His associates seem to have regarded him with kindness, which, in spite

of their admiration of his writings, was not unmixed with contempt.

In truth, there was in his character much to love, but very little to

respect. His heart was soft even to weakness: he was so generous that he

quite forgot to be just: he forgave injuries so readily that he might be

said to invite them; and was so liberal to beggars that he had nothing

left for his tailor and his butcher. He was vain, sensual, frivolous,

profuse, improvident. One vice of a darker shade was imputed to him,

envy. But there is not the least reason to believe that this bad

passion, though it sometimes made him wince and utter fretful

exclamations, ever impelled him to injure by wicked arts the reputation

of any of his rivals. The truth probably is, that he was not more

envious, but merely less prudent, than his neighbours. His heart was on

his lips. All those small jealousies, which are but too common among men

of letters, but which a man of letters who is also a man of the world

does his best to conceal, Goldsmith avowed with the simplicity of a

child. When he was envious, instead of affecting indifference, instead

of damning with faint praise, instead of doing injuries slily and in the

dark, he told everybody that he was envious. "Do not, pray, do not talk

of Johnson in such terms," he said to Boswell; "you harrow up my very

soul." George Steevens and Cumberland were men far too cunning to say

such a thing. They would have echoed the praises of the man whom they

envied, and then have sent to the newspapers anonymous libels upon him.

Both what was good and what was bad in Goldsmith's character was to his

associates a perfect security that he would never commit such villany.

He was neither ill natured enough, nor long headed enough, to be guilty

of any malicious act which required contrivance and disguise.

Goldsmith has sometimes been represented as a man of genius, cruelly

treated by the world, and doomed to struggle with difficulties which at

last broke his heart. But no representation can be more remote from the

truth. He did, indeed, go through much sharp misery before he had done

anything considerable in literature. But, after his name had appeared on

the title-page of the "Traveller," he had none but himself to blame for

his distresses. His average income, during the last seven years of

his life, certainly exceeded 400 pounds a year; and 400 pounds a year

ranked, among the incomes of that day, at least as high as 800 pounds a

year would rank at present. A single man living in the Temple with 400

pounds a year might then be called opulent. Not one in ten of the young

gentlemen of good families who were studying the law there had so much.

But all the wealth which Lord Clive had brought from Bengal, and Sir

Lawrence Dundas from Germany, joined together, would not have sufficed

for Goldsmith. He spent twice as much as he had. He wore fine clothes,

gave dinners of several courses, paid court to venal beauties. He had

also, it should be remembered, to the honour of his heart, though not of

his head, a guinea, or five or ten, according to the state of his purse,

ready for any tale of distress, true or false. But it was not in dress

or feasting, in promiscuous amours or promiscuous charities, that his

chief expense lay. He had been from boyhood a gambler, and at once the

most sanguine and the most unskilful of gamblers. For a time he put off

the day of inevitable ruin by temporary expedients. He obtained advances

from booksellers, by promising to execute works which he never began.

But at length this source of supply failed. He owed more than 2000

pounds; and he saw no hope of extrication from his embarrassments. His

spirits and health gave way. He was attacked by a nervous fever, which

he thought himself competent to treat. It would have been happy for him

if his medical skill had been appreciated as justly by himself as by

others. Notwithstanding the degree which he pretended to have received

at Padua, he could procure no patients. "I do not practise," he once

said; "I make it a rule to prescribe only for my friends." "Pray, dear

Doctor," said Beauclerk, "alter your rule; and prescribe only for your

enemies." Goldsmith now, in spite of this excellent advice, prescribed

for himself. The remedy aggravated the malady. The sick man was induced

to call in real physicians; and they at one time imagined that they had

cured the disease. Still his weakness and restlessness continued. He

could get no sleep. He could take no food. "You are worse," said one

of his medical attendants, "than you should be from the degree of fever

which you have. Is your mind at ease?" "No, it is not," were the last

recorded words of Oliver Goldsmith. He died on the third of April 1774,

in his forty-sixth year. He was laid in the churchyard of the Temple;

but the spot was not marked by any inscription, and is now forgotten.

