CHAPTER VI.

THE PÁSUPATA SYSTEM OF NAKULÍSA.

Certain Máhesvaras disapprove of this doctrine of the Vaishnavas known

by its technicalities of the servitude of souls and the like, inasmuch

as bringing with it the pains of dependence upon another, it cannot be

a means of cessation of pain and other desired ends. They recognise as

stringent such arguments as, Those depending on another and longing

for independence do not become emancipated, because they still depend

upon another, being destitute of independence like ourselves and

others; and, Liberated spirits possess the attributes of the Supreme

Deity, because at the same time, that they are spirits they are free

from the germ of every pain as the Supreme Deity is. Recognising these

arguments, these Máhesvaras adopt the Pásupata system, which is

conversant about the exposition of five categories, as the means to

the highest end of man. In this system the first aphorism is: Now then

we shall expound the Pásupata union and rites of Pasupati. The meaning

is as follows:--The word _now_ refers to something antecedent, and

this something antecedent is the disciple's interrogation of the

spiritual teacher. The nature of a spiritual teacher is explicated in

the Ganakáriká:--

"But there are eight pentads to be known, and a group, one

with three factors;

"He that knows this ninefold aggregate is a self-purifier, a

spiritual guide.

"The acquisitions, the impurities, the expedients, the

localities, the perseverance, the purifications,

"The initiations, and the powers, are the eight pentads; and

there are three functions."

The employment in the above line of the neuter numeral three

(_tríni_), instead of the feminine three (_tisrah_), is a Vedic

construction.

(_a._) Acquisition is the fruit of an expedient while realising, and

is divided into five members, viz., knowledge, penance, permanence of

the body, constancy, and purity. Thus Haradattáchárya says: Knowledge,

penance, permanence, constancy, and purity as the fifth.

(_b._) Impurity is an evil condition pertaining to the soul. This is

of five kinds, false conception and the rest. Thus Haradatta also

says:--

"False conception, demerit, attachment, interestedness, and

falling,

"These five, the root of bondage, are in this system

especially to be shunned."

(_c._) An expedient is a means of purifying the aspirant to

liberation.

These expedients are of five kinds, use of habitation, and the rest.

Thus he also says:--

"Use of habitation, pious muttering, meditation, constant

recollection of Rudra,

"And apprehension, are determined to be the five expedients

of acquirements."

(_d._) Locality is that by which, after studying the categories, the

aspirant attains increase of knowledge and austerity, viz., spiritual

teachers and the rest. Thus he says:--

"The spiritual teachers, a cavern, a special place, the

burning-ground, and Rudra only."

(_e._) Perseverance is the endurance in one or other of these pentads

until the attainment of the desired end, and is distributed into the

differenced and the rest. Thus it is said:--

"The differenced, the undifferenced, muttering, acceptance,

and devotion as the fifth."

(_f._) Purification is the putting away, once for all, of false

conception and the other four impurities. It is distributed into five

species according to the five things to be put away. Thus it is said--

"The loss of ignorance, of demerit, of attachment, of

interestedness,

"And of falling, is declared to be the fivefold purification

of the state of bondage."

(_g._) The five initiations are thus enumerated:--

"The material, the proper time, the rite, the image, and the

spiritual guide as the fifth."

(_h._) The five powers are as follow:--

"Devotion to the spiritual guide, clearness of intellect,

conquest of pleasure and pain,

"Merit and carefulness, are declared the five heads of

power."

The three functions are the modes of earning daily food consistent

with propriety, for the diminution of the five impurities, viz.,

mendicancy, living upon alms, and living upon what chance supplies.

All the rest is to be found in the standard words of this sect.

In the first aphorism above recited, the word _now_ serves to

introduce the exposition of the termination of pain (or emancipation),

that being the object of the interrogation about the putting away of

pain personal, physical, and hyperphysical. By the word _pasu_ we are

to understand the effect (or created world), the word designating that

which is dependent on something ulterior. By the word _pati_ we are to

understand the cause (or _principium_), the word designating the Lord,

who is the cause of the universe, the _pati_, or ruler. The meaning of

the words sacrifices and rites every one knows.

In this system the cessation of pain is of two kinds, impersonal and

personal. Of these, the impersonal consists in the absolute

extirpation of all pains; the personal in supremacy consisting of the

visual and active powers. Of these two powers the visual, while only

one power, is, according to its diversity of objects, indirectly

describable as of five kinds, vision, audition, cogitation,

discrimination, and omniscience. Of these five, vision is cognition of

every kind of visual, tactual, and other sensible objects, though

imperceptible, intercepted, or remote. Audition is cognition of

principles, conversant about all articulate sounds. Cogitation is

cognition of principles, conversant about all kinds of thoughts.

