CHAPTER XXIII

SHILOH

McClellan's advance upon Richmond, in its beginnings at least,

antedated the great conflict at Shiloh. But its crisis did not come

until much later, nor did it in its early progress involve aught that

was of significance in its bearing upon the conduct and outcome of the

war.

It seems proper therefore to discuss Shiloh and other operations in the

Mississippi Valley first, leaving the campaign in Virginia for later

consideration.

The Confederates, before the fall of Fort Donelson and Fort Henry, were

maintaining a line of offensive defense in Kentucky. This line extended

from the Big Sandy in the eastern part of the state to Columbus on the

Mississippi river in the extreme west.

The line was in many respects defective. The Confederate center of

operations was at Bowling Green, while the two ends of the defensive

line lay much farther north than that. The line thus constituted what

in military parlance is known as a reëntering angle. The enemy pushing

into such an angle with forces greater than those that defended it or

even with an inferior force, had easy choice to attack on either side

as he pleased, concentrating at will, while compelling the Confederates

to scatter their forces along the whole of an extensive line by way of

defending all parts of it equally.

It was the original purpose of those who devised this defensive system

to correct the fault by pushing their center forward from Bowling Green

to Paducah on the Ohio river, nearly fifty miles above the mouth of

that stream. Had this been accomplished, it would have made the angle

of defense a salient instead of a reëntering one.

Let us explain the advantage of this for the benefit of the

non-military reader. If the Confederates could have established

themselves at Paducah with their lines trending off to the southeast on

the one side and to the southwest on the other, they, instead of their

enemies, would have had choice of positions in which to concentrate.

Assailed at any point it would have been easy for them to throw all

possible force quickly to the defense of the threatened position.

Grant interfered with all this planning when he moved up the Ohio, and

seized upon Paducah, which was quickly fortified so strongly as to

render the execution of the scheme thereafter impracticable. From that

time forward it was clear that the Confederates must either maintain

their line of defense by means of a vast and dangerously unmanageable

reëntering angle, or they must withdraw from their two advanced wing

points. To do this latter thing would have been to abandon Kentucky

completely, and it was no part of the Confederate program to do that.

A second defect in this scheme of defense was that the line thus

formed was traversed by two rivers, the Tennessee and the Cumberland,

both practically navigable by steamboats. It was obvious to ordinary

common-sense that should both or either of these rivers at any time

fall under control of the enemy, with his multitudinous gunboats and

other river craft which could easily be made to carry guns, the western

half of the Confederate force must be completely and at once cut off

from all but a very roundabout and slow communication with its allies

on the east.

Here was a danger which must have presented itself obtrusively to the

minds of those who formed and ordered this military arrangement. It

is difficult for a military critic in this later day to understand or

to conceive upon what principle of scientific warfare such a line was

accepted as even tolerably judicious. Its adoption seems in fact to

have been determined more by political than by military considerations.

In order to meet the difficulty the Confederates created the two great

fortresses--Henry and Donelson--to defend the rivers. These forts were

curiously misplaced. They were located one upon the one river, and

the other upon the other, at a point near the dividing line between

Kentucky and Tennessee. At that point the two rivers run within eleven

miles of each other. But a little farther down the streams--that is

to say a little farther north--their course brings them within three

miles of each other. Here obviously on all accounts was the point at

which the defensive works should have been constructed. In that case

the two forts would have been within easy supporting distance of each

other and neither could have been assailed from the rear. Moreover,

we have the authority of no less eminent an engineer than General

Beauregard for saying that the ground at this point is well fitted by

its natural conformation for purposes of defense, while at the point

actually selected for the two fortresses it is peculiarly lacking in

that advantage. But the more defensible position was in Kentucky and

purely political considerations had weight in determining the choice of

the less advantageous point of defense in Tennessee.

The defective character of this line of defense and the mistake

underlying its acceptance were strongly emphasized after the overthrow

of Zollicoffer at Mill Springs and the pushing forward of General

Thomas's forces to more southerly points. This movement placed a

threatening force on the right flank of the Confederate line of

defense. Nevertheless, the Confederate War Department clung to its

mistaken policy. It lived at that time in a fool's paradise in which

facts counted for little in comparison with theories, and in which

optimism was expected to serve the purpose of guns and brigades and

defensive works.

