ADDRESS.

Neither duty nor inclination will permit me to take leave of you,

young gentlemen, without offering a few remarks, of general

application to the subject of our late studies.

We part, perhaps to meet no more. Some of you go into the active

business of life, some to pursue your researches under other guidance.

To both alike, my experience may enable me to suggest thoughts, and to

offer advice, which may be found of some practical value.

Whether your immediate destination is to the bar or the closet, you

will alike find the necessity of continuing your studies. To give them

such a direction as may be profitable and honorable to you, is my sole

remaining duty.

There are many branches of the law which you will still find time to

investigate at leisure. Many years will probably elapse, before you

will be called to take the _sole_ management of any case involving

valuable rights or intricate questions. The land law, and the

perplexing minutiæ of chancery jurisdiction, will be of this

description. When engaged in such cases, you will commonly find

yourself associated with older and abler counsel, from whom you will

then obtain, at a glance, more insight into these difficult subjects

than I have been able to afford. Under such guidance, you will have

opportunities to investigate the law, with an eye to its application

to your case. You will then see the practical value of the principles

with which you have been made acquainted, and may execute your first

tasks in that line, as successfully as if you were already imbued with

every thing but that knowledge which nothing but study and practice

combined can afford.

But though, in regard to matters of this sort, a general acquaintance

with the grand principles of the law is as much as you can be expected

to carry to the bar, there are other duties which you must assume, in

a complete state of preparation. Let me particularize a few of these.

You will find it then of the utmost importance, to be thoroughly

acquainted with the science of pleading. I have not concealed from you

that the loose practice of our courts dispenses habitually with many

of its rules, and has done much to confuse them all. But they still

retain all their truth, all their reasonableness, and much of their

authority. The courtesy of the bar will indeed save you from the

consequences of any mistake you may make in the outset. But though

this may screen your errors from the public eye, they will not escape

the animadversion of your brethren. They will be prevented from

forming such an estimate of your acquirements, as will lead them to

recommend you to their clients, in the hope of obtaining from you

valuable aid. It is by such recommendations that young men most

frequently gain opportunities to make an advantageous display of

talent, and an introduction into that sort of business which is, at

once, a source of honor and profit.

It sometimes happens, (though, to the credit of the profession such

occurrences are rare,) that a young man, on his first appearance at

the bar, encounters adversaries who do not extend to him the

forbearance which youth has a right to expect. He is taken at a

disadvantage. His want of experience and readiness lays him open to a

more practised opponent, who ungenerously strikes a blow by which his

client is injured, and he himself is brought into disrepute. To him

who is really deficient in capacity or acquirement, such an attack is

sometimes fatal. To him who, on a fit occasion can retaliate on his

adversary, it is of decisive advantage. Mankind are generally disposed

to take sides with the weak and injured party, and to visit with their

indignation any ungenerous abuse of accidental advantages. A young man

therefore, thus assailed, is sure to have with him the sympathy of the

profession and of the public. They look, for a time at least, with

interest to his course. They are impatient to see him redress himself;

and, until he has done so, all the rules of comity and forbearance

which generally regulate the practice, are suspended in his favor.

