CHAPTER III. MEMORY AND HABIT

There are two qualities of nervous tissues (possibly of all

living tissue) that are basic in all nervous and mental

processes. They are dependent upon the modificability of nerve

cells and fibers by stimuli, e. g., a light flashing through the

pupil and passing along the optical tracts to the occipital

cortex produces changes which constitute the basis of visual

memory. Experience modifies nervous tissue in definite manner,

and SOMETHING remembers. Who remembers? Who is conscious? Believe

what you please about that, call it ego, soul, call it

consciousness dipped out of a cosmic consciousness; and I have no

quarrel with you.

Memory has its mechanics, in the association of ideas, which

preoccupied the early English psychologists and philosophers; it

is the basis of thought and also of action, and it is a prime

mystery. We know its pathology, we think that memories for speech

have loci in the brain, the so-called motor memories in Broca's

area.[1] We know that a hemorrhage in these areas or in the

fibers passing from them, or a tumor pressing on them may destroy

or temporarily abolish these memories, so that a man may KNOW

what he wishes to say, understand speech and be unable to say it,

though he may write it (motor aphasia). In sensory aphasia the

defect is a loss of the capacity to understand spoken speech,

though the patient may be able to say what he himself wishes. (It

is fair to say that the definite location of these capacities in

definite areas has been challenged by Marie, Moutier and others,

but this denial does not deny the organic brain location of

speech memories; it merely affirms that they are scattered rather

than concentrated in one area.)

[1] Foot of the left or right third frontal convolutions,

auditory speech in the supramarginal, etc.

In its widest phases memory alters with the state of the brain.

In childhood impressibility is high, but until the age or four or

five the duration of impression is low, and likewise the power of

voluntary recall. In youth (eighteen-twenty) all these capacities

are perhaps at their highest. As time goes on impressibility

seems first of all to be lost, so that it becomes harder and

harder to learn new things, to remember new faces, new names.

The typical difficulty of middle age is to remember names,

because these have no real relationship or logical value and must

be arbitrarily remembered. The typical senile defect is the

dropping out of the recent memories, though the past may be

preserved in its entirety. With any disease of the brain,

temporary or permanent, amnesia or memory loss may and usually is

present (e. g., general paresis, tumor, cerebral

arteriosclerosis, etc.). As the result of Carbon monoxide

poisoning, as after accidental or attempted suicidal gas

inhalation, the memory, especially for the most recent events, is

impaired and the patient cannot remember the events as they

occur; he passes from moment to moment unconnected to the recent

past, though his remote past is clear. Since memory is the basis

of certainty, of the feeling of reality, these unfortunates are

afflicted with an uncertainty, a sense of unreality, that is

almost agonizing. As the effects of the poison wear off, which

even in favorable cases takes months, the impressibility returns

but never reaches normality again.

Unquestionably there is an inherent congenital difference in

memory capacity. There are people who are prodigies of memory as

there are those who are prodigies of physical strength,--and

without training. The IMPRESSIBILITY for memories can in no way

be increased except through the stimulation of interest and a

certain heightening of attention through emotion. For the man or

woman concerned with memory the first point of importance is to

find some value in the fact or thing to be learned. Before a

subject is broached to students the teacher should make clear its

practical and theoretic value to the students. Too often that is

the last thing done and it is only when the course is finished

that its practical meaning is stressed or even indicated. In

fact, throughout, teaching the value of the subject should

constantly be emphasized, if possible, by illustrations from

life. There are only a few who love knowledge for its own sake,

but there are many who become eager for learning when it is made

practical.

The number of associations given to a fact determines to a large

extent its permanence in memory and the power of recalling it. In

my own teaching I always instruct my students in the technique of

memorizing, as follows:

1. Listen attentively, making only as many notes as necessary to

recall the leading facts. The auditory memories are thus given

the first place.

2. Go home and read up the subject in your textbooks, again

making notes. Thus is added the visual associations.