When at the end of January, 1862, the War Department asked General

Beauregard to go to that region as second in command under General

Albert Sydney Johnston, it confidently assured him that the troops

under General Johnston's command exceeded seventy thousand in number.

On his arrival there General Beauregard found that in fact these widely

and dangerously scattered forces numbered less than forty-five thousand

and that the several parts could not possibly be made to support each

other. He found also that the strength in fortification, in guns and

in men, which should have been concentrated mainly in Forts Henry and

Donelson, had been largely wasted at Columbus, a position naturally

indefensible or defensible by a small as easily as by a large force. He

found that vast quantities of precious stores had been warehoused there

in face of the fact that Columbus was the most northerly and the most

exposed point on the entire defensive line.

When General Beauregard joined General Johnston and made his study

of conditions, he pointed out all these defects in the line and all

the dangers they involved. General Beauregard had, since the battle

of Manassas, developed an aggressive tendency which he had strangely

lacked in the earlier months of his career as a general. He had grown

into a real general. He therefore proposed to General Johnston an

instant offensive movement.

Here it is important for the reader clearly to understand the situation.

General Polk, commanding the Confederates at Columbus, was threatened

by a superior force under General Pope in Missouri, on the other

side of the river. General Johnston's position at Bowling Green was

threatened by a distinctly superior army under General Buell which lay

scarcely more than a two days' march to the north and east. Moreover

the position of Bowling Green was already in effect turned by Thomas's

advance from eastern Kentucky towards eastern Tennessee. In the

meanwhile General Grant, supported by the gunboats, was in possession

of Paducah and threatening to advance with 15,000 men for the reduction

of Fort Henry and Fort Donelson.

The Confederate forces were scattered beyond all possibility of

effective coöperation except by a concentration in advance involving a

radical change in the scheme and line of defense. There were at that

time about 14,000 Confederate effectives at Bowling Green; about 5,500

at Forts Henry and Donelson; about 8,000 near Clarksville; and about

15,000 at and near Columbus. Other detached forces at various points

swelled the total of the Confederate forces in Kentucky and Tennessee

to about 45,000 fighting men.

Grant was threatening the river forts with 15,000 men. Pope had 30,000

men or more in southeast Missouri, threatening Columbus. Buell had a

large and rapidly increasing army, numbering from 40,000 to 60,000 men

(overestimated by Beauregard at 75,000 or 80,000) at Bacon's Creek,

within striking distance, forty miles, of Bowling Green.

It was obviously easy for Pope to occupy Polk at Columbus and for Buell

to engage Johnston at Bowling Green with an overwhelming force, while

Grant should advance to the assault of Forts Henry and Donelson.

Buell, with his army of 40,000 or 50,000 men, might easily have

overwhelmed Johnston's 14,000 at Bowling Green. Pope could have so far

engaged Polk at Columbus as to prevent the detachment even of a squad

from that quarter for Johnston's reinforcement. Grant in the meanwhile

could make his advance with 15,000 men--to be reinforced presently to

27,000--and the gunboats, against Forts Henry and Donelson, defended as

those works were by no more than 5,500 men.

It was Beauregard's urgent advice to withdraw all but garrison forces

from Columbus, Bowling Green and Clarksville, and to concentrate an

overmastering force for resistance to Grant in front of Fort Donelson.

This plan was in some degree acted upon. That is to say enough men were

concentrated at the forts to swell the record of Grant's subsequent

capture to about 15,000 men, but not enough to defend the position.

The plan might have failed had an attempt been made to execute it in

its full scope. Attempted by half measures as it was its failure was

clearly foreordained. Grant captured the forts and their defending

garrisons and made himself master of the two rivers which, next to the

Mississippi, were of most vital importance to both sides. After the

forts had fallen the occupation of Nashville was quite a matter of

course, and equally so was the necessity of the Confederate evacuation

of Kentucky and of practically all of Tennessee.

