The Kitchen, though it has a certain air of rudeness, and has lost its

ancient fire-place, is still a very interesting relic, and one of the

most perfect things in the castle. It occupies the whole interior of a

large strong square tower. The windows, which have stepped sills, are

set high up in the walls, and are connected by a perforated passage

of defence provided with garde-robes, which runs all round. Two pairs

of very strong vaulting ribs, intersecting in the centre, carry the

louvre, which is of stone and of immense size. The lower part, twelve

feet square, rises to upwards of the same height above the leads, and

is surmounted by an octagon fifteen feet higher still. Externally it

forms a very striking and effective feature. Below the Kitchen a cellar

of the same shape and size has a well-groined vaulted roof carried

on a central pillar. Another to the east, which has a large double

fire-place at one end, has a strongly ribbed circular segmental vault.

All the first-floor chambers of the west front, including Clifford’s

Tower, have plain barrel vaults. The lower chamber of Bulmer’s Tower

had till lately a richly groined vault of great strength and beauty.

The Hall Tower has both its lower stories vaulted; the first ribbed,

the second plain. The whole of this tower, inside and out, has been

wonderfully preserved. Vaults, windows, grilles, doorways, stairs,

garde-robes, all are nearly intact, and will bear careful examination.

It is really the most perfect thing in the place. The Chapel, all

mutilated as it is, still deserves notice. The Sanctuary, which forms

the central portion of a tower, has a boldly ribbed quadripartite

vault. Above it is a guard-chamber. Its exterior window, above the

eastern one of the Chapel, is marked by a very remarkable little

hanging machicoulis.

[Illustration: _Raby Castle, West Side._]

The entrance to Raby is by the Porter’s Lodge in the north-west portion

of the embattled outer wall. In this Lodge are found some family

relics; among others, the sword worn by Lord Barnard, son of the first

Earl of Darlington, at the battle of Fontenoy, where a bullet, striking

his sword, broke it, and then, glancing off, disabled its wearer. The

Gateway is flanked by two towers, each of which is surmounted by a

figure of a mail clad warrior.

The main entrance to the castle itself is on the west side, between

two towers. It is a long passage, with groined roof and traces of

portcullis; and carriages drive through this passage into the

Quadrangle, or Court-yard. Crossing this, and facing the main entrance

just alluded to, is the enormous doorway opening into the Great or

Entrance Hall. Through this doorway the carriages literally drive into

the mansion, and there set down the guests in the Hall itself, which

is of great size, with an arched roof, supported by eight octagonal

pillars in its centre. “When the brilliant gas above combines its glare

with that of two enormous fires, and the roof is echoing to the tramp

of horses and the roll of wheels, the visitor cannot but be struck

with the unusual entrance,” says a recent writer. In this Hall is hung

Turner’s famous picture of Raby Castle.

Above this Great Hall is the famous Baron’s Hall immortalised by

Wordsworth, where

“Seven hundred knights, retainers all

Of Neville, at the muster’s call,

Had sate together in Raby’s hall.”

This Hall, which is 126 feet long by 36 feet broad, is ceiled with

oak and contains a large number of family portraits; also “Interior

of an Artist’s Studio,” by Teniers, and portraits of Queen Elizabeth,

Cromwell, James II., and Frederick, Prince of Wales. The south end

of the room is modern, being built over the Octagon Drawing-room. A

staircase leads from the Baron’s Hall to the Chapel, renovated by the

second duke. Some of the windows are filled with stained glass by

Wailes; others with old German glass. The Chapel contains Murillo’s

“St. Catherine” and “The Saviour bearing the Cross.”

