The only thing that seems to have unpleasantly disturbed his easy yet

busy life was a delicate state of health, and he grew more ailing as he

grew older. At one time an affection of the chest caused him to lose his

voice, and he was ordered to drink the waters of the baths of Bourbon as

a means of regaining it. His correspondence with Racine on this occasion

is published. Boileau's letters are the best, the most witty, easy, and

amusing. Racine relates how each day the king inquired after his health,

and was eager for his return to court; while Boileau laments over his

continued indisposition. There was a dispute among the physicians, as to

his bathing in the waters as well as drinking them: some of the learned

declaring such an act fatal, while others recommended it as a mode of

cure. Racine related to the king, while at dinner, the perplexity of his

friend between these contradictory counsels. "For my part," said the

princess de Conti, who was sitting near Louis, "I would rather be mute

for thirty years, than risk my life to regain my voice." Boileau

replied, "I am not surprised at the princess of Conti's sentiment. If

she lost her speech, she would still retain a million other charms to

compensate to her for her loss, and she would still be the most perfect

creature that for a long time nature has produced; but a wretch like me

needs his voice to be endured by men, and to dispute with M.

Charpentier. If it were only on the latter account one ought to risk

something; and life is not of such value, but that one may hazard it for

the sake of being able to interrupt such a speaker." These letters are

very entertaining; they display the style of the times, and the vivacity

and amiableness of Boileau's disposition, in very pleasing colours. His

vivacity was of the head, and of temper. He was exempt from vehemence of

feeling; and did not suffer the internal struggles to which those are

subject whose souls are impregnated with passion; nor was he satirical

in conversation: as madame de Sévigné said of him, he was cruel only

in verse; and Lord Rochester's expression was applied to him--

"The best good man, with the worst-natured muse."

Without pride, also, and without pretension, he could turn his own fame

and labours into a jest. Going one day to present the order for his

pension, which said that it was granted "on account of the satisfaction

which the king derived from his works," the clerk asked him what sort of

works his were. "Masonry," he replied: "I am an architect." At another

time, when, passing Easter at a friend's house in the country, and being

exact in fulfilling his religious duties, he made his confession to a

country curate, to whom he was unknown, the confessor asked him what his

usual occupations were? "Writing verses," replied the penitent. "So much

the worse," said the curate; "and what sort of verses?" "Satires."

"Still worse--and against whom?" "Against those who write bad verses,

against the vices of the times, against pernicious books, romances, and

operas." "Ah!" cried the curate, "that is not so bad, and I have nothing

to say against it."

[Sidenote: 1687.

Ætat.

51.]

His spirit of intolerance for "those who wrote bad verses," or approved

them, was excited to its height by Perrault's[92] "Siècle de Louis

Quatorze." This poem was the origin of the famous dispute as to the

ancients and moderns, which "Swift's Battle of the Books" made known in

this country. Perrault, with little Latin, and no Greek, undertook to

depreciate Homer; and he had Fontenelle for his ally, who, with more

learning and less taste, declared that, if the Greek bucolic writers had

now first produced their pastorals, they would be scouted as wretched.

Perrault did not content himself with the exposition of his opinion in

his poem; he wrote a "Parallel between the Ancients and Moderns," in

which he not only praised the good writers of the day, but even

Chapelain, Quinault, Cotin, and others on whom Boileau had set the seal

of his irony.

[Sidenote: 1692.

Ætat.

56.]

The satirist could neither brook this rebellion against his fiat, nor

the sort of blasphemy indulged in against those great masters of the art

whom he was aware he but feebly imitated. He wrote several bitter

epigrams against Perrault; and then, finding that by no explanation or

translation could he make a mere French reader understand the sublimity

of Pindar, he sought to imitate this poet in his ode on the taking of

Namur. This was a bold undertaking, and it cannot be said that he

succeeded; for the French language was then far less capable than now of

expressing the sublime; and Boileau's talent was not of that elevated

and daring kind which could invent new modes of expression, and force

his language to embody the ideal and bold images that constitute the

sublime. Still we must honour the attempt for the sake of its motive.

"The following ode," he says, in his preface, "was written on occasion

of those strange dialogues, lately published, in which all the great

writers of antiquity are treated as authors to be compared with the

Chapelains and Cotins; and in which, while it is sought to do honour to

our age, it is really vilified by the fact that there exist men capable

of writing such nonsense. Pindar is the worst treated." He goes on to

say that, as it was exceedingly difficult to explain the beauties of

Pindar to those who did not understand Greek, he attempted to write a

French ode in imitation of his style, as the best mode of conveying an

idea of it. This war went on for some time; and various attacks,

replies, and rejoinders appeared on both sides. At last a personal

reconciliation took place between Boileau and Perrault; neither yielded

his opinion, but they ceased to write against each other.

