CHAPTER VII. EXCITEMENT, MONOTONY AND INTEREST

No matter what happens in the outside world, be it something we

see, hear or feel, in any sense-field there is an internal

reverberation in our bodies,--excitement. Excitement is the

undifferentiated result of stimuli, whether these come from

without or from within. For a change in the glands of the body

heaps up changes within us, which when felt, become excitement.

Thus at the mating period of animals, at the puberty of man,

there is a quite evident excitement demonstrated in the conduct

of the animal and the adolescent. He who remembers his own

adolescence, or who watches the boy or girl of that age, sees the

excitement in the readiness to laugh, cry, fight or love that is

so striking.

Undoubtedly the mother-stuff of all emotion is the feeling of

excitement. Before any emotion reaches its characteristic

expression there is the preparatory tension of excitement. Joy,

sorrow, anger, fear, wonder, surprise, etc., have in them as a

basis the same consciousness of an internal activity, of a world

within us beginning to seethe. Heart, lungs, blood stream, the

great viscera and the internal glands, cerebrum and sympathetic

nervous system, all participate in this activity, and the outward

visage of excitement is always the wide-open eye, the slightly

parted lips, the flaring nostrils and the slightly tensed muscles

of the whole body. Shouts, cries, the waving of arms and legs,

taking the specific direction of some emotion, make of excitement

a fierce discharger of energy, a fact of great importance in the

understanding of social and pathological phenomena. On the other

hand, excitement may be so intensely internal that it shifts the

blood supply too vigorously from the head and the result is a

swoon. This is more especially true of the excitement that

accompanies sorrow and fear than joy or anger, but even in these

emotions it occurs.

There are some very important phases of excitement that have not

been given sufficient weight in most of the discussions.

1. In the very young, excitement is diffuse and spreads

throughout the organism. An infant starts with a jump at a sudden

sound and shivers at a bright light. A young child is

unrestrained and general in his expression of excitement, no

matter what emotional direction that excitement takes. Bring

about any tension of expectation in a child--have him wait for

your head to appear around the corner as you play peek-a-boo, or

delay opening the box of candy, or pretend you are one thing or

another--and the excitement of the child is manifested in what is

known as eagerness. Attention in children is accompanied by

excitement and is wearying as a natural result, since excitement,

means a physical discharge of energy. A child laughs all over and

weeps with his entire body; his anger involves every muscle of

his body and his fear is an explosion. The young organism cannot

inhibit excitement.

As life goes on, the capacity for localizing or limiting

excitement increases. We become better organized, and the

disrupting force of a stimulus becomes less. Attention becomes

less painful, less tense, i.e., there is less general muscular

and emotional reaction. Expectation is less a physical

matter--perhaps because we have been so often disappointed--and

is more cerebral and the emotions are more reflective and

introspective in their expression and less a physical outburst.

Indeed, the process often enough goes too far, and we long for

the excitement of anticipation and realization. We do not start

at a noise, and though a great crowd will "stir our blood"

(excitement popularly phrased and accurately), we still limit

that excitement so that though we cheer or shout there is a core

of us that is quiet.

This is the case in health. In sickness, especially in that

condition known as neurasthenia, where the main symptoms cluster

around an abnormal liability to fatigue, and also in many other

conditions, there is an increase in the diffusion of excitement

so that one starts all over at a noise, instead of merely turning

to see what it is, so that expectation and attention become

painful and fatiguing. Crowds, though usually pleasurable, become

too exciting, and there is a sort of confusion resulting because

attention and comprehension are interfered with. The neurasthenic

finds himself a prey to stimuli, his reaction is too great and he

fatigues too readily. He finds sleep difficult because the little

noises and discomforts make difficult the relaxation that is so

important. The neurasthenic's voluntary attention is lowered

because of the excitement he feels when his involuntary attention

is aroused.

In the condition called anhedonia, which we shall hear of from

time to time, there is a blocking or dropping out of the sense of

desire and satisfaction even if through habit one eats, drinks,

has sexual relationship, keeps up his work and carries out his

plans. This lack of desire for the joys of life is attended by a

restlessness, a seeking of excitement for a time, until there

arises a curious over-reaction to excitement. The anhedonic

patient finds that noises are very troublesome, that he becomes

unpleasantly excited over music, that company is distressing

because he becomes confused and excited, and crowds, busy scenes

and streets are intolerable. Many a hermit, I fancy, who found

the sensual and ambitious pleasure of life intolerable, who

sought to fly from crowds to the deserts, was anhedonic but he

called it renunciation. (Whether one really ever renounces when

desire is still strong is a nice question. I confess to some

scepticism on this point.)