Presently after being "kept in" by Halleck Grant was restored to

command--though still as a mere volunteer officer under censure and

still subject to General Halleck's often paralyzing domination. Grant

instantly began, after his habit, to plan a further campaign of damage

to the enemies of the Union. One opportunity had been denied to him. He

sought another.

In the meanwhile his capture of Forts Henry and Donelson had split the

Confederate line of defense in two and rendered its further maintenance

an utter impossibility. With the Tennessee and Cumberland rivers in

Federal possession it was manifestly absurd to think of maintaining a

line of defense which those rivers traversed. The success of Grant had

completely ended all possibility of coöperation between the eastern and

western wings of that defensive line. The forces west of the Tennessee

and those east of that river must henceforth act independently and

rather hopelessly, or else they must retire to a new line farther south

upon which coöperation might be possible.

It was decided to retire. Bowling Green was evacuated and the Federal

General Buell instantly occupied it. A little later Nashville was

evacuated by the Confederates in behalf of a less exposed position.

It was at the same time determined to withdraw from Columbus all the

forces assembled there except a garrison sufficient to work the guns,

and to defend the point for a time with the aid of Commodore Hollins's

gunboats in the Mississippi.

The new line of defense adopted by the Confederates was the Memphis and

Charleston railroad, running through southern Tennessee and northern

Mississippi, Alabama, etc. This line presented no natural advantages

of defense, but it covered the most vitally important railroad

communications of the Confederacy. Furthermore it will be observed

that this line of defense lies almost exactly midway between the Ohio

River and the Gulf of Mexico. In other words, under Grant's energetic

aggressiveness, the Federal control had been pushed from the Ohio river

nearly half way to the gulf. The process of "splitting the Confederacy

in two," was already well advanced at the beginning of the spring of

1862.

It was always the keynote of Grant's policy to "press things," and

after his period of suspension from command he began again to carry out

that obviously wise policy.

As the dominant thought in General Grant's strategy from beginning to

end of the war, he was strongly impressed with the fact that the North

was vastly superior to the South in all military resources, and as a

man of practical common sense it was his idea that this superiority in

men, arms, ammunition, food supplies, and all else that tends to help

military endeavor should be insistently and persistently utilized in

the breaking of Confederate resistance within the briefest possible

time. The ancient thought of divine arbitrament in arms had no place in

his mind. The notion was incredible to him that two armies should stand

still and do nothing while a David on the one side and a Goliath on the

other should make a personal trial of conclusions. He was not lacking

in chivalry or sentiment, as abundantly appeared on several conspicuous

occasions, but he had besides an all-dominating common sense, and he

used it. He fully agreed with the Confederate General Forrest in his

definition of strategy as the art of "getting there first with the most

men." He did not understand modern warfare to be in any wise akin to

a medieval tournament in which equality of opportunity must be sought

at all costs. Quite on the contrary he regarded war as a perfectly

practical matter of business, to be carried on as such. He clearly saw

it to be what it is and always must be, a cruel survival from barbaric

times, a measuring of brute strength in that last appeal of humanity,

to the arbitrament of arms.

His common sense taught him that whatever of science there might be

involved in the conduct of war, its results depended after all upon

brute force. It was therefore his plan always to bring to bear all that

he possessed of brute force for the solution of the problems at issue,

and, wherever he could, to press his adversary with heavier battalions

than that adversary could muster.

Having been set free again with permission to resume active warfare,

Grant intuitively desired to push forward, pressing his adversary at

every point, seizing upon every assailable position and making himself

master of every place from which further war could be waged with hope

of success.

As we have seen, he had been called back from this program of common

sense after his capture of Forts Henry and Donelson, and until March

13 he was not again allowed to do anything whatever or to use his

abilities in any manner in the public service.

By making himself master of the two rivers he had completely destroyed

the Confederate line and scheme of defense. He had completely cut

off that part of the Confederate force which had its headquarters at

Bowling Green from that part of it whose chief seat was at Columbus.