[Sidenote: 1659.

Ætat.

56.]

At this time also he wrote other satires:--one on women, which rather

consists of portraits of various faulty individuals than a satire

against the sex in general. It is by no means one of the best of his

works. We may say otherwise, however, of the spirit that reigns in the

satire addressed to Ambiguity, and which, from the boldness with which

it attacks the jesuits, is at once one of the most useful of his works,

and displays the independence of his soul. He wrote his epistle also on

the Love of God, another jansenist production. At this time he again

awoke to the pleasures of composition, at the same time that he showed

such a love for his works that he emptied his portfolios of every scrap

of verse he had ever written, and placed them in the hands of the

booksellers.[93] As he grew older he became more recluse in his habits,

without losing any of the pleasure he always felt in the society of his

intimate friends. The turn he had for personal enjoyment, which had

shown itself in youth, in a love for social and convivial pleasures,

became a sort of happy indolence, enlivened by the pleasures of

friendship. His correspondence with Racine displays an affectionate

disposition, an easy carelessness as to money, and a quiet sort of wit,

which turned to pleasantry the ordinary routine of life, and bespeaks a

mind at ease, and a well-balanced disposition. The expenses of his wars

caused Louis XIV. to reduce the pensions he had granted, and those of

Boileau and Racine suffered with the rest. Racine was then at court; and

he wrote to his friend to inform him, that their salaries as

historiographers were fixed at 4000 livres a year for himself and 2000

for Boileau; the health of the latter not permitting him to follow the

army being the cause of his receiving the smaller sum. Racine adds, "You

see everything is arranged as you yourself wished, yet I am truly

annoyed that I appear to receive more than you; but, besides the fatigue

of the journeys, which I am glad that you are spared, I know that you

are so noble and friendly that I feel sure you will rejoice at my being

the best paid." Boileau replied, "Are you mad with your compliments? Do

you not know that I myself prescribed the mode in which this affair

should be settled; and can you doubt but that I am satisfied with an

arrangement by which I receive all I asked?" His friendship for Racine

seems to have been the warmest feeling of his heart; and growing deaf as

he grew old, and leading a more and more retired life, the tragedian,

his family, and a few others, formed all his society. There is something

simple and touching in the mention Racine makes of their visits in his

letters to his eldest son. The bitter satirist adapting his talk to the

younger children of his friend, while he was so deaf that he could not

hear their replies, and his eager endeavours to amuse them, gives zest

to Racine's exclamation, "He is the best man in the world!" Sometimes

the spirit of composition revived in him, but it quickly grew cold

again[94]; yet, while it lasted, it furnished occupation and amusement.

He did not live wholly at Paris. He had saved 8000 livres, and with this

sum he purchased a country house at Auteuil. Charmed with his

acquisition, he at first spent a good deal on it; he embellished the

grounds, and delighted to assemble his friends together. Racine often

retired there to repose from his attendance at court, and from his

fatigues in following the army in various campaigns. Boileau, fastidious

in all things, knew well how to choose his company. The conversations

were either enlivened by sallies of wit, or rendered interesting by his

sagacity and good taste. He had long renounced his more equivocal modes

of amusing, such as mimicry, as unworthy. In the heyday of youth sallies

of this sort are indulged in under the influence of high animal spirits;

and it is whimsical to remark how the slothful spirit of age gravely

denounces that as wrong which it is no longer capable of achieving.

Boileau, however, had many other resources. His guests delighted to

gather his opinions, and hung upon his maxims. He criticised the works

of the day, and the favourite authors. He admired La Bruyère, though he

called him obscure, and justly remarked that he spared himself the most

difficult part of a work when he omitted the transitions and links of

one portion with another. No one dared praise St. Evremond before him,

though he had become the fashionable author of the day. He detested low

pleasantry. "Racine," he said, "is sometimes silly enough to laugh over

Scarron's travestie of Virgil, but he hides this from me."

[Sidenote: 1698.

Ætat.

62.]