In most of the apartments of the castle are many fine pictures,

portraits and others, among which are the Duke of Cleveland, son of

Charles II.; Barbara Villiers, Duchess of Cleveland; Lady Barnard, wife

of Christopher, Lord Barnard; Harry, second Duke of Cleveland, in his

Garter robes; and the first Duke of Cleveland in his uniform as Colonel

of the Durham Militia. The Octagon Drawing-room, built by the second

duke, is, in all its details, a most elaborate and highly finished

apartment. The furniture is elegant. In this room is Hiram Powers’

celebrated statue of the “Greek Slave,” purchased by the second Duke of

Cleveland for £1,800.

The Kitchen is a fine specimen of mediæval architecture, and is

evidence of the lavish hospitality of a former age. “The enormous oven

would have baked bread for an army, and is described by Pennant as

being, in his time, used as a wine-cellar, ‘the sides being divided

into two parts, and each part holding a hogshead of wine in bottles.’”

It is not necessary for us to enter further into the details of the

interior arrangements of the castle. All we need say is, that the rooms

are fitted and furnished with all the appliances of Art which might be

expected in the home of so enlightened and so liberal-minded a nobleman

as his Grace the Duke of Cleveland.

Staindrop, closely adjoining Raby Park, is an interesting town, whose

Church contains many monuments to members of the noble families of

Nevil and Vane. The Church was restored in 1849. Among the monuments,

perhaps the most interesting are an altar-tomb, with recumbent

effigies, to Ralph Nevil, Earl of Westmoreland, and his two wives,

Margaret, daughter to Hugh, Earl of Stafford, and Joan, daughter to

John of Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster; and a monument in wood, with effigies

of Henry, fifth Earl of Westmoreland (1564), and his two wives. There

is also a magnificent white marble altar-tomb to the first Duke of

Cleveland, by Westmacott, the recumbent figure on which is beautifully

executed. In the chancel there is a monument, of exquisite design, in

the purest white marble, in memory of Sophia, Duchess of Cleveland

(wife of the second duke), who died in 1859. Within the altar-rails are

other monuments, including those of Henry, second Earl of Darlington,

who died in 1792; Margaret, Countess of Darlington, who died in 1800;

and Katharine Margaret, Countess of Darlington, who died in 1807. There

are also stained-glass windows in memory of Henry, second Duke of

Cleveland; one erected by the friends and tenants of the Duke, and the

other by Lady Augusta Powlett, his sister-in-law. A monumental brass of

chaste design, on the north side of the Church, preserves the memory of

William, third Duke of Cleveland. North of the Church is a Mausoleum,

erected by the second Duke of Cleveland, in which the remains of the

Duke and other members of the family repose.

CLIEFDEN.

OUR notice of “charming Cliefden” must necessarily be brief; not

because the “Stately Home” itself lacks of stateliness, of beauty, of

grandeur, or of interest; not because the episodes in its history are

“few and far between,” or devoid of incident; not because its glorious

situation and its picturesque surroundings present few features for the

pen to dwell upon, and the poetic or artistic mind to linger over; and

not because the genealogies of the families to which it has belonged

will not vie both in point of antiquity, in fame, and in noble and

illustrious actions with others; but simply because the space at our

disposal will admit only of words where we would gladly have written

paragraphs. In interest, in beauty, and picturesque surroundings,

Cliefden will bear favourable comparison with most others of our

series, while it yields to none in the loveliness, the romantic beauty,

and the attractiveness of its situation. To take only a cursory glance

at such a place is like peeping in at the door of a picture gallery,

without having time to note any of the treasures spread on its walls.

