If the following pages might choose their own time and place they would

meet their reader not in the trolley-car or on the suburban train, but

in his own home, comfortably seated. For in order to justify the

eulogistic tone of the descriptions which must presently occupy them

their first word must be a conciliatory protest against hurry. One

reason we Americans garden so little is that we are so perpetually in

haste. The art of gardening is primarily a leisurely and gentle one.

And gentility still has some rights. Our Louisiana Creoles know this,

and at times maintain it far beyond the pales of their evergreen

gardens.

"'Step lively'?" one of them is said to have amazedly retorted in a New

York street-car. "No, the lady shall not step lively. At yo' leisure,

madame, entrez!" In New Orleans the conductors do not cry "Step lively!"

Right or wrong, the cars there are not absolutely democratic. Gentility

really enjoys in them a certain right to be treated gently.

If democracy could know its own tyrants it would know that one of them

is haste--the haste, the hurry of the crowd; that hurry whose cracking

whip makes every one a compulsory sharer in it. The street-car

conductor, poor lad, is not to blame. The fault is ours, many of us

being in such a scramble to buy democracy at any price that, as if we

were belatedly buying railway tickets, we forget to wait for our change.

Now one of this tyrant's human forms is a man a part of whose tyranny is

to call himself a gardener, though he knows he is not one, and the

symbol of whose oppression is nothing more or less than that germ enemy

of good gardening, the lawn-mower. You, if you know the gardening of our

average American home almost anywhere else, would see, yourself, how

true this is, were you in New Orleans. But you see it beautifully proved

not by the presence but by the absence of the tyranny. The lawn-mower

is there, of course; no one is going to propose that the lawn-mower

anywhere be abolished. It is one of our modern marvels of convenience, a

blessed release of countless human backs from countless hours of

crouching, sickle-shaped, over the sickle. It is not the tyrant, but

only like so many other instruments of beneficent democratic

emancipation, the tyrant's opportunity. A large part of its convenience

is expedition, and expedition is the easiest thing in the world to

become vulgarized; vulgarized it becomes haste, and haste is the tyrant.

Such arguing would sound absurdly subtle aimed against the uncloaked,

barefaced tyranny of the street-car conductor, but the tyranny of the

man with the lawn-mower is itself subtle, masked, and requires subtlety

to unmask it.

See how it operates. For so we shall be the better prepared for a

generous appreciation of those far Southern gardens whose beauty has

singled them out for our admiration. We know, of course, that the

"formal garden," by reason of its initial and continuing costliness,

is, and must remain, the garden of the wealthy few, and that the

gardening for the great democracy of our land, the kind that will make

the country at large a gardened land, is "informal," freehand,

ungeometrical gardening. In this sort, on whatever scale, whether of the

capitalist or of the cottager, the supreme feature is the lawn; the

lawn-mower puts this feature within the reach of all, and pretty nearly

every American householder has, such as it is, his bit of Eden.

But just in that happy moment the Tempter gets in. The garden's mistress

or master is beguiled to believe that one may have a garden without the

expense of a gardener and at the same time without any gardening

knowledge. The stable-boy, or the man-of-all-work, or the cook, or the

cottager himself, pushes the lawn-mower, and except for green grass, or

changeable brown and green, their bit of Eden is naked and is not

ashamed.

Or if ashamed, certain other beguilements, other masked democratic

tyrannies, entering, reassure it; bliss of publicity, contempt of

skill, and joy in machinery and machine results. An itinerant ignoramus

comes round with his own lawn-mower, the pushing of which he now makes

his sole occupation for the green half of the year, and the entire

length, breadth and thickness of whose wisdom is a wisdom not of the

lawn but only of the lawn-mower; how to keep its bearings oiled and its

knives chewing fine; and the lawn becomes staringly a factory product.

