EXPLANATION OF THE TABLE ON P. 149.

Column I. contains the names of the successive sedimentary strata.

" II. contains the percentage of the duration of the various epochs,

according to _Williams_, the time from the Cambrian until recent times

being taken as 100.

" III. gives the estimated duration in years of the Palæozoic,

Mesozoic, and Cænozoic periods, according to _Walcott_.

" IV. gives in years the duration of the various smaller epochs, as

computed from Walcott and Williams' statements.

" V. Representatives of stages of the ancestral line of man. The

names stand in the level of the stratum in which they have made their

first appearance.

" VI. contains the number of years which, in the present

calculation, have been assumed necessary for the animal to reach

puberty.

" VII. contains the number of generations which can have elapsed

from stage to stage. For example, 60,000 generations separate the

earliest known anthropoid apes from Pithecanthropus.

Let us follow the descent of man further back. The next stage,

reckoning backwards, is that from Pithecanthropus to _bonâ-fide_

anthropoid apes. They are represented in the Miocene by various

genera--_e.g._, Pliopithecus and Dryopithecus. According to Croll and

Wallace, 850,000 years ago carry us into the Miocene epoch. Assuming

that these apes lived about 600,000 years before Pithecanthropus,

namely, in the later half of the Miocene, and taking puberty at ten

years of age, a high estimate, we get not less than 60,000 generations.

2. From Apes back to lowest Lemurs in the lowest Eocene. The date of

Eocene being fixed at 3,000,000, we have about 2,100,000 years for this

stage; assuming as much as five years for puberty, this results in

420,000 generations.

3. From Lemures to Prototheria. The earliest known mammalian remains

come from the Rhætic, or top formation of the Triassic epoch; allowing

for the Rhætic only 100,000 years, we have to add the whole of the

Jurassic and Cretaceous, in all about 5,500,000 years. Assuming three

years for a generation, we get 1,800,000 generations.

4. From Prototheria to something like the Theromorpha at the bottom of

the Triassic strata. A duration of 1,700,000 years divided by four

gives 425,000 generations.

5. From Theromorpha to Proreptilia, represented by Eryops and Cricotus

from the Lower Permian of Texas. Allowing 1,000,000 years, each

generation at four years, we obtain 250,000 generations.

6. From Proreptilia to Eotetrapoda, the first terrestrial Vertebrata,

represented by something like the Stegocephali, the earliest of which

are known from the Coal-measures. Assuming them to have come into

existence at the bottom of the Coal-measures, for the duration of which

we may guess 2,000,000 years, we get, with four years' allowance for

puberty, 500,000 generations.

7. From Eotetrapoda to a not yet separated or differentiated group

of Crossopterygian and Dipnoan fishes, both of which are known from

Devonian strata. The duration of the latter has been computed at

4,000,000 years, which, with 1,000,000 for the Mountain Limestone

formation, gives us 5,000,000 for this stage. Assuming, for the sake

of round numbers, as much as five years for a generation, we get

1,000,000 generations.

8. Earliest stage, down to the first fish-like creatures. Teeth and

spines indicating the existence of fishes are known from the Upper

Silurian. By carrying the earliest fishes down to the bottom of the

Silurian, with 2,700,000 years' duration, and allowing three years for

attaining puberty, the calculation results in 900,000 generations.

Further back we cannot go. We do not know of any Vertebrate remains

from the Ordovician and Cambrian, which together represent 6,700,000

years, enough for at least half as many generations of Prochordate

creatures. The pre-Cambrian or Laurentian epoch lies quite beyond the

reach of calculation, nor have we any trustworthy fossil remains of

living matter from these strata, to which, however, Haeckel and others

refer the first beginnings of life.

All the above calculations are, of course, only approximate. What we

do know is the existence of representatives of the stages, our proofs

being the fossils; but when we refer the origin of the Eotetrapoda,

for example, to the bottom and not somewhere to the middle of the

Coal-measures, we are guessing merely. Alterations in the levels

assumed for the various stage-representatives will, of course, alter

the result of the number of generations; but the leading idea, as

a whole, is not thereby upset. The fact remains that in the Upper

Silurian we have fishes; from the Coal-measures onwards, fishes and

Amphibia; since the Permian, fishes, Amphibia, and reptiles; since the

end of the Trias these three classes and the Mammalia; and lastly, at

least since the Plistocene, man himself. If Evolution is true at all,

the transformation from early fish-like creatures to man has come about

within these epochs. Being able to assign a time of duration to each

of them, with an approximate total of 21,000,000 years, we are also

able to put the whole ancestral series to a test by expressing each

great stage in generations. The result is very satisfactory. The whole

enormous stretch from the lowest fish-like creatures to man has been

resolved into more than 5,000,000 successive generations, and each of

these means a little step forwards in onward Evolution.

Nothing is to be gained for the understanding of our problem of

Evolution if we multiply this enormous number of generations by ten

or any other multiple. We are not able to conceive changes so small

as those which necessarily have existed between Pithecanthropus and

man if the whole striking difference is analysed into 17,000 steps.

Every one of these stages in the modifications of the muscles, the

skeletal framework, increase of brain, shortening of the trunk,

lengthening of the legs, improvement of the hands, loss of the hairy

coat, etc., is truly microscopical, imperceptible, just as the

Evolutionist imagines the whole process to have been. Again, where is

the difficulty implied by the change from an air-breathing, in many

structural points half-amphibian, fish into a primitive land-crawling

four-footed creature, if we are allowed to resolve the transformation

into 1,000,000 stages? So far from there being any difficulty, rather

does it appear questionable if so many infinitely small changes have

been necessary to bring about this result.

One thousand years make apparently no difference in the evolution of

animals, nor does one second change the aspect of the hands on the

face of a clock, nor did Julius Cæsar's commission of scientific men

appreciate the error of about eleven minutes in the length of the year

beyond its real value; but now the Russians are, owing to this neglect,

nearly two weeks behind the civilized nations.

The Last Link: Our Present Knowledge of the Descent of Man · 第 28 / 39 题