It has been suggested that the troops which are required for the

Federal service in tropical lands might well be recruited from the

negroes. It has indeed been proposed that these soldiers should be

permitted to take their families with them so that they might become

permanently and contentedly established in Luzon and elsewhere in

the colonies. There is no doubt but that the abler negroes, when

properly officered, make excellent soldiers--at least as infantry

men. The experience had with them during the Spanish War makes this

point perfectly clear. It may also be reckoned that they would endure

tropical climates better than the whites. It may further be said that

the existence of a large and well respected force of blacks in the

Federal army would unquestionably add to the social position of the

negroes in the estimation of both races. Again, the return of these men

to their homes, after their period of service, would be advantageous.

Their training and experience would make them of much value to their

people.

There are, however, certain signal disadvantages which would arise

from the employment of negroes as soldiers. In the first place, it

would tend to remove from the body of the folk the abler men--those

to whom we should mainly look for the uplifting of their race. This

evil, great in the case of all levies, would be most serious in this

case; for the reason that, while with white troops the rank and file

are not commonly by nature leaders of their society, they would be so

with black recruits. If the choice could be made of the Guinea type,

this loss would not be serious; but it certainly would fall to the more

militant stocks--those to which we have to look for advancement. In

the next place, we must see that the negro does not need the training

in passive obedience and mere order of life that the common soldier

receives. He has had that already in quite sufficient measure. He now

should have the lessons of individual responsibility--of control of his

life from within--lessons that civil life alone can give. Therefore,

the well-wisher of the race will be inclined to oppose this project of

recruiting our armies from the negroes of the Southern States. If it

is determined to enlist them it would be best to limit the age of the

recruits to about twenty years, and the period of active service to

five years, so that the men may be returned to civil life young enough

to enter on ordinary employments.

At present it is most desirable that the negroes of the South should

be induced to save money, for until that habit is formed, there is

little chance of lifting them in the economic scale or of developing

in them the business sense, which is one of the corner-stones of

civilization. It is probable that more could be done in the way of

correcting the faults and stimulating the latent capacities of the race

by developing this motive than by any other means. It is difficult to

suggest any effective system by which this end can be attained. The

general conditions of the South make rural savings-banks impossible.

The receipts, at least for many years, would be too small to render the

business remunerative. The only practicable method appears to be that

of a Federal system operated through the post-offices. The institution

of such a system appears to be justified by the two conditions: the

exceeding need of such a provision and the impossibility of doing

the work except through the postal machinery of which the Federal

Government holds a monopoly. It may be said that this method has proved

successful under other governments, and that it has been for some time

established in Canada. In our own country it is clearly demanded,

in all rural communities, though nowhere else so gravely as in the

Southern States.

In looking over the latent possibilities of the negro people, the

observer can not fail to remark their keen delight in music. Statistics

on this, as on other facts, are lacking; but from what I have been

able to learn, it appears probable that a far greater proportion of

the blacks are sensitive to musical effects than is the case with the

white people. I have indeed never been able to find a black man who

was so far lacking in this sensibility that he did not enjoy the songs

of his people. It is not unlikely that close inquiry would show this

to be a remarkable feature in this unexplored race. As yet little

effort has been made to determine the true measure of this capacity of

the negro for music. It may be that they can not attain to the higher

levels of the art; yet it is perfectly evident that their voices are

exceptionally good, and that they have a keen native sense of time and

tune. The most effective dance music I have ever heard has been made by

negroes who could not read a note. When we consider how large a place

music has in our life, it is a fair suggestion that this quality of the

black nature might well be made the subject of experiment.

Those who look closely at the conditions of the negroes of the South

are led to the belief that the existing separation in sympathy of the

races is not likely long to continue. The greater number of the negroes

instinctively crave a protective relation with the whites. It is the

ancient disposition of the weak man to lean upon the strong which has

in all ages and lands determined the relations of folk. At present the

two peoples are held apart by the memories of slavery, rather than

by any real personal dislike--the race prejudice which so commonly

separates the Northern white from the negro. As this temporary barrier

wears down, we may hope to find a new form of association arising--one

in which the negroes will seek and find their friends among the trusted

men of the superior race. I have seen marks of this new relation here

and there, not many nor very clear, but fairly indicative of what may

come about, provided the political excitement is allowed to subside

and the people of the South, black and white, make their adjustments

according to their motives and capacities, with no reference to the

Federal power.