So complete was this severance, as a glance at a map will show, that

General Albert Sydney Johnston sent General Beauregard at once to

command the western force as a separate army with specific instructions

to act upon his own judgment, bearing in mind that coöperation between

the two forces was no longer possible.

It was surely a great strategic victory for Grant thus to break an

elaborate line of defense and thus completely to divide an army

already inferior to the armies opposing it in numbers, resources

and equipments. But this was not all of it. By this division of the

Confederate forces Grant was left free to attack either half of the

Southern army at will, with overwhelming numbers--for in addition to

his own 38,000 men--for his force had been swelled to that strength--he

had Buell's much larger force within easy call, to say nothing of

Thomas's command, now foot-loose for aggressive campaigning. It is safe

to say that had Grant been permitted, he could and would have fallen

upon and crushed the Confederates under Johnston, with an absolutely

overwhelming army. He could and would have conquered every remaining

Confederate stronghold in Tennessee and northern Georgia and Alabama

and he could and probably would have made within the first year of the

war that "march to the sea," either at Mobile or at Savannah, which was

left for Sherman to make years later.

On the other hand, with a strong detachment he could easily have

destroyed the long and exceedingly vulnerable line of communication

that connected Columbus, Kentucky, with the South.

At Jackson, Tennessee, the Mississippi Central railroad coming up from

New Orleans and the Mobile and Ohio line running north from Mobile

formed a junction. From that point north to Columbus, there was but

one fragile line of single track, earth-ballasted railroad, serving

as a connecting link between the South and its excessively advanced

western position at Columbus. It is difficult to imagine a line of

military communication more vulnerable than this little thread. The

country between the Tennessee river and this railroad line was quite

open and there was neither fortress nor force, except here and there

an easily conquerable picket post to defend the communication. If

Grant had been left with a free hand there is no doubt whatever that

he would instantly have sent westward a force too small in itself for

its detachment to weaken him, but large enough to make itself instantly

and completely master of this railroad line. He would thus have cut off

all communication between Columbus and the South. He would have made

himself quickly master of all the forces and all the supplies and all

the ordnance that had been foolishly concentrated at Columbus. He would

without a battle have compelled the surrender of that stronghold, with

all its preposterously numerous garrison, with all its great guns, and

with all of the rich store of supplies and ammunition and other war

material collected there.

It was another absurdity of the early war that Grant was forbidden to

do any of these things, when the time for their doing was ripe. By

orders of his "superior officer" Halleck, Grant was held idle at the

forts that he had conquered while this opportunity slipped away. From

the sixteenth of February to the thirteenth of March this only general

who knew how to do things and how to get things done was condemned to

idleness and inaction by the absurd order of a distinctly unfriendly

martinet.

In the meantime the Confederates, not being fools, utilized the

opportunity given them by this delay, to rescue themselves from their

peculiarly perilous position. Johnston withdrew the eastern half of the

Confederate army from Bowling Green to the line of the railroad that

led from Memphis eastward. Beauregard, in command of the western half

of the army which Grant had so completely sundered, clearly saw the

situation and promptly retired his forces from Columbus to Corinth,

Mississippi, on the line of the Memphis and Charleston railroad at

its intersection of the Mobile and Ohio line. He had in the meantime

transferred to New Madrid on the Mississippi, and to Island Number 10

in that stream, the best of the ordnance in Columbus, thus providing as

effectually as he could for the defense of the great river and for its

blockading against Federal gunboats and still more important Federal

transports bearing troops and supplies to points below.

Corinth is a little village in the extreme north of Mississippi. It

has no pronounced defensive advantages whatsoever. It lies in a region

of nearly flat lands with no line of bold hills to protect it and no

difficult stream to serve as a base of defense. But it lies upon that

line of railroad which the Confederates must defend if they were to

preserve their communications between the east and the west at the

crossing of the north and south line.

At Corinth the Confederates concentrated all their forces. Against

Corinth Grant instantly directed his operations as soon as he was

restored to command and permitted by his superior officer to carry on

the war for his country upon lines marked out by common-sense.