Then tyranny turns the screw again, and in the bliss of publicity and a

very reasonable desire to make the small home lot look as large as

possible, down come the fences, side and front, and the applauding

specialist of the lawn-mower begs that those obstructions may never be

set up again, because now the householder can have his lawn mowed so

much _quicker_, and he, the pusher, can serve more customers. Were he

truly a gardener he might know somewhat of the sweet, sunlit, zephyrous,

fragrant outdoor privacies possible to a real garden, and more or less

of that benign art which, by skilful shrubbery plantings, can make a

small place look much larger--as well as incomparably more

interesting--than can any mere abolition of fences, and particularly of

the street fence. But he has not so much as one eye of a genuine

gardener or he would know that he is not keeping your lawn but only

keeping it shaven. He is not even a good garden laborer. You might as

well ask him how to know the wild flowers as how to know the lawn

pests--dandelion, chickweed, summer-grass, heal-all, moneywort and the

like--with which you must reckon wearily by and by because he only mows

them in his blindness and lets them flatten to the ground and scatter

their seed like an infantry firing-line. Inquire of him concerning any

one of the few orphan shrubs he has permitted you to set where he least

dislikes them, and which he has trimmed clear of the sod--put into short

skirts--so that he may run his whirling razors under (and now and then

against) them at full speed. Will he know the smallest fact about it or

yield any echo of your interest in it?

There is a late story of an aged mother, in a darkened room, saying

falteringly to the kind son who has brought in some flowers which she

caresses with her soft touch, "I was wishing to-day--We used to have

them in the yard--before the lawn-mower--" and saying no more. I know it

for a fact, that in a certain cemetery the "Sons of the American

Revolution" have for years been prevented from setting up their modest

marks of commemoration upon the graves of Revolutionary heroes, because

they would be in the way of the sexton's lawn-mower.

Now in New Orleans the case is so different that really the amateur

gardener elsewhere has not all his rights until he knows why it is so

different. Let us, therefore, look into it. In that city one day the

present writer accosted an Irishman who stood, pruning-shears in hand,

at the foot of Clay's statue, Lafayette Square. It was the first week of

January, but beside him bloomed abundantly that lovely drooping jasmine

called in the books _jasminum multiflorum_.

"Can you tell me what shrub this is?"

"That, sor, is the _monthly flora!_ Thim as don't know the but-hanical

nayum sometimes calls it the stare jismin, but the but-hanical nayum is

the _monthly flora_."

The inquirer spoke his thanks and passed on, but an eager footfall

overtook him, his elbow felt a touch, and the high title came a third

time: "The but-hanical nayum is the _monthly flora_."

The querist passed on, warmed by a grateful esteem for one who, though

doubtless a skilled and frequent tinkler of the lawn-mower within its

just limitations, was no mere dragoon of it, but kept a regard for

things higher than the bare sod, things of grace in form, in bloom, in

odor, and worthy of "but-hanical nayum." No mere chauffeur he, of the

little two-wheeled machine whose cult, throughout the most of our land,

has all but exterminated ornamental gardening.

In New Orleans, where it has not conquered, there is no crowding for

room. A ten-story building is called there a sky-scraper. The town has

not a dozen in all, and not one of that stature is an apartment or

tenement house. Having felled her surrounding forests of cypress and

drained the swamps in which they stood, she has at command an open plain

capable of housing a population seven times her present three hundred

and fifty thousand, if ever she chooses to build skyward as other cities

do.

But this explains only why New Orleans _might_ have gardens, not why she

chooses to have them, and has them by thousands, when hundreds of other

towns that have the room--and the lawns--choose not to have the

shrubberies, vines and flowers, or have them without arrangement. Why

should New Orleans so exceptionally choose to garden, and garden with

such exceptional grace? Her house-lots are extraordinarily numerous in

proportion to the numbers of her people, and that is a beginning of the

explanation; but it is only a beginning. Individually the most of those

lots are no roomier than lots elsewhere. Thousands of them, prettily

planted, are extremely small.

The explanation lies mainly in certain peculiar limitations, already

hinted, of her--democracy! That is to say, it lies in her fences. Her

fences remain, her democracy is different from the Northern variety. The

difference may consist only in faults both there and here which we all

hope to see democracy itself one day eliminate; but the difference is

palpable. The fences mean that the dwellers behind them have never

accorded to each other, as neighbors, that liberty-to-take-liberties of

which Northern householders and garden-holders, after a

quarter-century's disappointing experiment, are a bit weary.

