CONVERTED CASTLES.

Rural England, I learn, is rapidly changing hands--not for the first

time, by the way, but we cannot go into that just now. Excellent

treatises on feudal tenure, wapentake, the dissolution of the

monasteries and the enclosure of common lands may be picked up dirt

cheap at any second-hand bookshop in the Charing Cross Road with the

words "Presentation Copy" erased from the flyleaf by a special and

ingenious process. What is happening now is that farmers are buying up

the big estates in pieces, and Norman piles or Elizabethan manors are

beginning to be too expensive to maintain, what with coal and the rise

in the minimum wage of vassals and one thing and another.

"The stately homes of England

How beautiful they stood

Before their recent owners

Relinquished them for good,"

as the poet justly observes. And even if there is enough money to keep

up the castle without the broad acres (though as a matter of fact an

acre is not any broader than it is long) there is no fun in having a

castle at all when the deer park has been divided into allotments and

the Dutch garden is under swedes.

The question is then what is going to happen to Montmorency (pronounced

"Mumsie") Castle, and The Towers at Barley Melling?

In London the difficulty of dealing with huge houses has been solved in

a very subtle manner by turning them into a couple of maisonettes

apiece, so that under the portico of what used to be 105 Myrtle Crescent

you discover two perfectly good doors, marked 105a and 105b. Into the

letter-box of the door marked 105a the postman invariably puts the

letters intended for 105b, and _vice versá_, but, as these are always

letters addressed to the last tenant but two, it does not really very

much matter. Both are desirable maisonettes, though the tenants of 105a

have the sole enjoyment of the lincrusta dadoes in the original

dining-room. In some cases there are as many as three maisonettes, and

the notice on the area gate says, "105c. _Mrs. Orlando Smith_," where it

used to say simply "No bottles." I never really understood that notice

myself, for whenever I am walking along with an empty bottle that I want

to get rid of I do not throw it down into an area, where it would make a

most horrible crash, but softly into the thick shrubs of the Crescent

Gardens.

This brings me back to the country again.

There will not be enough of the new rich to purchase a castellated

mansion apiece, partly because of the Excess Profits Duty, which is

crippling this kind of enterprise, and partly because so many baronial

seats, romantic and picturesque in their way, are terribly

under-garaged. On the other hand you cannot expect a farmer who happens

to be buying the fields round Badgery Mortimer to have any use for a

dungeon keep or the haunted picture-gallery in the west wing. No, there

is only one thing to do and that is to break these places up into a

number of self-contained homes.

* * * * *

[Illustration: MODERN AND ANCIENT.

_Young Cricketer_. "Yes, I cocked one off the splice in the gully

and the blighter gathered it."

_Father_. "Yes, but how did you get out? Were you caught, stumped or

bowled, or what?"]

* * * * *

Punch, or the London Charivari, Volume 159, July 21, 1920 · 第 17 / 33 题