AND IN ANOTHER PART OF THE SAME WORK.

He who has a sacred and divine conception of things, will be in

reality a king[21]. For being persuaded by this, he will be the cause

of all good but of no evil. And, moreover, that he will be just,

being fitted for society, is evident to every one. For communion or

association consists in equality, and in the distribution of it.

And justice indeed precedes, but communion participates. For it is

impossible for a man to be unjust, and yet distribute equality;

or that he should distribute equality, and yet not be adapted to

association. But how is it possible that he who is sufficient to

himself should not be continent? For sumptuousness is the mother of

incontinence, and incontinence of wanton insolence, from which so

many human evils are derived. But self-sufficiency is not vanquished

by sumptuousness, nor by any thing which proceeds from it; but being

itself a certain principle, it leads all things, but is not led by

any thing. And to govern, indeed, is the province of God, and also of

a king (on which account, likewise, he is denominated sufficient to

himself); but it pertains to both, not to be governed by any one. It

is, however, evident, that these things cannot be effected without

prudence. And it is manifest that God is the intellectual prudence of

the world. For the world is connectedly contained by gracefulness,

and a fit order of things, which cannot take place without intellect.

Nor is it possible for a king without prudence to possess these

virtues; I mean justice, continence, communion, and such other

virtues as are the sisters of these.

Political fragments of Archytas, Charondas, Zaleucus, and other ancient Pythagoreans, preserved by Stobæus · 第 29 / 60 题