balance is greatly

in favour of the Chinese. What can we judge from this, but that the rule

of Yakoob Beg, while presenting some striking features, was inferior in

degree to that of the Chinese? It is only fair to remember that the

difficulties in his path were great, and that he overcame many of them.

Before closing this chapter some description of the chief men who

assisted him to conquer the country, and then to govern it, may be not

without interest to the reader.

First among these, by right of his position as well as by his high

abilities, comes the Seyyid Yakoob Khan, or Hadji Torah, as he has more

conveniently been called, the prince who has recently visited several of

the principal courts of Europe. He is a near relative of the Athalik

Ghazi, although, strange to say, there is no consanguinity between them.

He is a son of Nar Mahomed Khan, the governor of Tashkent, who married

as his second wife Yakoob Beg's sister, and who was instrumental in

advancing the interests of Yakoob Beg during the earlier days of his

career in Khokand. The Seyyid was almost as old as his uncle, the Ameer

of Kashgar, having been born in Tashkent in 1823; but despite this near

connection Hadji Torah played no part in the conquest of Kashgar. Until

Yakoob Beg achieved complete success in his enterprise in Eastern

Turkestan he was considered by Khokandians of high rank a simple

adventurer. The Seyyid Yakoob Khan was of the best lineage in Turkestan,

and it is very possible that until the year 1867 he regarded his uncle

with a considerable amount of indifference. Certain it is that Hadji

Torah was far otherwise employed than in assisting his relative when

the latter was engaged in some of the desperate encounters of his not

uneventful career. In the civil administration of Khokand he filled,

under Alim Kuli, high posts, such as Principal of the Madrassa of

Tashkent, and then he was appointed Kazi, or Judge. It was after the

fall of Ak Musjid that he commenced that career of activity as a

traveller and a negotiator which brought him to the shores of the

Bosphorus and to the banks of the Neva and the Thames. That was in the

year 1854, and he was appointed as a sort of secretary to the embassy of

Mirza Jan Effendi, the ambassador sent by Mollah Khan to Constantinople

for aid. On a subsequent occasion he again visited Constantinople in a

similar capacity, after the death of Mollah Khan, and during the brief

tenure of power by his successor, Mahomed Khan, the nominee of Alim

Kuli. This was in 1865, and during the troubles that ensued in Khokand

and the final success of Khudayar Khan, the legal ruler of Khokand and

antagonist of Alim Kuli, Hadji Torah resided quietly at Constantinople,

where Abdul Aziz entertained him with sumptuous hospitality. It would

appear that he obtained some kind of reputation among the numerous

visitors from either Turkestan who came to Turkey, and apart from his

sacrosanct character few could fail to be impressed favourably by his

cheerful yet dignified manner. His uncle in 1870 had indeed overcome all

opposition to his rule, and it might at a first glance appear strange

why he should desire to secure the services of a man of whom he could

have seen or known little for many years. But Hadji Torah possessed

abilities and experience rare among the inhabitants of Central Asia, and

to Yakoob Beg the very talents his nephew possessed were those he was

most in need of.

In 1870 the Athalik Ghazi was anxious to draw close the bonds of

alliance with the Porte; who could assist him better than the man who

had resided in Constantinople for several years, and who had formed a

friendly intimacy with the Sultan? In 1871 Yakoob Beg first recognized

the imminence of danger to his state from Russia, then put in possession

of Kuldja; who could instruct him in the most effectual way of warding

off that danger, either by an alliance with England or by propitiating

the Russians, than the travelled Hadji Torah? The very qualities that

the Seyyid Yakoob Khan possessed were those the Ameer Yakoob Beg stood

most in need of. He might search among all his followers, those who had

shared every vicissitude of his strange fortunes, and he could not find

one other with an identical capacity. The overtures to his nephew are

thus easily intelligible, and the nephew himself gladly greeted his

entry into a wider career than was that of an honoured guest on the

hospitality of the Porte. His subsequent embassies in the service of

Kashgar to St. Petersburg, Calcutta, Constantinople, and London are too

recent and too well known to require mention here. When he settled in

Kashgar he married a daughter of Mahomed Khoja, the Sheikh-ul-Islam of

Kashgaria. His weight with the people was consequently very great, and

his judgment was greatly valued by the Ameer. Even over Beg Bacha, the

turbulent and ferocious heir-apparent, Hadji Torah had acquired some

influence by his ready tact and _bonhomie_.

Of the two chief personages, Mahomed Khoja and Abdulla Pansad, the

priest and the soldier, who assisted Yakoob Beg, it is unfortunately

impossible to discover much, and that little has already been stated in

the preceding pages. There can be no doubt, however, that they were the

principal instruments in promoting the aggrandizement of Yakoob Beg, and

the two who enjoyed more than any other the confidence and friendship of

the man they had supported so faithfully. But of another well-tried

follower we know more, chiefly through the pages of Dr. Bellew. Mahomed

Yunus seems to have been the most educated and well informed among the

governors of Yakoob Beg. He had the reputation of being quite the

best-informed man in Kashgar, but as the _curriculum_ of instruction did

not include modern languages, it is difficult to guage the exact degree

of that reputation. He was an old and trusted follower of the Athalik

Ghazi, for when he was in the service of Khokand Mahomed Yunus

officiated as his scribe. He, however, as a civilian, took no part in

the expedition of Buzurg Khan, and it was not until after the death of

Alim Kuli and the success of Khudayar Khan that he joined his firm

friend and master in Kashgar. So high an opinion had Yakoob Beg of his

talents, and so pressed was he for skilled rulers, that Mahomed Yunus

was at once appointed Dadkwah of the recently conquered district of

Yarkand, the richest, the most populous, and the most turbulent of all

the governorships in Kashgaria. The skill with which he brought the

troublesome Yarkandis into complete submission to the new ruler, and the

rare ability he manifested in his administration of his province down

almost to the present time, justify the selection of his whilome comrade

in Khokand. At first it seems that the governor ruled with a high hand,

and that the slightest symptom of insubordination was checked by an

immediate arrest and a not long-delayed execution. During the last seven

years, however, his government had become milder, chiefly because all

evil-doers had been got rid of. Among some of the minor followers may be

mentioned Alish Beg, Dadkwah of Kashgar; Ihrar Khan Torah, the first

envoy despatched from Kashgar to India; and Mahomed Beg of Artosh: but

we have no sufficient information of them to give an account of them

that would be interesting to the general reader.

The Life of Yakoob Beg; Athalik Ghazi, and Badaulet; Ameer of Kashgar · 第 9 / 14 章