Petherton was getting very worked-up, to judge from his reply:--

SIR,--I disapprove of your levity. This is a serious matter to me.

On your own showing George's behaviour is scandalous, and although I

should scarcely expect you to look at the matter in its proper light

I should have thought that even you would have interfered now that

matters have reached such a state. Your attitude is intolerable.

I am well able to protect the Government's secrets, and my movements

could be of little interest even to you, but I do not think the

society of your maids desirable for a young man like George. I

strongly suspect that they are having a bad influence over him. He is

becoming careless in his work.

I accidentally overheard him say, in conversation with the grocer's

man, that he was--to use his own expression--walking out with a Miss

Parsons. Is this either your parlour-maid or housemaid? or is it some

third person?

Yours faithfully,

FREDERICK PETHERTON.

DEAR OLD CHAP (I replied),--Thank you for your cheering letter. I

hope neither of us will say or do anything that would terminate this

exchange of letters, which is keeping me from dwelling too much on the

War.

Miss Parsons is our cook, as worthy a young woman as ever riveted an

apple-dumpling or tossed a custard. She would make George an excellent

wife. Don't worry about the parlour-maid or housemaid. They would, I

am sure, be delighted to be at the wedding.

Yours,

HARRY.

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 152, January 17, 1917 · 第 34 / 48 题