Discrimination is cognition of principles conversant about the whole

system of institutes, according to the text and according to its

significance. Omniscience is cognition of principles ever arising and

pervaded by truth, relative to all matters declared or not declared,

summary or in detail, classified and specialised. Such is this

intellectual power.

The active power, though one only, is indirectly describable as of

three kinds, the possession of the swiftness of thought, the power of

assuming forms at will, and the faculty of expatiation. Of these, the

possession of the swiftness of thought is ability to act with

unsurpassable celerity. The power of assuming forms at will is the

faculty of employing at pleasure, and irrespective of the efficacy of

works, the organs similar and dissimilar of an infinity of organisms.

The faculty of expatiation is the possession of transcendent supremacy

even when such organs are not employed. Such is this active power.

All that is effected or educed, depending on something ulterior, it is

threefold, sentiency, the insentient, and the sentient. Of these,

sentiency is the attribute of the sentients. It is of two degrees

according to its nature as cognitive or incognitive. Cognitive

sentiency is dichotomised as proceeding discriminately and as

proceeding indiscriminately. The discriminate procedure, manifestable

by the instruments of knowledge, is called the cogitative. For by the

cogitant organ every sentient being is cognisant of objects in

general, discriminated or not discriminated, when irradiated by the

light which is identical with the external things. The incognitive

sentiency, again, is either characterised or not characterised by the

objects of the sentient soul.

The insentient, which while unconscious is dependent on the conscious,

is of two kinds, as styled the effect and as styled the cause. The

insentient, styled the effect, is of ten kinds, viz., the earth and

the other four elements, and their qualities, colour, and the rest.

The insentient, called the causal insentient, is of thirteen kinds,

viz., the five organs of cognition, the five organs of action, and the

three internal organs, intellect, the egoising principle, and the

cogitant principle, which have for their respective functions

ascertainment, the illusive identification of self with not-self, and

determination.

The sentient spirit, that to which transmigratory conditions pertain,

is also of two kinds, the appetent and non-appetent. The appetent is

the spirit associated with an organism and organs; the non-appetent is

the spirit apart from organism and organs. The details of all this are

to be found in the Pañchártha-bháshyadípiká and other works. The cause

is that which retracts into itself and evolves the whole creation.

This though one is said to be divided according to a difference of

attributes and actions (into Mahesvara, Vishnu, &c.) The Lord is the

possessor of infinite, visual, and active power. He is absolutely

first as connected eternally with this lordship or supremacy, as

possessing a supremacy not adventitious or contingent. This is

expounded by the author of the Ádarsa, and other institutional

authorities.

Union is a conjunction of the soul with God through the intellect, and

is of two degrees, that characterised by action, and that

characterised by cessation of action. Of these, union characterised by

action consists of pious muttering, meditation, and so forth; union

characterised by cessation of action is called consciousness, &c.

Rite or ritual is activity efficacious of merit as its end. It is of

two orders, the principal and the subsidiary. Of these, the principal

is the direct means of merit, religious exercise. Religious exercise

is of two kinds, acts of piety and postures. The acts of piety are

bathing with sand, lying upon sand, oblations, mutterings, and

devotional perambulation. Thus the revered Nakulísa says:--

"He should bathe thrice a day, he should lie upon the dust.

Oblation is an observance divided into six members."

Thus the author of the aphorisms says:--

"He should worship with the six kinds of oblations, viz.,

laughter, song, dance, muttering _hum_, adoration, and pious

ejaculation."

Laughter is a loud laugh, Aha, Aha, by dilatation of the throat and

lips. Song is a celebration of the qualities, glories, &c., of

Mahesvara, according to the conventions of the Gandharva-sástra, or

art of music. The dance also is to be employed according to the _ars

saltatoria_, accompanied with gesticulations with hands and feet, and

with motions of the limbs, and with outward indications of internal

sentiment. The ejaculation _hum_ is a sacred utterance, like the

bellowing of a bull, accomplished by a contact of the tongue with the

palate, an imitation of the sound _hudung_, ascribed to a bull, like

the exclamation Vashat. Where the uninitiated are, all this should be

gone through in secret. Other details are too familiar to require

exposition.

The postures are snoring, trembling, limping, wooing, acting absurdly,

talking nonsensically. Snoring is showing all the signs of being

asleep while really awake. Trembling is a convulsive movement of the

joints as if under an attack of rheumatism. Limping is walking as if

the legs were disabled. Wooing is simulating the gestures of an

_innamorato_ on seeing a young and pretty woman. Acting absurdly is

doing acts which every one dislikes, as if bereft of all sense of what

should and what should not be done. Talking nonsensically is the

utterance of words which contradict each other, or which have no

meaning, and the like.