The coffin was followed by Burke and Reynolds. Both these great men were

sincere mourners. Burke, when he heard of Goldsmith's death, had burst

into a flood of tears. Reynolds had been so much moved by the news that

he had flung aside his brush and palette for the day.

A short time after Goldsmith's death, a little poem appeared, which

will, as long as our language lasts, associate the names of his two

illustrious friends with his own. It has already been mentioned that he

sometimes felt keenly the sarcasm which his wild blundering talk brought

upon him. He was, not long before his last illness, provoked into

retaliating. He wisely betook himself to his pen; and at that weapon he

proved himself a match for all his assailants together. Within a

small compass he drew with a singularly easy and vigorous pencil the

characters of nine or ten of his intimate associates. Though this little

work did not receive his last touches, it must always be regarded as a

masterpiece. It is impossible, however, not to wish that four or five

likenesses which have no interest for posterity were wanting to that

noble gallery; and that their places were supplied by sketches of

Johnson and Gibbon, as happy and vivid as the sketches of Burke and

Garrick.

Some of Goldsmith's friends and admirers honoured him with a cenotaph

in Westminster Abbey. Nollekens was the sculptor; and Johnson wrote the

inscription. It is much to be lamented that Johnson did not leave to

posterity a more durable and a more valuable memorial of his friend. A

life of Goldsmith would have been an inestimable addition to the Lives

of the Poets. No man appreciated Goldsmith's writings more justly than

Johnson; no man was better acquainted with Goldsmith's character and

habits; and no man was more competent to delineate with truth and spirit

the peculiarities of a mind in which great powers were found in company

with great weaknesses. But the lists of poets to whose works Johnson was

requested by the booksellers to furnish prefaces ended with Lyttleton,

who died in 1773. The line seems to have been drawn expressly for the

purpose of excluding the person whose portrait would have most fitly

closed the series. Goldsmith, however, has been fortunate in his

biographers. Within a few years his life has been written by Mr Prior,

by Mr Washington Irving, and by Mr Forster. The diligence of Mr Prior

deserves great praise; the style of Mr Washington Irving is always

pleasing; but the highest place must, in justice, be assigned to the

eminently interesting work of Mr Forster.

*****

SAMUEL JOHNSON. (December 1856.)

Samuel Johnson, one of the most eminent English writers of the

eighteenth century, was the son of Michael Johnson, who was, at the

beginning of that century, a magistrate of Lichfield, and a bookseller

of great note in the midland counties. Michael's abilities and

attainments seem to have been considerable. He was so well acquainted

with the contents of the volumes which he exposed to sale, that the

country rectors of Staffordshire and Worcestershire thought him an

oracle on points of learning. Between him and the clergy, indeed,

there was a strong religious and political sympathy. He was a zealous

churchman, and, though he had qualified himself for municipal office

by taking the oaths to the sovereigns in possession, was to the last a

Jacobite in heart. At his house, a house which is still pointed out to

every traveller who visits Lichfield, Samuel was born on the 18th of

September 1709. In the child, the physical, intellectual, and moral

peculiarities which afterwards distinguished the man were plainly

discernible; great muscular strength accompanied by much awkwardness and

many infirmities; great quickness of parts, with a morbid propensity to

sloth and procrastination; a kind and generous heart, with a gloomy

and irritable temper. He had inherited from his ancestors a scrofulous

taint, which it was beyond the power of medicine to remove. His parents

were weak enough to believe that the royal touch was a specific for this

malady. In his third year he was taken up to London, inspected by the

court surgeon, prayed over by the court chaplains, and stroked and

presented with a piece of gold by Queen Anne. One of his earliest

recollections was that of a stately lady in a diamond stomacher and a

long black hood. Her hand was applied in vain. The boy's features, which

were originally noble and not irregular, were distorted by his malady.