3. Write out in brief form the substance of the lecture, deriving

your knowledge from both the lecture and the book. You thus add

another set of associations to your memories of the subject.

4. Teach the subject to or discuss it with a fellow student. By

this you vitalize the memories you have, you link them firmly

together, you lend to them the ardor of usefulness and of

victory. You are forced to realize where the gaps, the lacunae of

your knowledge come, and are made to fill them in.

Thus the best way to remember a fact is to find a use for it and

to link it to your interests and your purposes. Unrelated it has

no value; related it becomes in fact a part of you. After that

the mechanics of memory necessitate the making of as many

pathways to that fact as possible, and this means deliberately to

associate the fact by sound, by speech and by action. The

advertised schemes of memory training are simply association

schemes, old as the hills, and having value indeed, but too much

is claimed for them. A splendid memory is born, not made; but any

memory, except where disease has entered, can be improved by

training.

It is because lectures on the whole do not supply enough

associations or arouse enough interest that the lecture is the

poorest method of teaching or learning. Man's mind sticks easily

to things, but with difficulty to words about things. To maintain

attention for an hour or so, while sitting, is a task, and there

develops a tendency either to a hypnoidal state in which the mind

follows uncritically, or to a restless uneasiness with wandering

mind and fatigue of body. A demonstration, on the other hand, a

laboratory experiment with short, personal instruction, a bodily

contact with the problem calls into play interest, enthusiasm,

curiosity, motor images, the use of the hands, and is THE method

of teaching.

There are at present excellent psychological methods of testing

out the memory capacity. Every one engaged in any responsible

work, or troubled about his memory, should be so tested. While

there are other qualities of mind of great importance, memory is

basic, and no one can really understand himself who is in doubt

about his memory. In such diseases as neurasthenia one of the

commonest complaints is the "loss of memory," which greatly

troubles the patient. As a matter of fact, what is impaired is

interest and attention, and when the patient realizes this he is

usually quite relieved. The man who has a poor memory may become

very successful if he develops systems of recording, filing,

indexing, but his possibilities of knowledge are greatly reduced

by his defect.[1]

[1] It is the growth of the subject matter of knowledge that

makes necessary the elaborate systems of indexing, etc., now so

important. It is as much as man can do to follow the places where

the men work, let alone what they are doing. This growth of

knowledge is getting to be an extra-human phenomenon. Of this

Graham Wallas has written entertainingly.

A second fundamental ability of living tissue, and of particular

importance in character, is habit formation. Habit resides in the

fact that once living tissue has been traversed by a stimulus and

has responded by an act, three things result:

1. The pathway for that stimulus becomes more permeable; becomes,

as it were, grooved or like a track laid across the living

structure of the nervous system.

2. The responding element is more easily stirred into activity,

responds with more vigor and with less effort.

3. Consciousness, at first invoked, recedes more and more, until

the habit-action of whatever type tends to become automatic.

There is in this last peculiarity a tendency for the habit to

establish itself as independent of the personality, and if an

injurious or undesired habit, to set up the worst of the

conflicts of life,--a conflict between one's intention and an

automaton in the shape of a powerfully entrenched habit.

Habits are economical of thought and energy, generally speaking;

that is their main recommendation. A dozen examples present

themselves at once as illustrative: piano playing, with its

intense concentration on each note, with consciousness attending

to the action of each muscle, and then practice, habit formation,

and the ease and power of execution with the mind free to wander

off in the moods suggested by the music, or to busy itself with

improvisations, flourishes and the artistic touches. Before true

artistry can come, technique must be relegated to habit. So with

typewriting, driving an automobile, etc.

