Have you ever strolled from the inn at Lucerne, on a pleasant

afternoon, along the Zurich road, to the old General's garden, where

stands the colossal lion designed by Thorwaldsen, to keep fresh the

brave renown of the Swiss guard who perished in defence of the royal

family of France during the massacre of the Revolution? Carved from

the massive sandstone, the majestic animal, with the fatal spear in

his side, yet loyal in his vigil over the royal shield, is a grand

image of fidelity unto death. The stillness, the isolation, the

vivid creepers festooning the rocks, the clear mirror of the basin,

into which trickle pellucid streams, reflecting the vast proportions

of the enormous lion, the veteran Swiss, who acts as _cicerone_, the

adjacent chapel with its altar-cloth wrought by one of the fair

descendants of the Bourbon king and queen for whom these victims

perished, the hour, the memories, the admixture of Nature and Art,

convey a unique impression, in absolute contrast with such white

effigies, for instance, as in the dusky precincts of Santa Croce

droop over the sepulchre of Alfieri, or with the famous bronze boar

in the Mercato Nuevo of Florence, or the ethereal loveliness of that

sweet scion of the English nobility, moulded by Chantrey in all the

soft and lithe grace of childhood, holding a contented dove to her

bosom.

Even as the subject of taste, independently of historical diversities,

sculpture presents every degree of the meretricious, the grotesque,

and the beautiful,--more emphatically, because more palpably, than

is observable in painting. The inimitable Grecian standard is an

immortal precedent; the Mediæval carvings embody the rude Teutonic

truthfulness; where Canova provoked comparison with the antique, as

in the Perseus and Venus, his more gross ideal is painfully evident.

How artificial seems Bernini in contrast with Angelo! How minutely

expressive are the terra-cotta images of Spain! What a climax of

absurdity teases the eye in the monstrosities in stone which draw

travellers in Sicily to the eccentric nobleman's villa, near Palermo!

Who does not shrink from the French allegory and horrible melodrama

of Roubillac's monument to Miss Nightingale, in Westminster Abbey?

How like Horace Walpole to dote on Ann Conway's canine groups! We

actually feel sleepy, as we examine the little black marble Somnus

of the Florence Gallery, and electrified with the first sight of the

Apollo, and won to sweet emotion in the presence of Nymphs, Graces,

and the Goddess of Beauty, when, shaped by the hand of genius, they

seem the ethereal types of that

----"common clay ta'en from the common earth,

Moulded by God and tempered by the tears

Of angels to the perfect form of woman."

Yet the distinctive element in the pleasure afforded by sculpture is

tranquillity,--a quiet, contemplative delight; somewhat of awe

chastens admiration; a feeling of peace hallows sympathy; and we

echo the poet's sentiment,--

"I do feel a mighty calmness creep

Over my heart, which can no longer borrow

Its hues from chance or change,--those children of to-morrow."

It is this fixedness and placidity, conveying the impression of fate,

death, repose, or immortality, which render sculpture so congenial

as commemorative of the departed. Even quaint wooden effigies, like

those in St. Mary's Church at Chester, with the obsolete peaked

beards, ruffs, and broadswords, accord with the venerable

associations of a Mediæval tomb; while marble figures, typifying

Grief, Poetry, Fame, or Hope, brooding over the lineaments of the

illustrious dead, seem, of all sepulchral decorations, the most apt

and impressive. We remember, after exploring the plain of Ravenna on

an autumn day, and rehearsing the famous battle in which the brave

young Gaston de Foix fell, how the associations of the scene and

story were defined and deepened as we gazed on the sculptured form

of a recumbent knight in armor, preserved in the academy of the old

city; it seemed to bring back and stamp with brave renown forever

the gallant soldier who so long ago perished there in battle. In

Cathedral and Parthenon, under the dome of the Invalides, in the

sequestered parish church or the rural cemetery, what image so

accords with the sad reality and the serene hope of humanity, as the

adequate marble personification on sarcophagus and beneath shrine,

in mausoleum or on turf-mound?

"His palms infolded on his breast,

There is no other thought express'd

But long disquiet merged in rest."

