THE OLD MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY.

Among the most remarkable proofs of the diffusion of speculation was the

Mathematical Society, which flourished from 1717 to 1845. Its habitat was

Spitalfields, and I think most of its existence was passed in Crispin

Street. It was originally a plain society, belonging to the studious

artisan. The members met for discussion once a week; and I believe I am

correct in saying that each man had his pipe, his pot, and his problem. One

of their old rules was that, "If any member shall so far forget himself and

the respect due to the Society as in the warmth of debate to threaten or

offer personal violence to any other member, he shall be liable to

immediate expulsion, or to pay such fine as the majority of the members

present shall decide." But their great rule, printed large on the back of

the title page of their last book of regulations, was "By the constitution

of the Society, it is the duty of every member, if he be asked any

mathematical or philosophical question by another member, to instruct him

in the plainest and easiest manner he is able." We shall presently see

that, in old time, the rule had a more homely form.

I have been told that De Moivre[766] was a member of this {377} Society.

This I cannot verify: circumstances render it unlikely; even though the

French refugees clustered in Spitalfields; many of them were of the

Society, which there is some reason to think was founded by them. But

Dolland,[767] Thomas Simpson,[768] Saunderson,[769] Crossley,[770] and

others of known name, were certainly members. The Society gradually

declined, and in 1845 was reduced to nineteen members. An arrangement was

made by which sixteen of these members, who where not already in the

Astronomical Society became Fellows without contribution, all the books and

other property of the old Society being transferred to the new one. I was

one of the committee which made the preliminary inquiries, and the reason

of the decline was soon manifest. The only question which could arise was

whether the members of the society of working men--for this repute still

continued--were of that class of educated men who could associate with the

Fellows of the Astronomical Society on terms agreeable to all parties. We

found that the artisan element had been extinct for many years; there was

not a man but might, as to education, manners, and position, have become a

Fellow in the usual way. The fact was that life in Spitalfields had become

harder: and the weaver could {378} only live from hand to mouth, and not up

to the brain. The material of the old Society no longer existed.

In 1798, experimental lectures were given, a small charge for admission

being taken at the door: by this hangs a tale--and a song. Many years ago,

I found among papers of a deceased friend, who certainly never had anything

to do with the Society, and who passed all his life far from London, a

song, headed "Song sung by the Mathematical Society in London, at a dinner

given Mr. Fletcher,[771] a solicitor, who had defended the Society gratis."

Mr. Williams,[772] the Assistant Secretary of the Astronomical Society,

formerly Secretary of the Mathematical Society, remembered that the Society

had had a solicitor named Fletcher among the members. Some years elapsed

before it struck me that my old friend Benjamin Gompertz,[773] who had long

been a member, might have some recollection of the matter. The following is

an extract of a letter from him (July 9, 1861):

"As to the Mathematical Society, of which I was a member when only 18 years

of age, [Mr. G. was born in 1779], having been, contrary to the rules,

elected under the age of 21. How I came to be a member of that Society--and

continued so until it joined the Astronomical Society, and was then the

President--was: I happened to pass a bookseller's small shop, of

second-hand books, kept by a poor taylor, but a good mathematician, John

Griffiths. I was very pleased to meet a mathematician, and I asked him if

he would give me some lessons; and his reply was that I was more capable to

teach him, but he belonged to a society of mathematicians, and he would

introduce me. I accepted the offer, and I was elected, and had many

scholars then to teach, as {379} one of the rules was, if a member asked

for information, and applied to any one who could give it, he was obliged

to give it, or fine one penny. Though I might say much with respect to the

Society which would be interesting, I will for the present reply only to

your question. I well knew Mr. Fletcher, who was a very clever and very

scientific person. He did, as solicitor, defend an action brought by an

informer against the Society--I think for 5,000l.--for giving lectures to

the public in philosophical subjects [i.e., for unlicensed public

exhibition with money taken at the doors]. I think the price for admission

was one shilling, and we used to have, if I rightly recollect, from two to

three hundred visitors. Mr. Fletcher was successful in his defence, and we

got out of our trouble. There was a collection made to reward his services,

but he did not accept of any reward: and I think we gave him a dinner, as

you state, and enjoyed ourselves; no doubt with astronomical songs and

other songs; but my recollection does not enable me to say if the

astronomical song was a drinking song. I think the anxiety caused by that

action was the cause of some of the members' death. [They had, no doubt,

broken the law in ignorance; and by the sum named, the informer must have

been present, and sued for a penalty on every shilling he could prove to

have been taken]."

I by no means guarantee that the whole song I proceed to give is what was

sung at the dinner: I suspect, by the completeness of the chain, that

augmentations have been made. My deceased friend was just the man to add

some verses, or the addition may have been made before it came into his

hands, or since his decease, for the scraps containing the verses passed

through several hands before they came into mine. We may, however, be

pretty sure that the original is substantially contained in what is given,

and that the character is therefore preserved. I have had myself to repair

damages every now and then, in the way of conjectural restoration of

defects caused by ill-usage. {380}

A Budget of Paradoxes, Volume I · 第 186 / 198 题