More fundamental than these, which are largely skill habits, are

the organic habits. One of the triumphs of pediatrics depends

upon the realization that the baby's welfare hangs on regular

habits of feeding, that he is not to be fed except at stated

intervals; as a result processes of digestion are set going in a

regular, harmonious manner. In other words, these processes may

be said to "get to know" what is expected of them and act

accordingly. The mother's time is economized and the strain of

nursing is lessened. In adults, regular hours of eating make it

possible for the juices of digestion to be secreted as the food

is ingested; in other words, an habitual adjustment takes place.

If there were one single health habit that I would have

inculcated above all others, it would be the habit of regularly

evacuating the bowels. While constipation is not the worst ill in

the world, it causes much trouble, annoyance and a considerable

degree of ill health, and, in my opinion, a considerable degree

of unhappiness. A physician may be pardoned for frank advice: all

the matters concerning the bowels, such as coarse foods, plenty

of water and exercise, are secondary compared to the habit of

going to the stool at the same time each day, whether there be

desire or not. A child should be trained in this matter as

definitely as he is trained to brush his teeth. In fact, I think

that the former habit is more important than the latter. The mood

of man is remarkably related to the condition of his

gastro-intestinal tract and the involuntary muscle of that tract

is indirectly under the control of the will through habit

formation.

Sleep[1] the mysterious, the death in life which we all seek each

night, is likewise regulated by habit. Arising from the need of

relief from consciousness and bodily exertion, the mechanism of

sleep is still not well understood. Is there a toxic influence at

work? is the body poisoned by itself, as it were, as has been

postulated; is there a toxin of fatigue, or is there a

"vaso-motor" reaction, a shift of the blood supply causing a

cerebral anaemia and thus creating the "sleepy" feeling? The

capacity to sleep is a factor of great importance and we shall

deal with it later under a separate heading as part of the

mechanism of success and failure. At present we shall simply

point out that each person builds up a set of habits regarding

sleep,--as to hour, kind of place, warmth, companionship,

ventilation and even the side of the body he shall lie on, and

that a change in these preliminary matters is often attended by

insomnia. Moreover, a change from the habitual in the general

conduct of life--a new city or town, a strange bed, a disturbance

in the moods and emotions--may upset the sleep capacity. Those in

whom excitement persists, or whose emotions are persistent,

become easily burdened with the dreaded insomnia. Sleep is

dependent on an exclusion of excitement and exciting influences.

If, however, exciting influences become habitual they lose their

power over the organism and then the individual can sleep on a

battle field, in a boiler factory, or almost anywhere.

Conversely, many a New Yorker is lulled to sleep by the roar of

the great city who, finds that the quiet of the country keeps him

awake.

[1] As good a book as any on the subject of sleep is Boris

Sidis's little monograph.

Sleeplessness often enough is a habit. Something happens to a man

that deeply stirs him, as an insult, or a falling out with a

friend, or the loss of money,--something which disturbs what we

call his poise or peace of mind. He becomes sleepless because,

when he goes to bed and the shock-absorbing objects of daily

interest are removed, his thoughts revert back to his difficulty;

he becomes again humiliated or grieved or thrown into an

emotional turmoil that prevents sleep. After the first night of

insomnia a new factor enters,--the fear of sleeplessness and the

conviction that one will not sleep. After a time the insult has

lost its sting, or the difficulty has been adjusted, there is no

more emotional distress, but there is the established

sleeplessness, based on habitual emotional reaction to sleep. I

know one lady whose fear reached the stage where she could not

even bear the thought of night and darkness. It is in these cases

that a powerful drug used two or three nights in succession

breaks up the sleepless habit and reestablishes the power to

sleep.

People differ in their capacity to form habits and in their love

of habits. The normal habits, thoroughness, neatness and method

come easily to some and are never really acquired by others.

People of an impetuous, explosive or reckless character, keenly

alive to every shade of difference in things, find it hard to be

methodical, to carry on routine. The impatient person has similar

difficulties. Whereas others take readily to the same methods of

doing things day by day; and these are usually non-explosive,

well inhibited, patient persons, to whom the way a thing is done

is as important as the goal itself.