At first sight it will appear to most of the Northern people over-much

to ask that the powers at Washington give up all efforts to deal with

the needs of the negro folk--the so-called wards of the nation. Yet

experience has shown the impracticability of the project of helping

these negroes with the long arm of the Federal law. All that has been

undertaken in this way has been fruitless or worse. The only chance for

lifting the black man to the full status of the citizen is by leaving

his future essentially in the hands of the masterful folk who alone

can help him. We see that the ruling class in the South have a measure

of interest in the status of the negro and an opportunity to benefit

his state that can never belong to the people of the North. Although

the country, as a whole, will, of course, suffer from the failure to

elevate the blacks, the burden will lie most heavily on those with whom

they dwell.

The Southern whites have given evidence of political capacity of a high

order. Even their blunder in the rebellion is in good part compensated

for by the sagacity with which they accepted the results of the war

and turned them to the best account they could. They are not likely to

cower before the vast undertakings which the uplifting of the blacks

will entail; as yet, they have not accepted the task as their own. They

have indeed been brought to believe that their business was to defend

their own class interests, as well as they might be able to, against

the attacks of the negroes, aided by the Federal power. If they are

forced to see that within the limits the Federal Constitution sets

to action, the responsibility for the future of their several States

is in the hands of those who control their politics, we may hope to

find the political and economic skill which went to the development of

the system of slavery given to the advancement of the Africans. While

the work must needs be done by the men who are near to it, it should

receive every possible aid and sympathy from those who, because they

are far away, can not effectively control the matter. The cause is so

large that it needs the help of all who wish it well.

It appears to me that the time has come for an effective union of

endeavor on the part of those of North and South, ex-slaveholder and

ex-abolitionist alike, who wish to see the negro have, not his rights

in the common sense of the word (for mere rights are a pitiful share

for a man), but rather a good human chance to climb the ladder of

civilization, upon which our ancestors set him. The aims of these two

ancient parties surely have for a common end the best that can be done

for the negro people. It is just as much a mistake to suppose that the

majority of the slaveholders in a malign spirit sought to oppress and

torture the blacks, as to fancy that the abolitionists desired to set

the negroes over their sometime masters; for history will probably

write it down that the better men of these two parties were both

dealing with the same very difficult problem: that their contentions

grew from a failure on both sides to see the whole of the matter.

It is possible that something might be done to help towards effective

work, looking to the end we have in view, through a society for the

study of the African problem. Such an association, provided it included

men who were guided by a true spirit of inquiry and had no political

ends to win, especially if it was in part made up of Southerners who

had a large-minded view of the matter, could do much to guide action in

profitable ways. In general, I am opposed to the increase in the number

of societies; so that, if there be any in existence that could fairly

undertake this task, I should prefer to see it set about the work. I

am not aware, however, that there is any existing association which

includes such questions in its field of inquiry.

It will be observed that the suggestions I have made concerning the

immediate needs of the negro do not include any mention of the higher

scholastic education. This is not because I disbelieve in such training

for those blacks who, by their evident capacity, show that it fits

them; but because it seems futile at the present time to waste efforts

in giving these people an education for which they are in general by

no means ready--which, if attained, does not afford them a way to a

suitable station. The few youths of the race who really desire what is

commonly called a college education, are reasonably certain to receive

it in some one of the many schools where they are sure of a welcome and

of all due help. Even in the case of those blacks who, by some rare

chance, have inherited the proper foundations of the higher mental

training, and are made ready for the so-called professions, I see but a

very poor chance of advancement to any fit positions in this country.

Even in the part of the North where one would expect these well-trained

negroes would have a fair chance in life, it does not avail them. As

physicians, lawyers, clergymen or engineers they can look forward to

no future having a definite relation to their capacities. They can not

expect to have any range of social opportunities, and their employment

will have to be essentially with their own people.

The youth of negro blood might naturally expect to find in a community

devoted to the maintenance of his rights at least a welcome to the

external business society. He will, however, find that the people who

would willingly sacrifice much to ensure him an equal place in matters

political, allow their race prejudices or those of their associates to

deny him fair play. It is a lamentable fact that this dislike to these

men of the other aspect is far stronger in the North than in the South.

In the parts of the North where negroes are rare, there is, it is true,

a sense of duty by them that ensures their place before the law; but

not enough personal contact with them to wear away the first offence of

their diverse aspect. In most parts of the Southern States the black

man is so constantly in view that the instinctive prejudice is worn

away--he is perhaps, in a somewhat contemptuous way, personally liked.

The race prejudice takes the form of certain rules of intercourse,

expressing about the feeling that separates the commissioned officers

and the enlisted men of an army. There is an element of truth in the

statement, attributed to Thomas Carlyle, that the Northern man said,

“God d--d you, Sambo, be free;” and the Southerner, “God bless you,

Sambo, be slave.” The result to Sambo is the same--a deprivation of

opportunities in all the higher walks of life.