In truth, it is for want of comprehensive perception that we take so

readily for granted the limited scope of this glorious art. There is

in the Grecian mythology alone a remarkable variety of character and

expression, as perpetuated by the statuary; and when to her deities

we add the athletes, charioteers, and marble portraits, a realm of

diverse creations is opened. Indeed, to the average modern mind, it

is the statues of Grecian divinities that constitute the poetic

charm of her history; abstractly, we regard them with the poet:--

"Their gods? what were their gods?

There's Mars, all bloody-haired; and Hercules,

Whose soul was in his sinews; Pluto, blacker

Than his own hell; Vulcan, who shook his horns

At every limp he took; great Bacchus rode

Upon a barrel; and in a cockle-shell

Neptune kept state; then Mercury was a thief;

Juno a shrew; Pallas a prude, at best;

And Venus walked the clouds in search of lovers;

Only great Jove, the lord and thunderer,

Sat in the circle of his starry power

And frowned 'I will!' to all."

Not in their marble beauty do they thus ignobly impress us,--but calm,

fair, strong, and immortal. "They seem," wrote Hazlitt, "to have no

sympathy with us, and not to want our admiration. In their faultless

excellence they appear sufficient to themselves."

In the sculptor's art, more than on the historian's page, lives the

most glorious memory of the classic past. A visit to the Vatican by

torchlight endears even these poor traditional deities forever.

On lofty ceilings vivid frescoes glow,

Auroras beam,

The steeds of Neptune through the waters go,

Or Sibyls dream.

As in the flickering torchlight shadows weaved

Illusions wild,

Methought Apollo's bosom slightly heaved

And Juno smiled.

Aerial Mercuries in bronze upspring,

Dianas fly,

And marble Cupids to the Psyches cling

Without a sigh.

To this variety in unity, this wealth of antique genius, Crawford

brought the keen relish of an observant and the aptitude of a

creative mind. His taste in Art was eminently catholic; he loved the

fables and the personages of Greece because of this very diversity

of character,--the freedom to delineate human instincts and passions

under a mythological guise,--just as Keats prized the same themes as

giving broad range to his fanciful muse. A list of our prolific

sculptor's works is found to include the entire circle of subjects

and styles appropriate to his art--first, the usual classic themes,

of which his first remarkable achievement was the Orpheus; then a

series of Christian or religious illustrations, from Adam and Saul

to Christ at the Well of Samaria; next, individual portraits; a

series of domestic figures, such as the "Children in the Wood," or

"Truant Boys"; and, finally, what may be termed national statuary,

of which Beethoven and Washington are eminent exemplars. Like

Thorwaldsen, Crawford excelled in _basso-rilievo_, and was a

remarkable pictorial sculptor. Having made early and intense

studies of the antique, he as carefully observed Nature; few

statuaries have more keenly noted the action of childhood or

equestrian feats, so that the limbs and movement of the sweetest of

human and the noblest of brute creatures were critically known to him.

In sculpture, we believe that a great secret of the highest success

lies in an intuitive eclecticism, whereby the faultless graces of the

antique are combined with just observation of Nature. Without

correct imitative facility, a sculptor wanders from the truth and

the fact of visible things; without ideality, he makes but a

mechanical transcript; without invention, he but repeats

conventional traits. The desirable medium, the effective principle,

has been well defined by the author of "Scenes and Thoughts in Europe":--

"Art does not merely copy Nature; it _coöperates_ with her, it makes

palpable her finest essence, it reveals the spiritual source of the

corporeal by the perfection of its incarnations." That Crawford

invariably kept himself to "the height of this great argument" it

were presumptuous to assert; but that he constantly approached such

an ideal, and that he sometimes seized its vital principle, the

varied and expressive forms yet conserved in his studio at Rome

emphatically attest. He had obtained command of the vocabulary of

his art; in expressing it, like all men who strive largely, he was

unequal. Some of his creations are far more felicitous than others;

he sometimes worked too fast, and sometimes undertook what did not

greatly inspire him; but when we reflect on the limited period of his

artist-life, on the intrepid advancement of its incipient stages

under the pressure of narrow means and comparative solitude, on the

extraordinary progress, the culminating force, the numerous trophies,

and the acknowledged triumphs of a life of labors, so patiently

achieved, and suddenly cut off in mid career,--we cannot but

recognize a consummate artist and the grandest promise yet

vouchsafed to the cause of national Art.

