WRITTEN A HUNDRED YEARS HENCE.

(_FROM A COLLECTION OF COMMUNICATIONS SUPPLIED BY OUR PROPHETIC

COMPILER._)

DEAR MR. PUNCH,--Forgive me for addressing you, but the urgency of

the occasion warrants the intrusion. A hundred years since, the old

Fighting _Foudroyant_ was sold by the Admiralty to be broken up. The

moment the Public of the Period learned the cruel fact through the

customary sources of information, they flew to the rescue. Headed by

the then LORD MAYOR, they raised a fund to bring back the discarded

vessel, and yet in those distant days there were they who denied

that the _Foudroyant_ had ever done anything in particular. And now

we propose doing the same thing. On the Thames there is an ancient

steamboat called _Citizen Z_, that once belonged to the Company that

started penny river lifts. It is certainly rather out of date, but is

full of historical memories. It is said that the Cabinet travelled

to Greenwich on its venerable boards, where they feasted on the

half-forgotten Whitebait, and the entirely, superseded Champagne. It

has carried, at one time or another, all the nobility to Rosherville,

there to spend (as the old saying went) "a happy day," and yet it is

proposed to break it up! Out upon the thought! Have we no veneration

for our relics of the past? Cannot we appreciate a boat that should

have had an honoured place in the Museum at Woolwich? Do not let this

act of Vandalism be done. Save the steamer for the sake of its past.

Yours truly, A REAR-ADMIRAL.

_H.M.S. Electric-Balloon, Skye._

DEAR MR. PUNCH,--I appeal to you, and I know I shall not appeal in

vain. The picturesque Cabman's Shelter in the middle of Piccadilly is

threatened! I hope you will exert your influence to preserve it. It

absolutely teems with historical associations. Lord RANDOLPH CHURCHILL

is supposed to have used it for writing his famous letter on the

Poor-Laws, and to this day is shown the initials of CHARLES STUART

PARNELL which were carved by that celebrated statesman on one of its

benches about the middle of the last century--probably in 1854. And

why is it to be removed? Simply because it is said to impede the

traffic! Could anything be more absurd? Do, pray, save it from the

hand of the ruthless "improver." Yours truly,

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 103, October 8, 1892 · 第 14 / 24 题