His cheeks were deeply scarred. He lost for a time the sight of one eye;

and he saw but very imperfectly with the other. But the force of

his mind overcame every impediment. Indolent as he was, he acquired

knowledge with such ease and rapidity that at every school to which

he was sent he was soon the best scholar. From sixteen to eighteen he

resided at home, and was left to his own devices. He learned much at

this time, though his studies were without guidance and without plan. He

ransacked his father's shelves, dipped into a multitude of books, read

what was interesting, and passed over what was dull. An ordinary lad

would have acquired little or no useful knowledge in such a way: but

much that was dull to ordinary lads was interesting to Samuel. He read

little Greek: for his proficiency in that language was not such that he

could take much pleasure in the masters of Attic poetry and eloquence.

But he had left school a good Latinist; and he soon acquired, in the

large and miscellaneous library of which he now had the command, an

extensive knowledge of Latin literature. That Augustan delicacy of

taste which is the boast of the great public schools of England he never

possessed. But he was early familiar with some classical writers who

were quite unknown to the best scholars in the sixth form at Eton.

He was peculiarly attracted by the works of the great restorers of

learning. Once, while searching for some apples, he found a huge folio

volume of Petrarch's works. The name excited his curiosity; and

he eagerly devoured hundreds of pages. Indeed, the diction and

versification of his own Latin compositions show that he had paid at

least as much attention to modern copies from the antique as to the

original models.

While he was thus irregularly educating himself, his family was sinking

into hopeless poverty. Old Michael Johnson was much better qualified

to pore upon books, and to talk about them, than to trade in them. His

business declined; his debts increased; it was with difficulty that the

daily expenses of his household were defrayed. It was out of his power

to support his son at either university; but a wealthy neighbour offered

assistance; and, in reliance on promises which proved to be of very

little value, Samuel was entered at Pembroke College, Oxford. When the

young scholar presented himself to the rulers of that society, they were

amazed not more by his ungainly figure and eccentric manners than by

the quantity of extensive and curious information which he had picked up

during many months of desultory but not unprofitable study. On the first

day of his residence he surprised his teachers by quoting Macrobius; and

one of the most learned among them declared that he had never known a

freshman of equal attainments.

At Oxford, Johnson resided during about three years. He was poor, even

to raggedness; and his appearance excited a mirth and a pity which

were equally intolerable to his haughty spirit. He was driven from the

quadrangle of Christ Church by the sneering looks which the members

of that aristocratical society cast at the holes in his shoes. Some

charitable person placed a new pair at his door; but he spurned them

away in a fury. Distress made him, not servile, but reckless and

ungovernable. No opulent gentleman commoner, panting for one-and-twenty,

could have treated the academical authorities with more gross

disrespect. The needy scholar was generally to be seen under the gate

of Pembroke, a gate now adorned with his effigy, haranguing a circle of

lads, over whom, in spite of his tattered gown and dirty linen, his wit

and audacity gave him an undisputed ascendency. In every mutiny against

the discipline of the college he was the ringleader. Much was

pardoned, however, to a youth so highly distinguished by abilities and

acquirements. He had early made himself known by turning Pope's Messiah

into Latin verse. The style and rhythm, indeed, were not exactly

Virgilian; but the translation found many admirers, and was read with

pleasure by Pope himself.

The time drew near at which Johnson would, in the ordinary course of

things, have become a Bachelor of Arts: but he was at the end of his

resources. Those promises of support on which he had relied had not been

kept. His family could do nothing for him. His debts to Oxford tradesmen

were small indeed, yet larger than he could pay. In the autumn of 1731,

he was under the necessity of quitting the university without a

degree. In the following winter his father died. The old man left but a

pittance; and of that pittance almost the whole was appropriated to the

support of his widow. The property to which Samuel succeeded amounted to

no more than twenty pounds.

His life, during the thirty years which followed, was one hard struggle

with poverty. The misery of that struggle needed no aggravation, but

was aggravated by the sufferings of an unsound body and an unsound mind.

