_Ly_. Is it not said that, among the professed Stoics, Platonists, and

Epicureans, some do know their respective doctrines, and some do not

(without prejudice to their general respectability)?

_Her_. That is true.

_Ly_. Well, don't you think it will be a troublesome business to

distinguish the first, and know them from the ignorant professors?

_Her_. Very.

_Ly_. So, if you are to recognize the best of the Stoics, you will have to

go to most, if not all, of them, make trial, and appoint the best your

teacher, first going through a course of training to provide you with the

appropriate critical faculty; otherwise you might mistakenly prefer the

wrong one. Now reflect on the additional time this will mean; I purposely

left it out of account, because I was afraid you might be angry; all the

same, it is the most important and necessary thing of all in questions

like this--so uncertain and dubious, I mean. For the discovery of truth,

your one and only sure or well-founded hope is the possession of this

power: you _must_ be able to judge and sift truth from falsehood; you must

have the assayer's sense for sound and true or forged coin; if you could

have come to your examination of doctrines equipped with a technical skill

like that, I should have nothing to say; but without it there is nothing

to prevent their severally leading you by the nose; you will follow a

dangled bunch of carrots like a donkey; or, better still, you will be

water spilt on a table, trained whichever way one chooses with a

finger-tip; or again, a reed growing on a river's bank, bending to every

breath, however gentle the breeze that shakes it in its passage.

If you could find a teacher, now, who understood demonstration and

controversial method, and would impart his knowledge to you, you would be

quit of your troubles; the best and the true would straightway be

revealed to you, at the bidding of this art of demonstration, while

falsehood would stand convicted; you would make your choice with

confidence; judgement would be followed by philosophy; you would reach

your long-desired Happiness, and live in its company, which sums up all

good things.

_Her_. Thank you, Lycinus; that is a much better hearing; there is

more than a glimpse of hope in that. We must surely look for a man of

that sort, to give us discernment, judgement, and, above all, the power

of demonstration; then all will be easy and clear, and not too long. I am

grateful to you already for thinking of this short and excellent plan.

_Ly_. Ah, no, I cannot fairly claim gratitude yet. I have not discovered

or revealed anything that will bring you nearer your hope; on the

contrary, we are further off than ever; it is a case of much cry and

little wool.

_Her_. Bird of ill omen, pessimist, explain yourself.

_Ly_. Why, my friend, even if we find some one who claims to know this art

of demonstration, and is willing to impart it, we shall surely not take

his word for it straight off; we shall look about for another man to

resolve us whether the first is telling the truth. Finding number two, we

shall still be uncertain whether our guarantor really knows the difference

between a good judge and a bad, and shall need a number three to guarantee

number two; for how can we possibly know ourselves how to select the best

judge? You see how far this must go; the thing is unending; its nature

does not allow us to draw the line and put a stop to it; for you will

observe that all the demonstrations that can possibly be thought of are

themselves unfounded and open to dispute; most of them struggle to

establish their certainty by appealing to facts as questionable as

themselves; and the rest produce certain truisms with which they compare,

quite illegitimately, the most speculative theories, and then say they

have demonstrated the latter: our eyes tell us there are altars to the

Gods; therefore there must be Gods; that is the sort of thing.

_Her_. How unkindly you treat me, Lycinus, turning my treasure into

ashes; I suppose all these years are to have been lost labour.

_Ly_. At least your chagrin will be considerably lessened by the

thought that you are not alone in your disappointment; practically all

who pursue philosophy do no more than disquiet themselves in vain. Who

could conceivably go through all the stages I have rehearsed? you admit

the impossibility yourself. As to your present mood, it is that of the

man who cries and curses his luck because he cannot climb the sky, or

plunge into the depths of the sea at Sicily and come up at Cyprus, or

soar on wings and fly within the day from Greece to India; what is

responsible for his discontent is his basing of hopes on a dream-vision

or his own wild fancy, without ever asking whether his aspirations were

realizable or consistent with humanity. You too, my friend, have been

having a long and marvellous dream; and now reason has stuck a pin into

you and startled you out of your sleep; your eyes are only half open yet,

you are reluctant to shake off a sleep which has shown you such fair

visions, and so you scold. It is just the condition of the day-dreamer;