_He_ is free to take advantages of his ungenerous assailant, which,

under other circumstances would be denounced as ungentlemanly. And

they would be so, because they would be in violation of the covenanted

rules of the profession. But between him and his adversary there is no

such covenant. A state of war abrogates all treaties. It follows that

all the maxims of courtesy which forbid any advantage to be taken of

slips in pleading, do not restrain him; and he is free to hold the

other up to all the strictness of the law. It is expected he should do

so. If he does not, it is concluded that he does not know how. But if

he has once carefully studied the science and made himself acquainted

with its principles, he stands on strong ground, and sooner or later

his triumph is sure. The older and more hackneyed his adversary, the

greater his advantage; for it is true in law, as in morals, that evil

practice vitiates the understanding. The _habit_ of loose pleading

unsettles the knowledge of the rules and principles of pleading, and

many nice technicalities are totally forgotten. There is not, for

example, one old county-court lawyer in a hundred, who remembers that

$100 means nothing in pleading, and that a declaration in which the

sum should be no otherwise expressed, would be so bad as to make it

doubtful whether even the sovereign panacea of our late Statute of

Jeofails would cure it. But though _this_ be doubtful, there is no

doubt that, on demurrer, it would be fatal. A demurrer then, being

filed and submitted _sub silentio_, it is probable that such a defect

would escape even the eye of the court. In that case a reversal of the

judgment would be sure, and a triumph would be gained that would

gratify the profession, and command the admiration of the multitude.

A thousand cases of the same sort might be suggested, where an old

practitioner, though on his guard, (as he must be against one whom he

has provoked to retaliation,) would, from a mere defect of memory, or

the established influence of vicious practice, fall into blunders

which would place him at the mercy of an adversary who has his

learning more fresh about him. How many, for example, will remember

where to stop the defence, in drawing a plea in abatement, or to the

jurisdiction of the court? How many ever think of the necessity of

entitling their pleadings? How many know how to take advantage of this

defect, even when it occurs to them?

But though you should escape the attack of any illiberal practitioner,

yet cases will occur, in which the nature of the controversy will

require great accuracy in drawing out the pleadings to a precise and

well defined issue. In such cases, no disposition to mutual or

_self_-indulgence in the bar, can prevent the necessity of pleading

correctly. In such cases, opportunities will be offered you of

reciprocating the kindness of your seniors, by lending them the aid of

your pen, and assisting them to recall forgotten technicalities. The

value of such aids will raise you in their esteem, establish you in

their regard, and ensure you their good offices. Out of such

circumstances grow alliances which are strength and honor to both

parties. A well read young lawyer, associated with one of less

learning but more experience, sagacious, vigilant, and versed in human

nature and the established though irregular routine of business, is

like the lame man mounted on the shoulders of the blind. Their powers

are not merely united; they are reciprocally multiplied; they fall

together habitually. Their joint success commands confidence and

practice, and finally the fruit of all their triumphs enures to the

benefit of the survivor.

But there is another point of view in which an intimate knowledge of

the rules and principles of pleading is of permanent advantage,

notwithstanding all the looseness which our practitioners habitually

indulge. It has been well said, that "the record is the lock and key

of the law." You will often find that without this interpreter, the

ancient books are sealed to you. It is by this alone that you will

sometimes be able to discover the point really decided. The concise

notes of the old reporters taken for the use of those already familiar

with the great principles and leading maxims of the science of

pleading, are perfectly unintelligible to the mere sciolist.

It often happens too, that a lawyer undertakes a suit or defence which

cannot be sustained, and thus involves his client in unnecessary

expense. Such blunders would often be avoided by a ready familiarity

with the science of pleading. The attorney has but to ask himself,

"how shall I frame the declaration or plea?" and the answer shows him

the impossibility of making good his case. He advises accordingly;

and, though the advice be at the moment unpalatable, it will be

afterwards remembered with gratitude and respect. No reproach is

keener or more just, than that of a client who has been decoyed into

expensive litigation by the rapacity of the disingenuous, or the

blunders of the unskilful. A place among those whose advice may be

relied on, is the safest and most honorable at the bar. It cannot be

lost without some great error. It gives a lien on posterity. The

father hands down to the son a respect for his constant and faithful

adviser. Friend communicates it to friend; neighbor to neighbor. The

showy qualities which are the gift of nature to others, are

neutralized by it. The plain man, destitute of such endowments,

becomes the patron, the dispenser of business and benefits to him

whose eloquence shakes the court--commands his gratitude, secures his

friendship, and, on all admissible occasions, makes this envied talent

his own.

There is another subject on which an ever ready preparation is even

more indispensable than on the subject of pleading. I mean that of

_evidence_. On this, of necessity, we have touched but lightly. It

would be properly, one of the principal subjects of a second course.