2. Seeking excitement is one of the great pleasure-trends of

life. In moderation, tension, expectation and the diffuse bodily

reactions are agreeable; there is a feeling of vigor, the

attention is drawn from the self and there is a feeling of being

alive that is pleasurable. The tension must not be too long

sustained, nor the bodily reaction too intense; relaxation and

lowered attention must relieve the excitement from time to time;

but with these kept in mind, it is true that Man is a seeker of

excitement.

This is a factor neglected in the study of great social

phenomena. The growth of cities is not only a result of the

economic forces of the time; it is made permanent by the fact

that the cities are exciting. The multiplicity and variety of the

stimuli of a city--social, sexual, its stir and bustle--make it

difficult for those once habituated ever to tolerate the quiet of

the country. Excitement follows the great law of stimulation; the

same internal effect, the same feeling, requires a greater and

greater stimulus, as well as new stimuli. So, the cities grow

larger, increase their modes of excitement, and the dweller in

the city, unless fortified by a steady purpose, becomes a seeker

of excitement.

Not only is excitement pleasurable when reached through the

intrinsically agreeable but it can be obtained from small doses

of the intrinsically disagreeable. This is the explanation of the

pleasure obtained from the gruesome, from the risk of life or

limb, or from watching others risk life or limb. Aside from the

sense of power obtained by traveling fast, it is the risk, THE

SLIGHT FEAR, producing excitement, that makes the speed maniac a

menace to the highways. And I think that part of the pleasure

obtained from bitter foods is that the disagreeable element is

just sufficient to excite the gastro-intestinal tract. The

fascination of the horrible lies in the excitement produced, an

excitement that turns to horror and disgust if the disagreeable

is presented too closely. Thus we can read with pleasurable

excitement of things that in their reality would shock us into

profoundest pain. The more jaded one is, the more used to

excitement, the more he seeks what are, ordinarily, disagreeable

methods of excitement. Thus pain in slight degree is exciting,

and in the sexual sphere pain is often sought as a means of

heightening the pleasure, especially by women and by the roue. I

suspect also that the haircloth shirt and the sackcloth and ashes

of the anhedonic hermit were painful methods of seeking

excitement.

Sometimes pain is used in small amounts to relieve excitement.

Thus the man who bites his finger nails to the quick gets a

degree of satisfaction from the habit. Indeed, all manner of

habitual and absurd movements, from scratching to pacing up and

down, are efforts to relieve the tension of excitement. One of my

patients under any excitement likes to put his hands in very hot

water, and the pain, by its localization, takes away from the

diffuse and unpleasant excitement. The diffuse uncontrolled

excitement of itching is often relieved by painful biting and

scratching. Here is an effort to localize a feeling and thus

avoid diffuse discomfort, a sort of homeopathic treatment.

3. As a corollary to the need of excitement and its pleasure is

the reaction to monotony. Monotony is one of the most dreaded

factors in the life of man. The internal resources of most of us

are but small; we can furnish excitement and interest from our

own store for but a short time, and there then ensues an intense

yearning for something or somebody that will take up our

attention and give a direction to our thought and action. Under

monotony the thought turns inward, there is daydreaming and

introspection,[1] which are pleasurable only at certain times for

most of us and which grow less pleasurable as we grow older.

Watch the faces of people thinking as they travel alone in

cars,--and rarely does one see a happy face. The lines of the

face droop and sighs are frequent. Monotony and melancholy are

not far apart; monotony and a restless seeking for excitement are

almost synonymous. Of course, what constitutes monotony will

differ in the viewpoint of each person, for some are so

constituted and habituated (for habit is a great factor) that it

takes but few stimuli to arouse a well-sustained interest, and

others need or think they need many things, a constantly changing

set of circumstances for pleasure.

[1] Stanley Hall, in his book "Adolescence," lays great stress on

monotony and its effects. See also Graham Wallas' "The Great

Society."