he is rolling in gold, digging up treasure, sitting on his throne, or

somehow at the summit of bliss; for dame _How-I-wish_ is a lavish

facile Goddess, that will never turn a deaf ear to her votary, though he

have a mind to fly, or change statures with Colossus, or strike a gold-

reef; well, in the middle of all this, in comes his servant with some

every-day question, wanting to know where he is to get bread, or what he

shall say to the landlord, tired of waiting for his rent; and then he

flies into a temper, as though the intrusive questioner had robbed him of

all his bliss, and is ready to bite the poor fellow's nose off.

As you love me, do not treat me like that. I see you digging up treasure,

spreading your wings, nursing extravagant ideas, indulging impossible

hopes; and I love you too well to leave you to the company of a life-long

dream--a pleasant one, if you will, but yet a dream; I beseech you to get

up and take to some every-day business, such as may direct the rest of

your life's course by common sense. Your acts and your thoughts up to now

have been no more than Centaurs, Chimeras, Gorgons, or what else is

figured by dreams and poets and painters, chartered libertines all, who

reek not of what has been or may be. Yet the common folk believe them,

bewitched by tale and picture just because they are strange and monstrous.

I fancy you hearing from some teller of tales how there is a certain lady

of perfect beauty, beyond the Graces themselves or the Heavenly

Aphrodite, and then, without ever an inquiry whether his tale is true,

and such a person to be found on earth, falling straight in love with

her, like Medea in the story enamoured of a dream-Jason. And what most

drew you on to love, you and the others who worship the same phantom,

was, if I am not mistaken, the consistent way in which the inventor of

the lady added to his picture, when once he had got your ear. That was

the only thing you all looked to, with that he turned you about as he

would, having got his first hold upon you, averring that he was leading

you the straight way to your beloved. After the first step, you see, all

was easy; none of you ever looked round when he came to the entrance, and

inquired whether it was the right one, or whether he had accidentally

taken the wrong; no, you all followed in your predecessors' footsteps,

like sheep after the bell-wether, whereas the right thing was to decide

at the entrance whether you should go in.

Perhaps an illustration will make my meaning clearer: when one of those

audacious poets affirms that there was once a three-headed and six-handed

man, if you accept that quietly without questioning its possibility, he

will proceed to fill in the picture consistently--six eyes and ears,

three voices talking at once, three mouths eating, and thirty fingers

instead of our poor ten all told; if he has to fight, three of his hands

will have a buckler, wicker targe, or shield apiece, while of the other

three one swings an axe, another hurls a spear, and the third wields a

sword. It is too late to carp at these details, when they come; they are

consistent with the beginning; it was about that that the question ought

to have been raised whether it was to be accepted and passed as true.

Once grant that, and the rest comes flooding in, irresistible, hardly now

susceptible of doubt, because it is consistent and accordant with your

initial admissions. That is just your case; your love-yearning would not

allow you to look into the facts at each entrance, and so you are dragged

on by consistency; it never occurs to you that a thing may be self-

consistent and yet false; if a man says twice five is seven, and you take

his word for it without checking the sum, he will naturally deduce that

four times five is fourteen, and so on _ad libitum_. This is the way

that weird geometry proceeds: it sets before beginners certain strange

assumptions, and insists on their granting the existence of inconceivable

things, such as points having no parts, lines without breadth, and so on,

builds on these rotten foundations a superstructure equally rotten, and

pretends to go on to a demonstration which is true, though it starts from

premisses which are false.