In New Orleans virtually every home, be it ever so proud or poor, has a

fence on each of its four sides. As a result the home is bounded by its

fences, not by its doors. Unpleasant necessities these barriers are

admitted to be, and those who have them are quite right in not liking

them in their bare anatomy. So they clothe them with shrubberies and

vines and thus on the home's true corporate bound the garden's profile,

countenance and character are established in the best way possible;

without, that is, any impulse toward embellishment _insulated_ from

utility. Compelled by the common frailties of all human nature (even in

a democracy) to maintain fortifications, the householder has veiled the

militant aspect of his defences in the flowered robes and garlandries of

nature's diplomacy and hospitality. Thus reassured, his own inner

hospitality can freely overflow into the fragrant open air and out upon

the lawn--a lawn whose dimensions are enlarged to both eye and mind,

inasmuch as every step around its edges--around its meandering shrubbery

borders--is made affable and entertaining by Flora's versatilities.

[Illustration: "In New Orleans the home is bounded by its fences, not by

its doors--so they clothe them with shrubberies and vines."

It is pleasant to notice how entirely the evergreen-vine-covered wall

preserves the general air of spaciousness. The forest tree at the front

and right (evergreen magnolia) is covered with an evergreen vine from

the turf to its branches.]

[Illustration: "The lawn ... lies clean-breasted, green-breasted, from

one shrub-and-flower-planted side to the other, along and across."

A common garden feature in New Orleans is the division fence with front

half of wire, rear half of boards, both planted out with shrubs. The

overhanging forest tree is the evergreen magnolia (_M. grandiflora_).]

At the same time, let us note in passing, this enlargement is partly

because the lawn--not always but very much oftener than where lawns go

unenclosed--lies clean-breasted, green-breasted, from one

shrub-and-flower-planted side to the other, along and across; free of

bush, statue, urn, fountain, sun-dial or pattern-bed, an uninterrupted

sward. Even where there are lapses from this delightful excellence they

often do not spoil, but only discount, more or less, the beauty of the

general scheme, as may be noted--if without offence we may offer it the

homage of criticism--in one of the gardens we have photographed [page

176] to illustrate these argumentations. There eight distinct

encumbrances narrow the sward without in the least adding to the

garden's abounding charm. The smallest effort of the reader's eye will

show how largely, in a short half-day's work, the fair scene might be

enhanced in lovely dignity simply by the elimination of these slight

excesses, or by their withdrawal toward the lawn's margins and into

closer company with the tall trees.

In New Orleans, where, even when there are basements, of which there are

many, the domains of the cook and butler are somewhere else, a nearly

universal feature of every sort of dwelling--the banker's on two or

three lots, the laborer's on half a one--is a paved walk along one side

of the house, between the house and the lawn, from a front gate to the

kitchen. Generally there is but the one front gate, facing the front

door, with a short walk leading directly up to this door. In such case

the rear walk, beginning at the front door-steps, turns squarely

along the house's front, then at its corner turns again as squarely to

the rear as a drill-sergeant and follows the dwelling's ground contour

with business precision--being a business path. In fact it is only the

same path we see in uncrowded town life everywhere in our land.

[Illustration: "There eight distinct encumbrances narrow the sward....

In a half-day's work, the fair scene might be enhanced in lovely dignity

by the elimination of these excesses."

The sky-line of this beautiful garden becomes a part of the garden

itself, a fact of frequent occurrence in New Orleans. The happy contrast

of rearmost oak and palm is also worthy of notice.]

But down there it shows this peculiarity, that it is altogether likely

to be well bordered with blooming shrubs and plants along all that side

of it next the lawn. Of course it is a fault that this shrubbery

border--and all the more so because it is very apt to be, as in three of

our illustrations [pages 174,178, 180], a rose border--should, so

often as it is, be pinched in between parallel edges. "No pinching" is

as good a rule for the garden as for the kindergarten. Manifestly, on

the side next the house the edge between the walk and the planted border

should run parallel with the base line of the house, for these are

business lines and therefore ever so properly lines of promptitude--of

the shortest practicable distance between two points--lines of supply

and demand, lines of need. For lines of need, business speed!

