TO A. S. SUVORIN.

BOGIMOVO,

July 24, 1891.

... Thanks for the five kopecks addition. Alas, it will not settle my

difficulties! To save up a reserve, as you write, and extricate myself from

the abyss of halfpenny anxieties and petty terrors, there is only one

resource left me--an immoral one. To marry a rich woman or give out Anna

Karenin as my work. And as that is impossible I dismiss my difficulties in

despair and let things go as they please.

You once praised Rod, a French writer, and told me Tolstoy liked him. The

other day I happened to read a novel of his and flung up my hands in

amazement. He is equivalent to our Matchtet, only a little more

intelligent. There is a terrible deal of affectation, dreariness, straining

after originality, and as little of anything artistic as there was salt in

that porridge we cooked in the evening at Bogimovo. In the preface this Rod

regrets that he was in the past a “naturalist,” and rejoices that the

spiritualism of the latest recruits of literature has replaced materialism.

Boyish boastfulness which is at the same time coarse and clumsy.... “If we

are not as talented as you, Monsieur Zola, to make up for it we believe in

God.” ...

July 29.

Well, thank God! To-day I have received from the bookshop notice that there

is 690 roubles 6 kopecks coming to me. I have written in answer that they

are to send five hundred roubles to Feodosia and the other one hundred and

ninety to me. And so I am left owing you only one hundred and seventy. That

is comforting, it’s an advance anyway. To meet the debt to the newspaper I

am arming myself with an immense story which I shall finish in a day or two

and send. I ought to knock three hundred roubles off the debt, and get as

much for myself. Ough! ...

August 6.

... The death of a servant in the house makes a strange impression, doesn’t

it? The man while he was alive attracted attention only so far as he was

one’s “man”; but when he is dead he suddenly engrosses the attention of

all, lies like a weight on the whole house, and becomes the despotic master

who is talked of to the exclusion of everything.

... I shall finish my story to-morrow or the day after, but not to-day, for

it has exhausted me fiendishly towards the end. Thanks to the haste with

which I have worked at it, I have wasted a pound of nerves over it. The

composition of it is a little complicated. I got into difficulties and

often tore up what I had written, and for days at a time was dissatisfied

with my work--that is why I have not finished it till now. How awful it is!

I must rewrite it! It’s impossible to leave it, for it is in a devil of a

mess. My God! if the public likes my works as little as I do those of other

people which I am reading, what an ass I am! There is something asinine

about our writing....

To my great pleasure the amazing astronomer has arrived. She is angry with

you, and calls you for some reason an “eloquent gossip.” To begin with, she

is free and independent; and then she has a poor opinion of men; and

further, according to her, everyone is a savage or a ninny--and you dared

to give her my address with the words “the being you adore lives at ...,”

and so on. Upon my word, as though one could suspect earthly feelings in

astronomers who soar among the clouds! She talks and laughs all day, is a

capital mushroom-gatherer, and dreams of the Caucasus to which she is

departing today.

August 18.

At last I have finished my long, wearisome story [Footnote: “The Duel.”]

and am sending it to you in Feodosia. Please read it. It is too long for

the paper, and not suitable for dividing into parts. Do as you think best,

however....

There are more than four signatures of print in the story. It’s awful. I am

exhausted, and dragged the end, like a train of waggons on a muddy night in

autumn, at a walking pace with halts--that is why I am late with it....

August 18.

Speaking of Nikolay and the doctor who attends him, you emphasize that

“all that is done without love, without self-sacrifice, even in regard

to trifling conveniences.” You are right, speaking of people generally,

but what would you have the doctors do? If, as your old nurse says, “The

bowel has burst,” what’s one to do, even if one is ready to give one’s

life to the sufferer? As a rule, while the family, the relations, and

the servants are doing “everything they can” and are straining every

nerve, the doctor sits and looks like a fool, with his hands folded,

disconsolately ashamed of himself and his science, and trying to preserve

external tranquillity....

Doctors have loathsome days and hours, such as I would not wish my worst

enemy. It is true that ignoramuses and coarse louts are no rarity among

doctors, nor are they among writers, engineers, people in general; but

those loathsome days and hours of which I speak fall to the lot of doctors

only, and for that, truly, much may be forgiven them....

The amazing astronomer is at Batum now. As I told her I should go to Batum

too, she will send her address to Feodosia. She has grown cleverer than

ever of late. One day I overheard a learned discussion between her and the

zoologist Wagner, whom you know. It seemed to me that in comparison with

her the learned professor was simply a schoolboy. She has excellent logic

and plenty of good common sense, but no rudder, ... so that she drifts and

drifts, and doesn’t know where she is going....