The only safe way up for the negro appears to lie in the industrial

field, in mechanical employments, where his race may not weigh against

him, and where head and hands may help one another to profit of mind

and pocket--in business of varied kinds where he may get money, and

with it the station that, in the common view, nothing else will afford

him; in good work done for his race such as will give him the dignity

in the eyes of all men that the master of Tuskegee has won. It is very

much better for a negro youth, and for his race, that he should be a

successful blacksmith, farmer or engineer, than a lawyer or physician,

hindered and shunned, sorely burthened as he is sure to be by the

cross that his fellowmen force him to bear. Therefore, unless they are

willing to betake themselves to countries where the government is in

the control of mixed peoples, thereby escaping the worst evils of race

prejudice, it seems best for negroes not to seek the so-called learned

professions, but to win their way on the lines where they will find

less resistance--on ways quite fit for a man, even if not the highest.

It has been suggested that our colonies may afford a field for

professionally educated negroes; but there, if they are to be ruled by

the home government, it is likely that they will find a white caste in

control. We may thus expect that the same essential disfranchisement

will be found there as at home. Moreover, as before remarked, this

project of sending to far lands the individual of ability who is needed

at home, can not commend itself to those who feel the need which

is with us, a need that calls for all the capacity we can hope to

develop among the black people. It is clearly not a time to consider a

proposition to export these abler youths of the black population.

Back of all our projects to bring the negroes of the South to the full

station of citizens, to get rid of the contempt and the consequences

of the contempt in which they are, as a race, so generally held,

is the grave question as to the practicability of framing a social

and political system in which men of such diverse origin may have

a substantially equal chance. It must be granted that in no modern

state of high grade has this problem been fairly solved. The instances

from the tropical colonies of Great Britain are not really apposite;

but there seems no fundamental difficulty to contend with in order

to attain this end. With cultivated people of their own race about

them the better negro youth would not be deprived of that element of

education. We have taken into our political family races scarcely less

different in motives from our own than are the negroes, making no kind

of objection to their sharing the commonwealth with us. In certain ways

it is true that a nation loses strength where it fails to have its

elements closely knit together. But it may be doubted whether these

losses are not more than compensated for by the gains that arise from

diversities such as would come from the introduction into our system of

a body of folk with the capacities which our Africans are likely with

thorough training to develop.

In this matter there are but two courses open to us--one of folly,

the other of wisdom. We may leave the black people to work out their

own salvation as best they may, to lie as a mass at the bottom of our

society, except so far as the abler men who may arise among them help

their struggling fellows. The result of this will be the perpetuation

of all the existing evils. Or we may set to work, after the true manner

of our folk, with the full knowledge that the task is very great, but

that we have the strength to see it done. With this spirit we may

accomplish the noblest work that men have ever undertaken in any nation.

To the people of the South we may fairly say: “These negroes were

brought here by your forefathers, and thus tied to the land. In their

training as slaves, they were given an opportunity to rise far above

their primitive savagery. You have seen in serious trials how, as a

race, they are trustworthy. They are now your fellow-citizens in name,

but are in a condition to be a permanent menace to your commonwealth.

Properly aided on their way upward, they may be of great value to your

descendants.” To the people of the North we may plead for all the help

they can give; for hardly less than the Southerners, their ancestors

shared in the actions which brought the negroes to this country.

They gave the blacks the semblance of citizenship by the process of

emancipation. If the work stops there, it may be questioned whether it

was a boon to the masses of the folk it made nominally free. To be what

it was meant to be, then, it needs more than enactments. There must be

long continued and devoted labor, wisely directed.

A necessary part of the work of a true emancipation of the negro is a

careful inquiry into the history and former status of the people. Such

an inquiry, placed and kept in good hands, is a necessary preliminary

to sagacious action. It may serve to unite the men of all parts of the

country in a work that so nearly concerns us all. There is not, nor

is there likely to arise, a situation that so calls for intelligent

patriotism as this we are sorely neglecting. We may go far away and

rear an empire with our armies; but if we leave these, our neighbors,

without a fair chance to develop the good that is in them, we shall

have lost our real opportunity for great deeds--mayhap we shall fix

among us evils that in the end will drag us down.

THE PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY OF THE LANDS.

BY PROFESSOR W. M. DAVIS.

HARVARD UNIVERSITY.