Here comes a very entertaining problem, the question of the value

of habits. Good habits save time and energy, tend to eliminate

useless labor and make for peace and quiet. But there is a large

body of persons who come to value habits for themselves and,

indeed, this is true to a certain extent of all of us. Once an

accustomed way of doing things is established it becomes not only

a path of least resistance, but a sort of fixed point of view,

and, if one may mix metaphors a trifle, a sort of trunk for the

ego to twine itself around. There is uneasiness in the thought of

breaking up habits, an uneasiness that grows the more as we

become older and is deepened into agony if the habit is tinged

with our status in life, if it has become a sort of measure of

our respectability. Thus a good housekeeper falls into the habits

of doing things which were originally a mark of her ability,

which she holds as sacred and values above her health and energy.

There are people who fiercely resent a new way of doing things;

they have woven their most minor habits into their ego feeling

and thus make a personal issue of innovations. These are the

upholders of the established; they hate change as such; they are

efficient but not progressive. In its pathological form this type

becomes the "health fiends" who never vary in their diet or in

their clothing, who arise at a certain time, take their "plunge"

regardless, take their exercise and their breakfasts alike as a

health measure without real enjoyment, etc., who grow weary if

they stay up half an hour or so beyond their ordinary bedtime;

they are the individuals who fall into health cults, become

vegetarians, raw food exponents, etc.

Opposed to the group that falls into habits very readily is the

group that finds it difficult to acquire habitual ways of working

and living. All of us seek change and variety, as well as

stability. Some cannot easily form habits because they are

quickly bored by the habitual. These restless folk are the

failures or the great successes, according to their intelligence

and good fortune. There is a low-grade intelligence type, without

purpose and energy, and there is a high-grade intelligence type,

seeking the ideal, restless under imperfection and restraint,

disdaining the commonplace and the habits that go with it. Is

their disdain of habit-forming and customs the result of their

unconventional ways, or do their unconventional ways result

because they cannot easily form habits? It is very probable that

the true wanderer and Bohemian finds it difficult, at least in

youth, to form habits, and that the pseudo-Bohemian is merely an

imitation.

Habit is so intimately a part of all traits and abilities that we

would be anticipating several chapters of this book did we go

into all the habit types. Social conditions, desire, fatigue,

monotony, purpose, intelligence, inhibition, all enter into habit

and habit formation. Youth experiments with habit; old age clings

to it. Efficiency is the result of good habits but originality is

the reward of some who discard habits. A nation forms habits

which seem to be part of its nature, until emigration to another

land shows the falsity of this belief. So with individuals: a man

feels he must eat or drink so much, gratify his sex appetite so

often, sleep so many hours, exercise this or that amount, seek

his entertainment in this or that fashion,--until something

happens to make the habit impossible and he finds that what he

thought a deeply rooted mode of living was a superficial routine.

Though good habits may lead to success they may also bar the way

to the pleasures of experience; that is their danger. A man who

finds that he must do this or that in such a way had better

beware; he is getting old, no matter what his age.[1] For we grow

older as we lose mobility,--in joints, muscles, skin and our ways

of doing, feeling and thinking! It is a transitory stage of the

final immobility of Death.

[1] Says the talkative Autocrat of the Breakfast Table: "There is

one mark of age that strikes me more than any of the physical

ones; I mean the formation of Habits. An old man who shrinks into

himself falls into ways that become as positive and as much

beyond the reach of outside influences as if they were governed

by clock work."

We have not considered the pathological habits, such as

alcoholism, excessive smoking and eating, perverse sex habits.

The latter, the perverse sex habits, will be studied when

discussing the sex feelings and purposes in their entirety.

Alcoholism is not yet a dead issue in this country though those

who are sincere in wishing their fellows well hope it soon will

be. It stands, however, as a sort of paradigm of bad habit-

forming and presents a problem in treatment that is typical of

such habits.