But for lines of pleasure, grace and leisure. It is the tactful office

of this shrubbery border to veil the business path from the lawn--from

the pleasure-ground. Therefore its _outside_, lawn-side edge should be a

line of pleasure, hence a line of grace, hence not a straight line (dead

line), nor yet a line of but one lethargic curve, but a line of suavity

and tranquil ongoing, a leisurely undulating line.

[Illustration: "The rear walk ... follows the dwelling's ground contour

with business precision--being a business path."]

Not to have it so is an error, but the error is an inoffensive one

easily corrected and the merit is that the dwelling's business path is

greenly, bloomingly screened from its pleasure-ground by a lovely

natural drapery which at the same time furnishes, as far as the path

goes, the house's robes of modesty. Indeed they are furnished farther

than the path goes; for no good work gathers momentum more readily than

does good gardening, and the householder, having begun so rightly, has

now nothing to do to complete the main fabric of his garden but to carry

this flow of natural draperies on round the domicile's back and

farther side and forward to its front again. Thus may he wonderfully

extenuate, even above its reach and where it does not conceal, the

house's architectural faults, thus winsomely enhance all its

architectural charm; like a sweet human mistress of the place, putting

into generous shadow all the ill, and into open sunshine all the best,

of a husband's strong character. (See both right and left foreground of

illustration on page 178, and right foreground on page 180.)

And now if this New Orleans idea--that enough private enclosure to

secure good home gardening is not incompatible with public freedom,

green lawns, good neighborship, sense of room and fulness of

hospitality, and that a house-lot which is a picture is worth more to

everybody (and therefore is even more democratic) than one which is

little else than a map--if this idea, we say, finds any credence among

sister cities and towns that may be able to teach the Creole city much

in other realms of art and criticism, let us cast away chalk and

charcoal for palette and brush and show in floral, arborescent, redolent

detail what is the actual pictorial excellence of these New Orleans

gardens.

For notwithstanding all their shut-in state, neither their virtues nor

their faults are hid from the passing eye. The street fence, oftenest of

iron, is rarely more than breast-high and is always an open fence.

Against its inner side frequently runs an evergreen hedge never taller

than the fence's top. Commonly it is not so tall, is always well clipped

and is so civil to strangers that one would wish to see its like on

every street front, though he might prefer to find it not so invariably

of the one sort of growth--a small, handsome privet, that is, which

nevertheless fulfils its office with the perfection of a solid line of

palace sentries. Unluckily there still prevails a very old-fashioned

tendency to treat the front fence as in itself ornamental and to

forget two things: First, that its nakedness is no part of its

ornamental value; that it would be much handsomer lightly

clothed--underclothed--like, probably, its very next neighbor;

clothed with a hedge, either close or loose, and generously kept below

the passer's line of sight. And, second, that from the householder's

point of view, looking streetward from his garden's inner depth, its

fence, when unplanted, is a blank interruption to his whole fair scheme

of meandering foliage and bloom which on the other three sides frames in

the lawn; as though the garden were a lovely stage scene with the fence

for footlights, and some one had left the footlights unlit.

[Illustration: "Thus may he wonderfully extenuate, even ... where it

does not conceal, the house's architectural faults."]

A lovely stage scene, we say, without a hint of the stage's unreality;

for the side and rear fences and walls, being frankly unornamental, call

for more careful management than the front and are often charmingly

treated. (Page 174.) (See, for an example of a side fence with front

half of wire and rear half of boards, page 174, and for solid walls,

pages 180 and 184.) Where they separate neighbors' front lawns they

may be low and open, but back of the building-line, being oftenest tight

and generally more than head-high, they are sure to be draped with such

climbing floral fineries as honeysuckles, ivies, jasmines white and

yellow, lantanas, roses or the Madeira vine. More frequently than not

they are planted also, in strong masses, with ever so many beautiful

sorts of firmer-stemmed growths, herbaceous next the sod, woody behind,

assembled according to stature, from one to twelve feet high, swinging

in and out around the lawn until all stiffness of boundaries is waved

and smiled away.