The subsidiary religious exercise is purificatory subsequent ablution

for putting an end to the sense of unfitness from begging, living on

broken food, &c. Thus it is said by the author of the aphorisms:

Bearing the marks of purity by after-bathing.

(It has been stated above that omniscience, a form of the cognitive

power, is cognition of principles ever arising and pervaded by truth,

relative to all matters declared or not declared, summary, or in

detail). The summary is the enouncement of the subjects of attributes

generally. This is accomplished in the first aphorism: (Now then we

shall expound the Pásupata union and rites of Pasupati). Detail is the

fivefold enouncement of the five categories according to the

instruments of true knowledge. This is to be found in the

Rásíkara-bháshya. Distribution is the distinct enouncement of these

categories, as far as possible according to definitions. It is an

enumeration of these according to their prevailing characters,

different from that of other recognised systems. For example, the

cessation of pain (or emancipation) is in other systems (as in the

Sankhya) the mere termination of miseries, but in this system it is

the attainment of supremacy or of the divine perfections. In other

systems the create is that which has become, and that which shall

become, but in this system it is eternal, the spirits, and so forth,

the sentient and insentient. In other systems the _principium_ is

determined in its evolution or creative activity by the efficacy of

works, whereas in this system the _principium_ is the Lord not thus

determined. In other institutes union results in isolation, &c., while

in these institutes it results in cessation of pains by attainment of

the divine perfections. In other systems paradise and similar spheres

involve a return to metempsychosis, but in this system they result in

nearness to the Supreme Being, either followed or not followed by

such return to transmigratory experiences.

Great, indeed, an opponent may say, is this aggregate of illusions,

since if God's causality be irrespective of the efficacy of works,

then merits will be fruitless, and all created things will be

simultaneously evolved (there being no reason why this should be

created at one time, and that at another), and thus there will emerge

two difficulties. Think not so, replies the Pásupata, for your

supposition is baseless. If the Lord, irrespective of the efficacy of

works, be the cause of all, and thus the efficacy of works be without

results, what follows? If you rejoin that an absence of motives will

follow, in whom, we ask, will this absence of motives follow? If the

efficacy of works be without result, will causality belong to the doer

of the works as to the Lord? It cannot belong to the doer of the

works, for it is allowed that the efficacy of works is fruitful only

when furthered by the will of the creator, and the efficacy so

furthered may sometimes be fruitless, as in the case of the works of

Yayáti, and others. From this it will by no means follow that no one

will engage in works, for they will engage in them as the husbandman

engages in husbandry, though the crop be uncertain. Again, sentient

creatures engage in works because they depend on the will of the

creator. Nor does the causality pertain to the Lord alone, for as all

his desires are already satisfied, he cannot be actuated by motives to

be realised by works. As for your statement, continues the Pásupata,

that all things will be simultaneously evolved, this is unreasonable,

inasmuch as we hold that causal efficiency resides in the unobstructed

active power which conforms itself to the will of the Lord, whose

power is inconceivable. It has accordingly been said by those versed

in sacred tradition:--

"Since he, acting according to his will, is not actuated by

the efficacy of works,

"For this reason is he in this system the cause of all

causes."

Some one may urge: In another system emancipation is attained through

a knowledge of God, where does the difference lie? Say not so, replies

the Pásupata, for you will be caught in a trilemma. Is the mere

knowledge of God the cause of emancipation, or the presentation, or

the accurate characterisation, of God? Not the mere knowledge, for

then it would follow that the study of any system would be

superfluous, inasmuch as without any institutional system one might,

like the uninstructed, attain emancipation by the bare cognition that

Mahádeva is the lord of the gods. Nor is presentation or intuition of

the deity the cause of emancipation, for no intuition of the deity is

competent to sentient creatures burdened with an accumulation of

various impurities, and able to see only with the eyes of the flesh.

On the third alternative, viz., that the cause of emancipation is an

accurate characterisation of the deity, you will be obliged to consent

to our doctrine, inasmuch as such accurate characterisation cannot be

realised apart from the system of the Pásupatas. Therefore it is that

our great teacher has said:--

"If by mere knowledge, it is not according to any system,

but intuition is unattainable;

"There is no accurate characterisation of principles

otherwise than by the five categories."

Therefore those excellent persons who aspire to the highest end of man

must adopt the system of the Pásupatas, which undertakes the

exposition of the five categories.

A. E. G.

The Sarva-Darsana-Samgraha Or, Review of the Different Systems of Hindu Philosophy · 第 6 / 16 章