Before the young man left the university, his hereditary malady had

broken forth in a singularly cruel form. He had become an incurable

hypochondriac. He said long after that he had been mad all his life, or

at least not perfectly sane; and, in truth, eccentricities less strange

than his have often been thought grounds sufficient for absolving

felons, and for setting aside wills. His grimaces, his gestures, his

mutterings, sometimes diverted and sometimes terrified people who did

not know him. At a dinner table he would, in a fit of absence, stoop

down and twitch off a lady's shoe. He would amaze a drawing-room by

suddenly ejaculating a clause of the Lord's Prayer. He would conceive

an unintelligible aversion to a particular alley, and perform a great

circuit rather than see the hateful place. He would set his heart on

touching every post in the streets through which he walked. If by any

chance he missed a post, he would go back a hundred yards and repair the

omission. Under the influence of his disease, his senses became morbidly

torpid, and his imagination morbidly active. At one time he would

stand poring on the town clock without being able to tell the hour. At

another, he would distinctly hear his mother, who was many miles off,

calling him by his name. But this was not the worst. A deep melancholy

took possession of him, and gave a dark tinge to all his views of human

nature and of human destiny. Such wretchedness as he endured has driven

many men to shoot themselves or drown themselves. But he was under no

temptation to commit suicide. He was sick of life; but he was afraid of

death; and he shuddered at every sight or sound which reminded him of

the inevitable hour. In religion he found but little comfort during his

long and frequent fits of dejection; for his religion partook of his

own character. The light from heaven shone on him indeed, but not in a

direct line, or with its own pure splendour. The rays had to struggle

through a disturbing medium; they reached him refracted, dulled and

discoloured by the thick gloom which had settled on his soul; and,

though they might be sufficiently clear to guide him, were too dim to

cheer him.

With such infirmities of body and mind, this celebrated man was left, at

two-and-twenty, to fight his way through the world. He remained during

about five years in the midland counties. At Lichfield, his birthplace

and his early home, he had inherited some friends and acquired others.

He was kindly noticed by Henry Hervey, a gay officer of noble family,

who happened to be quartered there. Gilbert Walmesley, registrar of

the ecclesiastical court of the diocese, a man of distinguished parts,

learning, and knowledge of the world, did himself honour by patronising

the young adventurer, whose repulsive person, unpolished manners, and

squalid garb moved many of the petty aristocracy of the neighbourhood to

laughter or to disgust. At Lichfield, however, Johnson could find no

way of earning a livelihood. He became usher of a grammar school in

Leicestershire; he resided as a humble companion in the house of a

country gentleman; but a life of dependence was insupportable to his

haughty spirit. He repaired to Birmingham, and there earned a few

guineas by literary drudgery. In that town he printed a translation,

little noticed at the time, and long forgotten, of a Latin book about

Abyssinia. He then put forth proposals for publishing by subscription

the poems of Politian, with notes containing a history of modern Latin

verse: but subscriptions did not come in; and the volume never appeared.

While leading this vagrant and miserable life, Johnson fell in love. The

object of his passion was Mrs Elizabeth Porter, a widow who had children

as old as himself. To ordinary spectators, the lady appeared to be a

short, fat, coarse woman, painted half an inch thick, dressed in gaudy

colours, and fond of exhibiting provincial airs and graces which were

not exactly those of the Queensberrys and Lepels. To Johnson, however,

whose passions were strong, whose eyesight was too weak to distinguish

ceruse from natural bloom, and who had seldom or never been in the same

room with a woman of real fashion, his Titty, as he called her, was

the most beautiful, graceful, and accomplished of her sex. That his

admiration was unfeigned cannot be doubted; for she was as poor as

himself. She accepted, with a readiness which did her little honour,

the addresses of a suitor who might have been her son. The marriage,

however, in spite of occasional wranglings, proved happier than might

have been expected. The lover continued to be under the illusions of the

wedding-day till the lady died in her sixty-fourth year. On her monument

he placed an inscription extolling the charms of her person and of her

manners; and when, long after her decease, he had occasion to mention

her, he exclaimed, with a tenderness half ludicrous, half pathetic,

"Pretty creature!"

His marriage made it necessary for him to exert himself more strenuously

than he had hitherto done. He took a house in the neighbourhood of his

native town, and advertised for pupils. But eighteen months passed away;

and only three pupils came to his academy. Indeed, his appearance was

so strange, and his temper so violent, that his schoolroom must have

resembled an ogre's den. Nor was the tawdry painted grandmother whom

he called his Titty well qualified to make provision for the comfort of

young gentlemen. David Garrick, who was one of the pupils, used, many

years later, to throw the best company of London into convulsions of

laughter by mimicking the endearments of this extraordinary pair.