Thus tranquil and esteemed, surrounded by friends, and without a care,

he lived long, notwithstanding the weakness of his constitution and bad

health. A few days after the death of Racine, he appeared at court to

take the king's commands with regard to the task of historiographer,

which had now devolved entirely on himself. He spoke to the king of the

intrepidity with which his friend viewed the approaches of death. "I am

aware of this," replied Louis, "and somewhat surprised, for he feared

death greatly; and I remember that at the siege of Gand you were the

more courageous of the two." The king afterwards added, "Remember, I

have always an hour in the week to give you when you like to come."

Boileau, however, never went to court again. His friends often entreated

him to appear from time to time, but he answered, "What should I do

there? I cannot flatter." No doubt he felt admiration for all Louis's

great qualities, and gratitude for the kindness shown to himself; but he

was too penetrating an observer, and too impartial a judge, not to be

aware that the court paid to a king, amounting in those days almost to

idolatry, renders him a factitious personage, and only fit to be

approached by those who, either through long habit, or by having some

point to gain, accommodate themselves to that sort of watchful deference

and self-immolation which is intolerable to persons accustomed to utter

spontaneously what they think, and to enjoy society so far as they are

unshackled by fears of offending a master.

Boileau survived Racine several years: this period was spent in

retirement, and his health grew weaker and weaker. He lived either at

Paris or Auteuil. There Louis Racine, the son of the poet, from whom we

gather these details, often visited him. He was a youth at that time; he

and Boileau played at skittles together; the poet was a good player, and

often knocked down all nine at one bowling. "It must be confessed," he

said, "that I possess two talents equally useful to my country; I play

well at nine-pins, and write verses." Louis Racine was then at school at

Beauvais. He wrote an elegy on a dog; and his mother, a good but

narrow-minded woman, took it to Boileau, and begged him to dissuade her

son from following the career of a poet. The youth went trembling to

hear his fiat; and Boileau, who saw no eminent talent in the production

of his young friend, told him that he was very bold, with the name he

bore, to attempt poetry. "Perhaps," he said, "you might one day write

well; but I am incredulous as to extraordinary events, and I never heard

of the son of a great poet turning out a great poet. The younger

Corneille has merit, but he will always be a minor Corneille; take care

that the same thing does not happen to you." Thus it is that in age we

look back on the career we boldly enter on in youth; and aware of the

dangers we ran, and forgetting the enthusiasm and passion that then

raised us above fear, and promised us success, we endeavour to impart to

our juniors the prudence and experience we have gained. In vain. Life

would be far other than it is, did the young, at the dictum of the old,

divest themselves of errors and passions, desires and anticipations, and

see as plainly as those advanced in life the nothingness of the objects

of their wishes. It is the scheme of the Creator, for some unknown

purpose, that each new generation should go over the same course; and

each, reaching the same point of rest, should wonder what the impulse is

that drives successors over the same dangerous ground.

To return to Boileau: not long before his death he somewhat changed his

habits. Though not in want of money, he was induced, by the

solicitations of a friend, to sell him his house at Auteuil, it being

promised that a room should always be reserved for him, and that he

should continue as much its master as when he actually possessed it.

Fifteen days after the sale he visited the place, and, going into the

garden, looked about for a little grove, beneath whose shade he was

accustomed to saunter and indulge in reverie; it was no longer there: he

called for the gardener, and heard that, by order of the new proprietor,

his favourite trees had been cut down: he paused for a moment, and then

went back to his carriage, saying, "Since I am no longer master, what

business have I here?" He returned instantly to Paris, and never

revisited Auteuil.

Boileau was a pious man; he fulfilled strictly his religious duties. It

is told of him that, dining with the duke of Orleans on a fast-day,

nothing but flesh being served at table, Boileau confined himself to

bread: the duke, perceiving this, said, "The fish has been forgotten, so

you must be content to forego the fast as we do." "Yet," said Boileau,

"if you were but to strike the ground with your foot, fish would rise

from the earth." A witty and happy adaptation of Pompey's boast. In his

latter years he congratulated himself on the purity of his poems. "It is

a great consolation," he said, "to a poet about to die, to feel that he

has never written any thing injurious to virtue."

His last days were employed in correcting a complete edition of his

works. This was to include his "Dialogue on the Romances," which so

pleasantly ridicules the language which mademoiselle Scuderi puts in the

mouths of Cyrus, Horatius Codes, and Clelia. Out of respect for the

authoress he had hitherto refrained from printing it; but it had been

read in private: the marquis de Sévigné had written it down from

recollection; and it had been printed in a pirated edition of the works

of St. Evremond. Mademoiselle Scuderi being dead, Boileau resolved on

publishing it. But the chief addition to his edition was his "Epistle to

Ambiguity." Already was the publication in progress when the jesuits

took alarm. They gave it in charge to père le Tellier, the king's

confessor, to speak to Louis, and to induce him to stop the publication.