Shelley used to say that a Roman peasant is as good a judge of

sculpture as the best academician or anatomist. It is this direct

appeal, this elemental simplicity, which constitutes the great

distinction and charm of the art. There is nothing evasive and

mysterious; in dealing with form and expression through features and

attitude, average observation is a reliable test. The same English

poet was right in declaring that the Greek sculptors did not find

their inspiration in the dissecting-room; yet upon no subject has

criticism displayed greater insight on the one hand and pedantry on

the other, than in the discussion of these very _chefs-d'oeuvre_ of

antiquity. While Michel Angelo, who was at Rome when the Laocoön was

discovered, hailed it as "the wonder of Art," and scholars

identified the group with a famous one described by Pliny, Canova

thought that the right arm of the father was not in its right

position, and the other restorations in the work have all been

objected to. Goethe recognized a profound sagacity in the artist:

"If," he wrote, "we try to place the bite in some different position,

the whole action is changed, and we find it impossible to conceive

one more fitting; the situation of the bite renders necessary the

whole action of the limbs";--and another critic says, "In the group

of the Laocoön, the breast is expanded and the throat contracted to

show that the agonies that convulse the frame are borne in silence."

In striking contrast with such testimonies to the scientific truth

to Nature in Grecian Art was the objection I once heard an American

back-woods mechanic make to this celebrated work; he asked why the

figures were seated in a row on a dry-goods box, and declared that

the serpent was not of a size to coil round so small an arm as the

child's, without breaking its vertebrae. So disgusted was Titian with

the critical pedantry elicited by this group, that, in ridicule

thereof, he painted a caricature,--three monkeys writhing in the

folds of a little snake.

Yet, despite the jargon of connoisseurship, against which Byron,

while contemplating the Venus de Medici, utters so eloquent an

invective, sculpture is a grand, serene, and intelligible art,--more

so than architecture and painting,--and, as such, justly consecrated

to the heroic and the beautiful in man and history. It is predominantly

commemorative. How the old cities of Europe are peopled to

the imagination, as well as the eye, by the statues of their

traditional rulers or illustrious children, keeping, as it were, a

warning sign, or a sublime vigil, silent, yet expressive, in the

heart of busy life and through the lapse of ages! We could never

pass Duke Cosmo's imposing effigy in the old square of Florence

without the magnificent patronage and the despotic perfidy of the

Medicean family being revived to memory with intense local

association,--nor note the ugly mitred and cloaked papal figures,

with hands extended, in the mockery of benediction, over the beggars

in the piazzas of Romagna, without Ranke's frightful picture of

Church abuses reappearing, as if to crown these brazen forms with

infamy. There was always a gleam of poetry,--however sad,--on the

most foggy day, in the glimpse afforded from our window, in

Trafalgar Square, of that patient horseman, Charles the Martyr. How

alive old Neptune sometimes looked, by moonlight, in Rome, as we

passed his plashing fountain! And those German poets,--Goethe,

Schiller, and Jean Paul,--what to modern eyes were Frankfort,

Stuttgart, and Baireuth, unconsecrated by their endeared forms? The

most pleasant association Versailles yielded us of the Bourbon

dynasty was that inspired by Jeanne d'Arc, graceful in her marble

sleep, as sculptured by Marie d'Orléans; and the most impressive

token of Napoleon's downfall we saw in Europe was his colossal image

intended for the square of Leghorn, but thrown permanently on the

sculptor's hands by the waning of his proud star. The statue of Heber,

to Christian vision, hallows Calcutta. The Perseus of Cellini

breathes of the months of artistic suspense, inspiration, and

experiment, so graphically described in that clever egotist's memoirs.

