CHAPTER XIX

ARTILLERY DUELS

With the beginning of May, the weather became warmer and the rain and

watersoaked roads more accessible. In spite of this, however,

conditions along the eastern front throughout the entire month of May

were very much the same as during April. Continuously the guns on both

sides thundered against each other, with a fairly well-maintained

intensity which, however, would increase from time to time in some

places. Frequently, almost daily, infantry attacks, usually preceded

by artillery preparation, would be launched at various points. These,

however, were almost all of local character and executed by

comparatively small forces. Even smaller detachments, frequently

hardly more than scouting parties, often would reach the opponent's

lines, but only rarely succeed in capturing trenches, and then usually

were soon forced to retire to their own lines in the face of

successive counterattacks. Again in May the story of events on the

eastern front is lacking in sensational movements, accompanied by

equally unsensational success or failure. But, nevertheless, it is on

both sides a story of unceasing activity, of unending labor, of

unremitting toil, of endless suffering, of unlimited heroism, and of

unsurpassed courage, the more so, because much of all that was

accomplished was counted only as part of the regular daily routine,

and lacked both the incentive and the reward of widespread publicity,

which more frequently attaches to military operations of more

extensive character. Not for years to come will it be possible to

write a detailed history of this phase of the Great War as far as the

eastern front is concerned. Not until the regimental histories of the

various Russian, German and Austro-Hungarian military units will have

been completed will it become practicable to recount all the uncounted

deeds of valor accomplished by heroes whose names and deeds now must

remain unknown to the world at large, even though both perchance have

been for months and months on the lips of equally brave comrades in

arms.

The new month was opened by the Germans with another intensive

artillery bombardment of the Uxkull bridgehead. Farther to the south,

before Dvinsk, and also at many points in the Lake district to the

south of this fortress, the Russian positions likewise were raked by

violent gunfire. An attempted offensive movement on the extreme

northern end of the line before Raggazem, on the Gulf of Riga, broke

down before the Russian gunfire, even before it was fully developed.

German naval airships successfully bombarded Russian military depots

at Perman, while another squadron of sea planes inflicted considerable

damage to the Russian aerodrome at Papenholm. A Russian squadron was

less successful in an attack on the German naval establishment at

Vindau on the east shore of the Baltic Sea.

May 2, 1916, brought a continuation of artillery activity at many

points. It was especially intensive in the Jacobstadt and Dvinsk

sectors of the Dvina front, as well as in the Ziriu-Baranovitchy

sector in the south and along the Oginski Canal, still farther to the

south. At two other points the Germans, after extensive artillery

preparation, attempted to launch infantry attacks, but were promptly

driven back. This occurred near the village of Antony, ten miles

northwest of Postavy, where two successive attacks failed, and farther

north in the region east of Vidzy.

The following day again was devoted to artillery duels at many points.

Aeroplanes, also, became more active. German planes bombarded many

places south of Dvinsk, and attacked the railway establishments at

Molodetchna, on the Vilna-Minsk railway, at Minsk, and at Luniniets,

in the Pripet Marshes, east of Pinsk on the Pinsk-Gomel railway. May

4, 1916, brought especially intensive artillery fire along the entire

Dvina front, in the Krevo sector south of the Vilna-Minsk railway, and

along the Oginski Canal, particularly in the region of Valistchie.

The Dvina front along its entire length was once more the subject of a

violent artillery attack from German batteries on May 5, 1916. Uxkull,

so many times before the aim of the German fire, again received

special attention. The Friedrichstadt sector, too, came in for its

share. All along this front aeroplanes not only guided the gunfire,

but supported it extensively by dropping bombs. Between Jacobstadt and

Dvinsk a Russian battery succeeded in reaching a German munition depot

and with one well-placed hit caused havoc among men and munitions.

Southeast of Lake Med a surprise attack, carried out by comparatively

small Russian forces, resulted in the capture of some German trenches.

Northwest of Krochin strong German forces, after artillery preparation

lasting over three hours, attacked the village of Dubrovka. Some

ground was gained, only to be lost again shortly after as a result of

a ferocious counterattack made by Russian reenforcements which had

been brought up quickly.