The most important principles established in physical geography

during the nineteenth century are that the description of the earth’s

surface features must be accompanied by explanation, and that the

surface features must be correlated with their inhabitants. During the

establishment of these evolutionary principles, exploration at home

and abroad has greatly increased the store of recorded facts; the more

civilized countries have been in large part measured and mapped; the

coasts of the world have been charted; the less civilized continents

have been penetrated to their centers. This harvest of fact has been an

indispensable stimulus to the study of physical geography; yet it can

not be doubted that the spirit which has given life to the letter of

the subject is the principle of evolution--inorganic and organic. This

is especially true of the geography of the lands.

The century has seen the measurement of higher peaks in the Himalayas

than had been previously measured in the Andes. The Nile has been

traced to its source in the lakes of equatorial Africa, verifying the

traditions of the ancients; and the Kongo has been found to cross the

equator twice on its way to the sea. Facts without number have been

added to the previous sum of knowledge. But at the same time, it has

been discovered that the valleys of mountain ranges are the work of

erosion; that the product of valley erosion is often seen in extensive

piedmont fluviatile plains; that waterfalls are retrogressively

worn away until they are reduced to the smooth grade of a maturely

established river; and that interior basins are slowly filling with the

waste that is washed in from their rims upon their floors. Here are

explanatory generalizations, involving, yet going far beyond matter of

direct observation. Such generalizations in geography correspond to the

recognition in astronomy that planetary movements exemplify the law of

gravitation; they are the Newton as against the Kepler of the subject.

The sufficient justification of the demand that has now arisen for

explanation and correlation in the study of land forms is found in the

repeated experience that until an explanatory description of a region

can be given, one may be sure that some of its significant elements

pass unnoticed; and until the controls that it exerts on living forms

are studied, one may be confident that its geographical value is but

half measured. A sentence from Guyot’s Earth and Man may here be taken

as a guide: “To describe, without rising to the causes, or descending

to the consequences, is no more science than merely and simply to

relate a fact of which one has been a witness.” There could hardly

be devised a more concise and searching test of good work than this

quotation suggests. The causes, in so far as the physical geography of

the lands is concerned, have been learned chiefly through the study of

geology; yet it does not by any means follow that all geologists are

possessed of such knowledge of these causes as will constitute them

geographers. The consequences have been learned through the study of

evolutionary biology; yet a distinct addition to the usual discipline

of biology is required in order to apprehend its geographical

correlations. The limited space allowed to this article will require

that further consideration of the consequences be excluded, in order to

give due consideration to the causes.

One of the preparatory steps in the century’s advance was taken

by the German geographer, Ritter, who, near the beginning of the

century, advocated a new principle that may be illustrated by the

change in the definition of geography from “the description of the

earth and its inhabitants” to “the study of the earth in relation

to its inhabitants;” but advance beyond this beginning was for

a long time obstructed by certain ancient beliefs. Theological

preconceptions as to the age of the earth and the associated geological

doctrine of catastrophism, although attacked by the rising school of

uniformitarianism, were then dominant. They gave to the geographer

a ready-made earth, on which the existing processes of change were

unimportant. Furthermore, the belief in the separate creation of every

organic species led to the doctrine of teleology, which maintained the

predetermined fitness of the earth for its inhabitants, and of its

inhabitants for their lifework. All this had to be outgrown before

geographers could understand the slow development of land forms and the

progressive adaptation of all living beings to their environments. Yet

the beginning that Ritter made was of great importance, and it would

have led further had it not happened that for many decades professors

of geography in Europe brought chiefly a historical training to their

chairs, to the almost entire neglect of physical geography. In the

last thirty years there has been a reaction from this condition in

Germany and France, but Italy, with many professors of geography in her

universities, still for the most part follows historical methods.

In the victory of the uniformitarians over the catastrophists began

the fortunate alliance of geography with geology, which was long

afterwards happily phrased by Mackinder: “Geology considers the past

in the light of the present; geography considers the present in the

light of the past.” Instead of believing in cataclysmic upheavals and

in overwhelming floods, Playfair and other exponents of the Huttonian

school taught that mountains were slowly upheaved and slowly worn down.

The simplicity of Playfair’s argument finds excellent illustration in

the often quoted passage regarding the origin of valleys: “Every river

appears to consist of a main trunk, fed from a variety of branches,

each running in a valley proportioned to its size, and all of them

together forming a system of vallies, communicating with one another,

and having such a nice adjustment of their declivities that none of

them join the principal valley either on too high or too low a level;

a circumstance which would be infinitely improbable if each of these

vallies were not the work of the stream that flows in it.” Descriptions

of valleys should always recognize the share that rivers have had in

eroding them, or else the “nice adjustment of their declivities” may

pass unnoticed.

The Popular Science Monthly, June, 1900 Vol. 57, May, 1900 to October, 1900 · 第 4 / 12 段