VII.

Publishers have their little theories, their little superstitions, and

their blind faith in the great god Chance which we all worship. These

things lead them into temptation and adversity, but they seem to do

fairly well as business men, even in their own behalf. They do not make

above the usual ninety-five per cent. of failures, and more publishers

than authors get rich.

Some theories or superstitions publishers and authors share together.

One of these is that it is best to keep your books all in the hands of

one publisher if you can, because then he can give them more attention

and sell more of them. But my own experience is that when my books were

in the hands of three publishers they sold quite as well as when one had

them; and a fellow-author whom I approached in question of this venerable

belief laughed at it. This bold heretic held that it was best to give

each new book to a new publisher, for then the fresh man put all his

energies into pushing it; but if you had them all together, the publisher

rested in a vain security that one book would sell another, and that the

fresh venture would revive the public interest in the stale ones.

I never knew this to happen; and I must class it with the superstitions

of the trade. It may be so in other and more constant countries, but in

our fickle republic each last book has to fight its own way to public

favor, much as if it had no sort of literary lineage. Of course this is

stating it rather largely, and the truth will be found inside rather than

outside of my statement; but there is at least truth enough in it to give

the young author pause. While one is preparing to sell his basket of

glass, he may as well ask himself whether it is better to part with all

to one dealer or not; and if he kicks it over, in spurning the imaginary

customer who asks the favor of taking the entire stock, that will be his

fault, and not the fault of the customer.

However, the most important question of all with the man of letters as a

man of business is what kind of book will sell the best of itself,

because, at the end of the ends, a book sells itself or does not sell at

all; kissing, after long ages of reasoning and a great deal of culture,

still goes by favor, and though innumerable generations of horses have

been led to the water, not one horse has yet been made to drink. With

the best, or the worst, will in the world, no publisher can force a book

into acceptance. Advertising will not avail, and reviewing is

notoriously futile. If the book does not strike the popular fancy,

or deal with some universal interest, which need by no means be a

profound or important one, the drums and the cymbals shall be beaten in

vain. The book may be one of the best and wisest books in the world,

but if it has not this sort of appeal in it the readers of it, and,

worse yet, the purchasers, will remain few, though fit. The secret of

this, like most other secrets of a rather ridiculous world, is in the

awful keeping of fate, and we can only hope to surprise it by some lucky

chance. To plan a surprise of it, to aim a book at the public favor,

is the most hopeless of all endeavors, as it is one of the unworthiest;

and I can, neither as a man of letters nor as a man of business, counsel

the young author to do it. The best that you can do is to write the book

that it gives you the most pleasure to write, to put as much heart and

soul as you have about you into it, and then hope as hard as you can to

reach the heart and soul of the great multitude of your fellow-men. That,

and that alone, is good business for a man of letters.

The man of letters must make up his mind that in the United States the

fate of a book is in the hands of the women. It is the women with us who

have the most leisure, and they read the most books. They are far better

educated, for the most part, than our men, and their tastes, if not their

minds, are more cultivated. Our men read the newspapers, but our women

read the books; the more refined among them read the magazines. If they

do not always know what is good, they do know what pleases them, and it

is useless to quarrel with their decisions, for there is no appeal from

them. To go from them to the men would be going from a higher to a lower

court, which would be honestly surprised and bewildered, if the thing

were possible. As I say, the author of light literature, and often the

author of solid literature, must resign himself to obscurity unless the

ladies choose to recognize him. Yet it would be impossible to forecast

their favor for this kind or that. Who could prophesy it for another,

who guess it for himself? We must strive blindly for it, and hope

somehow that our best will also be our prettiest; but we must remember at

the same time that it is not the ladies’ man who is the favorite of the

ladies.

There are, of course, a few, a very few, of our greatest authors who have

striven forward to the first place in our Valhalla without the help of

the largest reading-class among us; but I should say that these were

chiefly the humorists, for whom women are said nowhere to have any warm

liking, and who have generally with us come up through the newspapers,

and have never lost the favor of the newspaper readers. They have become

literary men, as it were, without the newspaper readers’ knowing it; but

those who have approached literature from another direction have won fame

in it chiefly by grace of the women, who first read them; and then made

their husbands and fathers read them. Perhaps, then, and as a matter of

business, it would be well for a serious author, when he finds that he is

not pleasing the women, and probably never will please them, to turn

humorous author, and aim at the countenance of the men. Except as a

humorist he certainly never will get it, for your American, when he is

not making money, or trying to do it, is making a joke, or trying to do

it.

Literature and Life (Complete) · 第 12 / 228 题