WINCHESTER'S OPPORTUNITY.

War legislation has pressed hard on many callings, and on none more

than that of the architect. But the embargo has been lifted; the

ancient art is coming to its own again, and it is of happy omen

that the new President of the Royal Academy has been chosen from the

architects. In this context we welcome the stimulating article in a

recent issue of _The Times_ _à propos_ of the Winchester War Memorial.

"Are we never," asks the writer, "to take risks in our architecture?"

and his answer, briefly summed up, is "Perish the thought. _De

l'audace, encore de l'audace, toujours de l'audace._" It is, of

course, a pity that the Winchester War Memorial scheme has not met

with the unanimous approval of Wykehamists. Possibly they have reason,

for while adding a new cloister, a new gateway and a new hall to

the existing school buildings, it involves the pulling down of the

Quingentenary Memorial Building, erected some twenty years ago, and

of some old houses in Kingsgate Street. Some consider such a drastic

destruction to be unfortunate, but, says _The Times_, it is "necessary

if any scheme worthy of the occasion is to be carried out." Moreover

it is proposed to re-erect the Quingentenary Memorial on a new site,

"where it will certainly look as well as ever."

The greatest event in our history, as the writer finely observes,

cannot be worthily commemorated by any timid compromise. Winchester

has set a splendid example, but it is perhaps too much to expect

that it will be followed by London, owing to the inevitable clash of

conflicting interests in our unwieldy metropolis. The erection of

a new Pantheon on the site of St. Paul's and the removal of WREN'S

massive but _démodé_ structure to Hampstead Heath, where it would

certainly look as well as ever, is, we fear, however much _The Times_

may desire it, beyond the range of practical politics. But example is

infectious, and if only the Winchester authorities would expand their

scheme and carry it out with Dantonesque audacity to its full logical

conclusion, other towns and cities might ultimately fall into line.

Winchester Cathedral, as we need hardly remind our readers, has only

been rescued from subsidence and collapse at an immense cost by a

lavish use of the resources of modern engineering. The building itself

is not without merits, but its site is inconspicuous and the swampy

nature of the soil is a constant menace to its durability. The scheme

which we venture with all humility to suggest is that it should be

removed and re-erected, in the same spirit though in the architectural

language of our own day, on the summit of St. Catherine's Hill,

where it would look better than ever, and be connected by a scenic

neo-Gothic railway with Meads. This would not only add to the

amenities of the landscape, but enable the present cathedral site to

be utilized for a purpose more in consonance with the needs of the

age. We do not presume to dictate, but may point out that if the

deanery and the canons' houses were pulled down and re-erected on the

golf-links, where they would look better than ever, space would be

available for a majestic aerodrome, or, better still, an experimental

water-stadium for submarines, in memory of KING ALFRED, the founder of

our Fleet.

Into the question of details, design and cost it is not for us to

enter. We confine ourselves to appealing with all the force at our

command to Winchester, fortunate, as _The Times_ reminds us, in the

choice of an architect of genius and ingenuity, to persevere, to

rise to the occasion, to cast compromise to the winds and above all

to remember that the greatest compliment which can be paid to the

architects of the past is to remove their buildings to sites where

they look better than ever and do not suffer from the immediate

neighbourhood of the masterpieces of their successors. Architecture

has been defined as "frozen music." But on great occasions such as

this it needs to be taken out of its cold-storage and judiciously

thawed.

* * * * *

[Illustration: THE SOFT ANSWER.

_Navvy_ (_to person who has accidentally bumped him_). "GO TO

BLANKETY--BLANK--BLANK--BLAZES."

_Person_. "GENTLE STRANGER, YOUR LIGHTEST WISH, EXPRESSED IN SUCH

COURTEOUS LANGUAGE, IS TO ME A COMMAND."

(_Ambulance call_.)]

* * * * *

"Lost, sulky inflate."--_Glasgow Citizen_.

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 156, February 5, 1919 · 第 24 / 31 题