Restlessness, eager searching for change, intense dissatisfaction

are the natural fruit of monotony. Here is an important item in

the problems of our times. Side by side with growth of the cities

and their excitement is the growing monotony of most labor. The

factory, with its specialized production, reduces the worker to a

cog in the machinery. In some factories, in the name of

efficiency, the windows are whitewashed so that the outside world

is shut out and talking is prohibited; the worker passes his day

performing his unvaried task from morning to night. Under such

circumstances there arises either a burning sense of wrong, of

injustice, of slavery and a thwarting of the individual dignity,

or else a yearning for the end of the day, for dancing, drinking,

gambling, for anything that offers excitement. Or perhaps both

reactions are combined. Our industrial world is poorly organized

economically, as witness the poor distribution of wealth and the

periodic crises, but it is abominably organized from the

standpoint of the happiness of the worker. Of this, more in

another place.

Monotony brings fatigue, because there is a shutting out of the

excitement that acts as an antidote to fatigue-feeling. A man

who works without fatigue six days a week is tired all day Sunday

and longs for Monday. The modern housewife,[1] with her four

walls and the unending, uninteresting tasks, is worn out, and her

fatigue reaction is the greater the more her previous life has

been exciting and varied. Fatigue often enough is present not

because of the work done but because the STIMULUS TO WORK HAS

DISAPPEARED. Monotony is an enemy of character. Variety, in its

normal aspect, is not only the spice of life; it is a great need.

Stabilization of purpose and work are necessary, but a

standardization that stamps out the excitement of variety is a

deadly blow to human happiness.

[1] See my book "The Nervous Housewife!"

Under monotony certain types of personalities develop an intense

inner life, which may be pathological, or it may be exceedingly

fruitful of productive thought.

Some build up a delusional thought and feeling. For delusion

merely means uncorrected thought and belief, and we can only

correct by contact and collision. The whole outer world may

vanish or become hostile and true mental disease develop. Perhaps

it is more nearly correct to say that minds predisposed to mental

disease find in monotony a circumstance favoring disease.

On the other hand, a vigorous mind shut out from outer stimuli[1]

finds in this circumstance the time to develop leisurely, finds a

freedom from distraction that leads to clear views of life and a

proper expression. A periodic retirement from the busy, too-busy

world is necessary for the thinker that he may digest his

material, that he may strip away unessential beliefs, that he may

find what it is he really needs, strives for and ought to have.

[1] Perhaps this is why real genius does not flourish in our

crowded, over-busy days, despite the great amount of talent.

4. Here we come to another corollary of the need for excitement,

the need of relaxation. At any rate, satisfaction and pleasure

need periods of hunger in order to be felt. In the story of

Buddha he is represented as being shielded from all sorrow and

pain, living a life filled with pleasure and excitement, yet he

sought out pain. So excitement, if too long continued--or rather

if a situation that produces excitement of a pleasurable kind be

too long endured--will result in boredom. "Things get to be the

same," whether it be the excitement of love, the city, sports or

what not. This is a basic law of all pleasures. In order that

life may have zest, that excitement may be easily and pleasurably

evoked and by normal means, we need relaxation, periods free from

excitement, or we must pass on to a costly chase for excitement

that brings breakdown of the character.

5. If the seeking of excitement, as such, is one of the prime

pleasures of life, organized excitement in the form of interest

is the directing and guiding principle of activity. At the outset

of life interest is in the main involuntary and is aroused by the

sights, sounds and happenings of the outer world. As time goes

on, as the organism develops, as memories of past experiences

become active, as peculiarities of personality develop, and as

instincts reach activity, interest commences to take definite

direction, to become canalized, so to speak. In fact, the

development of interest is from the diffuse involuntary form of

early childhood to a specialization, a condensation into definite

voluntary channels. This development goes on unevenly, and is a

very variable feature in the lives of all of us. Great ability

expresses itself in a sustained interest; a narrow character is

one with overdeformed, too narrow interest; failure is often the

retention of the childish character of diffuse, involuntary

interest. And the capacity to sustain interest depends not only

on the special strength of the various abilities of the

individual, but remarkably on his energy and health. Sustained

"voluntary" interest is far more fatiguing than involuntary

interest, and where fatigue is already present it becomes

difficult and perhaps impossible. Thus after much work, whether

physical or mental, during and after illness--especially in

influenza, in neurasthenic states generally, or where there is an

inner conflict--interest in its adult form is at a low ebb.