The monarch was docile to the voice of his confessor: he not only

forbade Boileau to publish the satire, but ordered him to give up the

original into his hands, informing him, at the same time, that with this

omission his edition might appear. But Boileau, feeling himself about to

die, disdained to temporise, and preferred suppressing the whole edition

rather than truckle to the jesuits.

[Sidenote: 1711.

Ætat.

75.]

His death was Christian and catholic, yet not so strictly devout as that

of Racine. To the last he maintained his literary tastes, and was alive

to critical remark. A friend thought to amuse him during his last

illness by reading a new and popular tragedy: "Ah! my friend," he cried,

"am I not dying in time? the Pradons, whom we laughed at in our youth,

were suns in comparison with these authors." When he was asked how he

felt, he replied by a verse from Malherbe:

"Je suis vaincu du temps, je cède à ses outrages."

As he was expiring, he saw M. Coutard approach; he pressed his hand,

saying, "Bon jour, et adieu--c'est un long adieu."

He died of dropsy on the chest, on the 13th of March, 1711, in the

seventy-fifth year of his age. He was buried in the lower chapel of the

Sainte Chapelle, immediately under the spot which, in the upper chapel,

is immortalised by his "Lutrin." Numerous friends attended the funeral;

and one among them overheard a woman say, "He had many friends, it

seems, yet I have heard that he spoke ill of everybody."

This is an exaggeration of what may be considered as the only flaw in

Boileau's character:--generous and charitable; simple and natural in his

manners; full of friendship, kindness, and integrity; we almost hesitate

to pronounce severity of criticism against bad books a fault; but we

cannot avoid perceiving that the ridicule he has attached to the names

of Chapelain, Cotin, and others, however well deserved by their

writings, might have been spared to the men. It reminds us too strongly

of the anonymous critics of the present day not to be held in

detestation.

It is not necessary to enter at length on the subject of his works. He

possessed to a high degree the faculty of wit; generally speaking wit

simply, not humour[95]: point the most acute, expressions the most

happy, embody and carry home his meaning. He is not as elegant as

Horace, nor as bitter nor as elevated as Juvenal: he indeed resembles

the former more than the latter; but he has vivacity and truth, and a

high tone of moral and critical feeling, which give strength to his

epigrams; his principal defect being the want of a playful fancy, which

caused a sort of aridity to be spread over his happiest sallies. He

laboured to polish his verses diligently; and their apparent ease

results from the justness of taste that taught him to retrench every

superfluity of expression. The "Lutrin" rises superior to his other

productions; and in these days, and for posterity, his fame will chiefly

rest upon that poem.

[Footnote 78: The place of his birth and the date have been disputed.

Critics have decided on the farts above given. The doubt partly

originated in Boileau himself. Louis XIV. one day asked him his age; he

replied, "I came into the world a year before your majesty, that I might

announce the glories of your reign." The reply pleased the king, and was

applauded by the courtiers; nor did Boileau err much in the fact; for,

being born as late in the year as December, he was scarcely more than a

year older than the king, though the date of that monarch's birth was

1638.]

[Footnote 79:

Que si quelqu'un, mes Vers, alors vous importune,

Pour savoir mes parents, ma vie, et ma fortune,

Contez lui qu'allié d'assez hauts magistrats,

Fils d'un greffier, né d'ayeux avocats,

Des le berceau perdant une forte jeune mère,

Réduit seize ans après à pleurer mon vieux père,

J'allai d'un pas hardi, par moi-mème guidé,

Et de mon seul génie en marchant seconde,

Studieux amateur de Perse et d'Horace,

Assez pres de Regnier m'asseoir sur le Parnasse.--Epître X.

La famille en pâlit, et vit en frémissant,

Dans la poudre du greffier un poète naissant.--Epître V.]

[Footnote 80: The duc de Montauzier married Julie d'Angennes, demoiselle

de Rambouillet--the deity of the clique which established the system of

factitious gallantry which Molière and Boileau ridiculed and exploded.