Cliefden, now one of the seats of his Grace the Duke of Westminster,

is situated in Buckinghamshire, and overlooks the river Thames in its

most attractive part. It is to Cliefden that the river here owes its

chief loveliness, but it is also to the river that Cliefden is indebted

for one of its principal attractions. From the Berkshire side of the

Thames the woods and the mansion form a magnificent scene, but it is

from the bosom of the stream that its beauties are best understood

and most enjoyed. “Cliefden runs along the summit of a lofty ridge

which overhangs the river. The outline of this ridge is broken in the

most agreeable way; the steep bank is covered with luxuriant foliage,

forming a hanging wood of great beauty, or in parts bare, so as to

increase the gracefulness of the foliage by the contrast; and the whole

bank has run into easy-flowing curves at the bidding of the noble

stream which washes its base. A few islands deck this part of the

river, and occasionally little tongues of land run out into it, or a

tree overhangs it, helping to give vigour to the foreground of the rich

landscape. From the summit the views are really magnificent; both up

and down the river they are of surpassing beauty. Looking over Windsor,

the eye ranges far away till it loses itself in the hazy distance, to

which the royal pile gives an aërial grace, while it adds majesty to

the whole view. Looking up the river towards Hedsor the charming seat

of Lord Boston, we have a prospect little less splendid, though of

a different character. A vast extent of country lies at one’s feet,

covered with dense wooded tracts, from which ever and anon peeps up an

old grey tower; and the blue smoke marks a secluded village, while the

glorious river winds away like a broad stream of molten silver.” The

immediate grounds, whether Thamesward or landward, are well laid out,

and present at every turn spots of beauty and loveliness not excelled

elsewhere.

[Illustration: _Cliefden._]

Speaking of the river scenery about Cliefden, Mr. Hall, in his “Book

of the Thames,” says, “Those who accuse our great island river of

insipidity, who, if they concede its claims to beauty, deny its

pretensions to grandeur, will do well to row beneath the thick

woods of Taplow and Cliefden, and, looking up, they will have no

difficulty in imagining themselves in one of the grandest and richest,

in picturesque attractions, of our English lakes; indeed, they will

require only the near and distant mountains to fancy themselves under

the heights of Glena, in all-beautiful Killarney. Well may we rejoice

to scan the charms of our glorious river, and ask the aid of Poetry

and Art to give them fame and power. But the painter will fail here.

He may select graceful nooks, and a thousand objects will, singly or

in groups, present themselves as fitting subjects for his pencil;

but he cannot convey to the eye and mind a just idea of the mingled

grandeur and beauty of this delicious locality; while the poet will

find only themes which have been, ever and everywhere, the chosen and

the favoured of his order. Those who row past these charming woods,

and note what has been done by taste, in association with wealth, to

render every part delightful, ascend any of the heights and examine the

‘prospect,’ near or distant, their enjoyment will be largely enhanced.

It is impossible, indeed, to exaggerate the beauty and harmony of the

foliage which everywhere surrounds us:—

‘Beautiful in various dyes,

The gloomy pine, the poplar blue,

The yellow beech, the sable yew,

The slender fir that taper grows.

The sturdy oak with broad-spread boughs;

And, beyond., the purple grove.

Haunt of Phyllis—Queen of Love!’

But there are here hundreds of other trees which the poet could

not commemorate, for they were unknown in England in his time. All

climes and countries have contributed to the wealth of foliage at

Cliefden—woods, lawns, and gardens are enriched by tributes from

every land to which enterprise has conducted British science to gather

treasures converted from exotics into subjects naturalised and ‘at

home.’”

Cliefden formerly belonged to the ancient family of Manfeld, of

Buckinghamshire, from whom it was purchased by the infamously

profligate George Villiers, second Duke of Buckingham, who built the

mansion, and expended large sums of money in laying out the grounds and

planting them with all the rarities of arboriculture he could procure.

He employed Archer, the architect, to design and erect the mansion, and

to adorn the grounds with alcoves and other buildings of a like nature.

[Illustration: _The Thames at Cliefden._]

The house was a commanding square structure, of three stories in

height, besides the terrace (440 feet long), and it had wings connected

with the main building by a colonnade. It was built of red brick, with

stone dressings. He furnished it in a sumptuous manner, and hung its

walls with fine tapestry and valuable pictures. Here the Duke brought

his mistress, the Countess of Shrewsbury, and here gave full bent to

his licentious habits. Thus Cliefden gained an unenviable notoriety,

and has been immortalised in song and in prose:—

“Gallant and gay, in Cliefden’s proud alcove,

The bower of wanton Shrewsbury and love.”