He moved at once to Pittsburg Landing on the Tennessee river. Pittsburg

Landing lies about twenty miles north by east of Corinth and between

the two there is no considerable stream, no important range of hills,

nothing in the shape of physical conformation of the ground that could

aid Confederate defense or facilitate Confederate aggression. On the

contrary the streams near Pittsburg ministered exclusively to Federal

purposes.

When Grant arrived at Pittsburg Landing he found the army encamped

about equally upon the eastern and western sides of the river. He

instantly and boldly ordered the whole of it to the western or

Confederate bank of the stream.

This was a very daring thing to do. For with the Tennessee river behind

him and with no means of easily crossing it in retreat, Grant must face

the certain surrender of his army in case of an unsuccessful battle in

that position. In such an event there could be no alternative. But it

was not Grant's habit of mind to look for alternatives. He boldly took

the risk as it was his custom to do. He threw his whole army across

the river and there waited for the arrival of Buell's stronger force,

which had been ordered by Halleck to join him and was marching in

very leisurely fashion to do so. The army under Grant's own immediate

command numbered now about 38,000 men, increased almost immediately

to 45,000. That under Buell which was strolling westward to reinforce

him numbered more than 40,000. He thus had prospect of an overwhelming

force with which to assail the Confederates at Corinth, where under

Beauregard's tireless activity they had succeeded in concentrating

about 45,000 or 50,000 men, a large part of this force consisting of

raw recruits unorganized, undrilled, undisciplined and extremely ill

armed.

Whether Halleck planned this concentration of Grant's and Buell's

armies for an advance upon Corinth as his partisans contend, or whether

Grant planned it and Halleck merely accepted the plan as others stoutly

assert, is a matter of no historical consequence, whatever biographical

interest it may have. In either case the purpose of the concentration

was to move upon Corinth in irresistible force, overthrow the

Confederates there and seize upon the two important lines of railroad

which intersect each other at that point. It was at any rate Halleck's

purpose to command in this campaign in person. But it was not intended

to advance upon Corinth until Grant's and Buell's armies should form a

junction, and there was no thought or expectation that the Confederates

would themselves assume the offensive. General Halleck planned to leave

St. Louis not earlier than April 7, and perhaps several days later,

for Pittsburg Landing. In the meanwhile General Grant had posted his

army loosely and had thrown up no earthworks in the field. All his

procedures indicated that he did not expect to be molested where he lay

or to encounter the enemy until he should go in search of him. Indeed,

he telegraphed Halleck on the fifth of April, the very day before the

battle, saying, "The main force of the enemy is at Corinth, with troops

at different points east.... I have scarcely the faintest idea of an

attack (general one) being made upon us, but will be prepared should

such a thing take place."

At the very moment when that dispatch was penned the Confederates with

their entire strength were actually on march to assail an enemy who had

"scarcely the faintest idea of an attack" being made upon him either

then or later. In his memoirs General Grant said:

"When all reinforcements should have arrived I expected to take the

initiative by marching on Corinth and had no expectation of needing

fortifications.... The fact is I regarded the campaign we were engaged

in as an offensive one and had no idea that the enemy would leave

strong intrenchments to take the initiative when he knew he would be

attacked where he was, if he remained."

It had been the purpose of General Johnston to deliver his blow on the

morning of the fifth of April, overthrow Grant, and be prepared to

fall upon Buell when he should arrive. But matters of detail went so

far wrong that the Confederates, advancing from Corinth to attack, did

not reach the neighborhood of Shiloh church, where Sherman was posted

without fortifications, until nightfall of that day. They bivouacked

very near the Federal lines, but strangely enough their presence in

force was not discovered by the enemy they purposed to fall upon at

daylight. In the meanwhile the head of Buell's column had come up and

the rest of it was dangerously near at hand.

The Confederates made their assault with great impetuosity at dawn

of April 6. The first that Sherman, who held the advance of Grant's

position, knew of the impending battle was when the Confederates forty

thousand strong rushed upon his camps and after a brief but stubborn

struggle carried them, Sherman being driven back so hurriedly that he

left his tents standing and the breakfasts of his men not yet cooked.