Not all persons have a liability to the alcoholic habit. For most

people lack of real desire or pleasure prevented alcoholism. The

majority of those who drank little or not at all were not in the

least tempted by the drug. "Will power" rarely had anything to do

with their abstinence and the complacency with which they held

themselves up as an example to the drunken had all the flavor of

Phariseeism. To some the taste is not pleasing, to others the

immediate effects are so terrifying as automatically to shut off

excess. Many people become dizzy or nauseated almost at once and

even lose the power of locomotion or speech.

In many countries and during many centuries most of those who

became alcoholic were such largely through the social setting

given to alcohol. Because of the psychological effects of this

drug in removing restraint, inhibition and formality, in its

various forms it became the symbol of good-fellowship; and

because it has an apparent stimulation and heat-producing effect

there grew up the notion that it aided hard labor and helped

resist hardship. As the symbol of good-fellowship it grew into a

tradition of the most binding kind, so that no good time, no

coming together was complete without it, and its power is

celebrated in picturesque songs and picturesque sayings the world

over. Hospitality, tolerance, good humor, kindliness and the

pleasant breaking down of the barriers between man and man, and

also between man and woman, all these lured generation after

generation into the alcoholic habit.

There are relatively normal types of the heavy drinker,--the

socially minded and the hard manual worker. But there is a large

group of those who find in alcohol a relief from the burden of

their moods, who find in its real effect, the release from

inhibitions, a reason for drinking beyond the reach of reason. Do

you feel that the endless monotony of your existence can no

longer be borne,--drink deep and you color your life to suit

yourself. Do disappointment and despair gnaw at your love of life

so that nothing seems worth while,--some bottled "essence of

sunshine" will give new, fresh value to existence. Are you a

victim of strange, uncaused fluctuations of mood so that

periodically you descend to a bottomless pit of melancholy,

--well, then, why suffer, when over the bar a man will furnish

you a release from agony? And so men of certain types of

temperament, or with unhappy experiences, form the alcoholic

habit because it gives them surcease from pain; it deals out to

them, temporarily, a new world with happier mood, lessened

tension and greater success.

Seeking relief[1] from distressing thoughts or moods is perhaps

one of the main causes of the narcotic habit. The feeling of

inferiority, one of the most painful of mental conditions, is

responsible for the use not only of alcohol but also of other

drugs, such as cocaine, heroin, morphine, etc. One of the most

typical cases of this I have known is of a young man of

twenty-five, a tall fellow with a very unattractive face who had

this feeling of inferiority almost to the point of agony,

especially in the presence of young women, but also in any

situation where he would be noticed. He was fast becoming a

hermit when he discovered that a few drinks completely removed

this feeling. From that time on he became a steady drinker, with

now and then a short period when he would try to stop drinking,

only to resume when he found himself obsessed again by the

dreaded inferiority complex.

[1] This is the main theme of De Quincey's "Confessions of an

Opium Eater."

Similarly a shameful position, such as that of the prostitute or

the chronic criminal, is "relieved" by alcohol and drugs, so that

the majority of these types of unfortunates are either drunkards

or "dopes." Too often have reformers reversed the relationship,

believing that alcohol caused prostitution and crime. Of course

that relationship exists, but more often, in my experience, the

alcohol is used to keep up the "ego" feeling, without which few

can bear life.

Curiously enough, one of the sex perversions, masturbation, has

in a few cases a similar genesis. I have known patients who, when

under the influence of depression, or humiliated in some way or

other, found a compensating pleasure in the act. Here we come to

a cardinal truth in the understanding of ourselves and our

fellows and one we shall pursue in detail later,--that face to

face with mental pain, men seek relief or pleasure or both by

alcohol, drugs, sensual pleasures of all kinds, and that the

secret explanation of all such habits is that they offer

compensation for some pain and are turned to at such times. What

one man seeks in work, another man seeks in religion, another

finds in self-flagellation, and still others seek in alcohol,

morphine, sexual excesses, etc.