A woman was carting rye, and she fell off the waggon head downwards. She

was terribly injured: concussion of the brain, straining of the vertebrae

of the neck, sickness, fearful pains, and so on. She was brought to me. She

was moaning and groaning and praying for death, and yet she looked at the

man who brought her and muttered: “Let the lentils go, Kirila, you can

thresh them later, but thresh the oats now.” I told her that she could talk

about oats afterwards, that there was something more serious to talk about,

but she said to me: “His oats are ever so good!” A managing, vigilant

woman. Death comes easy to such people....

August 28.

I send you Mihailovsky’s article on Tolstoy. Read it and grow perfect. It’s

a good article, but it’s strange; one might write a thousand such articles

and things would not be one step forwarder, and it would still remain

unintelligible why such articles are written....

I am writing my Sahalin, and I am bored, I am bored.... I am utterly sick

of life.

Judging from your telegram I have not satisfied you with my story. You

should not have hesitated to send it back to me.

Oh, how weary I am of sick people! A neighbouring landowner had a nervous

stroke and they trundled me off to him in a scurvy jolting britchka. Most

of all I am sick of peasant women with babies, and of powders which it is

so tedious to weigh out.

There is a famine year coming. I suppose there will be epidemics of all

sorts and risings on a small scale....

August 28.

So you like my story? [Footnote: “The Duel.”] Well, thank God! Of late I

have become devilishly suspicious and uneasy. I am constantly fancying that

my trousers are horrid, and that I am writing not as I want to, and that I

am giving my patients the wrong powders. It must be a special neurosis.

If Ladzievsky’s surname is really horrible, you can call him something

else. Let him be Lagievsky, let von Koren remain von Koren. The multitude

of Wagners, Brandts, and so on, in all the scientific world, make a Russian

name out of the question for a zoologist--though there is Kovalevsky. And

by the way, Russian life is so mixed up nowadays that any surnames will do.

Sahalin is progressing. There are times when I long to sit over it from

three to five years, and work at it furiously; but at times, in moments of

doubt, I could spit on it. It would be a good thing, by God! to devote

three years to it. I shall write a great deal of rubbish, because I am not

a specialist, but really I shall write something sensible too. It is such a

good subject, because it would live for a hundred years after me, as it

would be the literary source and aid for all who are studying prison

organization, or are interested in it.

You are right, your Excellency, I have done a great deal this summer.

Another such summer and I may perhaps have written a novel and bought an

estate. I have not only paid my way, but even paid off a thousand roubles

of debt.

... Tell your son that I envy him. And I envy you too, and not because your

wives have gone away, but because you are bathing in the sea and living in

a warm house. I am cold in my barn. I should like new carpets, an open

fireplace, bronzes, and learned conversations. Alas! I shall never be a

Tolstoyan. In women I love beauty above all things; and in the history of

mankind, culture, expressed in carpets, carriages with springs, and

keenness of wit. Ach! To make haste and become an old man and sit at a big

table! ...

P.S.--If we were to cut the zoological conversations out of “The Duel”

wouldn’t it make it more living? ...

MOSCOW,

September 8.

I have returned to Moscow and am keeping indoors. My family is busy trying

to find a new flat but I say nothing because I am too lazy to turn round.

They want to move to Devitchye Polye for the sake of cheapness.

The title you recommend for my novel--“Deception”--will not do: it would

only be appropriate if it were a question of conscious lying. Unconscious

lying is not deception but a mistake. Tolstoy calls our having money and

eating meat lying--that’s too much....

Death gathers men little by little, he knows what he is about. One might

write a play: an old chemist invents the elixir of life--take fifteen drops

and you live for ever; but he breaks the phial from terror, lest such

carrion as himself and his wife might live for ever. Tolstoy denies mankind

immortality, but my God! how much that is personal there is in it! The day

before yesterday I read his “Afterword.” Strike me dead! but it is stupider

and stuffier than “Letters to a Governor’s Wife,” which I despise. The

devil take the philosophy of the great ones of this world! All the great

sages are as despotic as generals, and as ignorant and as indelicate as

generals, because they feel secure of impunity. Diogenes spat in people’s

faces, knowing that he would not suffer for it. Tolstoy abuses doctors as

scoundrels, and displays his ignorance in great questions because he’s just

such a Diogenes who won’t be locked up or abused in the newspapers. And so

to the devil with the philosophy of all the great ones of this world! The

whole of it with its fanatical “Afterwords” and “Letters to a Governor’s

Wife” is not worth one little mare in his “Story of a Horse....”

Letters of Anton Chekhov to His Family and Friends · 第 117 / 237 题