In 1667-8 the Duke had taken part in a singular triple duel about the

Countess, and had mortally wounded her husband by running him through

the body. Pepys thus wrote of this duel:—“January 17th. Much discourse

of the duell yesterday between the Duke of Buckingham, Holmes, and

one Jenkins, on one side, and my Lord of Shrewsbury, Sir John Talbot,

and one Bernard Howard, on the other side: and all about my Lady

Shrewsbury, who is at this time, and hath for a great while been, a

mistress to the Duke of Buckingham. And so her husband challenged him,

and they met yesterday in a close near Barne-Elmes, and there fought:

and my Lord Shrewsbury is run through the body, from the right breast

through the shoulder; and Sir John Talbot all along up one of his

armes; and Jenkins killed upon the place, and the rest all in a little

measure wounded.

[Illustration: _Cliefden: the Cottage._]

This will make the world think that the King hath good counsellors

about him, when the Duke of Buckingham, the greatest man about him,

is a fellow of no more sobriety than to fight about a mistress. And

this may prove a very bad accident to the Duke of Buckingham, but that

my Lady Castlemaine do rule all at this time as much as ever she did,

and she will, it is believed, keep all matters well with the Duke of

Buckingham; though this is a time that the King will be very backward,

I suppose, to appear in such a business. And it is pretty to hear how

the King had some notice of this challenge a week or two ago, and did

give it to my Lord Generall to confine the Duke, or take security that

he should not do any such thing as fight: and the Generall trusted to

the King that he, sending for him, would do it; and the King trusted

to the Generall. And it is said that my Lord Shrewsbury’s case is to

be feared that he may die too: and that may make it much worse for the

Duke of Buckingham: and I shall not be much sorry for it, that we may

have some sober man come in his room to assist in the Government.”

[Illustration: _Cliefden: the Summer Cottage._]

The Countess of Shrewsbury (the Duke’s mistress), who was Anna Maria,

daughter of Robert, Earl of Cardigan, is said to have held the Duke’s

horse, habited as a page, while the duel was being fought, and that

she thus not only saw her husband mortally wounded, but then went

home with the murderer, where she took him to her arms “in the shirt

covered with her husband’s blood.” The Duke was married to the Hon.

Mary Fairfax, daughter and heiress of Lord Fairfax, the Parliamentary

general—a woman of pure tastes and faultless habits—whom he

shamefully neglected. Pepys, under date the 15th of May, 1668, says, “I

am told also that the Countesse of Shrewsbury is brought home by the

Duke [the Earl had died of his wounds in March] of Buckingham to his

house, where his Duchesse, saying that it was not for her and the other

to live together in a house, he answered, ‘_Why, madam, I did think so,

and therefore have ordered your coach to be ready to carry you to your

father’s_;’ which was a devilish speech, but, they say, true; and my

Lady Shrewsbury is there, it seems.”

Large as was the income of the Duke, his profligacy, extravagance, and

immoralities so swallowed it up that he did not complete Cliefden, and

died in wretchedness; and but for the timely help of Lord Arran, a

few days before his decease, in abject poverty and loneliness. “There

is not,” wrote Lord Arran, “so much as one farthing towards defraying

the least expense;” and Pope, in one of his epistles to Lord Bathurst,

remarks—

“Behold! what blessings wealth to life can lend,

And see what comforts it affords our end!

In the worst inn’s worst room, with mat half-hung,

The floors of plaster, and the walls of dung,

On once a flock bed, but repaired with straw,

With tape-tied curtains, never meant to draw,

The George and Garter dangling from that bed,

Where tawdry yellow strove with dirty red,

Great Villiers lies—alas! how changed from him,

That life of pleasure, and that soul of whim,

Gallant and gay in Cliefden’s proud alcove,

Tho bower of wanton Shrewsbury and love;

Or just as gay at council in a ring

Of mimick’d statesmen and their merry king.