The first that Grant knew of a tremendous attack of which he had had

"scarcely the faintest idea," was when at his headquarters at Savannah

several miles down the river he heard the guns at work at Shiloh.

There has been much and angry discussion of the question whether or

not Grant and Sherman were "surprised," in the military acceptation

of the term, by the Confederate onslaught at Shiloh. The point has

little historical importance, but in the light of all the facts since

disclosed by the records it is difficult to interpret what happened

there otherwise than as a complete surprise, which but for the

excellent discipline of the Federal troops and their superb fighting

quality might easily have ended in disaster. We have seen that Halleck

in St. Louis did not intend to leave for the front, where he expected

to command in person, until the next day or even later. We have seen

how confident Grant was in his belief that the Confederates intended no

general attack either then or later and how he planned himself to take

the offensive. It is certain that Grant's forces were not disposed as

they would have been if an assault by the enemy had been anticipated.

The several advance corps were posted with little or no reference to

coöperation between them to resist an enemy assaulting in force. No

line of battle had been formed or in any way provided for. Sherman,

who was first assailed, was resting quietly in camps which would very

certainly have been stripped for action if an attack had been expected.

Indeed, Sherman's very latest reports to Grant had expressed the

utmost confidence that no attack was in contemplation, and that the

Confederates would do nothing more than annoy the pickets. He reported

to Grant that they "will not press our pickets far." In brief it is

obvious that neither Halleck at St. Louis, nor Grant at Savannah,

Tennessee, nor Sherman, holding the front at Shiloh meeting house,

anticipated a battle in front of Pittsburg Landing. They expected to

fight on the offensive at Corinth when they should be ready to advance,

but the thought of having to defend themselves against a Confederate

force assailing them at Shiloh seems never to have occurred to them

until the Confederates fell upon Sherman's camp with their "yell," for

a first warning of their presence.

Sherman with two brigades lay in front. The two brigades were widely

separated, as they would not have been had an attack in force been

regarded as even a possibility. McClernand's division lay far in rear

of Sherman. Prentiss, Hurlbut, W. H. L. Wallace and the commander of C.

F. Smith's force--that general being ill--with their several divisions

were scattered about in the rear all the way to Pittsburg Landing,

while Lew Wallace with about five thousand men was posted several miles

farther down the river in complete isolation from the rest of the force.

General Van Horne, writing under the direct inspiration of General

George H. Thomas and with all the orders and dispatches under his

eye, says that the several divisions "were widely separated and did

not sustain such relations to each other that it was possible to

form quickly a connected defensive line; they had no defenses and no

designated line for defense in the event of a sudden attack, and there

was no general on the field to take by special authority the command of

the whole force in an emergency."

The ground in front of Pittsburg Landing was especially well adapted

to defense. Flanked on either side by creeks difficult to cross, it

compelled the assailants to depend almost entirely upon direct assault

in front with little chance of success in any effort they might make to

turn either flank.

There was as yet no officer authorized to take general command,

General Grant being at Savannah, far from the field, but the division

commanders, each acting upon his own responsibility, quickly responded

to the need, and not long after Sherman's camps had been overrun there

was a very tolerable line of battle contesting the Confederate advance

with great obstinacy and determination.

In the meanwhile Grant had ordered up such reinforcements as were at

hand and was himself hurrying to the scene to give personal direction

to the battle.

He found multitudes of stragglers and skulkers cowering under the river

bank, as is always the case during a battle when a place of refuge near

at hand offers a tempting security to the cowardly. But apart from

these spiritless ones he found the men of his army bearing themselves

right gallantly and contesting every inch of the ground over which the

Confederates were slowly beating them back towards the river.

The purpose of the Confederates was to break through the left of

Grant's line and reach the river, thus placing themselves on their

enemy's flank, threatening his rear and imperiling his entire army.