Just so you, when you have granted the principles of any school, believe

in the deductions from them, and take their consistency, false as it is,

for a guarantee of truth. Then with some of you, hope travels through,

and you die before you have seen the truth and detected your deceivers,

while the rest, disillusioned too late, will not turn back for shame:

what, confess at their years that they have been abused with toys all

this time? so they hold on desperately, putting the best face upon it and

making all the converts they can, to have the consolation of good company

in their deception; they are well aware that to speak out is to sacrifice

the respect and superiority and honour they are accustomed to; so they

will not do it if it may be helped, knowing the height from which they

will fall to the common level. Just a few are found with the courage to

say they were deluded, and warn other aspirants. Meeting such a one, call

him a good man, a true and an honest; nay, call him philosopher, if you

will; to my mind, the name is his or no one's; the rest either have no

knowledge of the truth, though they think they have, or else have

knowledge and hide it, shamefaced cowards clinging to reputation.

But now for goodness' sake let us drop all this, cover it up with an

amnesty, and let it be as if it had not been said; let us, assume that

the Stoic philosophy, and no other, is correct; then we can examine

whether it is practicable and possible, or its disciples wasting their

pains; it makes wonderful promises, I am told, about the Happiness in

store for those who reach the summit; for none but they shall enter into

full possession of the true Good. The next point you must help me with--

whether you have ever met such a Stoic, such a pattern of Stoicism, as to

be unconscious of pain, untempted by pleasure, free from wrath, superior

to envy, contemptuous of wealth, and, in one word, Happy; such should the

example and model of the Virtuous life be; for any one who falls short in

the slightest degree, even though he is better than other men at all

points, is not complete, and in that case not yet Happy.

_Her_. I never saw such a man.

_Ly_. I am glad you do not palter with the truth. But what are your hopes

in pursuing philosophy, then? You see that neither your own teacher, nor

his, nor his again, and so on to the tenth generation, has been absolutely

wise and so attained Happiness. It will not serve you to say that it is

enough to get near Happiness; that is no good; a person on the doorstep is

just as much outside and in the air as another a long way off, though with

the difference that the former is tantalized by a nearer view. So it is to

get into the neighbourhood of Happiness--I will grant you so much--that

you toil like this, wearing yourself away, letting this great portion of

your life slip from you, while you are sunk in dullness and wakeful

weariness; and you are to go on with it for twenty more years at the

least, you tell me, to take your place when you are eighty--always

assuming some one to assure you that length of days--in the ranks of the

not yet Happy. Or perhaps you reckon on being the exception; you are to

crown your pursuit by attaining what many a good man before you, swifter

far, has pursued and never overtaken.

Well, overtake it, if that is your plan, grasp it and have it whole, this

something, mysterious to me, of which the possession is sufficient reward

for such toils; this something which I wonder how long you will have the

enjoyment of, old man that you will be, past all pleasure, with one foot

in the grave; ah, but perhaps, like a brave soul, you are getting ready

for another life, that you may spend it the better when you come to it,

having learned how to live: as though one should take so long preparing

and elaborating a superlative dinner that he fainted with hunger and

exhaustion!

However, there is another thing I do not think you have observed: Virtue

is manifested, of course, in action, in doing what is just and wise and

manly; but you--and when I say you, I mean the most advanced

philosophers--you do not seek these things and ensue them, but spend the

greater part of your life conning over miserable sentences and

demonstrations and problems; it is the man who does best at these that

you hail a glorious victor. And I believe that is why you admire this

experienced old professor of yours: he nonplusses his associates, knows

how to put crafty questions and inveigle you into pitfalls; so you pay no

attention to the fruit--which consists in action--, but are extremely

busy with the husks, and smother each other with the leaves in your

debates; come now, Hermotimus, what else are you about from morning to

night?

_Her_. Nothing; that is what it comes to.

_Ly_. Is it wronging you to say that you hunt the shadow or the snake's

dead slough, and neglect the solid body or the creeping thing itself? You

are no better than a man pouring water into a mortar and braying it with

an iron pestle; he thinks he is doing a necessary useful job, whereas, let

him bray till all's blue (excuse the slang), the water is as much water as

ever it was.

