REGIMENTAL LOSSES.

A study of regimental actions shows clearly that the battalions which

faced musketry the steadiest, the longest and the oftenest, were the

ones whose aggregate loss during the war was greatest. Fighting

regiments leave a bloody wake behind them; retreating regiments lose

few men. At Chancellorsville the heaviest losses were in the corps that

stood--not in the one that broke.--Fox.

* * * * *

W. R. B., in Wilmington Messenger:

I write you a letter, as I wish to tell you about certain conversations

I lately had with an old Confederate--an officer of high rank, and

one who, after the war, was on intimate terms with Gen. Lee. It will

also contain a copy of a letter received by me some two months ago

from a member of Gen. Lee’s staff, and some other things which I think

will interest your old soldier readers. In one of the conversations

referred to mention was made of the letters of General Cobb (who was

killed at Fredericksburg) which have lately been published. In one

of these letters General Cobb says that Mr. Davis and General Lee

thought there was only one State in the Confederacy, and that was

Virginia. In referring to it I remarked that, allowing a little for

exaggeration, I did not think he was very far wrong; that I supposed

it was much the same in the other States, and that I knew of the

persistent injustice, and sometimes even cruelty, with which North

Carolina and her troops were treated. He at once came to the defence of

General Lee, and said he knew positively that he was not responsible

for much of the injustice of which I complained; that in the matter of

appointing and promoting officers General Lee often had very little

influence. For instance, after Jackson’s death, when the army was

reorganized and the two corps made into three, he was bitterly opposed

to having A. P. Hill and Ewell for corps commanders. He wished to have

Rodes--an Alabamian--to command one of them, and also wished to give

a division to Pettigrew and he always said if his divisions and corps

had been commanded at Gettysburg by officers of his choice he would

have gained that battle. But, said General ----, as the secretary of

war was a Virginian, and the influence of Virginia politicians was

so all-powerful, both in the executive mansion and the halls of our

congress, his wishes were not considered. Though a Virginian, he spoke

at length of this baneful influence which festered for four years in

Richmond. And just here it may be remarked that probably the most

humiliating thing connected with our struggle for independence--more

humiliating even than defeat--was the fact that North Carolinians and

other free born men should ever have allowed themselves to be at all

dominated by a public opinion, which was made by a sorry lot of ignoble

bomb-proof hunters. On one occasion I told General ---- about the

letter I had received from Col. Venable, and how lie happened to write

it. That I had heard reports as to General Pickett, while the assault

was being made, which reflected upon his courage, and was disposed to

doubt them, as I had heard that he had acted very bravely in his vain

attempt to rally his division when routed at Five Forks. I do not think

I succeeded in convincing him of this, for I think he believes yet that

General Pickett never went near his troops on this the day of their

last battle.

Wishing to know if there were any grounds for these reports, I wrote

to Colonel Venable, asking him how far into the field General Pickett

advanced with his division, and how near he was to it when it was

repulsed, and the following is his answer:

“Remington, Fauquier County, Va.

“Dear Sir:--It has been settled by officers of the United States

army, that both Pettigrew’s and Pickett’s men went to high water

mark--that is, equally far in the charge at Gettysburg. The Federal

government has caused marks to be placed at different points on the

field with great care.

“The charge should even be called the charge of Pettigrew’s and

Pickett’s men.

“Yours respectfully,

“CHAS. S. VENABLE.

“General Pettigrew was every inch a soldier and a very great loss

to the grand old army of northern Virginia.

Pickett or Pettigrew? An Historical Essay · 第 17 / 19 题