General Albert Sydney Johnston had been mortally wounded early in

the afternoon, but Beauregard, upon whom the Confederate command had

devolved, adopted and sought to carry out the strategy determined

upon. Late in the afternoon, he hurled the whole of Bragg's force upon

the left of Grant's line with an impetuosity which must have achieved

success had the tremendous assault been made an hour earlier. But

fortunately for the Federals General Buell had come up with a part

of his army. He quickly threw such regiments as he had with him into

action at the point of danger, and the danger was really extreme. It

was only necessary for the Confederates to push Grant's left wing back

for about two hundred yards farther than it had been pushed already in

order to seize upon the landing and completely cut Grant off from his

gunboats and transports acting as ferry-boats, and from all hope of

further reinforcement.

In that case Grant's problem would have been to save his shattered army

from complete overthrow, with surrender as the well-nigh inevitable

result. There is little doubt that the left wing must have given way

before Bragg's assault, as the Confederates expected it to do, but for

the reinforcement which Buell sent into action at the critical moment.

This reinforcement saved the left wing from the destruction intended

for it.

This statement is made upon the very careful and trustworthy authority

of General Van Horne, writing under direct inspiration of General

Thomas. In his "Memoirs" General Grant repudiates the claim of Buell's

having rendered important assistance at that time and insists that he

rendered him no help of any consequence on the first day of the battle.

But the memoirs were written from the memory of a very ill man many

years after the event, and may therefore be erroneous. At any rate

General Van Horne's account of what happened, supported as it is by

copies of all the orders given, seems the more trustworthy authority on

the point at issue.

Night was now near at hand. During a long day of continuous and

desperate fighting Grant had been slowly beaten back to the

neighborhood of the river bank. There he stood at bay with all his

artillery and all his infantry massed in a commanding position,

shattered and broken, and standing in desperate defense of a point from

which he could retreat no farther without retreating into the river.

Across his front lay a deep ravine. This would have been difficult

for his enemy to cross under the best of conditions. It was rendered

the more difficult by the fact that it was in part filled with back

water from the river. Still more important was the fact that it was

completely commanded by a plunging fire from the Federal artillery

which in spite of defeat stood resolutely to its guns.

Nevertheless the passage of that ravine was not quite impossible to a

determined foe; more difficult tasks have been accomplished by generals

of desperate courage commanding such an army as that under Beauregard

had proved itself to be during that unflinching day of slaughter.

It was a critical moment of the war--we may almost say it was _the_

critical moment of the war. If Beauregard could have forced that

ravine he must have driven his adversary into the river or compelled

the surrender of the Federal army with its complete destruction as the

only alternative. On the other hand, if he failed to force the ravine

that night it would be forever too late. For Buell's whole army was now

within call and it was certain that on the following day, if Grant were

not now destroyed, there would be a Federal force on the Confederate

side of the river with which Beauregard could not reasonably hope to

cope successfully.

It would perhaps be unjust to say that at this supreme crisis

Beauregard faltered and failed. The peril of the attempt was so great

and the certainty of slaughter so appalling that the very stoutest

heart might well have shrunk from the desperate hazard.

Beauregard himself has told us in his official reports, and in Colonel

Roman's inspired book, that he was unwilling to order a movement so

desperate in its chances and so certain to involve a slaughter of brave

men greater than any that has been anywhere recorded in the annals of

modern war. He was satisfied with the day's work done and confident of

complete victory on the morrow. So sure was he of this that he sent

dispatches to Richmond that night announcing a victory of stupendous

proportions and painting it in colors so glowing that President Davis

was moved to send a congratulatory message to the Congress, and that

body passed resolutions of the most enthusiastic kind.

During that night Buell's army, itself outnumbering what remained of

Beauregard's, was hurrying to reinforce Grant who planned to renew

the conflict at dawn with every prospect of reversing the first day's

results and wresting victory from what had been so nearly a complete

and disastrous defeat.

Early on the morning of the seventh of April Grant, reinforced by

Buell's men and having now an overmastering superiority of numbers,

took the offensive and assailed Beauregard's weakened army with a

determination which under the circumstances could mean nothing less

than victory.