No wit to flatter, left off all his store;

No fool to laugh at, which he valued more;

There victor of his health, of fortune, friends,

And fame, this lord of useless thousands ends.”

Soon after the Duke’s death all his property, being deeply mortgaged,

was sold, but did not realise enough to pay his debts; and dying

without issue, “his titles, which had been undeservedly conferred on

his father, and only disgraced by himself, became extinct.”

Cliefden was purchased by Lord George Hamilton (fifth son of the Duke

of Hamilton), who was created Baron Dechemont of Linlithgow, Viscount

Kirkwall of Orkney, and Earl of Orkney, in 1696. His lordship completed

the mansion, and did much towards beautifying the grounds. Dying

without male issue in 1737, his eldest daughter, Anne, became Countess

of Orkney, and succeeded to the Cliefden estate. She, however, did

not reside here, but let it to H.R.H. Frederick, Prince of Wales,

father of King George III., who for many years made it his summer

residence. Here, at Cliefden, on the 1st of August, 1740, was first

performed Thomson and Mallet’s masque of _Alfred_, in which occurs

the ever-famous and patriotic “ode in honour of Great Britain,” “Rule

Britannia”—

“When Britain first, at Heav’n’s command,

Arose from out the azure main”—

the music of which was composed by Dr. Arne. It was, therefore, within

the walls of Cliefden that “Rule Britannia” was first heard, and this

gives it a literary interest of no small note. The masque in which

it formed so prominent a feature was prepared and given at Cliefden,

to commemorate the accession to the throne, in 1714, of King George

I. (grandfather of Frederick, Prince of Wales), and in honour of the

third birthday of his daughter, the young Princess Augusta. It was

repeated the following night, and soon became the most popular of all

compositions.

In 1795 the mansion (it is traditionally said through the carelessness

of a maid-servant reading a novel in bed) was totally destroyed by

fire, the wings, at some distance from the main building, being alone

saved; while nearly all the sumptuous furniture, pictures, and tapestry

were devoured by the flames. The estate was afterwards purchased by Sir

George Warrender, by whom the mansion, which had been left in ruins

since the fire, was rebuilt in 1830. After his death the estate was

sold by Sir George’s executors to his Grace the Duke of Sutherland,

and on the 15th of November, 1849 (the day of thanksgiving for the

cessation of the cholera), only a few months after its purchase, it was

again burned down.

In the following year, 1850, the Duke of Sutherland set about

rebuilding the mansion on a scale of princely magnificence, and having

engaged the services of Barry as architect, the present pile soon rose

from the ruins of the former buildings. The “centre portion, which is

a revival of the design for old Somerset House, now extends to the

wings, which, together with the terrace, are made to harmonize with

the new building.” The house and grounds, like Trentham, owe much of

their beauty and loveliness to the good taste of the Duke and Duchess,

the latter of whom, when a dowager, made it one of her favourite

residences. The interior of this “Stately Home” needs no particular

description. The rooms are, of course, one and all sumptuously

furnished with all the appliances of wealth and taste, and are lavish

in their attractions. It is truly a “home of beauty and of taste.”

Cliefden passed from the Duke of Sutherland to his daughter, the Lady

Constance Leveson-Gower, married to the present Duke of Westminster,

whose property this splendid domain is.