There are two main directions which interest may take, because

there are two worlds in which we live. There is the inner world

of our feelings, our thoughts, our desires and our

struggles,[1]--and there is the outer world, with its people, its

things, its hostilities, its friendships, its problems and facts,

its attractions and repulsions. Man divides his interest between

the two worlds, for in both of them are the values of existence.

The chief source of voluntary interest lies in desire and value,

and though these are frequently in coalescence, so that the thing

we desire is the thing we value, more often they are not in

coalescence and then we have the divided self that James so

eloquently describes. So there are types of men to whom the outer

world, whether it is in its "other people," or its things, or its

facts, or its attractions and repulsions, is the chief source of

interest and these are the objective types, exteriorized folks,

whose values lie in the goods they can accumulate, or the people

they can help, or the external power they exercise, or the

knowledge they possess of the phenomena of the world, or the

things they can do with their hands. These are on the whole

healthy-minded, finding in their pursuits and interest a real

value, rarely stopping from their work to ask, "Why do I work? To

what end? Are things real?" Contrasted with them are those whose

gaze is turned inward, who move through life carrying on the

activities of the average existence but absorbed in their

thoughts, their emotions, their desires, their

conflicts,--perhaps on their sensations and coenaesthetic

streams. Though there is no sharp line of division between the

two types, and all of us are blends in varying degrees, these

latter are the subjective introspective folk, interiorized,

living in the microcosmos, and much more apt than the objective

minded to be "sick souls" obsessed with "whys and wherefores."

They are endlessly putting to themselves unanswerable questions,

are apt to be the mentally unbalanced, or, but now and then, they

furnish the race with one whose answers to the meaning of life

and the direction of efforts guide the steps of millions.

[1] Herbert Spencer's description of these two worlds is the best

in literature. "Principles of Psychology."

There is a good and a bad side to the two types of interest. The

objective minded conquer the world in dealing with what they call

reality. They bridge the water and dig up the earth; they invent,

they plow, they sell and buy, they produce and distribute wealth,

and they deal with the education that teaches how to do all these

things. They find in the outer world an unalterable sense of

reality, and they tend rather naively to accept themselves, their

interests and efforts as normal. In their highest forms they are

the scientist, reducing to law this tangle of outer realities, or

the artist, who though he is a hybrid with deep subjective and

objective interest, nevertheless remodels the outer world to his

concept of beauty. These objective-minded folk, the bulk of the

brawn and in lesser degree of the brain of the world, are apt to

be "materialists," to value mainly quantity and to be

self-complacent. Of course, since no man is purely objective,

there come to them as to all moments of brooding over the eggs of

their inner life, when they wonder whether they have reached out

for the right things and whether the goods they seek or have are

worth while. Such introspective interest comes on them when they

are alone and the outer world does not reach in, or when they

have witnessed death and misfortune, or when sickness and fatigue

have reduced them to a feeling of weakness. For it is true that

the objective minded are more often robust, hearty, with more

natural lust, passion and desire than your introspectionists,

more virile and less sensitive to fine impressions.

The introspectionists, culling, chewing the cud of their

experiences and sensations, find in their own reactions the

realities. In fact, interested in consciousness, they are

sometimes bold enough to deny the realities of anything else.

Where the others build bridges, they build up the ideas of

eternal good and bad, of beauty, of the transitory and the

permanent, of now and eternity. They deal with abstract ideas,

and they luxuriate in emotions. They build up beliefs where

thought is the only reality and is omnipotent. They are the

founders of religious, cults, fads and fancies. They inculcate

the permanent ideals, because they are the only ones who interest

themselves in something beside the show of the universe.

But too often they are the sick folk. Without the hardihood and

the energy to conquer the outer world, they fall back on a world

requiring less energy to study, less energy to conquer. Sometimes

they develop a sense of unreality which vitiates all their

efforts to succeed; or they become hypochondriacs, feeling every

flutter of the heart and every vague ache and pain. The Hamlet

doubting type is an introspectionist and oscillates in his mind

from yea to nay on every question. Such as this type develop

ideas of compensation and power and become cranks and fake

prophets. Or else, and this we shall see again, they become

imbued with a sense of inferiority, feel futile as against the

red-blooded and shrink from others through pain.

Everywhere one sees these phases of interest in antagonism and

cooperation. The "healthy-minded" acknowledge the leadership of a

past introspectionist but despise the contemporary one as futile

and light-headed. The introverted (to use a Freudian term) call

the others Philistines, and mock them for their lack of spiritual

insight, yet in everything they do they depend for aid and

sustenance upon them. Introspection gives no exact measurements

of value, but it gives value and without it, there can be no

wisdom. But always it needs the correction of the outer world to

keep it healthy.

