Mr. HUBERT. Well, now----

Mr. CLARDY. On my statement, that the approximate time where I went

down was approximately 11 instead of 10, and the approximate time that

we brought Mr. Jack Ruby from the jail to Captain Fritz' office was

approximately 3:30, instead of 2:30.

Mr. HUBERT. Those corrections you wish to make on the document marked

5061?

Mr. CLARDY. 5061.

Mr. HUBERT. As I understood it, there were two time corrections that

you think should be made, is that correct?

Mr. CLARDY. On that document alone, sir. And this was approximately

closer to 11 a.m., on this other document.

Mr. HUBERT. Let's see. You wish to make a correction as to the time

with reference to Clardy Exhibit No. 5061, to wit, your letter to Chief

Curry on November 27th and----

Mr. CLARDY. And on that also. It was approximately 3:30 instead of 2:30.

Mr. HUBERT. Two corrections here.

Mr. CLARDY. Yes, sir; two corrections on that.

Mr. HUBERT. And in the second paragraph of that letter where you name

the time as 10 a.m.----

Mr. CLARDY. Approximately; yes.

Mr. HUBERT. As the time at which Lieutenant Smart advised you and other

officers to report to the jail office. You now say the time should have

been what?

Mr. CLARDY. Should have been 11 a.m.

Mr. HUBERT. Should have been 11 a.m. Do you have another time

correction to make?

Mr. CLARDY. Time on the last paragraph there was the time that we

brought the prisoner out, Mr. Ruby, to Captain Fritz' office.

Mr. HUBERT. It reads now as "2:30 p.m."?

Mr. CLARDY. It reads 2:30. It should have been approximately 3:30 p.m.

Mr. HUBERT. Should have been 3:30 instead of 2:30. Both of those

corrections being as to Clardy Exhibit No. 5061. Did I understand that

you might have a correction as to Clardy Exhibit No. 5062?

Mr. CLARDY. Clardy Exhibit No. 5062. This. The second paragraph should

have been approximately 11 a.m., instead of 10 a.m.

Mr. HUBERT. Now, your best recollection is that the time that

Lieutenant Smart advised you and other officers to go to the city jail

office was 11 o'clock rather than 10 o'clock?

Mr. CLARDY. Yes, sir.

Mr. HUBERT. Have you anything you can tell us that would explain that

error in time that you made?

Mr. CLARDY. No, sir; I don't.

Mr. HUBERT. You see, the point I am making is, that on November 27, you

stated 10 a.m., apparently in your letter. Then--well, prior to that,

on November 25, when you were interviewed by the FBI you told them at

10 o'clock, and do you think that it is simply a mistake in time, or----

Mr. CLARDY. Well, it is a mistake in time on me--on the--on my first

report I was under the impression that I told them 11 a.m., which--now,

whether I did or not, I don't know, sir, on my first interview.

Mr. HUBERT. Let me call your attention to the fact that on Document

5063, which is the interview on December 3, you also mentioned 10 a.m.,

apparently. All I am trying to do, Detective Clardy, is to find out

why it is that you think it is 11 o'clock now, whereas before on three

separate occasions you thought it was 10.

Mr. CLARDY. Sir, I thought I told the agent that I talked to that it

was possibly closer to 11 than it was to 10, when I talked to him. To

be--just preactly [sic] what time I went down there, I am just judging.

Warren Commission (12 of 26): Hearings Vol. XII (of 15) · 第 374 / 425 题