HOW WE OUGHT TO CONDUCT OURSELVES TOWARDS OUR [OTHER] KINDRED.

The consideration of the duties pertaining to [our other] kindred

is consequent to the discussion of those that pertain to parents,

brothers, wives, and children; for the same things may, in a certain

respect, be said of the former as of the latter; and on this account

may be concisely explained. For, in short, each of us is, as it

were, circumscribed by many circles; some of which are less, but

others larger, and some comprehend, but others are comprehended,

according to the different and unequal habitudes with respect to

each other. For the first, indeed, and most proximate circle is

that which every one describes about his own mind as a centre, in

which circle the body, and whatever is assumed for the sake of the

body, are comprehended. For this is nearly the smallest circle, and

almost touches the centre itself. The second from this, and which

is at a greater distance from the centre, but comprehends the first

circle, is that in which parents, brothers, wife, and children are

arranged. The third circle from the centre is that which contains

uncles and aunts, grandfathers and grandmothers, and the children of

brothers and sisters. After this is the circle which comprehends

the remaining relatives. Next to this is that which contains the

common people, then that which comprehends those of the same tribe,

afterwards that which contains the citizens; and then two other

circles follow, one being the circle of those that dwell in the

vicinity of the city, and the other, of those of the same province.

But the outermost and greatest circle, and which comprehends all the

other circles, is that of the whole human race[51].

These things being thus considered, it is the province of him who

strives to conduct himself properly in each of these connections

to collect, in a certain respect, the circles, as it were, to one

centre, and always to endeavour earnestly to transfer himself from

the comprehending circles to the several particulars which they

comprehend. It pertains, therefore, to the man who is a lover of

kindred [to conduct himself in a becoming manner[52]] towards

his parents and brothers; also, according to the same analogy,

towards the more elderly of his relatives of both sexes, such as

grandfathers, uncles and aunts; towards those of the same age with

himself, as his cousins; and towards his juniors, as the children of

his cousins. Hence we have summarily shown how we ought to conduct

ourselves towards our kindred, having before taught how we should

act towards ourselves, our parents, and brothers; and besides these,

towards our wife and children. To which it must be added, that

those who belong to the third circle must be honoured similarly to

these; and again, kindred similarly to those that belong to the

third circle. For something of benevolence must be taken away from

those who are more distant from us by blood; though at the same time

we should endeavour that an assimilation may take place between us

and them. For this distance will become moderate, if, through the

diligent attention[53] which we pay to them, we cut off the length

of the habitude towards each individual of these. We have unfolded,

therefore, that which is most comprehensive and important in the

duties pertaining to kindred.

It is requisite, likewise, to add a proper measure conformably to

the general use of appellations, calling indeed cousins, uncles and

aunts, by the name of brothers, fathers and mothers; but of other

kindred, to denominate some uncles, others the children of brothers

or sisters, and others cousins, according to the difference of age,

for the sake of the abundant extension which there is in names.

For this mode of appellation will be no obscure indication of our

sedulous attention to each of these relatives; and at the same time

will incite, and extend us in a greater degree, to the contraction as

it were of the above mentioned circles. But as we have proceeded thus

far in our discussion, it will not be unseasonable to recall to our

memory the distinction with respect to parents, which we before made.

For in that place in which we compared mother with father, we said

that it was requisite to attribute more of love to a mother, and more

of honour to a father; and conformably to this, we shall here add,

that it is fit to have more love for those who are connected with

us by a maternal alliance, but to pay more honour to those who are

related to us by a paternal affinity.

Political fragments of Archytas, Charondas, Zaleucus, and other ancient Pythagoreans, preserved by Stobæus · 第 50 / 60 题