To stop short between a cursory notice of it and a thorough

investigation, such as we have not had time to make, might mislead the

student. He might overrate his knowledge if he found himself as well

acquainted with that as with other branches of the law; and supposing

he had enough, might venture to the bar without acquiring more. But

this is a topic of which a superficial knowledge will not do, even at

the beginning. It must be understood perfectly; it must be understood

distinctly; it must be wrought into the very texture of the mind, and

ever present there. The occasions on which this knowledge is wanted,

can rarely be anticipated. They start up like fire from the ground,

and he whose information is not various, exact and ready, is liable to

be disconcerted, embarrassed and disgraced. They often occur in those

apparently plain cases, which the partiality of friends sometimes

intrusts to the sole management of an untried lawyer. To be baffled,

through want of skill in such cases, is to injure those who have

sought to serve you. It mortifies and discourages your friends, and

what is worse, it disheartens you.

You will be often employed too, to set aside an office judgment, and

plead, _pro forma_, in a case admitting of no defence on the merits.

In such a case, where nothing is expected, your adversary, however

able, may be unprepared through some neglect of his client. Relying on

your rawness and want of skill, he may venture to trial. You strike at

the gap in his armor with the dexterity of a veteran; he is nonsuited,

and your success is the immediate source of honor and emolument. You

find yourself gazed at, followed, and employed by those who never saw

you before, and who know nothing of you but that, in a plain case,

admitting of no meritorious defence, you had just baffled one of the

first men at the bar. The consequence is, you are presently engaged in

business of more consequence, and if you acquit yourself well in it,

your practice is established and your fortune made.

To these two subjects then, of pleading and evidence, I advise you to

apply so much attention as to make you feel sure that you understand

them thoroughly. Having done this, let them be again revised

immediately before you go to the bar, and let them, in all the early

stages of your practice, be the constant objects of your attention and

study. You can never understand them too well, and your knowledge of

the last especially, can never be too ready. It is by ignorance on

these topics, that men lose causes they ought to gain. Such defeats

are disgraceful and ruinous. When the right of the case is against

you, it is your misfortune; but you are never blamed. But to be

defeated with law and fact both on your side, is to be weighed in the

balance and found wanting.

And here let me say a word of the cases which you lose, because the

law is against you. For these there is one short rule. "Though you

lose your case, do not lose your temper." It is easy for a young man

to argue himself into a conviction of the justice of his client's

case; but if you do not make others see it too, you must learn to

distrust that conviction. Remember that the argument which has

convinced you, without convincing others, came to you through the

favorable medium of self-love. A young man who doubts the justice of

his first cause just after having argued it, must be either very dull,

or very philosophical, or the case must have been utterly desperate.

On the other hand, remember that the judge is rarely exposed to any

undue bias. He can scarcely ever have a motive to do wrong; and he is

a man of tried integrity, practised to resist and overcome the

influence of such motives. Then remember that he is old, learned and

experienced, selected from among his fellows for his endowments; and

thus learn to acquiesce in his decisions with that cheerful

complacency which so well becomes a young man, distrustful, as all

young men should be, of his own judgment.

Above all things, never stimulate the dissatisfaction of your client.

You tell him he is wronged. He believes you. _You_ blame the judge.

_He divides_ the blame between the _judge_ and _you_. Was the judge

prejudiced _against you_? Do not say so, or men will not employ you to

practice before him. Was he ignorant? was he dull? was he inattentive?

You had the same chance to awaken his attention, to rouse his dulness,

to enlighten his ignorance, as your adversary. If you did not succeed,

another might, and your client will try another the next time. Let him

believe, if he can bring himself to do so, that he only failed because

the law was against him, and there is nothing to prevent his trying

you again. Better so, than to gratify him for the moment by catering

to his evil passions, at the risque of injustice to another, and

injury to yourself. Apart too from the injustice, prudence forbids

that any blow be struck at men in power, which is not well aimed, and

sure to take effect. He that throws up stones, endangers his own head.

