Magellanic Clouds.]

402. _Cloudy Stars_ are so called from their misty appearance. They look

like dim Stars to the naked eye; but through a telescope they appear

broad illuminated parts of the sky; in some of which is one Star, in

others more. Five of these are mentioned by _Ptolemy_. 1. One at the

extremity of the right hand of _Perseus_. 2. One in the middle of the

_Crab_. 3. One unformed, near the Sting of the _Scorpion_. 4. The eye of

_Sagittarius_. 5. One in the head of _Orion_. In the first of these

appear more Stars through the telescope than in any of the rest,

although 21 have been counted in the head of _Orion_, and above 40 in

that of the _Crab_. Two are visible in the eye of _Sagittarius_ without

a telescope, and several more with it. _Flamsteed_ observed a cloudy

Star in the bow of _Sagittarius_, containing many small Stars: and the

Star _d_ above _Sagittary_’s right shoulder is encompassed with several

more. Both _Cassini_ and _Flamsteed_ discovered one between the _Great_

and _Little Dog_, which is very full of Stars visible only by the

telescope. The two whitish spots near the South Pole, called the

_Magellanic Clouds_ by Sailors, which to the bare eye resemble part of

the Milky-Way, appear through telescopes to be a mixture of small Clouds

and Stars. But the most remarkable of all the cloudy Stars is that in

the middle of _Orion’s Sword_, where seven Stars (of which three are

very close together) seem to shine through a cloud, very lucid near the

middle, but faint and ill defined about the edges. It looks like a gap

in the sky, through which one may see (as it were) part of a much

brighter region. Although most of these spaces are but a few minutes of

a degree in breadth, yet, since they are among the fixed Stars, they

must be spaces larger than what is occupied by our solar System; and in

which there seems to be a perpetual uninterrupted day among numberless

Worlds which no human art ever can discover.

[Sidenote: Changes in the Heavens.]

403. Several Stars are mentioned by antient Astronomers, which are not

now to be found; and others are now visible to the bare eye which are

not recorded in the antient catalogues. _Hipparchus_ observed a new Star

about 120 years before CHRIST; but he has not mentioned in what part of

the Heavens it was seen, although it occasioned his making a catalogue

of the Stars; which is the most antient that we have.

[Sidenote: New Stars.]

The first _New Star_ that we have any good account of, was discovered by

_Cornelius Gemma_ on the 8th of _November_ A. D. 1572, in the Chair of

Cassiopea. It surpassed _Sirius_ in brightness and magnitude; and was

seen for 16 months successively. At first it appeared bigger than

_Jupiter_ to some eyes, by which it was seen even at mid-day: afterwards

it decayed gradually both in magnitude and lustre, until _March_ 1573,

when it became invisible.

On the 13th of _August_ 1596, _David Fabricius_ observed the _Stella

Mira_, or wonderful Star, in the _Neck_ of the _Whale_; which has been

since found to appear and disappear periodically, seven times in six

years, continuing in its greatest lustre for 15 days together; and is

never quite extinguished.

In the year 1600, _William Jansenius_ discovered a changeable Star in

the _Neck_ of the _Swan_; which, in time became so small as to be

thought to disappear entirely, till the years 1657, 1658, and 1659, when

it recovered its former lustre and magnitude; but soon decayed, and is

now of the smallest size.

In the year 1604 _Kepler_ and several of his friends saw a new Star near

the heel of the right foot of _Serpentarius_, so bright and sparkling

that it exceeded any thing they had ever seen before; and took notice

that it was every moment changing into some of the colours of the

rainbow, except when it was near the horizon, at which time it was

generally white. It surpassed _Jupiter_ in magnitude, which was near it

all the month of _October_, but easily distinguished from it by a steady

light. It disappeared between _October_ 1605 and the _February_

following, and has not been seen since that time.

In the year 1670, _July_ 15, _Hevelius_ discovered a new Star, which in

_October_ was so decayed as to be scarce perceptible. In _April_

following it regained its lustre, but wholly disappeared in _August_. In

_March_ 1672 it was seen again, but very small; and has not been visible

since.

In the year 1686 a new Star was discovered by _Kirch_, which returns

periodically in 404 days.

In the year 1672, _Cassini_ saw a Star in the _Neck_ of the Bull, which

he thought was not visible in _Tycho_’s time; nor when _Bayer_ made his

Figures.

[Sidenote: Cannot be Comets.]

404. Many Stars, besides those above-mentioned, have been observed to

change their magnitudes: and as none of them could ever be perceived to

have tails, ’tis plain they could not be Comets; especially as they had

no parallax, even when largest and brightest. It would seem that the

periodical Stars have vast clusters of dark spots, and very slow

rotations on their Axis; by which means, they must disappear when the

side covered with spots is turned towards us. And as for those which

break out all of a sudden with such lustre, ’tis by no means improbable

that they are Suns whose Fuel is almost spent, and again supplied by

some of their Comets falling upon them, and occasioning an uncommon

blaze and splendor for some time: which indeed appears to be the

greatest use of the cometary part of any system[86].

[Sidenote: Some Stars change their Places.]

Some of the Stars, particularly _Arcturus_, have been observed to change

their places above a minute of a degree with respect to others. But

whether this be owing to any real motion in the Stars themselves, must

require the observations of many ages to determine. If our solar System

changeth its Place, with regard to absolute space, this must in process

of time occasion an apparent change in the distances of the Stars from

each other: and in such a case, the places of the nearest Stars to us

being more affected than of those which are very remote, their relative

positions must seem to alter, though the Stars themselves were really

immoveable. On the other hand, if our own system be at rest, and any of

the Stars in real motion, this must vary their positions; and the more

so, the nearer they are to us, or the swifter their motions are; or the

more proper the direction of their motion is, for our perception.

[Sidenote: The Ecliptic less oblique now to the Equator than formerly.]

405. The obliquity of the Ecliptic to the Equinoctial is found at

present to be above a third part of a degree less than _Ptolemy_ found

it. And most of the observers after him found it to decrease gradually

down to _Tycho_’s time. If it be objected, that we cannot depend on the

observations of the antients, because of the incorrectness of their

Instruments; we have to answer, that both _Tycho_ and _Flamsteed_ are

allowed to have been very good observers: and yet we find that

_Flamsteed_ makes this obliquely 2-1/2 minutes of a degree less than

_Tycho_ did, about 100 years before him: and as _Ptolemy_ was 1324 years

before _Tycho_, so the gradual decrease answers nearly to the difference

of time between these three Astronomers. If we consider, that the Earth

is not a perfect sphere, but an oblate spheroid, having its Axis shorter

than its Equatoreal diameter; and that the Sun and Moon are constantly

acting obliquely upon the greater quantity of matter about the Equator,

pulling it, as it were, towards a nearer and nearer co-incidence with

the Ecliptic; it will not appear improbable that these actions should

gradually diminish the Angle between those Planes. Nor is it less

probable that the mutual attractions of all the Planets should have a

tendency to bring the planes of all their Orbits to a co-incidence: but

this change is too small to become sensible in many ages.

Astronomy Explained Upon Sir Isaac Newton's Principles And made easy to those who have not studied mathematics · 第 232 / 275 题