BUNGUS ON THE MYSTERY OF NUMBER.

Petri Bungi Bergomatis Numerorum mysteria. Bergomi [Bergamo], 1591,

4to. Second Edition.

The first edition is said to be of 1585;[62] the third, Paris, 1618. Bungus

is not for my purpose on his own score, but those who gave the numbers

their mysterious characters: he is but a collector. He quotes or uses 402

authors, as we are informed by his list; this just beats Warburton,[63]

whom some eulogist or satirist, I forget which, holds up as having used 400

authors in some one work. Bungus goes through 1, 2, 3, etc., and gives the

account of everything remarkable in which each number occurs; his accounts

not being always mysterious. The numbers which have nothing to say for

themselves are omitted: thus there is a gap between 50 and 60. In treating

666, Bungus, a good Catholic, could not compliment the Pope with it, but he

fixes it on Martin Luther with a little forcing. If from A to I represent

1-10, from K to S 10-90, and from T to Z 100-500, we see:

M A R T I N L U T E R A

30 1 80 100 9 40 20 200 100 5 80 1

which gives 666. Again, in Hebrew, _Lulter_ does the same:

[Hebrew: R T L W L]

200 400 30 6 30

And thus two can play at any game. The second is better than the first: to

Latinize the surname and not the Christian {56} name is very unscholarlike.

The last number mentioned is a thousand millions; all greater numbers are

dismissed in half a page. Then follows an accurate distinction between

_number_ and _multitude_--a thing much wanted both in arithmetic and logic.

A Budget of Paradoxes, Volume I · 第 34 / 198 题