[Illustration: _The Principal Front._]

The family of Grosvenor, of which the present owner of Cliefden is

the illustrious head, is one of high antiquity, tracing, as it does,

in England, from the Norman conquest, when his grace’s ancestor came

over with William the Conqueror. The principal line of the Grosvenors

was seated at Hulme, in the hundred of Northwich, in Cheshire, and was

descended in direct line from Gilbert le Grosvenour, nephew of Hugh

Lupus, the Norman Earl Palatine of Chester, whom he accompanied to this

country. The name, it is said, was derived from _le Gros Venour_, from

the family having held the hereditary post of chief huntsman to the

Dukes of Normandy. This main line was extinct in the twenty-second year

of the reign of Henry VI., the line being continued by Ralph Grosvenor,

second son of Sir Thomas Grosvenor, of Hulme. He married Joan Eaton,

daughter and sole heiress of John Eaton, of Eaton, or Eton, in

Cheshire, Esq., early in the fifteenth century. In 1621-2 a baronetcy

was conferred on the representative of the family; and in 1676, Sir

Thomas Grosvenor having married Mary, sole daughter and heiress of

Alexander Davies, of Ebury, in the county of Middlesex, Esq., laid the

foundation of the immense wealth and rapidly increasing honours of the

Grosvenors.

In 1761 the then baronet, Sir Richard Grosvenor, was elevated to the

peerage by the title of Baron Grosvenor of Eaton, in Cheshire, and

in 1781 was advanced to the titles of Viscount Belgrave and Earl

Grosvenor. He married Henrietta, daughter of Henry Vernon, Esq., by

whom he had issue an only son, Robert Grosvenor. The Earl died in 1802,

and was succeeded by his son, Robert Grosvenor, as second earl.

This nobleman was born in 1767, and married, in 1794, the Lady Eleanor

Egerton, daughter of the first Earl of Wilton, by whom he had issue his

successor, Lord Richard, who became third earl and second marquis; Lord

Thomas, who became Earl of Wilton; and Lord Robert, M.P. In 1831 Earl

Grosvenor was advanced to the dignity of a marquis, by the title of

Marquis of Westminster being conferred upon him. He died in 1845, and

was succeeded by his eldest son—

Richard, second Marquis of Westminster and third Earl Grosvenor.

He was born in 1795, and in 1819 married the Lady Elizabeth Mary

Leveson-Gower, second daughter of the first Duke of Sutherland, and by

her had issue a family of four sons and nine daughters. His lordship,

dying in 1869, was succeeded by his eldest son, the present peer, Hugh

Lupus Grosvenor, in all his titles and estates, who, in 1874, was

created Duke of Westminster.

The present noble head of this illustrious family, his Grace, Hugh

Lupus, first Duke and third Marquis of Westminster, Earl Grosvenor,

Viscount Belgrave, Baron Grosvenor of Eaton, a Baronet, and a Knight

of the Garter, was born on the 13th of October, 1825, and succeeded

his father in 1869. His grace was educated at Eton and at Balliol

College, Oxford, and represented Chester in Parliament from 1847 to

1869, when he entered the Upper House. In 1852 his grace, then Marquis

of Westminster, married his cousin, the Lady Constance Leveson-Gower,

daughter of the second Duke of Sutherland, and sister of the present

noble owner of Trentham. By this union his grace has issue, living,

five sons and three daughters. These are—Victor Alexander, by courtesy

Marquis of Westminster, to whom (born in 1853) her Majesty the Queen

stood sponsor in person, who married, in 1874, the Lady Sibell Mary

Lumley, daughter of the Earl of Scarborough, by whom he has issue, and

is heir to the titles and estates; Lord Arthur Hugh Grosvenor, born in

1863; Lord Henry George Grosvenor, born in 1864; Lord Robert Edward

Grosvenor, born in 1869; Lord Gerald Richard Grosvenor, born in 1874;

the Lady Elizabeth Harriet, born in 1856; the Lady Beatrice Constance,

born in 1858; and the Lady Margaret Evelyn, born in 1873.

The Duke of Westminster is patron of eleven livings, four of which are

London churches; and his seats are Eaton Hall, Cheshire; Cliefden,

Buckinghamshire; Halkin, Flintshire; and the mansion in Upper Grosvenor

Street.

The Stately Homes of England · 第 50 / 58 段