And here let me ask you whether, putting aside his discourse, you would

choose to resemble your master, and be as passionate, as sordid, as

quarrelsome, ay, and as addicted to pleasure (though that trait of his is

not generally known). Why no answer, Hermotimus? Shall I tell you a plea

for philosophy which I lately heard? It was from the mouth of an old, old

man, who has quite a company of young disciples. He was angrily demanding

his fees from one of these; they were long overdue, he said; the day

stated in the agreement was the first of the month, and it was now the

fifteenth.

The youth's uncle was there, a rustic person without any notion of your

refinements; and by way of stilling the storm, _Come, come, sir_, says he,

_you need not make such a fuss because we have bought words of you and not

yet settled the bill. As to what you have sold us, you have got it still;

your stock of learning is none the less; and in what I really sent the boy

to you for, you have not improved him a bit; he has carried off and

seduced neighbour Echecrates's daughter, and there would have been an

action for assault, only Echecrates is a poor man; but the prank cost me a

couple of hundred. And the other day he struck his mother; she had tried

to stop him when he was smuggling wine out of the house, for one of his

club-dinners, I suppose. As to temper and conceit and impudence and brass

and lying, he was not half so bad twelve months ago as he is now. That is

where I should have liked him to profit by your teaching; and we could

have done, without his knowing the stuff he reels of at table every day:

'a crocodile [Footnote: See _Puzzles_ in Notes.] seized hold of a baby,'

says he, 'and promised to give it back if its father could answer'--the

Lord knows what; or how, 'day [Footnote: See _Puzzles_ in Notes.] being,

night cannot be'; and sometimes his worship twists round what we say

somehow or other, till there we are with horns [Footnote: See _Puzzles_ in

Notes.] on our heads! We just laugh at it--most of all when he stuffs up

his ears and repeats to himself what he calls temperaments and conditions

and conceptions and impressions, and a lot more like that. And he tells us

God is not in heaven, but goes about in everything, wood and stone and

animals--the meanest of them, too; and if his mother asks him why he talks

such stuff, he laughs at her and says if once he gets the 'stuff' pat off,

there will be nothing to prevent him from being the only rich man, the

only king, and counting every one else slaves and offscourings._

When he had finished, mark the reverend philosopher's answer. _You should

consider_, he said, _that if he had never come to me, he would have

behaved far worse--very possibly have come to the gallows. As it is,

philosophy and the respect he has for it have been a check upon him, so

that you find he keeps within bounds and is not quite unbearable; the

philosophic system and name tutor him with their presence, and the

thought of disgracing them shames him. I should be quite justified in

taking your money, if not for any positive improvement I have effected,

yet for the abstentions due to his respect for philosophy; the very

nurses will tell you as much: children should go to school, because, even

if they are not old enough to learn, they will at least be out of

mischief there. My conscience is quite easy about him; if you like to

select any of your friends who is acquainted with Stoicism and bring him

here to-morrow, you shall see how the boy can question and answer, how

much he has learnt, how many books he has read on axioms, syllogisms,

conceptions, duty, and all sorts of subjects. As for his hitting his

mother or seducing girls, what have I to do with that? am I his keeper?_

A dignified defence of philosophy for an old man! Perhaps _you_ will say

too that it is a good enough reason for pursuing it, if it will keep us

from worse employments. Were our original expectations from philosophy

at all of a different nature, by the way? did they contemplate anything

beyond a more decent behaviour than the average? Why this obstinate

silence?

_Her_. Oh, why but that I could cry like a baby? It cuts me to the

heart, it is all so true; it is too much for me, when I think of my

wretched, wasted years--paying all that money for my own labour, too! I

am sober again after a debauch, I see what the object of my maudlin

affection is like, and what it has brought upon me.

_Ly_. No need for tears, dear fellow; that is a very sensible fable

of Aesop's. A man sat on the shore and counted the waves breaking;

missing count, he was excessively annoyed. But the fox came up and said

to him: 'Why vex yourself, good sir, over the past ones? you should let

them go, and begin counting afresh.' So you, since this is your mind, had

better reconcile yourself now to living like an ordinary man; you will

give up your extravagant haughty hopes and put yourself on a level with

the commonalty; if you are sensible, you will not be ashamed to unlearn

in your old age, and change your course for a better.