But Beauregard was an obstinate fighter and a skilful one and his men

were Americans of the same race and lineage and traditions as those

they were meeting in battle. There was terrible fighting, therefore,

on that second day, and it was only after a very desperate and a very

bloody struggle, hours long in duration, that Grant regained the

ground lost on the day before.

But Beauregard's struggle on that second day was rendered hopeless

from the outset by irresistible odds of numbers, and after a heroic

resistance he withdrew his army and retired in good order and

unmolested to his strongly fortified position at Corinth.

Thus ended one of the great and decisive battles of the war. The

Federals had lost 13,047 men--killed, wounded and prisoners. The

Confederate loss was officially reported at 10,699 men. They had

captured the whole of Prentiss's division, 2,200 strong.

But the respective losses did not accurately measure the importance

of the contest. The battle left the Confederates baffled in their

attempt to overthrow Grant, but not less determined than ever to fight

the matter out to that conclusion which they religiously believed to

be their due of righteousness. On the other hand, it left the Federal

army in overmastering force on the Confederate side of a river which

constituted the last serious natural obstacle to Grant's purposed march

to the gulf.

But Grant was again immediately superseded in the chief command and

forbidden to press the Confederates with that tireless and ceaseless

activity which was the dominant characteristic of his military methods.

He had now an army of about 120,000 men. In front of him lay the enemy

upon a weakly defensive line with an army reduced by battle losses

to less than 40,000 effectives. It was obviously Grant's greatest

opportunity, but he was not permitted to seize it and turn it to

account. For no sooner was the battle completely won than General

Halleck hurried down from St. Louis and himself assumed command.

His orders were paralyzing. Instead of pushing forward with his force,

that outnumbered the Confederates by about three to one, and quickly

making an end of their resistance, he fortified and proceeded to busy

himself with the petty and nagging criticism of battle reports while

the Confederates were doing all that remained possible to them to

gather recruits, to strengthen their position at Corinth and to prepare

means of resistance farther South.

When we shall come to consider in a future chapter, what else had

happened, we shall see clearly that by his victory on the second day of

the Shiloh battle, taken in connection with other occurrences, General

Grant had made easily possible the immediate and complete conquest

of the entire Mississippi Valley. It only required an immediate

and determined advance such as General Grant naturally and eagerly

desired to make, in order to complete that work at once. He says in

his "Memoirs" that two days would have been ample for the conquest of

Corinth. But General Grant was not in control of operations in the

western department. General Halleck was. General Grant was no longer

even in command of the army with which he had driven General Beauregard

back to Corinth. General Halleck was, and instead of pressing forward

at once as Grant desired to do and driving Beauregard still farther

south while capturing all his stores or compelling him to destroy them,

Halleck forbade all this and with three men to Beauregard's one, and

with thrice or four times his resources in artillery, ammunition and

everything else, he fortified at Shiloh and began a slowly scientific

approach to works that Grant, in command of that army, would have run

over as a schoolboy tramples down a pathway through a clover field.

Halleck did not even begin this "scientific" advance against Corinth

until the thirtieth of April--more than three weeks after the battle

at Shiloh had opened the way. It took him, by his slow methods, a

full month more to reach Corinth--less than twenty miles away--and

when he got there at last he found the place already evacuated, the

Confederates having made good use of the seven or eight weeks' time

which his dilatoriness had thus allowed them in removing their guns,

ammunition and stores to newly fortified positions farther south.

But Grant's achievement at Shiloh was too great to be ignored. Again,

as after the capture of Forts Henry and Donelson, the land was

resounding with the praises of this Galena clerk Ulysses S. Grant, and

nobody outside the war department at Washington was even thinking of

his superior officer, General Halleck.

But in order clearly to understand what and how much all this meant, it

is necessary in another chapter to recount what else had happened of

a nature calculated to contribute to the recovery of the Mississippi

river and the Mississippi Valley, and to the severance of the

Confederacy in twain.

The History of the Confederate War, Its Causes and Its Conduct, Volume 1 (of 2) A Narrative and Critical History · 第 14 / 21 章