May 6, 1916, brought a slightly new variation in fighting. Russian

torpedo boats appeared in the Gulf of Riga, off the west coast, and

bombarded, without success, the two towns of Rojen and Margrafen.

Artillery fire of considerable violence marked the next day, May 7,

1916. Russian batteries before Dvinsk caused a fire at Ill, the little

town just northwest of Dvinsk on the Dvinsk-Ponevesh railway, and so

well was this bombardment maintained that the Germans were unable to

extinguish the conflagration before it had reached some of their

munition depots. In the early morning hours very violent gunfire was

directed south of Illuxt. But an infantry attack, for which this

bombardment was to act as preparation, failed. Other bombardments were

directed against Lake Ilsen and the sector north of it, and against

the region south of the village of Vishnieff on the Beresina River.

Mining operations of considerable extent were carried out that night

near the village of Novo Selki, south of the town of Krevo. On May 8,

1916, artillery fire again roared along the Dvina front, especially

against the Uxkull bridgehead. An attack in force was made by German

troops against the village of Peraplianka north of Smorgon on the

Viliya May 9, 1916. After considerable artillery preparation the

Germans rushed up against the Russian barbed-wire obstacles. There,

however, they were stopped by concentrated artillery and rifle fire

and, after heavy losses, had to withdraw. A Russian attack of a

similar nature south of Garbunovka was not any more successful. In the

Pripet Marshes, too, artillery operations had by now become possible

again and the Russian positions west of the village of Pleshichitsa,

southeast of Pinsk, were subjected to a violent bombardment.

Throughout the balance of May not a day passed during which guns of

all calibers did not maintain a violent bombardment at many points

along the entire front. Especially frequent and severe was the gunfire

which the Germans directed against the Dvina sector of the Russian

positions. But, just as in the past weeks, the result, though not at

all negligible as far as the damage inflicted on men, material, and

fortifications was concerned, was practically nil in regard to any

change in the location of the front.

Infantry attacks during this period were not lacking, though they were

less frequent than artillery bombardments, and were at all times only

of local character, and in most cases executed with limited forces. A

great deal of this kind of fighting occurred in the region of Olyka

where engagements took place almost every day. One of the few more

important events was a German attack against the Jacobstadt sector of

the Dvina front. For two days, May 10 and 11, 1916, the fighting

continued, becoming especially violent to the north of the railway

station of Selburg on the Mitau-Kreutzburg railway. There very heavy

artillery fire succeeding the infantry attacks had destroyed some

small villages for the possession of which the most furious kind of

hand-to-hand fighting ensued. Finally the Germans captured by storm

about 500 yards of the Russian positions as well as some 300 unwounded

soldiers and a few machine guns and mine throwers.

Engagements of a similar character, though not always yielding such

definite results to either side, occurred on May 11, 1916, southwest

of Lake Medum, on May 12, 1916, at many points along the Oginski Canal

and also in the Pripet Marshes, where fighting now had again become a

physical possibility. On the latter day a Russian attempt to recapture

the positions lost previously near Selburg failed.

Thus the fortunes of war swayed from side to side. One day would bring

to the Germans the gain of a trench, the capture of a few hundred men

or guns, or the destruction of an enemy battery, to be followed the

next day by a proportionate loss. So closely was the entire line

guarded, so strongly and elaborately had the trenches and other

fortifications been built up, that the fighting developed into a

multitude of very short but closely contested engagements. In each one

of these the numbers engaged were very small, though the grand total

of men fighting on a given day at so many separate points on a front

of some 500 miles was, of course, still immense.

Amongst the places which saw the most fighting during this period were

many which had been mentioned a great many times before. Again and

again there appeared in the official records such names as: Lake

Sventen, Krevno, Lake Miadziol, Ostroff, Lake Narotch, Smorgon, Dahlen

Island, and many others.

The net result of all the fighting during May, 1916, was that both

sides lost considerable in men and material. Both Russians and

Germans, however, had succeeded in maintaining their respective lines

in practically the same position in which they had been at the

beginning of May.

The Story of the Great War, Volume 5 Battle of Jutland Bank; Russian Offensive; Kut-El-Amara; East Africa; Verdun; The Great Somme Drive; United States and Belligerents; Summary of Two Years' War · 第 6 / 19 章