Now I beg you not to fancy that I have said all this as an anti-Stoic,

moved by any special dislike of your school; my arguments hold against

all schools. I should have said just the same if you had chosen Plato or

Aristotle, and condemned the others unheard. But, as Stoicism was your

choice, the argument has seemed to be aimed at that, though it had no

such special application.

_Her_. You are quite right. And now I will be off to metamorphose

myself. When we next meet, there will be no long, shaggy beard, no

artificial composure; I shall be natural, as a gentleman should. I may go

as far as a fashionable coat, by way of publishing my renunciation of

nonsense. I only wish there were an emetic that would purge out every

doctrine they have instilled into me; I assure you, if I could reverse

Chrysippus's plan with the hellebore, and drink forgetfulness, not of the

world but of Stoicism, I would not think twice about it. Well, Lycinus, I

owe you a debt indeed; I was being swept along in a rough turbid torrent,

unresisting, drifting with the stream; when lo, you stood there and

fished me out, a true _deus ex machina_. I have good enough reason,

I think, to shave my head like the people who get clear off from a wreck;

for I am to make votive offerings to-day for the dispersion of that thick

cloud which was over my eyes. Henceforth, if I meet a philosopher on my

walks (and it will not be with my will), I shall turn aside and avoid him

as I would a mad dog.

HERODOTUS AND AETION

I devoutly wish that Herodotus's other characteristics were imitable; not

all of them, of course--that is past praying for--, but any one of them:

the agreeable style, the constructive skill, the native charm of his

Ionic, the sententious wealth, or any of a thousand beauties which he

combined into one whole, to the despair of imitators. But there is one

thing--the use he made of his writings, and the speed with which he

attained the respect of all Greece; from that you, or I, or any one else,

might take a hint. As soon as he had sailed from his Carian home for

Greece, he concentrated his thoughts on the quickest and easiest method

of winning a brilliant reputation for himself and his works. He might

have gone the round, and read them successively at Athens, Corinth,

Argos, and Sparta; but that would be a long toilsome business, he

thought, with no end to it; so he would not do it in detail, collecting

his recognition by degrees, and scraping it together little by little;

his idea was, if possible, to catch all Greece together. The great

Olympic Games were at hand, and Herodotus bethought him that here was the

very occasion on which his heart was set. He seized the moment when the

gathering was at its fullest, and every city had sent the flower of its

citizens; then he appeared in the temple hall, bent not on sight-seeing,

but on bidding for an Olympic victory of his own; he recited his

_Histories_, and bewitched his hearers; nothing would do but each

book must be named after one of the Muses, to whose number they

corresponded.

He was straightway known to all, better far than the Olympic winners.

There was no man who had not heard his name; they had listened to him at

Olympia, or they were told of him by those who had been there; he had

only to appear, and fingers were pointing at him: 'There is the great

Herodotus, who wrote the Persian War in Ionic, and celebrated our

victories.' That was what he made out of his _Histories_; a single

meeting sufficed, and he had the general unanimous acclamation of all

Greece; his name was proclaimed, not by a single herald; every spectator

did that for him, each in his own city.

The royal road to fame was now discovered; it was the regular practice of

many afterwards to deliver their discourses at the festival; Hippias the

rhetorician was on his own ground there; but Prodicus came from Ceos,

Anaximenes from Chios, Polus from Agrigentum; and a rapid fame it

brought, to them and many others.

However, I need not have cited ancient rhetoricians, historians, and

chroniclers like these; in quite recent times the painter Aetion is said

to have brought his picture, _Nuptials of Roxana and Alexander_, to

exhibit at Olympia; and Proxenides, High Steward of the Games on the

occasion, was so delighted with his genius that he gave him his daughter.

The Works of Lucian of Samosata — Volume 02 · 第 6 / 21 段