One feels like blessing the grief-bowed figures at the tomb of

Princess Charlotte, so truly do their attitudes express our sympathy

with the love and the sorrow her name excites. Would not Sterne have

felt a thrill of complacency, had he beheld his tableau of the Widow

Wadman and Uncle Toby so genially embodied by Ball Hughes? What more

spirited symbol of prosperous conquest can be imagined than the

gilded horses of St. Mark's? How natural was Michel Angelo's

exclamation, "March!" as he gazed on Donatello's San Giorgio, in the

Church of San Michele,--one mailed hand on a shield, bare head,

complete armor, and the foot advanced, like a sentinel who hears the

challenge, or a knight listening for the charge! Tenerani's

"Descent from the Cross," in the Torlonia Chapel, outlives in

remembrance the brilliant assemblies of that financial house. The

outlines of Flaxman, essentially statuesque, seem alone adequate to

illustrate to the eye the great Mediaeval poet, whose verse seems

often cut from stone in the quarries of infernal destiny. How grandly

sleep the lions of Canova at Pope Clement's tomb!

It is to us a source of noble delight, that with these permanent

trophies of the sculptor's art may now be mingled our national fame.

Twenty years ago, the address in Murray's Guide-Book,--_Crawford, an

American Sculptor, Piazza Barberini_,--would have been unique; now

that name is enrolled on the list of the world's benefactors in the

patrimony of Art. Greenough, by his pen, his presence, and his chisel,

gave an impulse to taste and knowledge in sculpture and architecture

not destined soon to pass away; no more eloquent and original

advocate of the beautiful and the true in the higher social economies

has blest our day; his Cherubs and Medora overflow with the poetry

of form; his essays are a valuable legacy of philosophic thought.

The Greek Slave of Powers was invariably surrounded by visitors at

the London World's Fair and the Manchester Exhibition. Palmer has

sent forth from his isolated studio at Albany a series of ideal busts,

of a pure type of original and exquisite beauty. Others might be

named who have honorably illustrated an American claim to

distinction in an art eminently republican in its perpetuation of

national worth and the identity of its highest achievements with

social progress.

Facility of execution and prolific invention were the essential

traits of Crawford's genius. For some years his studio has been one

of the shrines of travellers at Rome, because of the number and

variety as well as excellence of its trophies. The idea has been

suggested, and it is one we hope to see realized, that this complete

series of casts should be permanently conserved in such a temple as

Copenhagen reared to the memory of her great sculptor. It was on

account of this facility and fecundity that Crawford advocated

plaster as an occasional substitute for bronze and marble, where

elaborate compositions were proposed. He felt capable of achieving

so much, his mind teemed with so many panoramic and single

conceptions,--historical, allegorical, ideal, and illustrative of

standard literature or classical fable,--that only time and expense

presented obstacles to unlimited invention. Perhaps no one can

conceive this peculiar creativeness of his fancy and aptitude of hand,

who has not had occasion to talk with Crawford of some projected

monument or statue. No sooner was he possessed of the idea to be

embodied, the person or occasion to be commemorated, than he

instantly conceived a plan and drew a model, invariably possessing

some felicitous thought or significant arrangement. His sketch-book

was quite as suggestive of genius as his studio. The "Sketch of a

Statue to crown the Dome of the United States Capitol"--a photograph

of which is before us as we write, dated two years ago--is an

instance in point. A more grand figure, original and symbolic,

graceful and sublime, in attitude, aspect, drapery, accessories, and

expression, or one more appropriate, cannot be imagined; and yet it

is only one of hundreds of national designs, more or less mature,

which that fertile brain, patriotic heart, and cunning hand devised.

We are justified in regarding the appropriation by the State of

Virginia, for a monument to Washington by such a man, as an epoch in

the history of national Art. Crawford hailed it as would a confident

explorer the ship destined to convey him to untracked regions, the

ambitious soldier tidings of the coming foe, or any brave aspirant a

long-sought opportunity. It is one of the drawbacks to elaborate

achievement in sculpture, that the materials and the processes of

the art require large pecuniary facilities. To plan and execute a

great national monument, under a government commission, was

precisely the occasion for which Crawford had long waited. Happening

to read the proposals in a journal, while on a visit to this country,

he repaired immediately to Richmond, submitted his views, and soon

received the appointment.