[Illustration: " ... a lovely stage scene without a hint of the stage's

unreality."

The beauty of this spot could be enhanced in ten minutes by taking away

the planted urns which stand like gazing children in the middle

of the background.]

In that first week of January already mentioned the present writer saw

at every turn, in such borders and in leaf and blossom, the delicate

blue-flowered plumbago; two or three kinds of white jasmine, also in

bloom; and the broad bush-form of the yellow jasmine, beginning to

flower. With them were blooming roses of a dozen kinds; the hibiscus

(not althaea but the _H. rosasinensis_ of our Northern greenhouses), slim

and tall, flaring its mallow-flowers pink, orange, salmon and deep red;

the trailing-lantana, covering broad trellises of ten feet in height and

with its drooping masses of delicate foliage turned from green to

mingled hues of lilac and rose by a complete mantle of their

blossoms. He saw the low, sweet-scented geraniums of lemon, rose and

nutmeg odors, persisting through the winter unblighted, and the

round-leaved, "zonal" sorts surprisingly large of growth--in one case,

on a division fence, trained to the width and height of six feet. There,

too, was the poinsettia still bending in its Christmas red, taller than

the tallest man's reach, often set too forthpushingly at the front, but

at times, with truer art, glowing like a red constellation from the

remoter bays of the lawn; and there, taller yet, the evergreen _Magnolia

fuscata_, full of its waxen, cream-tinted, inch-long flowers smelling

delicately like the banana. He found the sweet olive, of refined leaf

and minute axillary flowers yielding their ravishing tonic odor with the

reserve of the violet; the pittosporum; the box; the myrtle; the

camphor-tree with its neat foliage answering fragrantly the grasp of the

hand. The dark camellia was there, as broad and tall as a lilac-bush,

its firm, glossy leaves of the deepest green and its splendid red

flowers covering it from tip to sod, one specimen showing by count a

thousand blossoms open at once and the sod beneath innumerably starred

with others already fallen. The night jasmine, in full green, was not

yet in blossom but it was visibly thinking of the spring. The Chinese

privet, of twenty feet stature, in perennial leaf, was saving its

flowers for May. The sea-green oleander, fifteen feet high and wide (see

extreme left foreground, page 176), drooped to the sward on four sides

but hoarded its floral cascade for June. The evergreen loquat (locally

miscalled the mespilus plum) was already faltering into bloom; also the

orange, with its flower-buds among its polished leaves, whitening for

their own wedding; while high over them towered the date and other

palms, spired the cedar and arborvitae, and with majestic infrequency,

where grounds were ample, spread the lofty green, scintillating boughs

of the magnolia grandiflora (see left foregrounds on pages 174, 182

and 184), the giant, winter-bare pecan and the wide, mossy arms of the

vast live-oak.

[Illustration: "Back of the building-line the fences ... generally more

than head-high ... are sure to be draped."]

[Illustration: " ... from the autumn side of Christmas to the summer

side of Easter."

In any garden as fair as this there should be some place to sit down.

This deficiency is one of the commonest faults in American gardening.]

Now while the time of year in which these conditions are visible

heightens their lovely wonder, their practical value to Northern

home-lovers is not the marvel and delight of something inimitable but

their inspiring suggestion of what may be done with ordinary Northern

home grounds, to the end that the floral pageantry of the Southern

January may be fully rivalled by the glory of the Northern June.

For of course the Flora of the North, who in the winter of long white

nights puts off all her jewelry and nearly all her robes and "lies down

to pleasant dreams," is the blonde sister of, and equal heiress with,

this darker one who, in undivested greenery and flowered trappings,

persists in open-air revelry through all the months from the autumn side

of Christmas to the summer side of Easter. Wherefore it seems to me the

Northern householder's first step should be to lay hold upon this New

Orleans idea in gardening--which is merely by adoption a New Orleans

idea, while through and through, except where now and then its votaries

stoop to folly, it is by book a Northern voice, the garden gospel of

Frederick Law Olmsted.

The Amateur Garden · 第 7 / 8 段