With the increasing excitement and tension of our times there is

a constant search for relief, and here is the origin of much of

the smoking. Most men find in the deliberate puff, in the slow

inhalation and in the prolonged exhalation with the formation of

the white cloud of smoke, a shifting of consciousness from the

major businesses of their mind, from a constant tension to a

minor business not requiring concentration and thereby breaking

up in a pleasurable, rhythmic fashion the sense of effort. When

one is alone the fatigue and even the pain of one's thinking is

relieved by shifting the attention to the smoking. Keeping one's

attention at a high and constant pitch is apt to produce a

restless fatigue and this is often offset to the smoker by his

habit. Excessive smoking may cause "nervousness" but as a matter

of fact it is more often a means by which the excessively nervous

try to relieve themselves. Of course it is not good therapeutics

under such conditions, but I believe that in moderation smoking

does no harm and is an innocent pleasure.

Some of the pathological motor habits, such as the tics, often

have a curious background. The most common tics are snuffing,

blinking, shaking of the head, facial contortions of one kind or

another. These arise usually under exciting conditions or in the

excitable, sometimes in the acutely self-conscious. Frequently

they represent a motor outlet for this excitement; they are the

motor analogues of crying, shouting, laughing, etc. (Indeed, a

common habit is the one so frequently heard,--a little laugh when

there is no feeling of merriment and no occasion for it.) Motor

activity discharges tension and is pleasurable and these tics

furnish a momentary pleasure; they relieve a feeling that some of

the victims compare to an itch and the habit thus is based on a

seeking of relief, even though that relief is obtained in a way

that distresses the more settled purposes of the individual.

In the establishment of good habits, those desirable from the

point of view of the important issues of life, training is of

course essential. But in the training of children, certain things

must be kept in mind: the usefulness, the practical value must be

presented to the child's mind in a way he can understand, or else

various ways of energizing him to help in the formation of the

habit must be used--praise and blame, reward and punishment.

Further, these habits are not to be held holy; cleanliness and

method are desirable acquisitions but not so desirable as a

feeling of freedom to play and experiment with life and things.

If the child is constantly worried lest he get too dirty, or

fears to play in his room because he may disorder it, he is

forming the good habits of cleanliness and method but also the

worse one of worry.

In the breaking of a bad habit, its root in desire and difficulty

must be discovered. Often enough a man does not face the source

of his trouble, preferring not to. I am not at all sure that it

is best in all cases for a man to know his own weakness; in fact,

I feel convinced to the contrary in some cases. But in the

majority of difficulties, self-revelation is salutary and makes

an intelligent coping with the situation possible. Here is the

value of the good friend, the respected pastor, the wise doctor.

The human being will always need a confessor and a confidante,

and he who is struggling with a habit is in utmost need of such

help.

Shall the struggler with a bad habit break it with its thralldom?

Shall he say to his chains, "From this time, nevermore!" To some

men it is given to win the victory this way, to rise to the

heights of a stubborn resolution and to be free. But not to many

is this possible. To others there is a long history of repeated

effort and repeated failures and then--one day there comes a

feeling of power, perhaps through a great love, a great cause, a

sermon heard, a chance sentence, or a bitter experience, and

then, like a religious conversion, the tracks of the old habit

are obliterated, never to be used again.

I have in mind two men, both heavy drinkers but differing in

everything else. One was a philosopher who saw the world in that

dreadful, clear white light of which Jack London[1] spoke, that

light which leaves no cozy, pleasant obscurities, in which Truth,

the naked, is horrible to look at, when life seems too unreal,

when purposes seem most futile. At such times he would get drunk

and be happy for the time being, and afterwards find himself

bitterly repentant, though even that was a pleasure compared to

the hollow world in which his sober self dwelt. Then one day,

when all his friends had given him up as hopeless, as destined

for disaster, he read a book. "The Varieties of Religious

Experience," by William James, came to him as a clear light comes

to a man lost in the darkness; he saw himself as a "sick soul,"

obsessed with the idea that he saw life relentlessly and clearly.