At length Johnson, in the twenty-eighth year of his age, determined to

seek his fortune in the capital as a literary adventurer. He set out

with a few guineas, three acts of the tragedy of Irene in manuscript,

and two or three letters of introduction from his friend Walmesley.

Never, since literature became a calling in England, had it been a less

gainful calling than at the time when Johnson took up his residence in

London. In the preceding generation a writer of eminent merit was sure

to be munificently rewarded by the government. The least that he could

expect was a pension or a sinecure place; and, if he showed any aptitude

for politics, he might hope to be a member of parliament, a lord of the

treasury, an ambassador, a secretary of state. It would be easy, on the

other hand, to name several writers of the nineteenth century of

whom the least successful has received forty thousand pounds from the

booksellers. But Johnson entered on his vocation in the most dreary

part of the dreary interval which separated two ages of prosperity.

Literature had ceased to flourish under the patronage of the great, and

had not begun to flourish under the patronage of the public. One man of

letters, indeed, Pope, had acquired by his pen what was then considered

as a handsome fortune, and lived on a footing of equality with nobles

and ministers of state. But this was a solitary exception. Even an

author whose reputation was established, and whose works were popular,

such an author as Thomson, whose Seasons were in every library, such an

author as Fielding, whose Pasquin had had a greater run than any drama

since The Beggar's Opera, was sometimes glad to obtain, by pawning his

best coat, the means of dining on tripe at a cookshop underground,

where he could wipe his hands, after his greasy meal, on the back of a

Newfoundland dog. It is easy, therefore, to imagine what humiliations

and privations must have awaited the novice who had still to earn a

name. One of the publishers to whom Johnson applied for employment

measured with a scornful eye that athletic though uncouth frame, and

exclaimed, "You had better get a porter's knot, and carry trunks." Nor

was the advice bad; for a porter was likely to be as plentifully fed,

and as comfortably lodged, as a poet.

Some time appears to have elapsed before Johnson was able to form any

literary connection from which he could expect more than bread for the

day which was passing over him. He never forgot the generosity with

which Hervey, who was now residing in London, relieved his wants during

this time of trial. "Harry Hervey," said the old philosopher many years

later, "was a vicious man; but he was very kind to me. If you call a dog

Hervey I shall love him." At Hervey's table Johnson sometimes enjoyed

feasts which were made more agreeable by contrast. But in general he

dined, and thought that he dined well, on sixpenny worth of meat, and a

pennyworth of bread, at an alehouse near Drury Lane.

The effect of the privations and sufferings which he endured at this

time was discernible to the last in his temper and his deportment. His

manners had never been courtly. They now became almost savage. Being

frequently under the necessity of wearing shabby coats and dirty shirts,

he became a confirmed sloven. Being often very hungry when he sat down

to his meals, he contracted a habit of eating with ravenous greediness.

Even to the end of his life, and even at the tables of the great, the

sight of food affected him as it affects wild beasts and birds of prey.

His taste in cookery, formed in subterranean ordinaries and alamode

beefshops, was far from delicate. Whenever he was so fortunate as to

have near him a hare that had been kept too long, or a meat pie made

with rancid butter, he gorged himself with such violence that his veins

swelled, and the moisture broke out on his forehead. The affronts which

his poverty emboldened stupid and low-minded men to offer to him would

have broken a mean spirit into sycophancy, but made him rude even to

ferocity. Unhappily the insolence which, while it was defensive,

was pardonable, and in some sense respectable, accompanied him into

societies where he was treated with courtesy and kindness. He was

repeatedly provoked into striking those who had taken liberties with

him. All the sufferers, however, were wise enough to abstain from

talking about their beatings, except Osborne, the most rapacious and

brutal of booksellers, who proclaimed everywhere that he had been

knocked down by the huge fellow whom he had hired to puff the Harleian

Library.

Miscellaneous Writings and Speeches — Volume 3 · 第 4 / 16 段