The absence of complexity in the language and intent of sculpture is

always obvious in the expositions of its votaries. In no class of

men have we found such distinct and scientific views of Art. One

lovely evening in spring, we stood with Bartolini beside the corpse

of a beautiful child. Bereavement in a foreign land has a desolation

of its own, and the afflicted mother desired to carry home a statue

of her loved and lost. We conducted the sculptor to the chamber of

death, that he might superintend the casts from the body. No sooner

did his eyes fall upon it, than they glowed with admiration and

filled with tears. He waved the assistants aside, clasped his hands,

and gazed spellbound upon the dead child. Its brow was ideal in

contour, the hair of wavy gold, the cheeks of angelic outline.

"How beautiful!" exclaimed Bartolini; and drawing us to the bedside,

with a mingled awe and intelligence, he pointed out how the rigidity

of death coincided, in this fair young creature, with the standard

of Art;--the very hands, he declared, had stiffened into lines of

beauty; and over the beautiful clay we thus learned from the lips of

a venerable sculptor how intimate and minute is the cognizance this

noble art takes of the language of the human form. Greenough would

unfold by the hour the exquisite relation between function and beauty,

organization and use,--tracing therein a profound law and an

illimitable truth. No more genial spectacle greeted us in Rome than

Thorwaldsen at his Sunday-noon receptions;--his white hair, kindly

smile, urbane manners, and unpretending simplicity gave an added

charm to the wise and liberal sentiments he expressed on Art,--

reminding us, in his frank eclecticism, of the spirit in which

Humboldt cultivates science, and Sismondi history. Nor less

indicative of this clear apprehension was the thorough solution we

have heard Powers give, over the mask taken from a dead face, of the

problem, how its living aspect was to modify its sculptured

reproduction; or the original views expressed by Palmer as to the

treatment of the eyes and hair in marble. During Crawford's last

visit to America, we accompanied him to examine a portrait of

Washington by Wright. It boasts no elegance of arrangement or

refinement of execution; at a glance it was evident that the artist

had but a limited sense of beauty and lacked imagination; but, on

the other hand, he possessed what, for a sculptor's object,--namely,

facts of form and feature,--is more important,--conscience.

Crawford declared this was the only portrait of Washington which

literally represented his costume; having recently examined the

uniform, sword, etc., he was enabled to identify the strands of the

epaulette, the number of buttons, and even the peculiar seal and

watch-key. A man so faithful to details, so devoted to authenticity,

Crawford argued, was reliable in more essential things. He remarked,

that one of his own greatest difficulties in the equestrian statue

had been to reconcile the shortness of the neck in Stuart's portrait

and Houdon's statue (the body of which was not taken from life) with

the stature of Washington,--there being an anatomical incongruity

therein. "I had determined," he continued, "to follow what the laws

of Nature and all precedent indicate as the right proportion,--

otherwise it would be impossible to make a graceful and impressive

statue; but in this picture, bearing such remarkable evidence of

authenticity, I find the correct distance between chin and breast."

American travellers in Italy will sometimes be repelled by a certain

narrowness in the critical estimate of modern sculptors; though of

all arts sculpture demands and justifies the most liberal eclecticism.

Thus, a broad line of demarcation has been arbitrarily drawn between

high finish and prolific invention, originality and superficial skill;

as if these merits could not be united, or were incompatible with

each other,--and that, invariably, works of "outward skill elaborate"

are "of inward less exact." A Boston critic denominates Powers

"a sublime mechanic," as if there were only physical imitation in

his busts, and no expression in his figures. The insinuation is

unjust. By exquisite finish and patient labor he makes of such

subjects as the Fisher-boy, the Proserpine, and Il Penseroso

charming creations,--in attitude and feature true to the moment and

the mood delineated, and not less true in each detail; their

popularity is justified by scientific and tasteful canons; and his

portrait busts and statues are, in many instances, unrivalled for

character as well as execution. A letter to one of his friends lies

before us, in which he responds to an amicable remonstrance at his

apparent slowness of achievement. The reasoning is so cogent, the

principle asserted of such wide application, and the artistic

conscience so nobly evident, that we venture to quote a passage.

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 02, No. 08, June 1858 A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics · 第 11 / 21 段