There came to him the conviction that he had been arrogant, a

conceited ass, bent on ruin, "a sickly soul," he said. Out of

that realization grew resolutions that needed no vowing or

pledging, for as simply as a man turns from one road to another

he turned from his habit into healthy-minded work.

[1] Jack London's "John Barleycorn."

The other was an essentially healthy-minded man but he loved

joviality, freedom and good fellowship. Without ever knowing how

he came to it, he found himself a confirmed drinker, holding an

inferior place, passed by men of lesser caliber. He struggled

fitfully but always slipped when the next "good fellow" slapped

him on the back and invited him to have a drink. One day he

stepped out of a barroom with a group of his cronies, and though

he walked straight there was a reckless, happy feeling in him

that pushed him on to his folly. A young lady standing on a

street corner waiting for a car caught his eye. Signaling to his

companions, he walked up to her, put his arms around her and

kissed her. The girl stood as if petrified, then she pushed him

off and looked him up and down deliberately with cold scorn in

her eyes. Then she took off her glove and slapped him across the

face with it, as if disdaining to use her hand. With that she

walked away.

The man was a gentleman, and he stood there stricken. The laugh

of his companions aroused him. He saw them as if they were

himself, with a horror and disgust that made him suddenly run

away from them.

"From that moment I never again had the slightest desire for

drink. The slap sobered me for good."

While these conversions occur now and then there are certain

practical points in the breaking of a habit that need attention

in each case.

In the first place it is best in the majority of instances to

avoid the particular stimuli and associations that set off the

habit. The stimulus is a kind of trigger; pull it and the habit

can hardly be checked. Whatever the situation is that acts as the

temptation, avoid it. Not for nothing do men pray, "Lead us not

into temptation." The will needs no such exercise and rarely

stands up well against such strain. This may mean a removal for

the time being from the source of temptation, a flying away to

gain strength.

Further, a substitution of habit, of purpose, is necessary. Some

line of activities must be selected to fill in the vacuum. A

hobby is needed, a devotion to some larger purpose, whether it be

in work or social activity. "Nature abhors a vacuum"; boredom

must be avoided, for that is a pain, awakening desire. The

gymnasium, golf, sports of all kinds are substitute pleasures of

great value.

Third, harness a friend, a superior or a respected equal to the

yoke with you. Pull double harness; let him lend his strength to

yours. Throw away pride; confess and receive new energy from his

sympathy and wisdom. If you are lucky enough to have such a

friend, or some wise counselor, thank God for him. For here is

where the true friend finds his highest value.

In the analysis of any character the question of the kind of

habits formed demands attention. Since almost all traits become

matters of habit, such an inquiry would sooner or later lead to a

catalogue of qualities. What is here pertinent is this,--that one

might inquire into the kind of habits that are easily formed by

the individual and the kind that are not. Habits fall into groups

such as these:

1. Relating to care of the body: cleanliness, diet, exercise,

bowel function, sleep. Here we learn about personal tidiness or

the reverse, foppery, dandyism, gluttony, asceticism, etc.

2. Relating to method, efficiency, neatness in work: some people

find it almost impossible to become methodical or neat; others

become obsessed by these qualities to the exclusion of mobility.

3. Relating to the pursuit of pleasure: type of pleasure sought,

time given to it, hobbies.

4. Relating to special habits: alcohol, tobacco, drugs, sex

perversions.

5. Relating to study and advancement: love of books, attendance

at lectures.

Especially in the study of children is some such scheme

essential, for then one gets a definite idea of their defects and

takes definite efforts to make habitual the desired practice, or

else one sees the special trend, and, if it is good, fosters it.

This, of course, is the long and short of character development.

The Foundations of Personality · 第 3 / 17 章