While we have dealt here with the extremes of extrospection and

introspection, it is safe to say that in the vast majority of

people there is a definite and unassailable interest in both of

these directions. Interest in others is not altruism and interest

in the self is not self-interest or egoism. But, on the whole,

they who are not interested in others never become

philanthropists; they who are not interested in things never

become savants; and they who do not dig deep into themselves are

not philosophers. There are, therefore, certain practical aspects

to the study of interest which are essential parts of the

knowledge of character.

1. Is the interest of the one studied controlled by some purpose

or purposes, or is it diffuse, involuntary, not well directed?

2. Is it narrow, so that it excludes the greater part of the

world, or is it easily evoked by a multiplicity of things? In the

breadth of interest is contained the breadth of character, but

not necessarily its intensity or efficiency. There are people of

narrow but intense successful interest, and others of broad,

intense successful interest, but one meets, too frequently,

people quickly interested in anything, but not for long or in a

practical fashion. There is a certain high type of failure that

has this difficulty.

3. Is its main trend outward, and if so, is there some special

feature or features of the world that excite interest?

4. Is its main trend inward, and is he interested in emotions,

thoughts, sensations,--In his mind or his body, in ideas or in

feelings? For it is obvious that the man interested in his ideas

is quite a different person than he who is keenly aware of his

emotions, and that the hypochondriac belongs in a class by

himself.

5. If there are special interests, how do these harmonize with

ability and with well-defined plan and purpose. It is not

sufficient to be keenly interested, though that is necessary. One

of the greatest disharmonies of life is when a man is interested

when he is not proficient, though usually proficiency develops

interest because it gives superiority and achievement.

Interest is heightened by the success of others, for we are

naturally competitive creatures, or by admiration for those

successful in any line of activity. The desire to emulate or

excel or to get power is a mighty factor in the maintenance of

interest. "See how nicely Georgie does it," is a formula for both

children and adults, and if omitted, interest would not be easily

aroused or maintained. In other words, the competitive feeling

and desire in its largest sense are necessary for the

concentrated excitement of interest. So any scheme of social

organization that proposes to do away with competition and desire

for superiority labors under the psychological handicap of

removing the basis of much of the interest in work and study and

must find some substitute for the lacking incentives before it

can seriously ask for the adherence of those with a realistic

view of human nature. One might, it is true, establish traditions

of work, bring about a livelier social conscience as to service,

but these are not sufficient to arouse real interest in the vast

majority of the race. Here and there one finds a man in whom

interest is aroused by the unsolved problem, by the reward of

fame and the pleasure of achievement, but such persons are rare.

The average man (and woman), in my experience, loses interest in

anything that does not directly benefit him or in which his

personal competitive feeling is not aroused. Interest becomes

vague and ill-defined the farther the matter concerned is from

the direct personal good of the individual, and proportionately

it becomes difficult to sustain it.

That is why in our day "dollars and cents" appeals to interest

are made; away with abstracts, away with sentiment; the publicity

man working for a good cause now uses the methods of the man

selling shoes or automobiles: he attempts to show that one's

interest and cooperation are demanded and necessary because one's

direct personal welfare is involved. Whether or not ethically

justifiable, it is a recognition of the fact that interest is

aroused and sustained, for the majority, by some direct personal

involvement.

Thus in education, a fact to be learned, or a subject to be

studied, should be first sketched or placed in some use value to

the student. Knowledge for knowledge's sake is appealing only to

the rare scholar, he who palpitates with interest over the

relationship of things to one another, he who seeks to discover

values. Now and then one finds such a person, one thrown into

sustained excitement by learning, but the great majority of

students, whether in medicine, law or mathematics, are

"practical," meaning that their interests are relatively narrow

and the good they seek an immediate one to be reaped by

themselves. Recognizing this fact in the abstract, the most of

teaching is conducted on the plane of the real scholar, and the

average student is left to find values for himself. From first to

last in teaching I would emphasize usevalue; true, I would seek

to broaden the conception of usevalue, so that a student would

see that usefulness is a social value, but no matter how abstract

and remote the subject, its relationship to usefulness would be

preliminary and continuously emphasized in order to sustain

interest.