Of course the duke was inimically inclined; but time softened the

exasperation, and Boileau, by apt flattery in his epistle to Racine,

completed the change. Soon after the publication of this epistle, the

peer and poet met in the galleries of Versailles, and exchanged

compliments; the duke took the satirist home to dine with him, and was

his friend ever after.]

[Footnote 81: The following is a specimen of the poetry of the

"Pucelle,"--the Maid of Orleans is addressing the king:--

"O! grand prince, que grand des cette heure j'appelle,

Il est vrai, le respect sert de bride à mon zèle:

Mais ton illustre aspect me redouble le cœur,

Et me le redoublant, me redouble la peur.

A ton illustre aspect mon cœur se sollicite,

Et grimpant contre mont, la dure terre quitte.

O! que n'ai-je le ton désormais assez fort

Pour aspirer à toi, sans te faire de tort.

Pour toi puissé-je avoir une mortelle pointe

Vers où l'épaule gauche à la gorge est conjointe,

Que le coup brisât l'os, et fit pleûvoir le sang

De la temple, du dos, de l'épaule, et du flanc."]

[Footnote 82: Voltaire, in his "Mémoire sur la Satire," severely

censures Boileau. Voltaire was peculiarly sensitive to satire, while he

never spared it in his turn; he cherished a sort of reserve in his mind,

that made it venial in him to attack with virulence, while no one was to

censure him without the most cutting return. This fact, however, does

not alter his argument. It is a difficult question. It may be said that

it is impossible but that bad books should be criticised by contemporary

writers, while all men of generous and liberal natures will be averse to

undertaking the office of butcher themselves.]

[Footnote 83: The pensions were granted in 1663. Chapelain selected the

names; but we can hardly believe that he wrote the list, such as it has

come down to us, wherein the praise lavished on himself is ridiculous

enough: The occasion of the pension is appended to the name: this is a

specimen of some among them:--

"Au sieur Pierre Corneille, premier poète dramatique du monde, deux

mille francs.

"Au sieur Desmarets, le plus fertile auteur, et doué de

la plus belle imagination qui ait jamais été, douze cents francs.

"Au sieur Molière, excellent poète comique, mille francs.

"Au sieur Racine, poète français, huit cents francs.

"Au sieur Chapelain, le plus grand poète français qui ait jamais

été, et du plus solide jugement, trois mille francs."]

[Footnote 84: Satire IX.]

[Footnote 85: For an account of Chapelle, see Life of Molière.]

[Footnote 86: In one of his later poems, Boileau, addressing his verses,

thus speaks Of the successes of his youth:--

"Vains et faibles enfans dans ma vieillesse nés,

Vous croyez sur les pas de vos heureux ainés,

Voir bientôt vos bons-mots, passant du peuple aux princes,

Charmer également la ville et les provinces;

Et, par le prompt effet d'un sel rejouissant.

Devenir quelquefois proverbes en naissant.

Mais perdez cette erreur dont l'appas vous amorce,

Le temps n'est plus, mes Vers, ou ma plume, en sa force

Du Parnasse Français formant les nourissons,

De si riches couleurs habillait ses leçons:

Quand mon Esprit, poussé d'un courroux légitime,

Vint devant la Raison plaider contre la Rime,

A tout le genre humain sçut faire le procès,

Et s'attaqua soi-même avec tant de succès.

Alors il n'était point de lecteur si sauvage,

Qui ne se déridât en lisant mon ouvrage,

Et qui pour s'égayer, souvent dans ses discours

D'un mot pris en mes vers n'empruntât le secours."]

[Footnote 87: In an article in The Liberal, Mr. Leigh Hunt draws a

parallel between Boileau and Pope, in that spirit of just and delicate

criticism for which he is remarkable: "As Terence was called half

Menander so Boileau is half Pope. He wants Ariel; he wants his invisible

world; he wants that poetical part of poetry which consists in bringing

a remote and creative fancy to wait on the more obvious wit and graces

that lie about us." The critic, however, bestows great praise on the

exordium of the "Lutrin;" and it must be remembered that Boileau

preceded Pope, and that the English poet was in some sort an imitator of

the French.]

[Footnote 88: The desk, being old fashioned and cumbrous, covered the

whole space before the chanter, and hid him entirely; the chanter

consequently removed it, which excited the anger of his superior, the

treasurer, who had it replaced. It was again removed, again replaced;

the whole chapter being in a state of dissension and enmity on the

subject, till Lamoignon contrived to pacify the parties.]

Lives of the most eminent literary and scientific men of France, Vol. 1 (of 2) · 第 25 / 33 段