"He that spits against the wind," said Dr. Franklin, "spits in his own

face."

There is another consideration to be regarded here. The profession is

a _unit_. Its respectability depends on that of the head. It is an

arch, of which the bench is the key-stone. Let them who should uphold

it, withdraw their support, and all will fall together. Would you

degrade the seat to which you aspire? Would you dim the lustre of that

honor, which is to be the brightest reward of a life spent in the

labors of your profession? Hardly more unwise is the youth, who would

revoke the prerogatives of age, forgetting that he shall himself be

old.

But there is a present advantage in a gentle and complacent

acquiescence in the unfavorable decisions of the court. It engages the

sympathy, the respect, and good will of all who witness it. Among

others it bespeaks the regard of the judge himself. However impartial

he may be, this will not be without its value. If he is seen to be

your friend, men will employ you, in the _hope_ that his friendship

may produce a bias in your favor. Your very enemies will serve you, by

charging him with partiality, in the hearing of those who may wish to

avail themselves of it by engaging your services. Besides, man is but

man. We lean to conviction from those we love. Why else is the

eloquence of a lovely woman so persuasive? We may man ourselves

against prejudice; but the very effort to do so unfixes the attention,

and the words of one who is odious to us are lost in air. But the

voice of a friend is music to the ear, and sinks into the mind. He is

a poor metaphysician who undervalues the influence of the affections

on the very sense of hearing.

It is of great importance, in this point of view, that you should not

misapprehend the relation between the bar and bench. A young man

entering into life, is apt to magnify the consequence and authority of

office; and he naturally falls into the belief that the incumbent is

disposed to presume upon it, and abuse its powers. There can be no

greater mistake than to apply this notion to a judge. The beautiful

fiction of Law, by which the members of the profession are considered

as brethren, of whom the judge is but the elder, hardly deserves the

name of fiction. There is no corps animated by a spirit so truly

fraternal, nor is there any member of it to whose comfort this spirit

is so essential, as the judge himself. Few men attain to that

elevation, without learning that the sanction of judicial authority is

opinion. The judge is armed indeed with the process of contempt. But

what is its true use? To conciliate the forbearance of others by his

forbearance in refraining from the use of it. In this view, it is

right that he should have it. But his comfort, his respectability, the

very stability of his office are secured, not by the power that he

_does_, but that which he does not exercise. Depend on it, among all

the brethren of your profession, you will find none to whom your

friendship will be so desirable as the judge himself.

Remarks of the same sort may be made with regard to your intercourse

with the members of the bar. You will find them for the most part

gentlemen and friends, disposed to lead you gently by the hand.

Requite their courtesy in kind. If an advantage is taken of you, I

have told you how to retaliate. You will have the whole bar on your

side. But such cases are rare. You will probably meet with nothing

illiberal. None will crow at you until your spurs are fully grown. No

sarcasm will be dealt out against you, unless by a junior like

yourself. In such case, in general, pass it by. It will be thought

that your self-respect restrains you from affording sport to the

by-standers, and you will rise in the respect of others. Men naturally

respect those who are seen to respect themselves. You may indeed be

sometimes provoked to retort, by attacks which will make a retort

necessary and proper. In that case, your previous habit of forbearance

will stand your friend. It will dispose others to presume you to be in

the right, and to approve your conduct. It will enable you to reflect;

to do nothing rashly; to choose your words; to measure the force of

your blow; and to strike without laying yourself open. To such

rencounters apply the advice of Polonius to his son:

"Beware

Of entrance into quarrel, but being in

Bear it, that the opposer may beware of you."

If you are compelled to strike, let no second blow be necessary, and

you will not soon be called to give another.