Interest, like any other form of excitement, needs new stimuli

and periods of relaxation. People under the driving force of

necessity continue at their work for longer periods of time and

more constantly than is psychologically possible for the

maintaining of interest. So it disappears, and then fatigue sets

in at once,--a fatigue that is increased by the effort to work

and the regret and rebellion at the change. The memory seems to

suffer and a fear is aroused that "I am losing my memory"; the

threat to success brings anguish and often the health becomes

definitely impaired. Overconcentrated, too long maintenance of

interest brings apathy,--an apathy that cannot be dispelled

except by change and rest. Here there is wide individual

variation from those who need frequent change and relaxation

periods to those who can maintain interest in a task almost

indefinitely.

A hobby, or a secondary object of interest, is therefore a real

necessity to the man or woman battling for a purpose, whose

interest must be sustained. It acts to relax, to shift the

excitement and to allow something of the feeling of novelty as

one reapproaches the task.

As a matter of fact, excitement and interest are not easily

separated from their derivatives and elaborations. Desire,

purpose, ambition, imply a force; interest implies a direction

for that force. Interest may be as casual as curiosity aroused by

the novel and strange, or as deep-seated and specialized as a

talent. The born teacher is he who knows how to arouse and

maintain and direct interest; the born achiever is the man whose

interest, quickly aroused, is easily maintained and directs

effort. To find the activity that is natively interesting and yet

suited to one's ability is the aim in vocational guidance.

There are some curious pathological aspects to interest

--"conflict" aspects of the subject. A man finds himself

palpitatingly interested in what is horrible to him, as a bird is

fascinated by a snake. Sex abnormalities have a marvelous

interest to everybody, although many will not admit it. Stories

of crime and bloodshed are read by everybody with great

avidity,--and people will go miles to the site of grim tragedy.

Court rooms are packed whenever a horrible murder is aired or a

nauseating divorce scandal is tried. A chaste woman will read, on

the sly and with inner rebellion, as many pornographic tales as

she can get hold of, and the "carefully" brought up, i. e., those

whose interest has been carefully directed, suddenly become

interested in the forbidden; they seek to peek through windows

when they should be looking straight ahead.

As a matter of fact, interest is as much inhibited as conduct.

"You mustn't ask about that" is the commonest answer a child

gets. "That's a naughty question to ask" runs it a close second.

Can one inhibit interest, which is the excitement caused by the

unknown? The answer is that we can, because a large part of

education is to do this very thing. "Can we inhibit any interest

without injuring all interests?" is a question often put. My

answer would be that it is socially necessary that interest in

certain directions be inhibited, whether it hurts the individual

or not. But the interest in a forbidden direction can be shifted

to a permitted direction, and this should be done. In my opinion,

sex interest can be so handled and a blunt thwarting of this

interest should be avoided. Some explanation leading the child to

larger, less personal aspects of sex should be given.

The interest of the child is often thwarted through sheer

laziness. "Don't bother me" is the reply of a parent shirking a

sacred duty. Interest is the beginning of knowledge, and where it

is discouraged knowledge is discouraged. Any inquiry can be met

on the child's plane of intelligence and comprehension, and the

parent must arrange for the gratification of this fundamental

desire. How? By a question hour each day, perhaps a children's

hour, a home university period where the vital interest of the

child will be satisfied.

To return to the morbid interests: do they arise from secret

morbid desires? The Freudian answer to that would be yes. And so

would many another answer. It is the answer in many cases,

especially where the desire is not so much morbid as forbidden.

The virgin, the continent who are intensely interested in sex are

not morbid, even though they have been forbidden to think of a

natural craving and appetite. But when the interest is for the

horrible it is often the case that the excitement aroused by the

subject is pleasurable, because it is a mild excitement and does

not quite reach disgust. Confronted with the real perversity, the

disgust aroused would quite effectually conquer interest.

And here is a fundamental law of interest: it must lead to a

profitable, pleasurable result or else it tends to disappear. If

this is too bold a statement, let me qualify it by stating that a

profitable, pleasurable result must be foreseen or foreseeable.

Either in some affective state, or in some tangible good,

interest seeks fulfillment. Disappointment is the foe of

interest, and too prolonged a "vestibule of satisfaction" (to use

Hocking's phrase) destroys or impairs interest.

The Foundations of Personality · 第 7 / 17 章