Subsequently the author is spoken of as

"A gentlemen of sincere piety, of strict morals, of a great and vast

understanding, and of a very solid judgement; a true son of the Church

of England, and _consequently a zealous asserter and defender of the

truly Christian and apostolical doctrine of non-resistance_; always

loyal and faithful to the king his master in the worst of times," &c.

After these specimens, there will be little difficulty, I think, in

determining that Granger was mistaken in describing the preface to the

_Memoirs_ as that which was suppressed, and that it was the publisher's

"address to the reader" of the _Discourse_ which incurred that sentence.

Dr. Thomas Smith appears to have edited both works; and in the same address

informs us of other works of Warwick in

"Divinity, philosophy, history, especially that of England, practical

devotion, and the like. This I now publish [the _Discourse_] was

written in the year 1678 (and designed as an appendix to his _Memoirs

of the Reign of King Charles the First_, of most blessed memory, which

hereafter may see the light, when more auspicious times shall encourage

and favour the publication), which he, being very exact and curious in

his compositions, did often refine upon," &c.

It may be well to inquire whether any of these theological or philosophical

lucubrations are yet extant. Was Sir Philip connected at all with Dr.

Smith, or was he descended from Arthur Warwick, author of _Spare Minutes_?

Notes and Queries, Number 203, September 17, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 32 / 149 题