I might multiply remarks of this sort without end, and perhaps with

little profit to you; for it is too true, "that no man learns wisdom

by another's experience." I am bound to own that it is not by the

practice of these maxims that I have learned their value. But

experience has perhaps convinced me of it somewhat sooner, because

they were inculcated in my youth, by one whose advice I fear was never

justly appreciated until his voice was hushed forever. My suggestions

to you may answer the same end. If, when my head lies low, the

recollection shall come to your minds accompanied by the feelings it

awakens in mine, my labor will not be lost or unrewarded.

But there is one maxim learned in that same school, which no one who

expects to thrive by his profession must neglect. The success of a

lawyer and his honor as a man depend on his fidelity and punctuality.

I need not recommend these to you. But a single auxiliary rule, in the

observance of which there is perfect safety, may be of use.

"Whenever you receive money for a client, always consider that

_specific_ money as his. Set apart the identical dollars and cents,

just as you received them, done up into a parcel labelled with his

name, and accompanied by a statement showing the amount received and

the balance due after deducting your fees and commissions. Let a

counterpart of this statement be drawn up in a book kept for the

purpose, and always carried with you; and at the foot of this

counterpart, take your client's receipt." In this proceeding there is

something level to the apprehension, and obvious to the senses of all

men. It will engage confidence, and multiply in your hands that sort

of business, which, if not the most honorable, is the least laborious,

and not the least profitable.

And now, my young friends, we close a relation which has been to me

one of the happiest of my life. God grant it may prove equally

profitable to you. If it does not, the fault is in me. I have indeed

the satisfaction to know that my exertions are appreciated by you, at

more than their real value; and that wherever your lots may be cast,

you will long remember the months we have spent together with feelings

responsive to my own. It has been my endeavor to divest the subject of

our studies of its dryness, and to render it, if possible, less

unpalatable than you had expected to find it. The task was difficult,

but I hope I have not altogether failed. I have felt it my duty too,

to lay aside the pedagogue, and to disarm my office of all austerity.

In doing this I had but to yield to my natural disposition. The rules

of our institution indeed placed me _in loco parentis_. But the

relation of an elder brother was more congenial to my feelings. I am

happy to believe that it has been so filled, as to establish the

sentiments appropriate to it in each of our minds; and that, when the

infirmities of age shall overtake me, there is not one of you who

would not extend an arm to stay my tottering steps, as there is not

one on whose shoulder I would not lean with confidence.

But my method of instruction was not adopted merely because it suited

my disposition. I believed it most appropriate to the subject of your

studies. It in some measure prepares you to enter in its true spirit

into that relation to the heads of your profession, of which I have

spoken. You will find few judges to whom the authority of office will

not be as irksome as it is to me; and it will be in your choice to

establish, between yourselves and your brethren of the bar and bench,

the same sentiments which make our separation at once pleasant and

painful.

I cannot take leave of you without offering and inviting

congratulations on the distinguished harmony which has pervaded every

department of our venerable institution. It has been a complete

fulfilment of the reciprocal pledges passed at the commencement of the

course, "that you should be treated as gentlemen, and that you would

so demean yourselves." How far this desirable end has been promoted by

the peculiar character and structure of the society of this place, you

are capable of deciding. We must have been unwise, not to avail

ourselves of the aids afforded by the moral influence of a circle of

gentlemen and ladies, intelligent, refined, polite and hospitable,

zealous for the honor and order of the college and the happiness of

its professors and students. It is this ever present influence that

has enabled us to dispense with the rigor of discipline, elsewhere so

necessary. It is this which enables William and Mary College to

preserve its distinctive characteristics. In any other situation they

would soon disappear. The city and the college have grown together.

They are moulded on each other. Each is a part of each. Each is

necessary to the other. You might learn as much, or more, elsewhere;

but where else would you leave behind, from what other place would you

carry with you so much of those kindly affections, the cultivation of

which is not the least important part of education? On these we have

determined to stake the usefulness, the permanency, and the prosperity

of our institution, and in these we find a reward for our labors,

which nothing can take away.

For the Southern Literary Messenger.

The southern literary messenger, Vol. I., No. 11, July, 1835 · 第 9 / 60 题